AustLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

Edited Legal Collections Data

You are here:  AustLII >> Databases >> Edited Legal Collections Data >> 2014 >> [2014] ELECD 773

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Articles | Noteup | LawCite | Help

Brachotte, Sandrine; Nuyts, Arnaud --- "Jurisdiction over cyber torts under the Brussels I Regulation" [2014] ELECD 773; in Savin, Andrej; Trzaskowski, Jan (eds), "Research Handbook on EU Internet Law" (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2014) 231

Book Title: Research Handbook on EU Internet Law

Editor(s): Savin, Andrej; Trzaskowski, Jan

Publisher: Edward Elgar Publishing

ISBN (hard cover): 9781782544166

Section: Chapter 10

Section Title: Jurisdiction over cyber torts under the Brussels I Regulation

Author(s): Brachotte, Sandrine; Nuyts, Arnaud

Number of pages: 23

Abstract/Description:

In a series of four recent cases, the European Court of Justice has devised a new jurisdictional framework for jurisdiction over cyber torts under art. 5(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (‘Brussels I Regulation’). In these cases, the Court has been called to rethink its classical interpretation of this provision dating back to 1976. The cases concern respectively the online infringement of personality rights (eDate Advertising and Martinez), the online infringement of trademark (Wintersteiger), the online use of databases (Football Dataco), and the online infringement of copyright (Pinckney). In the meantime, the Brussels I Regulation has been the subject of a recast. It has been replaced, as from 10 January 2015, by Regulation (UE) No. 1215/2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (‘Brussels I Bis Regulation’). Because of the removal of the specific rule of jurisdiction for alimonies (a matter which is now subject to a separate instrument), what was art. 5(3) of Brussels I has now become art. 7(2) of Brussels I Bis, though the wording of the provision has not been changed. This chapter presents an analytical overview of the matter, with a focus on the latest developments that stem from the four recent cases identified above. The purpose of the contribution is to identify the principles applied by the European Court of Justice in cyber torts cases.


AustLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/ELECD/2014/773.html