![]() |
Home
| Databases
| WorldLII
| Search
| Feedback
Edited Legal Collections Data |
Book Title: Enterprise Law
Editor(s): Shishido, Zenichi
Publisher: Edward Elgar Publishing
ISBN (hard cover): 9781781004449
Section: Chapter 9
Section Title: Takeover law and managerial incentives in the United States and Japan
Author(s): Milhaupt, Curtis J.
Number of pages: 14
Abstract/Description:
In their seminal work The Corporate Contract, Frank H. Easterbrook and Daniel R. Fischel conceptualized the interaction among corporate actors as a series of contractual agreements. Easterbrook and Fischel argued that through these contractual agreements, “managers and certain other participants exercise a great deal of discretion that is ‘reviewed’ by interactions with other self-interested actors.” In this conception of corporate law, formal legal rules function as gap-fillers in the contracts between corporate participants. Three types of formal rules relevant to corporate governance in most countries are: (1) corporate statutes enacted by legislators; (2) fiduciary principles defined by courts; and (3) regulations promulgated by securities regulators and stock exchanges. In every economy, informal (non-binding) gap fillers, such as codes of best practice, also play an important role in fleshing out the corporate contract. Managerial discretion is “reviewed” by other self-interested actors in many ways, creating competitive pressures that shape corporate contracts.
AustLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/ELECD/2014/584.html