![]() |
Home
| Databases
| WorldLII
| Search
| Feedback
Edited Legal Collections Data |
Book Title: Secrecy, National Security and the Vindication of Constitutional Law
Editor(s): Cole, David; Fabbrini, Federico; Vedaschi, Arianna
Publisher: Edward Elgar Publishing
ISBN (hard cover): 9781781953853
Section: Chapter 13
Section Title: Terrorists on trial: an open or closed case?
Author(s): Walker, Clive
Number of pages: 20
Abstract/Description:
Consistent with his ‘war on terror’ paradigm, President George W. Bush asserted that ‘it is not enough to serve our enemies with legal papers’. The resonant primary United Kingdom legal focus in the immediate aftermath of 9/11 was similarly weighted more towards executive intervention through detention without trial rather than court-based criminal prosecution. This vying between executive action and criminal prosecution in the UK never pitched as decisively in favour of executive action as in the US, and is now fading in British domestic law. Yet, the key question remains whether the traditions of openness, orality, and adversarial justice which are so revered by the common law world can be preserved within criminal litigation which heavily impinges on national security interests. The first section of this chapter will examine the foundations for the reinvigoration of the criminal justice paradigm in the years following the fading of executive interventions. This aspect posits that regular models of criminal justice should predominate in counter-terrorism. The second section will explore the salient implications for British criminal justice, particularly by probing the extent to which the delivery of criminal justice has remained ‘normal’ or whether elements of exceptionality have insinuated themselves into the criminal law or criminal processes, including, in particular, the role of undisclosed or secret evidence. The third section will reflect upon the future trends and implications. The then Home Officer Minister, Tony McNulty, stated in 2008 that ‘prosecution is – first, second and third – the Government’s preferred approach when dealing with suspected terrorists’
AustLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/ELECD/2013/682.html