AustLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

Edited Legal Collections Data

You are here:  AustLII >> Databases >> Edited Legal Collections Data >> 2014 >> [2014] ELECD 476

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Articles | Noteup | LawCite | Help

Gessner, Volkmar --- "State-society synergies in Western and Japanese economic and judicial reform" [2014] ELECD 476; in Vanoverbeke, Dimitri; Maesschalck, Jeroen; Nelken, David; Parmentier, Stephan (eds), "The Changing Role of Law in Japan" (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2014) 34

Book Title: The Changing Role of Law in Japan

Editor(s): Vanoverbeke, Dimitri; Maesschalck, Jeroen; Nelken, David; Parmentier, Stephan

Publisher: Edward Elgar Publishing

ISBN (hard cover): 9781783475643

Section: Chapter 3

Section Title: State-society synergies in Western and Japanese economic and judicial reform

Author(s): Gessner, Volkmar

Number of pages: 16

Abstract/Description:

An insightful description and analysis of recent judicial reforms in Japan (Vanoverbeke and Maesschalck 2009) shows - just like in Latin America, with which I am more familiar - mainly two elements driving all public policy initiatives: first, the interest in supporting the economy; and second, the goal of establishing the rule of law. These two reform elements are nicely linked by the assumption that the rule of law leads to economic growth. Unfortunately, there is mixed evidence for this assumption, and in current debates new assumptions emerge. Some very successful economies operate without formal rational law. On the one hand, Western nation states explain their economic success by efficient legal regimes. On the other hand, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan and in particular China, with their rates of economic growth unknown in Western industrialized countries in the latter half of the twentieth century: failed to put judiciaries and problem-solving lawyers at the center of the governance process, failed to serve as convenient fora for private litigation to enforce property and contract rights, failed to protect minority shareholder rights, failed to take intellectual property rights, competition law, or insolvency law very seriously, and failed to legalize state-private sector relations through constitutional and administrative law (Ohnesorge 2007, p. 290).


AustLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/ELECD/2014/476.html