AustLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

Edited Legal Collections Data

You are here:  AustLII >> Databases >> Edited Legal Collections Data >> 2013 >> [2013] ELECD 1348

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Articles | Noteup | LawCite | Help

Mitchell, Andrew; Munro, James --- "State-state dispute settlement under the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement" [2013] ELECD 1348; in Voon, Tania (ed), "Trade Liberalisation and International Co-operation" (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2013) 156

Book Title: Trade Liberalisation and International Co-operation

Editor(s): Voon, Tania

Publisher: Edward Elgar Publishing

ISBN (hard cover): 9781782546771

Section: Chapter 8

Section Title: State-state dispute settlement under the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement

Author(s): Mitchell, Andrew; Munro, James

Number of pages: 23

Abstract/Description:

Most modern preferential trade agreements (PTAs) contain formal stateñ state dispute settlement mechanisms, and the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPP) will be no exception. The addition of Mexico and Canada to the TPP negotiations brings the total number of TPP parties to 11, encompassing Australia, New Zealand, the United States, Peru, Chile, Brunei, Malaysia, Singapore, and Vietnam. This chapter discusses a number of special legal issues facing the TPP parties as they seek to design a well-functioning dispute settlement mechanism to resolve their disputes under the TPP. First, we discuss the implications of multiple overlapping trade treaties between various subsets of TPP parties, each containing their own dispute settlement systems, which raises questions in relation to conflicts of norms and conflicts of jurisdiction. Second, we consider the rules of interpretation that will be used by tribunals convened under the TPP to construe its terms and settle disputes, including a potential role for the jurisprudence of the World Trade Organization (WTO) dispute settlement system. Although the TPP parties have not released a draft text of their dispute settlement mechanism, we draw on their rich body of precedents under past PTAs and evaluate their effectiveness in addressing these special legal issues. We find a remarkable degree of diversity and inconsistency in TPP partiesí past practices, with some precedents substantially more effective than others in resolving particular legal problems. All of the TPP parties are WTO Members, and all have at least one existing PTA with another TPP party.


AustLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/ELECD/2013/1348.html