AustLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

Edited Legal Collections Data

You are here:  AustLII >> Databases >> Edited Legal Collections Data >> 2018 >> [2018] ELECD 1449

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Articles | Noteup | LawCite | Help

Custers, Bart --- "Methods of data research for law" [2018] ELECD 1449; in Mak, Vanessa; Tjong Tjin Tai, Eric; Berlee, Anna (eds), "Research Handbook in Data Science and Law" (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2018) 355

Book Title: Research Handbook in Data Science and Law

Editor(s): Mak, Vanessa; Tjong Tjin Tai, Eric; Berlee, Anna

Publisher: Edward Elgar Publishing

ISBN: 9781788111294

Section: Chapter 15

Section Title: Methods of data research for law

Author(s): Custers, Bart

Number of pages: 23

Abstract/Description:

Methods of data research are becoming increasingly important in the legal domain. After explaining the concept of legal big data, to show that law is an area in which a lot of big data is available, this chapter discusses and illustrates several existing and potential applications of data research methods for lawyers and legal researchers. Particular opportunities exist with regard to: (1) predictions; (2) searching, structuring and selecting; and (3) decision-making and empirical legal research. These methods constitute an important contribution to legal practice and legal scholarship as they may provide novel and unexpected insights and considerably increase efficiency (less resources, more results) and effectiveness (more accurate and reliable results) of legal research, both in legal practice and legal scholarship. This may, among other things, result in improved legal services, new business models, new knowledge and a more solid basis for evidence-based policies and legislation. However, there are also several limits to, and drawbacks of, the use of these data research methods for law. From a methodological perspective, these include the lack of human intuition, an abundance of results that are not always relevant, limited insights in underlying causality, issues with repurposing, self-confirmation, self-fulfilling prophecies and reliability issues. It is concluded that, given the opportunities these developments provide for new business models for legal services and for legal research (both in legal practice and in legal scholarship), it is likely that these methods will be used on a larger scale in the near future and that new and additional methods will be developed. This will change to some extent the way legal work looks like and the job market for lawyers.


AustLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/ELECD/2018/1449.html