AustLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

Edited Legal Collections Data

You are here:  AustLII >> Databases >> Edited Legal Collections Data >> 2016 >> [2016] ELECD 354

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Articles | Noteup | LawCite | Help

Gervais, Daniel J. --- "TRIPS, TRADEMARKS, AND TRADEMARK TRANSACTIONS: A FORCED RECONCILIATION?" [2016] ELECD 354; in Calboli, Irene; de Werra, Jacques (eds), "The Law and Practice of Trademark Transactions" (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2016) 5

Book Title: The Law and Practice of Trademark Transactions

Editor(s): Calboli, Irene; de Werra, Jacques

Publisher: Edward Elgar Publishing

ISBN (hard cover): 9781783472123

Section: Chapter 1

Section Title: TRIPS, TRADEMARKS, AND TRADEMARK TRANSACTIONS: A FORCED RECONCILIATION?

Author(s): Gervais, Daniel J.

Number of pages: 24

Abstract/Description:

The World Trade Organization’s (WTO) Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS Agreement) imposes limits to, and certain parameters for, the regulation by WTO Members of trademark transactions, such as licenses and assignments. WTO Members can challenge each other’s measures implementing these provisions if they believe another Member’s trademark rules violates the TRIPS Agreement using the WTO dispute-settlement system. This Chapter examines, first, the source of trademark provisions in the TRIPS Agreement and specifically whether they accord with common law or civil law trademark law and practice. It then considers the TRIPS Agreement provisions that are most likely to impact trademark transactions. After a review of Articles 15, 19 and 20 of the TRIPS Agreement, which at least indirectly impact trademark transactions, the Chapter devotes a separate part to Article 21, which provides rules applicable to licenses, transfers and assignments of trademarks. Like most other sections of the TRIPS Agreement, the trademark section is a compromise. While that compromise was not always between the same two positions, the differences between the two major legal systems, namely common law and civil law, do emerge rather frequently in the text. Indeed, one could attribute a score to determine which ‘side’ won the debate on each section of Part II of the TRIPS Agreement (that is, the part that contains the norms concerning substantive IP rights, including trademarks). For example, common law ‘scored’ a major win in copyright.


AustLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/ELECD/2016/354.html