AustLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

Edited Legal Collections Data

You are here:  AustLII >> Databases >> Edited Legal Collections Data >> 2015 >> [2015] ELECD 325

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Articles | Noteup | LawCite | Help

Frankel, Susy --- "Using intellectual property rules to support the self-determination goals of indigenous peoples" [2015] ELECD 325; in Geiger, Christophe (ed), "Research Handbook on Human Rights and Intellectual Property" (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2015) 627

Book Title: Research Handbook on Human Rights and Intellectual Property

Editor(s): Geiger, Christophe

Publisher: Edward Elgar Publishing

ISBN (hard cover): 9781783472413

Section: Chapter 33

Section Title: Using intellectual property rules to support the self-determination goals of indigenous peoples

Author(s): Frankel, Susy

Number of pages: 14

Abstract/Description:

Indigenous peoples have the right to maintain, control, protect and develop their cultural heritage, traditional knowledge and traditional cultural expressions, as well as the manifestations of their sciences, technologies and cultures, including human and genetic resources, seeds, medicines, knowledge of the properties of fauna and flora, oral traditions, literatures, designs, sports and traditional games and visual and performing arts. They also have the right to maintain, control, protect and develop their intellectual property over such cultural heritage, traditional knowledge, and traditional cultural expressions. The above Article from the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) is a statement of self-determination goals. Article 3 of UNDRIP provides an overarching goal of self-determinationand Article 31 is a detailed branch of that goal. It arose because the protection of the knowledge assets of indigenous peoples receives thin, if any, legal recognition let alone effective protection, while the knowledge assets of industrialised economies are strongly protected through international intellectual property minimum standards of protection. UNDRIP is not a binding treaty. As its name indicates it is a declaration, however, it captures the heart of what might be called the international problem of the inadequate protection of traditional knowledge. The kind of aspirations that Article 31 of UNDRIP expresses are an attempt to address the imbalance between the protection of intellectual property such as patents, copyright and trademarks, and the lack of protection of traditional knowledge.


AustLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/ELECD/2015/325.html