![]() |
Home
| Databases
| WorldLII
| Search
| Feedback
Edited Legal Collections Data |
Book Title: International Governance and Law
Editor(s): van Schooten, Hanneke; Verschuuren, Jonathan
Publisher: Edward Elgar Publishing
ISBN (hard cover): 9781847207272
Section: Chapter 10
Section Title: In a World Without a Sovereign: Native Title Law in Australia
Author(s): Dominello, Francesca
Number of pages: 23
Extract:
10. In a world without a sovereign:
native title law in Australia
Francesca Dominello
1. INTRODUCTION
In Mabo v Queensland (No. 2)1 the High Court of Australia held, by a six-
member majority, that the Meriam people, the recognized indigenous
inhabitants of the Murray Islands, were entitled, as against the whole
world, to possession, occupation, use and enjoyment of the lands of the
Murray Islands.2 For the first time in Australian law a form of indigenous
native title was found not only to exist, but also to have pre-dated and to
have survived the acquisition of British sovereignty over the Australian ter-
ritories. The Court's formulation was grounded in the common law: the
common law recognized that native title did exist; however, the content of
native title would arise from the traditions and customs of the indigenous
peoples themselves.
In order to facilitate the common law recognition of native title, the
Court first considered it necessary to reject the terra nullius doctrine as
forming any part of Australian law.3 The Court found that the terra nullius
doctrine had operated to deny any indigenous rights to land through the
characterization of Australia at the time of first settlement as a land
belonging to no one. This legal characterization had found support from a
line of judicial pronouncements that had declared the continent to be in
effect `desert and uncultivated'4 at the time of British settlement.
Before Mabo indigenous customary law only had the status of ...
AustLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/ELECD/2008/312.html