AustLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

Edited Legal Collections Data

You are here:  AustLII >> Databases >> Edited Legal Collections Data >> 2015 >> [2015] ELECD 1320

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Articles | Noteup | LawCite | Help

McCluskey, Martha --- "Personal responsibility for systemic inequality" [2015] ELECD 1320; in Mattei, Ugo; Haskell, D. John (eds), "Research Handbook on Political Economy and Law" (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2015) 227

Book Title: Research Handbook on Political Economy and Law

Editor(s): Mattei, Ugo; Haskell, D. John

Publisher: Edward Elgar Publishing

ISBN (hard cover): 9781781005347

Section: Chapter 15

Section Title: Personal responsibility for systemic inequality

Author(s): McCluskey, Martha

Number of pages: 19

Abstract/Description:

‘Equality ha[s] come and gone as a social idea with traction, even among liberal intellectuals,’ concludes the American historian Daniel T. Rodgers. In this chapter I argue that equality’s undoing follows from an economic ideology of law that grounds justice in an illusory divide between individual agency and collective support. If equality means gaining from government protection rather than from individual production, then equality will appear to come at the cost of responsible action. This conceptual bind operates through two strands of personal responsibility arguments. The first, perhaps more familiar, version legitimates inequality by attributing it to individual failure. In recent global austerity politics, a second theory of personal responsibility legitimates inequality and insecurity even while attributing these harms to systemic failures far beyond individual control. Welfare reform efforts in the United States embraced the first strand of argument in the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996. A prominent rationale for that legislation was that the former national welfare program of income support for impoverished single mothers caused more women to become impoverished single mothers, in a cycle of dependency or moral hazard that effectively rewarded women for bearing and raising children without an employed husband or without sufficient earnings of their own. The reform legislation increased penalties and benefit restrictions in order to induce impoverished parents to seek wage work or marriage or to delay or forgo bearing (or raising) children.


AustLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/ELECD/2015/1320.html