Home
| Databases
| WorldLII
| Search
| Feedback
Legal Education Review |
SOCIAL STRUCTURE, EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT AND ADMISSION
TO LAW SCHOOL
ALEX ZIEGERT*
INTRODUCTION1
“From the moment you are born, ...”, a
recent TV advertisement tells us, “... the odds are stacked against
you!”.
The advertisement then goes on to demonstrate how minimal the
chances are to incur certain favourable life-events. It suggests that,
rather
than trying hard, it is better to play the lottery as a way of overcoming the
adversities of everyday life. However doubtful
the actuarial calculations may be
which are used in the advertisement, it makes a forceful point: what we expect
to be, and what
— in a democratic society — is promised to be,
apparent equality of opportunities turns out as a maze of barriers, dead-ends
and capricious events. What the lottery advertisement implies, but what the
liberalist democratic formula fails to tell us generally,
is that the equal
chances provided by the social life of any society are not only as bad as, but
in fact worse, than chances provided
by a lottery. Different from the lottery,
the “odds” in real life are systematically “loaded when equal
access
is attempted to health, wealth, power and status, or to whatever seems
worth achieving in a given society. What appears to be chance,
or at best fate
and providence, is evidently the invisible hand of social structure, tipping
the scales consistently in the direction
of how that structure itself operates
at any given time in the life of an individual from the moment the individual is
born.
This observation is, of course, hardly original. However, it is
important to keep it in mind when one wants to assess the practices
of admitting
access to tertiary education — a resource in all modem societies —
and when one wants to design policies
which are aimed at reforming the access to
law schools — a formidable resource in all societies which follow the
common law
tradition. Viewed from the aspect of the complex and pervasive
historically entrenched social structure and social processes, to
change
admission practices effectively is an awesome task. Admission policies which are
advocated as “new” can be safely
assumed to be merely the
administration of more of the same unless enough leverage can be mobilised to
unsettle the systematic bias
of social structure and to neutralise some of the
thoroughly debilitating effects of its invisible hand. Obviously, to attain such
leverage is beyond the scope of individual universities and/or their law
faculties, and it is outside the work practices which are
employed in the
admission of students. We must assume that whatever universities can or will do
necessarily amounts to not much more
than tinkering with the systematic bias of
social structure.
There is now compelling evidence that this is in fact the
only result which universities have achieved in a fairly long history of
admission policy reforms in the tertiary education sector in Australia. There is
also increasing consensual knowledge2 that the even
more comprehensive and better coordinated actions and programmes on state or
national government level, which were
designed to affect the social mix of
undergraduates in Australia and overseas had no, or only a limited
effect.3 Often, the small effect achieved by incisive
single-measure government intervention4 or by broad
equal opportunity policies is counteracted by subsequent changes in admission
policies5 which in turn make access to higher education
even more highly competitive. Any gains made by these policies are whittled away
by
the social forces at work on a deeper and more complex level of a given
society.6
It is important to note, however, that
this bleak picture changes somewhat where specific target groups are concerned.
Here more narrowly
tailored government programmes can be shown to be reasonably
successful.7 Special programmes of this kind remain
promising but are, by definition, limited in their outcomes.
Finally, a
third and different case in the history of admission practices in educational
organisations in general and, especially,
in the tertiary education sector, is
the case of women. It provides us with the evidence that the dynamics of the
invisible hand
of social structure can be forced over time even if ever so
slightly. Women, coming from a position of practical exclusion from higher
education, have achieved, at least nominally, equal access to higher education
with men, even if, as yet, actual admission practices
are still quite
patchy.8 As the following discussion will show, this
more complex change in admission practices but, more importantly, in educational
attitudes
towards girls and women generally, has had and still has crucial
consequences for structural change in a given society. This potential
for change
is related to the pivotal role women have in societies as mothers who are,
rather than fathers, effectively in charge
of the socialisation of their
children. This is generally the case in all societies but plays a particularly
important role in the
educational programmes of societies which are on the way
to become modern, industrial societies and possibly post-modem
societies.9 It appears, then, that the educational
attainment of mothers is one of the most powerful single predictor variables for
structural
change and for intergenerational transmission in societies. A review
of admission policies has to address this observation.
In view of the
complex operation of social structure and social process, and their combined
effects on the work practices of educational
organisations on all levels
(family, primary education, secondary education, and tertiary education), a
review of admission practices
cannot be content to assess admission to law
school as a single, independent event but must attempt to link this event to the
socio-historical
context in which it occurs and in which a particular
educational organisation operates. This link provides the parameters for
educational
operations on all levels, from childhood to adulthood, on which
selection occurs. The following discussion is a report of an attempt
to draw
such a link. This attempt is limited by the specific objectives of the task set
for the researchers.10 However, neither the explorative
nature of such a study nor its necessary limitations should preclude that the
evaluation and discussion
of results are attempted with a substantial and
explicit connection between theory and research.11 The
study, as presented in this report, attempts to demonstrate such a connection.
It introduces a general model of the selective
dynamics of social structure and
social process as they can be seen to bear on educational operations, including
admission practices,
and as they can be shown to apply to New South Wales and to
the work practices of the Faculty of Law of the University of Sydney
in
particular. This model is based on the theory of operationally closed
systems12 described in section 2. Such a model informs
us what kind of data are needed and how they can be collected (described in
section
3) and it directs the way in which the collected empirical material can
be understood (interpreted) and presented in the following
discussion (section
4). Though such an approach uses the collected data to the best knowledge of the
researchers, it is obviously
still not the full story of admission to law
school.
THE PRACTICE OF LAW STUDENT SELECTION IN NEW SOUTH WALES — A THEORETICAL MODEL
The concept of law school intake (admission), as
envisaged here, starts from the assumption of a highly stratified concatenation
of
selection processes which affect every individual student on a number of
steps in the student’s life-career. The result of
these selection
processes is effectively, as far as our law students are concerned, that they
are eventually accepted as law students:
they have “made it”.
However, seen against the background of the population at large, the chances of
a new-born child
to be eventually admitted to law school are rather remote.
We find, then, a systematic funnelling process represented in the
life-careers of law-students as compared with the life-careers of
young adults
at large. This process is made up by a great number of multi-level selection
processes which, in the sociological sense,
are constituted by the interplay of
socialisation and education.13 This interplay is
orchestrated by social structure14 over time, both in
the Australian society at large and in the society of NSW in particular. The
picture which we gain from this sociological
view on law student selection as
practised by a particular law school (Sydney University Law School) appears to
be that of a funnel
which has numerous filter levels. Each of these filters
allows for only a minority of individuals to pass through to subsequent levels
and retains the rest. Evidently, those individuals who pass each level to the
next one possess particular (highly selected) personal
characteristics and they
share these characteristics with all those others who have also passed; and, the
more filters these individuals
pass, the more those who pass share personal
characteristics with each other.15 Seen from the
vantage point of the eventually successful admission to law school, and with
hindsight, all law students share the
experience of such a rather long, and in
fact — when compared with other university studies — one of the
longest possible,
educational career-paths. The high homogeneity of the personal
profiles of the students in this group should not come as a surprise.
The most
remarkable feature of this homogeneous group is the over-representation of
individuals who come from families with high
socio-economic status in a given
society, and who have had — on their long march through the education
system — sufficient
time and specific support in these family environments
to learn how to become educated. This feature becomes more prominent with
each
step on the career-path in the educational system. In short, our model suggests
that institutionalised education is not a simple
hand-out of knowledge to
particular individuals but rather a series of selective operations by families,
educational organisations
and the economic system to which individuals adjust
skilfully by socialisation. The overall outcome of education is that a specific
group of individuals acquire a particular set of social skills which affect the
way in which those individuals operate their cognitive
manoeuvres of
self-concept maintenance in order to achieve individually perceived goals which
are at the socio-cultural and socio-economic
disposition of society at large.
A comprehensive account of the complexity of the historical conditions for
educational outcomes in NSW is beyond the scope of our
study but such historical
conditioning must be kept in mind. It refers to a small, geographically
relatively isolated society which
is demographically concentrated in the State
capital, resulting in an extremely low, degree of mobility but a high degree of
interaction
between the local elites. This historical framework of a small
society in a large geographical space is basically a provincial one
and one
which is characterised by economic vulnerability.16
Here, the society needs to respond to wider international developments through
the adjustive operations of the economic and education
systems. Historically, it
appears that in Australia and NSW the education system has been the more open
and resilient one and that
the economic system has been the more, protectively,
closed and vulnerable one. Thus, while Australia has never developed a strong
secondary, industrial sector — and in this sense has never become an
industrial society in the full (socio-economic) sense
of the term — it has
become a modern developed society by the responsiveness of its highly
differentiated education system.
This education system provides the necessary
cultural capital to drive a relatively strong tertiary industry (services)
sector in
a vibrant multicultural environment. In Australia, as anywhere else in
modern Western societies, the crucial measure for development,
then, is the
capacity to relate the operations of the economic system and of the education
system meaningfully to each other. Such
a meaningful relationship between the
operations of different systems can be understood in the terms of structural
coupling.17 This means, in the case of a structural
coupling of the economic and education systems. that the operations in each
system condition
each other through the use of references to certification
(certificates, degrees and diplomas). The reference made to certification
by
both the education system and the economic system means that access to economic
resources (positions of occupational status and/or
wealth) in NSW, as anywhere
else in modem societies, depends increasingly, and often exclusively, on the
attainment of high levels
of formal education rather than on a traditional
recognition of practical skills through non-certified educational operations in
the economic system itself (for example by training “in house” or
“on the job”). By issuing certificates
and by a recognition of
issued certificates, the economic and the education systems condition each other
externally and they co-ordinate
their respective autonomous internal operations
by referring to, and occasionally quarrelling over18
certificates.
A good example for this important historical step of the mutual recognition
of the economic and educational systems in the structural
coupling through
references to certification is the change in the approach to recruitment for the
legal profession in Australia and
in NSW. Here, selection of recruits to the
legal profession has turned from a regime of
apprenticeship19 and in-house approbation in the
position of the articled clerk to a nearly exclusive regime of university
education or tertiary-education-styled
education in colleges of advanced
education, college of law, joint admission board courses and examinations,
modelled after university
courses and administered by university staff.
The
complex pattern of change by mutual connectedness of education and economics has
had a profound effect on the organisation of
formal education. Educational
careers have become longer, curricula more complex and more varied. Moreover,
formal education has
become more comprehensive for the entire population, and in
turn, access to educational organisations, especially their higher levels,
has
become more competitive.20 With every additional rung
in the ladder of formal education, that is, a further differentiation of the
education system, numbers
of intake increase but also selectivity overall
increases. Rather than to equip individuals for coping with modem society, this
process
of differentiation has the pervasive effect of sequestering
(classifying) — often irretrievably — the certified winners
and
losers in social life.
Conveniently simplified, we can distinguish five major levels of the
educational careers of law students in NSW The socialisation
in a family home
and in institutions (like kindergarten, primary schools) supporting
socialisation in primary groups (families).
On this basic level, education is
not highly formalised. This lack of formalisation, accounts for both the
strength and the failures
of education on this level. A major problem is that
there is no formal exit from the educational system on this level; educational
success is exclusively dependent on the socialisation processes which go on in
the privacy of family homes and/or in other primary
group
environments.21 Such family or primary group
performances are, in turn, crucially dependent on the organisational quality of
the unit, measured in
terms of their resources (e.g. socio-economic status and
educational attainment of members) and of the on-going processes in the
unit for
example supportiveness, communication, interaction, and liaison with external
environment. Resources and process together
provide for the human development
and for the socialisation of social competence of children and
adolescents,22 but also of the adults in such units.
Evidently, educational careers are formed on this level; omissions and
commissions perpetrated on individuals on this level are highly
formative for
the protection and maintenance of self-concept and so for the pathways which the
life-course of individuals will take.23 Because
socialisation does not allow for exits while education
does,24 the most distressing feature of education at
this level of low formalisation is that the mode of selection of the education
system,
and particularly, a number of specific “exits” from the
education system, are not easily visible and/or are not conceptualised
as such.
Rather, classifications of “success”, “failure”, and
“dropping out” are hiding here
in the private niches of family life
as so-called apathy, disinterest, retardation, unruliness, dyslexia, or as
diagnosed psychosomatic,
neurotic and psychotic disorders. Nevertheless, the
labels with which are assigned to individuals here, stick with the respective
individuals through informing their self concepts; they learn to see themselves
as failures in an early age, and this will be the
most distinct feature of the
life-careers of such individuals.
The socialisation and education in
secondary schools. In becoming more formalised, the selectiveness of the
education system becomes more conspicuous. With this higher degree of
organisational
formalisation, also exits from the educational system are
formalised (certified) on this level. Internally, the higher degree of
formalisation allows for more differentiation (specialisation) of the system; it
can fast-track some individuals for further advancement
and discourage others
from staying on. Students emerge from secondary schools as firmly classified
candidates for economic roles.
However, the selective effect of the official
classification of educational attainment is also related to the way in which it
is
valued by the respective individual on the base of personal and family
values. Such values allow, for instance, to view earning money
forming a family
or just dropping out of school as superior to the long term goal of reaching
high levels of educational attainment
with diffuse career perspectives and
distant earning capacities.
A special feature of the education system in NSW
on this level is the segmented operation of public (state) and private schools,
and
especially secondary schools.25 This segmentation
of the education system disperses scarce public resources further, and it
increases the selectiveness of the education
system on this level by introducing
further rungs. While state schools have to cope with a majority of mandatory
students in often
adverse educative environments, private schools can capitalise
for their educational operations on the formative effects of family
resources
and family process provided by those students who are set to have the longest
educational career-paths: students from private
schools spend the longest time
of all students in the state in the education system.
Our model suggests,
then, that while state secondary schools have large numbers of students, they
also have large numbers of “drop
outs” and of students who will
leave the education system as certified leavers on this level (year 10 school
certificate).
Comparatively few of these students will stay on in the education
system to go to university and even fewer will be admitted to law
school. In
contrast, private schools deal only with small but highly selected populations.
Only very few students here will exit
the education system before reaching
university, and many of them will be admitted to law school.
The
socialisation and education in tertiary education institutions. With the
increased differentiation of the economic system, the importance of the
education system grows and the pressure on the internal
differentiation of
universities intensifies. The result is a further spread of university
sub-systems (schools, faculties, departments,
amalgamations) and their
competition for resources by further differentiation of certification through
more specialised degrees or
diplomas.
With the increased internal
differentiation of universities and tertiary education institutions, the
tertiary level also becomes an
important re-entry level for many individuals who
have left the education system at earlier stages and who decide to upgrade their
chances for a better access to the economic system by higher levels of
educational attainment.
As far as the present practice of law school
admission is concerned, this group of re-entry students have to compete with the
systemicly
better positioned “educational stayers” from the
secondary schools, and especially those from the private secondary schools.
The socialisation and education in universities. The demand for
highest level education certification has expanded the scope and variety of
university activities. This has meant
a further differentiation of certificate
levels in grades of degrees, number of degree levels, and the specialisation of
degrees
and diplomas. Each of these differentiation levels, in turn, must be
seen to function predominantly as a selective rung in the ladder
of educational
careers. While the educational value of these differentiations of certification
remains doubtful,26 provide clearly the bonus of
additional or cumulative certification for individuals and organisations. With
that, they also provide
a further step to prevent or facilitate access to law
school in those cases where direct access from secondary school is not possible.
The socialisation and education in law schools. In spite of the, then
rather late, incorporation of legal education in universities, the law school in
the Anglo-American setting
has maintained a separateness from university
operations in general. This applies also to the modem version of Anglo- American
law
school teaching and research under, oddly enough, the auspices of
interdisciplinarity and contextuality. No other field of academic
endeavour
maintains so tenaciously institutional generality and is so poorly
organisationally specialised (differentiated) as legal education at law school.
This peculiar historical role of law schools refers to a more specific and
direct structural coupling with the economic system which
can be found in the
role that the legal profession plays in the history of common law. This direct
link between the legal profession
and law school overrides, in many respects,
the structural coupling of education and economics which applies generally to
universities
and it determines the higher selectivity of law schools as compared
with admission to university in general.
This higher selectivity of law
schools is expressed in features such as more restricted admission quota,
special provisions for combined
degrees and an implicit tendency toward graduate
schools which are not present in other university faculties.27
In this crucial aspect of highest educational selectivity, then, law
schools exhibit the same features as private secondary schools.
Both, private
secondary schools and law schools can present the unique structural position
which they hold in the education system
as “producing excellence”.
Their higher selectivity allows them to capitalise on refined selection
procedures and on elaborate educational classification schemes.
These
classification schemes mandate longer than average educational career paths and
strong family commitments to those students
who are set up to stay on those
longer career paths. It is, then, not surprising to find in law schools
predominantly those students
who also populate the private secondary schools.
Taken together, all rungs in the ladder to educational attainment have the
effect that the educational career which leads to a first
law degree is one of
the longest in the educational system. In turn, the student population so
selected is, in the end, one of the
most homogeneous student populations in
universities.28 However, this homogeneity does not
necessarily relate exclusively to socio-economic (class) criteria or academic
achievement criteria
(high HSC/TER) scores. Rather our model suggests that the
homogeneity of the law student population at Sydney University is the result
of
the perseverance on a rather long educational path as effected by a combination
of favourable family background variables, among
them also the socio-economic
status of families. In this respect, addressing only the warped social mix of
the law student population
means to overlook the more complex historical problem
why some families promote the acquisition of cultural capital in their children
while others do not and how the pathways of social mobility may look like which
lead from being born in the latter family- type to
constituting a family of the
former family-type as an adult who can intergenerationally transmit the value of
education to her children.
The research project, commissioned by the Faculty
of Law of the University of Sydney, had the objective of assessing the effects
of
current admission practices as reflected in the profile of admitted law
students. Based on the model of law student selection discussed
above, a
longitudinal study would have been the preferred approach. Such a longitudinal
assessment could have encompassed all stages
of the selection process, including
the formative family processes and also the exits from the selection process of
those students
who either do not seek or who fail to gain entry to law school.
However, due to time constraints this was not a feasible option.
Instead and by
convenience, our research concentrates on the later stages of the selection
process and relies exclusively on the
self-reports of law students. The
deficiencies which result from this approach will be discussed in the next
section.
METHODOLOGY
The collection of data for this study was conducted in two phases:29
The rationale for constituting the samples in this way was to survey two substantially large student populations who differ with respect to:
Table 1: Students Who Entered Law as a Graduate
SQ 7.2 WHAT WAS MAJOR AREA OF STUDY
|
||
|
First Year
|
Final Year
|
Arts
|
—
|
20.5
|
Science
|
—
|
5.2
|
Economics
|
—
|
4.3
|
Not Appl.
|
100.0
|
70.1
|
N
|
159.0
|
117.0
|
A further critical methodological point in the study is the use of student’s self-reports rather than, for instance, observational data. Self-reports create the methodological bias that findings reflect current perceptions of self of students, at the point of time of the report, rather than accurate (“objective”) records of past events in the educational careers of students.32 It appears, however, that this general problem in social science research is of little consequence in our study. On the one hand, faulty or falsified (“beautified”) recall by students must be considered to be minimal as far as concrete, biographical data and objective (officially recorded) events of their family backgrounds (occupational status of parents, educational attainment of parents) and educational careers (school type, degree type) are concerned. On the other hand, the reporting of students’ (perceived) self-concepts was intended because self-reports are the only access to the assessment of the experience of students. This approach is further accentuated by the complementary use of qualitative research methods. In this approach, interviews with largely open and unstructured questions were used which allowed students to elaborate on personal experiences and individual viewpoints.
FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION
The methodological dilemma that our study does not reflect adequately on processes which precede admission to law school, is particularly acute with regard to the early and most formative childhood experiences of law students. Selective processes are here set in the environment of face-to-face relations organised in primary groups, that is, mostly by family relations and, to a lesser extent and only complementary, by peer group relations. Significantly, even the law students themselves refer only rarely to these early years when talking more freely about their educational careers in the interviews. However, the effects of some fairly reliable standard variables of socialisation research33 can be discussed in the light of the results of our survey. These variables account for the distinction between family resources (educational attainment levels of parents, occupational status and work situation of parents, income levels but also network support, access to infrastructure, access to dominant culture through competence in language and culturally highly valued behavioural patterns) and family process (bonding between family members, communication, support, power/authority structures). These different sets of variables focus on interrelated but specifically differentiated outcomes of primary group socialisation. The relationship between the underlying family operations measured by the two sets of variables is, as a rule but not invariably accumulative throughout family histories, either in a positive form, that is, as benign “upward” loops, or in a negative form, that is, as vicious “downward loops. Furthermore, these family operations are also, through intergenerational transmission, accumulative through generations.34 This means that, depending on the quality of family resources and processes, individuals growing up in respective families are more or less resourceful themselves. Additionally, there is a significant probability that a person may engage in a stable interpersonal relationship, and finally form a new family with a person who commands similar levels of resourcefulness as that person. This results in the prevalent homogamic patterns where individuals with similar levels, for instance, of educational attainment or occupational status pool whatever resources they command, and where this leads to even more pronounced differences of family coping, including child rearing, between different families.
FAMILY RESOURCES
It is evident from our findings that the law students
in our samples come largely from families which have been highly successful
in
the accumulation of cultural and economic capital.35
Fathers and mothers of law students have overall, and by any count, a far higher
occupational status and a higher level of educational
attainment than fathers
and mothers in the population of Australia at large (compare Tables 2 and 3,
levels of parental educational
attainment, with Tables 4 and 5). So, the high
proportion of fathers of law students with professional occupational status
(about
25%) compares with only 14% of men with that status in the Australian
population at large.36 Conversely, only 9% of the
fathers of law students and 18% of the mothers are reported to have the status
of clerk or worker, compared
with 44% and 69% of men and women in Australia
overall who are reported to have that occupational status. Likewise, roughly 50%
of
the law students report that their fathers have attained a university degree,
and nearly the same proportion of mothers who hold
such a degree (49%) is
supported by the first year intake (19901, while only 11% of the men and 8% of
the women in work in Australia
are registered in the official statistics with
such a level of educational attainment.37 Conversely,
26% and 24% of the law students report that their fathers and mothers have
attained an educational level which is less
than a Higher School Certificate,
while 37% of the men and 43% of the women in work in Australia are reported to
have attained that
level.38
In the very few cases
where students have achieved admission to the law school in spite of the fact
that lower levels of both occupational
status and educational attainment of
parents are reported, the nominal disadvantage in these families is probably
balanced by favourable
family process, for instance, an effective network of
good relations between the members or the family which results in a highly
supportive and committed family environment. This is discussed further in
section 4.3.
Occupational Status and Level of educational attainment of
Parents. Two family-background variables are most clearly related to
structural advantage in modem Australian society. These are the father’s
occupational status and the mother’s level of educational attainment.
Findings related to these variables in our students’
self-reports support
the observation, made earlier, about resourceful family configurations in the
law student sample. Mothers in
these families are reported — when compared
to their male partners — to have achieved similarly high or even higher,
but rarely considerably lower level of educational attainment, and a lower
occupational status than that of their male partners.
Conversely, fathers in
these families are reported to have achieved a higher occupational status
— compared to their female
partners — and a similarly high but
frequently also a lower level of educational attainment than that of their
female partners.
The result of such configurations are highly favourable family
environments and it is this high level of the educational attainment
of their
mothers combined with the high occupational status of their fathers which
appears to be the crucial element in the life-careers
of those students who are
eventually admitted to law school.
Table 2: Father’s Occupation
SQ 10 FATHER’S OCCUPATION
|
||
|
First Year
|
Final Year
|
Upper Professional
|
26.1
|
24.8
|
Low Professional
|
3.2
|
4.3
|
Upper Services
|
19.1
|
19.7
|
Low Services
|
1.9
|
0.0
|
Managerial
|
21.0
|
17.1
|
Entrepreneurial
|
17.2
|
13.7
|
Worker
|
4.5
|
13.7
|
Other
|
7.0
|
6.8
|
N
|
157.0
|
117.0
|
Table 3: Mother’s Occupation
SQ 11 MOTHER’S OCCUPATION
|
||
|
First Year
|
Final Year
|
Upper Professional
|
5.1
|
3.4
|
Low Professional
|
10.8
|
13.4
|
Upper Services
|
27.4
|
23.5
|
Low Services
|
1.3
|
2.5
|
Managerial
|
5.7
|
3.4
|
Entrepreneurial
|
5.7
|
5.0
|
Worker
|
16.6
|
20.2
|
Other
|
27.4
|
28.6
|
N
|
157.0
|
119.0
|
When the two different intake groups of law students (“first year” and “final year”) are compared (Table 2 and Chart 3), all higher occupational positions of the fathers of law students are more frequently reported in the later intake group (1990), with the exception of a slight reduction of reported upper public service positions of law students’ fathers, and all lower positions (lower public service, worker) are here less frequently reported. Similarly, the reported levels of educational attainment of both parents are higher (higher occurrence of higher levels/ lower occurrence of lower levels) in the mow recent intake of law students (Tables 4 and 5, Charts 4 and 5). University degrees are no longer the almost exclusive achievement of only the fathers of law students: 40% of the students of the intake in 1990 report that their mothers hold a bachelor degree and 9% report that their mothers hold a higher than bachelor degree (Chart 4). In this comparison of the different intake groups, it should be kept in mind, that the final year group of students is, as mentioned earlier, a much more varied sample as far as their admission is concerned, than the first year group where students come almost exclusively dimly from high school. However, the comparison also shows that the competition for entry has further homogenised the group of students who are eventually admitted at this stage, and that resourceful families are even more over-represented as compared with other student samples or the general population.
Table 4: Father’s Educational Attainment
SQ 12 FATHER’S EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT
|
||
|
First Year
|
Final Year
|
Primary
|
2.5
|
5.0
|
Some Secondary
|
3.8
|
12.5
|
School Certificate
|
13.3
|
10.8
|
HCS
|
12.0
|
9.2
|
Tertiary
|
10.8
|
9.2
|
Bachelor Degree
|
30.4
|
32.5
|
Higher Degree
|
25.9
|
20.8
|
Other
|
1.3
|
0.0
|
N
|
158.0
|
120.0
|
Table 5: Mother’s Educational Attainment
Q 13 MOTHER’S EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT
|
||
|
First Year
|
Final Year
|
Primary
|
3.8
|
5.0
|
Some Secondary
|
3.1
|
12.3
|
School Certificate
|
12.6
|
15.8
|
HCS
|
16.4
|
17.5
|
Tertiary
|
14.5
|
20.8
|
Bachelor Degree
|
40.3
|
20.8
|
Higher Degree
|
8.8
|
5.8
|
Other
|
0.6
|
0.8
|
N
|
159.0
|
120.0
|
CHART 3: Father’s Occupation
CHART4: Mother’s Educational Attainment
CHART 5: Father’s Educational Attainment
CHART 6: HSC Score by Mother’s Educational
Attainment
(in %)
5
8
4
4
28
17
2
4
13
17
24
11
8
25
26
16
18
25
20
39
5
0
10
8
Lowest
to 400
401 to 420
421 to 440
441 plus
Primary only
Some
secondary
School certif.
HS Certif.
Bachelor deg.
Higher
CHART 7: Mother’s Educational Attainment by
Father’s
Occupation
Mother’s educational
attainment
CHART 8: Mother’s Educational Attainment
by Father’s Education
As noted earlier, there is a strong and significant tendency for couples overall to increase their individual resourcefulness by homogamic marital match-making. This observation applies clearly to parents of students who are eventually admitted to law school. Here, there is not only a higher than normally distributed chance that the parents of the students hold university degrees but also a higher chance that both parents hold such a degree compared with the population at large. Our data show that:
Socio-cultural background and access to the
dominant culture. Variables which refer to a specific socio-cultural
background of an individual, such as the country of birth of the parents and
native
language are generally referred to as “ethnic issues” and are
as such not generally seen in the context of family and
individual resources.
Our theoretical framework discussed in section 2 suggests otherwise. It points
to the intimate link between
family resources, access to societal infrastructure
and access to the dominant culture. The socio-cultural background, then,
explains,
to a high degree, the resourcefulness of families of law students as a
result of a positive relation with Anglo-Saxon and/or Anglo-
Celtic Australian
language and culture (Tables 6, 7 and 8).
Our data show that an accumulation
of cultural capital has been achieved here through effective intergenerational
transmission of
cultural capital in families where the parents, and possibly
already the grandparents, were born in Australia and that the group
of these
students constitutes the overwhelming majority of law students. The next largest
group of law students come from families
who have not been born in Australia but
in other sociocultural environments which are linked to the English culture
(United Kingdom,
New Zealand).39 Compared with this
predominance of English socio-cultural patterns, other ethnic backgrounds are
insignificant among law students,
even if one takes into account the quite
substantial number of students in the first year who report an Asian family
background (compare
Tables 6 and 7). A closer assessment of the language which
is primarily spoken in these families reveals here also a dominance of
English
(Table 21). This finding suggests that many of these Asian students come from
those countries which were former English colonies
(Hong Kong, Singapore,
Malaysia) and that their families must be assumed to command a high degree of
resourcefulness (high occupational
status of fathers, high level of educational
attainment of mothers) precisely because they have access to English
culture.40
Table 6: Mother’s Country of Birth
SQ 14.2 MOTHER’S COUNTRY OF BIRTH
|
||
|
First Year
|
Final Year
|
Australia
|
62.9
|
69.2
|
Other Anglo
|
15.1
|
10.8
|
North Europe
|
3.8
|
3.3
|
South Europe
|
3.8
|
8.3
|
East Europe
|
2.5
|
0.8
|
Asia
|
11.3
|
6.7
|
Other
|
0.6
|
0.8
|
159.0
|
120.0
|
Table 7: Father’s Country of Birth
SQ 14.3 FATHER’S COUNTRY OF BIRTH
|
||
|
First Year
|
Final Year
|
Australia
|
57.9
|
63.3
|
Other Anglo
|
16.4
|
17.5
|
North Europe
|
3.8
|
2.5
|
South Europe
|
5.0
|
7.5
|
East Europe
|
3.1
|
1.7
|
Asia
|
11.9
|
6.7
|
Other
|
1.9
|
0.8
|
N
|
159.0
|
120.0
|
Table 8: Primary Language Growing Up
SQ 14.4 ENGLISH PRIMARY LANGUAGE GROWING UP
|
||
|
First Year
|
Final Year
|
YES
|
83.0
|
90.1
|
NO
|
13.0
|
9.9
|
Arabic
|
0.6
|
0.8
|
Cantonese
|
8.8
|
0.8
|
Other Chinese
|
1.3
|
0.0
|
Croation
|
0.6
|
2.5
|
Estonian
|
0.6
|
0.0
|
French
|
0.6
|
0.0
|
German
|
0.6
|
0.0
|
Greek
|
1.3
|
2.5
|
Italian
|
0.6
|
0.8
|
Vietnamese
|
0.6
|
0.0
|
Serbian
|
0.6
|
0.0
|
N
|
159.0
|
120.0
|
FAMILY PROCESS
A survey by questionnaire, using student’s self-reports, is ill-suited to capture reliably family processes and dynamics which go back a long way in their lives. Here the interviews with the students reveal more adequately how stable and supportive family environments contribute to take children and adolescents through their comparatively long educational careers and sustain students on robust levels of self-esteem and appreciation of self-worth. Students also report here the high degree of intensive consultation and discussion with their parents at incisive stages of their life-careers, especially with the decision where to study and what to study at university :
... After talking to my parents, they just sort of said we leave it up to yourself and they sort of said you know maybe you should leave it open a little bit more, because you’re still pretty young. As it was, I was only seventeen (1 — B2).
Well, my father was a lawyer, and I have a bit of an idea what lawyers did. He didn’t really want to push me into the career, he even sort of recommended against it a couple of times when he came home after a hard day (4 — B2).
Because, when I finished my arts degree I felt law was a substantial career. Arts was interesting. I thoroughly enjoyed it but I thought, career-wise, law would be better. And I think parental desires as well played a role (26 — Bl).
Of course, there is not always agreement in family process:
The reason why I wanted to study law was because when I came into the Bachelor of Education, I was accepted into the law degree. My parents thought it was a bad career for a woman and they persuaded me to become a school teacher. They thought that would be easier for me and I was persuaded at that age to do that (28 — B1).
It is consistent with such reports
on the influence of family process on career decisions of students that law
students, especially
the younger ones, rank the importance of the information
about their studies and career which they obtain through their parents,
before
they applied for admission to a law degree, fairly high and above the
information which they obtained from career advice and
information officials. As
students grow older, this importance of parental consultation fades,
retrospectively,41 behind the relevance of information
obtained through their friends, and hew especially the friends who happen to be
lawyers themselves
(Tables 15 and 16).
Generally, it happened only rarely
that students reported spontaneously on their family relations in the context of
talking about
their educational careers but neither did they mention any
particular problems in their families in this respect. This could mean
that the
students take a favourable secure base for granted, especially since the group
with which they mix at law school is so highly homogeneous and does not
provide for many strikingly contrasting experiences. On the other hand, students
are also aware of
divisions among the student population which run exactly along
the line of parental support:
And if you have to work [in order to support yourself] then it is just tough, but I just do not know how they expect you to be able to get through the course. And graduates are more likely not going to have the support of their parents. And so there is a marked sort of division between the undergraduates who most likely are going to have the support of their home (2 — B8).
One thing I find difficult is, this being a full-time course, I think it caters very much for people who are being supported by their parents. The demographics on that are obvious. I think it is incredibly difficult to support yourself and do reasonably well (15 — B11).
There is not enough variety of people here ... And that reflects on the work that they [students at law school] do and what they expect from us and what they expect from the teachers and what they expect from the courses ... In that I mean they tend to come from a very sort of wealthy background, their parents are very well educated ... It is a very elitist selection (16 — B7).
Socialisation and Education in Secondary Schools
The Type of Secondary Schools
The lively
public debate on secondary schools in NSW highlights the importance which the
general public here attributes to formal
education. This debate draws a more or
less sharp distinction between state (public) schools and non-state schools and
attributes
the different outcomes of their selective operations to a perceived
difference in the quality of the education which the different
school types
provide. Given the ambiguous operations of education organisations as discussed
in this study, any account on what high
schools actually achieve differently
from each other must be viewed with suspicion. We can only safely assume that
any significant
difference in educational practices of the different types of
secondary schools rests solely on the (different) outcomes of different
selective admission practices. In other words, the quality of the performance of
secondary schools is the quality of the selected
student populations, or, the
more selective the admission practices of particular types of high schools are,
the easier it is for
these schools to allege superior institutional performance.
The data reported by the law students support such assumptions. When we
correlate the HSC score of law students with the type of high
school they
graduated from, we find no statistically significant relation between the
different HSC scores and any particular type
of high school. On this count,
then, no particular type of high school delivers a particular type of
“better student”
as far as admission to law school is concerned.
Table 9: Type of School of Graduation
SQ16 SCHOOL TYPE
|
||
|
First Year
|
Final Year
|
Selective
|
11.9
|
10.8
|
Non-selective
|
18.2
|
25.8
|
Catholic
|
22.6
|
26.7
|
Independent
|
45.3
|
35.0
|
TAFE
|
0.6
|
0.0
|
Other
|
1.3
|
2.7
|
N
|
159.0
|
120.0
|
In contrast, significant positive correlations are found when we relate the
type of school to the level of family resources available
in the families of law
students. Here it is evident that it is the observed strength of family
resources and family process of the
families of students who are eventually
admitted to law school which enables these families to have their children
admitted to selective
rather than to non-selective secondary schools in
disproportionately high numbers (Table 9). The selective accumulation of these
student populations, in turn, achieves the higher performance levels of
selective schools. This applies to selective schools both
in the state and in
the private sector of secondary education.42 When we
compare the different intake samples of law students, we find that in the group
of students who have been admitted in 1990
(first year law) and directly from
secondary school, the proportion of graduates from private schools, that is,
Catholic and independent
schools, is considerably higher than in the group of
students who have been admitted 1986 or earlier, and who are more varied in
their ways of finding entry to law school. Given the different composition of
our samples, these findings are partly an indication
for the tendency that, in
the light of higher competition from increasing numbers of academically highly
qualified children for the
admission to restricted courses of study like
medicine and law, there is a stronger move to selective schools generally, and
partly
that admission practices of the law school at present favour the direct
admission from high school. Students from selective schools
dominate this group
which is favoured by present admission practices. In other words, also the
admission practice of the law school
prefers, as do selective schools, what the
educational system already prefers.43 This tendency
accentuates the fairly established pattern, pointed out in the framework of our
underlying model above that the relative
small sector of selective schools
provides, relatively and in absolute numbers, more entrants to law school than
the large sector
of non-selective public schools. Stuck with greater numbers of
students with a greater variety of personal characteristics, non-selective
high
schools classify comparatively less students with academic credentials which
qualify for university studies, and they classify
even less students with
academic credentials which qualify for admission to law school.
We must
assume, then, that rather than different approaches to education, different
family styles determine the operational outcomes
of the educational practices of
selective and non-selective secondary schools respectively. These are, in turn,
reflected in their
classification schemes. Parents who are particularly
committed to the formal education of their children perceive admission to a
selective school to express such a parental commitment and they choose selective
schools for their children for this reason. This,
in effect, self-selection of
families who are committed to formal education, provides selective schools with
a highly homogeneous
population of largely motivated students while at the same
time preventing a more favourable mix of students in the non-selective
public
schools.
Also at this level, we can observe specific operations of the
structural coupling of economics and education. Parents who are committed
to
education and who are in a position to pay but have not attained high levels of
educational attainment themselves can participate,
to a degree, in the selective
operation of secondary schooling by “buying” their children a
“better education”
in selective (private) schools. Our data show
that it is predominantly families where fathers are reported to hold managerial
and
entrepreneurial occupational positions who send their children to private
(independent) schools, while students from families with
fathers who are
reported to hold upper professional or upper public service occupational
positions are less frequently reported to
have their children exclusively
admitted to private schools (Charts 10 and 11).
Parents who are committed to
the value of formal education are also committed to the long-term goal of
university studies for their
children. Students who come from such families
internalise such expectations and are pulled along toward this goal. They find
it
hard not to accept such middle- class and upper- middle-class values towards
university studies. In contrast, students in non-selective
schools are, on the
whole, subjected to a more diffuse set of pulls. Among them, and depending on
local mixes of student populations,
the variance of local sub-cultures and the
macro-economic climate, to exit the education system altogether, to leave the
parental
home and to earn money or to set up own families must be seen as very
strong motivations which may override the value of formal education
(discussed
in section 4.4).
Chart 9: Type of School of Graduation of Student
Chart 10: Father’s Occupation by School Type (first year)
Chart 11: Father’s Occupation by School Type (final year)
When we correlate the type of high school from which law
students have graduated with the form of entry to law school, it is evident
that, while a majority of these students have come directly from Catholic and
independent private schools into the combined degree
courses (77% and 84%
respectively), greater numbers of students from non-selective schools come to
the law school via the detour
of another degree, that is, as graduate students
(61% vs. 19%).44 This observation can serve as an
indicator of the different strength of the pull of the value of formal education
as experienced
by the students in the different types of high school: it is
strongest in independent schools and weakest in non-selective schools,
with the
selective state schools and Catholic schools taking up intermediary positions.
Our data show, then, that the direct route from a selective secondary school
to law school is the best predictor for eventual admission
to law school. Not
surprisingly, the students from selective schools dominate the upper levels of
educational attainment because
their families dominate the market of favourable
family resources and family process. The pool from which law students are drawn
is formed almost exclusively here and not on any later stage in the selection
process.
SOCIO-ECONOMIC SEGREGATION AND SECONDARY SCHOOLS
Although non-selective schools have no direct
control on the student population drawn from respective public school precincts,
also
here there is a selective effect due to the socioeconomic characteristics
of those urban areas in which high schools are situated.
The Sydney metropolitan
area, in which 78% of the law students in our sample lived when they went to
high school, is characterised
by a significant socioeconomic segregation of the
residential areas. We must assume that, in addition to the significant
prevalence
of selective schools in the educational careers of law students, also
the students who come from non-selective schools have been
selected through
schools which are predominantly situated in the more affluent residential areas
of Sydney. We can expect that this
minimises the differences between their
personal profiles and those of the students who come from selective schools.
In order to test this proposition, we grouped the residential areas of
Sydney according to a low, medium or high socio-economic
level45 and we assessed the distribution of the
reported law students’ place of residence in year 12
accordingly.46 It was found that 45% of all law
students in the sample lived in a suburb with a high socio-economic level, while
24% and 7% lived
in a suburb with medium and low socio-economic levels
respectively. The link of such a privileged living with selective high school
attendance is clearly positively related (Chart 12). The great majority of those
students who went to a selective high school lived
in a suburb with high or
medium socio-economic level in their last year at school (year 12). However,
also those students who have
come to the law school via non-selective schools
have predominantly lived in the more affluent suburbs of Sydney, even if a
substantial
number here, in contrast to students who go to selective high
schools, have lived in a suburb with a lower socio-economic level,
and probably
also went to school there. All in all, it is evident that not only selective
schools but also selective socio-economic
segregation of private living and
public schooling add to the homogeneous profile of the law student population.
The socio-economic segregation between residential areas and their more or
less supportive infrastructure is positively related to
the level of family
resources. Surprisingly, however, the occupational status of the father appears
not to be the crucial factor
for such a link. Our data show that it is above all
the educational attainment of the mother which provides the statistically
significant
relation (Chart 13). The higher the educational attainment of the
mother the more frequently the student resided in an affluent suburb
of Sydney
while attending high school. This finding points, again, to the pivotal role of
women who do not only organise predominantly
the internal working of families
but also liaise the family system with the social environment in general and
with the resource infrastructure
and the availability of services in that
environment in particular. We, therefore, can expect a greater influence of
mothers on the
choice of living arrangements than that of fathers. In view of
such reasoned residential choices by mothers, living arrangements
must be seen
as a further measure of resource maximisation by families who are already
resourceful.
Chart 12: Type of School by Type of Residential
Area
(year 12)
The evidence for a mediating role of the family living
arrangements is further supported by the finding that also the use of the
primary
language in the family home is distributed along the lines of
socio-economic segregation of residential arrangements, with the highest
use of
English as that primary language by the families who live in the most affluent
suburbs (91%), and the lowest use by families
who live in the least affluent
suburbs (70%). However, this difference is small and statistically not
significant since the number
of law students who did not speak English as a
primary language at home is very small overall (Table 8).
SECONDARY SCHOOL CURRICULA AND THE ADMISSION TO LAW SCHOOL
Students who come to law school have studied a wide
variety of subjects at high school and there is no prerequisite requirement on
part of the law school for any particular subject (Tables 10 and 11).
However, in line with the findings above which relate to the importance of
access to dominant language and culture, we find that certain
subjects are more
intimately related to high academic achievement and so, to admission to law
school, than others. Only in this limited
sense these subjects, namely English
and Modern History appear to have a certain predictor value with regard to
eventual admission
to law school.
However, a case could be made that English
and Modern History are most clearly related to the development of social and
intellectual
competence in adolescents and young adults in Australia, because
issues dealt with by these subjects allow for a considerable degree
of cultural
communication with children and adolescents in their socialisation processes and
in the educational environment of home
and school.
Our data support such an
argument. The study of English in year 12 by students who are eventually
admitted to law school is positively47 related both to
the levels of educational attainment of their mothers and to the occupational
position of their fathers. This means,
that the higher the levels of
mothers’ educational attainment and fathers’ occupational status
are, the greater is the
frequency with which their children have studied English
in year 12. Law students who had taken English in year 12 reported only
10% and
12% of mothers with only primary school or some secondary school levels
respectively but 83% of those who had finished a
bachelor degree. Similarly, law
students who had taken English in year 12, reported 66%, 45% and 41% of the
fathers with an upper
professional, managerial or upper civil service
occupational status but only 18% with the status of a worker or similar.
Chart 13: Mother’s Educational Attainment by Type of Residential Area (in year 12)
Table 10: Year 12 Subjects
SQ 8.1 YEAR 12 SUBJECTS
|
||
|
First Year
|
Final Year
|
Accountancy
|
0.0
|
28.6
|
Agriculture
|
25
|
1.7
|
Art
|
5.7
|
3.4
|
Biology
|
8.3
|
11.8
|
Chemistry
|
459
|
36.1
|
Croatian
|
0.6
|
0.8
|
Economics
|
40.8
|
37.0
|
Engineering SC
|
1.3
|
0.0
|
English
|
100.0
|
70.6
|
Estonian
|
0.6
|
0.0
|
French
|
19.7
|
74.3
|
General Studies
|
19.7
|
31.9
|
Geography
|
6.4
|
3.4
|
Geology
|
1.3
|
0.8
|
German
|
7.6
|
92
|
Greek Clas
|
1.3
|
0.0
|
Greek Mod
|
1.3
|
0.8
|
History Ancient
|
17.2
|
185
|
History Modern
|
34.4
|
31 9
|
Home Science
|
1.3
|
0.8
|
Italian
|
1.9
|
0.8
|
Japanese
|
2.5
|
0.0
|
Latin
|
17.2
|
4.2
|
Legal Studies
|
0.6
|
0.0
|
Maths
|
93.0
|
66.4
|
Music
|
5.1
|
3.4
|
Physics
|
35.7
|
27.7
|
Religious Studies
|
1.3
|
0.8
|
Russian
|
0.6
|
0.0
|
Science
|
10.2
|
1.7
|
Social Psychology
|
0.6
|
0.0
|
Society & Culture
|
1.3
|
0.0
|
Speech & Drama
|
1.3
|
0.0
|
Visual Arts
|
1.3
|
0.0
|
N
|
157.0
|
119.0
|
Table 11: Year 12 Subject — 4 Units Maths
SQ 8.2 4 UNIT MATHS IN HSC
|
||
|
First Year
|
Final Year
|
YES
|
47.4
|
15.3
|
NO
|
51.3
|
56.8
|
N
|
156.0
|
118.0
|
As far as Modern History in year 12 is concerned, which is generally much
less popular among law students than English, Maths, Economics
or some of the
natural science options (Table 10), the proposition is only statistically sup
ported for the variable of the educational
attainment of mothers, however, here
on a high level of significance.48 While law students
who have done Modern History in year 12 only report 4% and 7% of mothers with
primary or some secondary schooling
levels, they report 34% of mothers with a
completed bachelor or similarly high university degree.49
These contrasts are less pronounced but persist in the natural
science subjects like chemistry, physics, maths or the highly specialised
subject Mathematics — 4 units. Therefore, it is important to note that the
subjects chosen for year 12 in themselves do not
“produce” more or
less social and intellectual competence in the students but allow for a
different degree of expression
of competence which the students already have.
Here the choice of English and Modern History in year 12 appear to be better
predictors
for the eventual admission to law school than maths, chemistry or
physics.
A more important role may also be played by the educational
practices in the high schools to suggest and provide preferences for particular
subjects. Our data show that there is indeed a systematic bias towards the major
subjects (English, Maths, 4 unit Maths, Physics,
Modern History) being most
consistently taken by the students from independent schools. However, this
positive link of choice of
subject to selective school is only statistically
significant for Modern History. The correlation with the subject Maths and 4
unit
Maths reaching only moderate levels of significance (p=0.0527 and
p=0.0385). This means that the choice of subjects, at best, co-varies
with the
particular practices of the high school and is not a predictor for admission to
law school by itself. These classification
practices of respective high schools
constitute the “academic credentials” of any given student, and are
the most important
factor in determining his or her entry to tertiary education,
or — as in our case — admission to a combined law degree
(Table 12).
Table 12: Entry Score
SQ 8.2 4 UNIT MATHS IN HSC
|
||
|
First Year
|
Final Year
|
YES
|
47.4
|
15.3
|
NO
|
51.3
|
56.8
|
N
|
159.0
|
121.0
|
THE CHOICE OF STUDYING LAW
The last years at high school set the scene for important career decisions to be made by the students. Their reports after admission to law school reflect, retrospectively, that such decisions were not reached overnight. More surprisingly, it emerges from these reports that, for most of the students, the entry to law school was not a clear-cut choice or the preferred option but the more contingent result of vexing processes of narrowing down the field of options by exclusion of other options or by sheer serendipity. Typically, students report frequently a competing preference for both law and medicine50 — once it was clear that a sufficiently high level of the HSC score was achieved. This dilemma was ultimately resolved by reference to some further circumstantial factors:
To some extent it was partial because I had done very well at school. But the idea of becoming a doctor has never really interested me ... I turn green at the sight of blood and all sort of terrible things... and I’ve been very interested in debating at school. I’ve done quite well and the law seemed to fit in very nicely with that (3 — Bl).
[Law was] the course with a high aggregate that I could get into because it was next to medicine at that time. And that’s mainly the reason because it was the thing to be ... (4 — Bl).
However, for many students the choice was even more indeterminate:
It’s just something I arrived at. I often think how glad I am now that I have got from where I am and [that] I h’ve chosen what I h’ve done. But the more I think about it it’s just really a matter of luck. There was never any time when I sort of thought “Ah! That’s what I want to do”, because I saw Dad or anything like that (4 — B2).
Two aspects of law appear to make it difficult for
high school students to arrive at the decision to study law as the preferred
choice
in a more determined manner. The first is the relative social distance
and cultural artificiality of the operation of law in the
perspective of high
school students. Students cannot ground their references to law on any of the
traditional academic subjects in
high school. While they collect references to
law in a number of different subjects, none of them covers the question what law
“is”
in its entirety. The newly introduced subject “Legal
Studies” may address some of these problems of identification but
it may
also add to the confusion of high school students, given the complexity of the
operation of legal systems.
The second is the work practice definition of
law rather than the academically (scientifically) developed definition of the
discipline.
This traditional definition of law as “what lawyers
do” may make the career choice easier but it still leaves in doubt
whether
this is what academically highly achieving students want to study at university,
especially since students are aware that
law is obviously more than what lawyers
do. Here the combined degree has greatly enhanced the attractiveness of studying
law at university
because it allows for a sharper focus on the particular
academic interests of high school students as forged in the institutional
setting of high schools while at the same time retaining the prospect of an
established vocational career.
The answers of the students to the question
why they wanted to study law appear to reflect this unique historical and
cultural feature
of law as an academic discipline when they, on the one hand,
rank interest as a reason highly and, on the other hand, rank the technicality
of having had a sufficiently high entry score almost as highly (Table
13).51 Here, the responses to the questionnaire
typically gloss over the more complex stories of the decision-making in the
past. These
stories are reflected more adequately by the students’ own
narratives. It emerges from such more detailed accounts, for instance,
that the
value interest is ranked so highly because this category has a different
connotation for each student with regard to their
choice; the high ranking is an
aggregate of a number of diffuse notions rather than a measurement of concrete
expectations of students.
Furthermore, the references to this value include the
reference to the combined law degree rather than to law itself. In this way,
the
interest for studying law may be subsumed under the interest for subjects
studied for the other degree in the combined degree
framework. This suspicion
that not law but something else provided the intrinsic interest for studying law
is supported by our finding
that the curricula of the law school by themselves
had practically no appeal whatsoever for the students when they decided to study
law.52 The relationship between the reasons for
studying at Sydney University with the students’ ranking of reasons
indicates that
the (academic) prestige of the University of Sydney prevails as
the dominant reason. Compared with this reason, the teaching programme
of the
law school or the prestige of the law school are less important considerations
(Table 21). We must conclude that, if there
is any enthusiasm for law as an
academic discipline in the students’ reports, it is rather muted.
Table 13: Results of Completed Law Subjects
SQ9 RESULTS OF COMPLETED COMPULSORY LAW SUBJECTS
(Final year) |
||||
|
Fail
|
Pass
|
Dist.
|
H. Dist.
|
Legal Instruction
|
0.0
|
33.3
|
13.3
|
1.7
|
Contracts
|
0.0
|
44.2
|
14.2
|
1.7
|
Torts
|
0.0
|
43.3
|
21.7
|
0.8
|
Criminal
|
0.8
|
23.5
|
20.2
|
2.5
|
Constitutional
|
4.2
|
44.2
|
11.7
|
0.8
|
Administrative
|
0.8
|
36.7
|
15.0
|
2.5
|
Real Property
|
0.8
|
37.5
|
18.3
|
0.8
|
Success & Pers Prop
|
0.0
|
37.5
|
17.5
|
5.8
|
Equity
|
0.0
|
34.2
|
11.7
|
2.5
|
Company Law
|
0.0
|
16.7
|
18.3
|
0.8
|
International
|
0.0
|
20.0
|
31.7
|
2.5
|
Evidence
|
0.0
|
14.3
|
24.4
|
3.4
|
Jurisprudence
|
0.0
|
2.5
|
0.8
|
1.7
|
N FINAL = 120
|
In summary, then, we find that law becomes an option for students not by its
intrinsic attractiveness but, above all, when the achieved
high school marks put
a legal career into reach. However, this importance which high school leavers
accord to their HSC score —
rather than to their potential career paths
— fades with the years spent in law school. First year students and last
year students
view the reasons for studying law, retrospectively, quite
differently.
While it is noteworthy that law students overall rank the value
of serving others and the community (“helping”) below
the value of
“interest” but above the value of high income to be earned by
lawyers and above the favourable employment
perspectives, it is important to
point out that this result is influenced by gender-bias in a curious way. When
correlating the ranking
of Helping with gender, we find that female students
— who represent a majority of law students in our samples (54%) —
value this reason significantly (p= 0.016) higher than male students. On closer
examination, however, this appears to be so because
women are more reluctant to
reject this value as a reason for studying law altogether: the small proportion
(only 15%)53 of female students and male students who
rank this reason as very important is exactly the same and it is never
explicitly mentioned
as a reference in the narratives established by the
interviews of either male or female students as the main reason why they choose
law.
As far as ranking of reasons is concerned, the prospects of legal
practice as a career with high income and good employment opportunities
are
highly attractive features to advocate this choice. Also in this instance,
perception more than recall appears to direct the
students’ reports of
their reasons for studying law; thus, perception changes as students make their
way through law school.
While younger students in first year law, perhaps
unrealistically, rank the value of high income higher than the value Employment
Opportunities, the older law students who approach the end of their studies have
apparently a more sober picture of their future
careers; they are more concerned
with employment opportunities rather than with high income. Also this result is
influenced by gender-bias:
while only 9% of the males rate high income as not at
all important but 32% as a somewhat important factor in their choice, 24% of
the
women report that it was not at all a factor and 15% that it was a somewhat
important factor.54 In contrast, the value Employment
Opportunities is ranked by both female and male students almost identically high
as important (somewhat
important, women: 28%, men: 27%; very important, women:
10%, men: 10%). These results are independent of the type of high school
environment from which the students come, which is further indication that the
law student population, once selected through admission
to law school, shares
largely the same values independently of the different family and, consequently,
school backgrounds. Here only
the students who come from Catholic schools appear
to differ somewhat by ranking the value of a high income as a reason to study
law higher than their peers from other schools. This observation adds to a list
of indicators which show the particular (up ward)
social mobility of this law
student population.55 It appears that it is the upward
social mobility of this group rather than the religious values which is
expressed in their instrumental
attitude toward studying law and which sets this
group of students apart from the rest of the law student population.
The
spread of ranking of the reasons for studying law is a reflection of the diffuse
picture of law which students have before their
decision to study it and which
depends, therefore, highly on more personal, almost arbitrary, circumstances.
Notably the reason that
there was nothing else which seemed to appeal at the
time rates very highly with both first year law students and older students.
It
is this default reason which transpires most clearly as the main reason for the
choice of law in the narratives:
Well, I thought I’ll do a combined degree because the fact that I wasn’t really sure what I was going to do when I left school. I thought it was the most open sort of degree in that you could branch off once you have finished.” “Actually, the day before the UCAC forms had to be in, I was going for medicine. I only changed about an hour before I was going to put it in because I thought if I did medicine I’ll be sort of following the mob and you have to be a doctor. Whilst if you do economics/law, you can sort of think about whether you want to move into economics or law (1 — 1).
It’s just mainly I think law is a fairly flexible degree and so it could be quite useful. I did my arts degree for instance. There’s such a huge emphasis you know, these days on qualifications and education. Arts degrees aren’t looked on very kindly ... (2 — 1).
If you are not an Honours student or something and if you do not do well then you’re often better off not having done it. But I still can study and I had a sort of vague interest in law, so I just decided to continue on (2 — 2).
With this view on the way in which academically
highly achieving students end up choosing to study law, it may be concluded that
if
law students are frequently seen to be colourless among their peers from
other faculties this has a lot to do with the colourlessness
of law as an
academic discipline.56
When students were asked how
they rated the quality of their information about the requirements to enter law
prior to admission to
law school, they ranked the information which they
obtained as fairly high. The quality of the information about the actual length
of studies and about the career prospects of lawyers were ranked slightly lower
(Table 14). Here older law students, who are about
to enter legal careers, find
more frequently than first year students that, retrospectively, their knowledge
about being a lawyer
was rather limited when they decided to study law.
Table 14: Information About Studying Law
SQ 8.2 4 UNIT MATHS IN HSC
|
|||||
|
First Year
|
Final Year
|
Ranking First Year
|
Ranking Final Year
|
|
Requirements
|
4.2
|
4.1
|
1
|
Requirements
|
Requirements
|
Length
|
3.4
|
3.4
|
2
|
Length
|
Length
|
Being a Lawyer
|
2.7
|
2.2
|
3
|
Being a Lawyer
|
Being a Lawyer
|
N
|
159.0
|
121.0
|
|
|
|
Primary group relations are, as mentioned earlier, fundamental for the
cognitive processes in individuals, and our data show that
predominantly
relations of this kind have provided law students with the main inputs in their
decision-making on career options.
Students accord the highest relevance to
their friends, possibly lawyer friends and parents (Table 15). As we have seen
earlier,
the perception of such a retrospective relevance of the information
which law students obtained changes with their different life-cycle
stages at
the time of being questioned. As they grow older, friends and colleague-friends
are seen to be more important and parents
less important for providing relevant
information.
Interestingly, also the media occupy a high ranking with
reference to how information was obtained. However, this should not be seen
not
as a direct impact of this information source on the students but rather as the
operation of primary relations with parents and
friends which direct, support
and mediate the interest in and the consumption of media releases on possible
legal careers and the
operation of law itself. Here, obviously, the exploitative
dramatisation of legal action, especially in the areas of criminal law
and
courtroom-drama, exercises considerable appeal also for law students.
Table 15: Quality of Sources of Information Regarding Legal Studies
SQ 19 QUALITY OF SOURCES OF INFORMATION (SCORES)
|
|||||
|
First Year
|
Final Year
|
Ranking First Year
|
Ranking Final Year
|
|
Careers Adviser
|
1.9
|
1.6
|
1
|
Friends
|
Lawyers — Friends
|
Work Experience
|
1.9
|
1.6
|
2
|
Lawyers — Friends
|
Friends
|
Friends
|
3.5
|
2.0
|
3
|
Parents
|
Media
|
Siblings
|
1.7
|
1.4
|
4
|
Media
|
Parents
|
Parents
|
2.2
|
1.8
|
5
|
Lawyers — Other
|
Lawyers — Other
|
Lawyers — Friends
|
2.4
|
2.2
|
6
|
Work Experience
|
Work Experience
|
Lawyers — Other
|
2.0
|
1.7
|
7
|
Careers Adviser
|
Careers Adviser
|
Law School
|
1.4
|
1.4
|
8
|
Siblings
|
Careers Centre
|
Careers Centre
|
1.5
|
1.5
|
9
|
Careers Centre
|
Law School
|
Media
|
2.2
|
1.9
|
10
|
Law School
|
Siblings
|
Other
|
0.3
|
0.6
|
11
|
Other
|
Other
|
N
|
159.0
|
121.0
|
|
|
|
The information obtained through contacts with lawyers generally and through
work experience takes up middle positions in the ranking
of students. This is
due to the less frequent occurrence of such events in the lives of law students
as compared with the frequent
and intensive (highly valued) contacts with
friends and parents. Contacts with formalised providers of information like
career centres
or career advisers are nominated even less frequently. This casts
some doubt on the effectiveness of such services. Most surprisingly,
however,
the law school itself receives the lowest ranking by law students as far as
providing information is concerned. This may
indicate, once more, the distance
of legal education from the life-world of high school students or even law
students. On the other
hand, the law school may be perceived as not being in a
position to provide any useful or necessary information prior to admission.
Finally, this may indicate a retributive attribution of “bad marks”
to the law school on part of the law students for
not being sufficiently present
at the market places of information for high school students or for providing
only a poor service
when students need such information most.
Overall, law
students are not different from general populations in obtaining relevant
information predominantly through informal
communication channels rather than
from formal providers of information and valuing that informally received
information higher than
the formally provided information. However, this
fundamental importance of the immediate social environment, that is,
face-to-face
relations, highlights here the particular social environment from
which these students come. This environment produces — by
the mere
frequency of social contacts with relatives or friends who are lawyers or who
know lawyers — more references to law
and legal careers for eventual law
students than exist for a general population in NSW at large. Quite in contrast,
the general population
has hardly any of such positive references to law in
operation and they avoid contact with the law, where possible,
altogether.57 The assumption that the high occurrence
of positive or friendly contacts with lawyers is a reinforcing factor for the
selective effect
of the social background in career decisions is supported when
we correlate this variable with the occupational status of the fathers
of law
students. Here 47% of the children of fathers with upper professional
occupational status but only 9% of the students with
fathers with lower
professional status, 5% of the students with fathers with entrepreneurial
occupations and 2% of the students whose
fathers are reported with the status of
a worker, rank this source of information as important and relevant for their
decision to
study law.58
What has been said above
about valued information concerning the study of law applies also to the value
which law students attach
retrospectively to the informations which they
obtained concerning a possible legal career prior to admission to law school
(Table
16). However, here information is more sharply focused on factual advice
about what lawyers do and on people who are lawyers. In
this sense, informal
contacts with relatives or friends who are lawyers aw valued highest, while also
information about legal practice
obtained through the media, with the
qualifications mentioned above, plays an important role for the decision to
study law. Further,
the contacts with lawyers in general am valued more highly
than the information obtained through the discussions with parents or
friends.
Also here formal advice obtained from official career advisers plays a minor
role, including information directly obtained
from the law school.
Table 16: Quality of Sources of Information Regarding Legal Career
SQ 20 QUALITY OF SOURCES OF INFORMATION (SCORES)
|
|||||
|
First Year
|
Final Year
|
Ranking First Year
|
Ranking Final Year
|
|
Careers Adviser
|
1.8
|
1.5
|
1
|
Lawyers — Friends
|
Lawyers — Friends
|
Work Experience
|
1.9
|
1.7
|
2
|
Media
|
Media
|
Friends
|
1.7
|
1.8
|
3
|
Lawyers — Other
|
Lawyers — Other
|
Siblings
|
1.4
|
1.4
|
4
|
Parents
|
Parents
|
Parents
|
1.9
|
1.9
|
5
|
Work Experience
|
Friends
|
Lawyers — Friends
|
2.5
|
2.2
|
6
|
Careers Adviser
|
Work Experience
|
Lawyers — Other
|
2.0
|
1.9
|
7
|
Friends
|
Law School
|
Law School
|
1.2
|
1.7
|
8
|
Siblings
|
Careers Adviser
|
Careers Centre
|
1.3
|
1.4
|
9
|
Careers Centre
|
Siblings
|
Media
|
2.0
|
2.1
|
10
|
Law School
|
Careers Centre
|
Other
|
0.4
|
0.6
|
11
|
Other
|
Other
|
N
|
159.0
|
121.0
|
|
|
|
Table 17: Same Choice if More Information Regarding Legal Studies?
SQ 21 SAME CHOICE IF MORE INFO ABOUT LAW STUDIES (%)
|
||
|
First Year (%)
|
Final Year (%)
|
YES
|
71.7
|
81.7
|
NO
|
5.0
|
3.3
|
DON’T KNOW
|
23.5
|
15.0
|
N
|
159.0
|
121.0
|
Table 18: Same Choice if More Information Regarding Legal Career?
SQ 21 SAME CHOICE IF MORE INFO ABOUT LAW STUDIES (%)
|
||
|
First Year (%)
|
Final Year (%)
|
YES
|
74.1
|
74.4
|
NO
|
3.2
|
9.1
|
DON’T KNOW
|
22.8
|
16.5
|
N
|
158.0
|
121.0
|
Finally, we have attempted to assess the adequacy of the information which
students obtained concerning law as an academic discipline
and as a professional
career respectively. Here the questionnaire asked whether students would have
made their decisions to apply
for admission to law also, or again, if they had
had more information about both law as a discipline and the legal career options
(Tables 17 and 18). Overall, law students indicate that, retrospectively, they
had sufficient information or would have made the
same decision. Only very few
feel that what they know now about law would have dissuaded them from applying
for admission if it had
been known to them then.
However, there is a
substantial number of law students, especially in first year, who are not so
sure. It is difficult to assess why
so relatively many students express a
certain uneasiness as neither correlations with academic achievement variables
nor with family
background variables return any significant differences between
those students and those who are more confident that they made the
right choice.
However, the fact that particular students in first year are unsure about the
adequacy of prior information both in
relation to law studies and the legal
career, and that a considerable number of older students indicate that they
would not have
chosen law if they had had more information earlier, seems to
point again to the role which perceptions play in cognitive adjustments
at the
time when the students report their recall. In this sense, the response of first
year students that they are unsure may mean
that they experience difficulties in
coming to terms with their legal subjects,59 while
older students experience a crisis in relation to the question what to do after
they finished their studies. So it is more
likely that this current experience
of difficulties rather than the recall directs their negative
self-report.60
Socialisation and Education the Tertiary Education Level
Tertiary Institutions other than University
Due to the present admission practices of the University of Sydney, the
great majority of law students in this law school come directly
from secondary
schools and so form the dominant law student sub-culture. Also the few students
who enter law school as a graduate
student come largely from another faculty of
the University of Sydney. Even fewer law students enter law school at
undergraduate
level after they have come through tertiary education outside the
university sector through colleges of advanced education or TAFE.
Accordingly,
the total number of students in our sample who have followed this career path is
only under 2% and too small (Table 19) to return any meaningful
quantitative results about this group of law students.
Table 19: Type of Degree
SQ3 CAT. OF ENTRY TO LAW SCHOOL
|
||
|
First Year
|
Final Year
|
Comb. Law HSC
|
88.7
|
59.2
|
Comb. Law Pre Tertiary Rec
|
9.4
|
5.0
|
S Law Graduate
|
|
26.7
|
S Law HSC
|
|
7.5
|
Other
|
1.9
|
1.7
|
N
|
159.0
|
120
|
SOCIALISATION AND EDUCATION AT UNIVERSITY LEVEL
With the elimination of a direct and exclusive enrolment in the faculty of law in 1988, only very few (8% in final year), and older, students in the law school are now not enroled in one of the combined degree courses (arts/law, economics/ law, science/law) or do not, by being admitted as graduate students, graduate from the law school with two degrees. This is, in itself, an indication of the growing intensity of the selective practices which are discussed here. The large group of students who are enroled in the combined degrees, then, sets the standards and patterns for law student socialisation experiences (89% in first year, 59% in final years). As observed above, most students of the relatively few students who are admitted as graduate students have attained their first degree in other faculties of the University of Sydney and rarely come from other universities in Sydney. Even less graduate students migrate to Sydney from universities outside of NSW or from overseas (Table 20). Graduate students differ from the combined law degree students in that they are older than the combined degree students and that they come from less affluent backgrounds.61 This basic difference makes them perceive differences between themselves and the combined degree students more acutely, even for the outside observer the differences seem to be small and insignificant.
Table 20: Entry to Institution
SQ 7.3 ENTRY TO INSTITUTION
|
||
|
First Year
|
Final Year
|
University of New South Wales
|
71.7
|
81.7
|
Macquarie University
|
5.0
|
3.3
|
University of Sydney
|
23.3
|
15.0
|
Other NSW University
|
|
|
Other Aust. University
|
|
|
Not Applicable
|
|
|
N
|
159.0
|
119.0
|
Such a different outlook of students who are admitted as graduates (p=0.0000) is reflected in their reported reason why they chose the University of Sydney for studying law. Significantly (p=0.0000), by far the most important reason reported by combined law degree students is the specific a peal of Sydney University as one of the most prestigious, if not the most prestigious university in NSW (Table 21). This supports our earlier findings of the outstanding value which resourceful families place on academic education and it puts into perspective how much value is placed by law students and their parents on a wide range of traditional academic disciplines which can be combined with the studies for a law degree. The strength of the University of Sydney is seen in providing especially this wide range of academic excellence and we can suggest that it is the more concrete institutional and prestigious image of the University as a whole which appeals to the specific population of high school students and their families rather than the diffuse image of law and legal education which is of secondary concern in the choice of preferences.
Table 21: Reasons for Studying Law at Sydney University
SQ 37 PRIMARY REASON
|
|||||
|
First Year (%)
|
Final Year (5)
|
|
Ranking First Year
|
Ranking Final Year
|
Prestige Law School
|
15.2
|
11.6
|
1
|
Prestige University`
|
Prestige University
|
Prestige University
|
44.9
|
36.4
|
2
|
Sufficient HSC
|
Offer of Place
|
Offer of Place
|
1.9
|
12.4
|
3
|
Prestige Law School
|
Prestige Law School
|
Interesting Curriculum
|
1.3
|
0.8
|
4
|
Reputation for Teaching
|
Family Tradition
|
Reputation for Teaching
|
5.7
|
5.0
|
5
|
No Particular Reason
|
Sufficient HSC
|
Convenience
|
4.4
|
7.4
|
6
|
Family Tradition
|
No Particular Reason
|
Family Tradition
|
4.4
|
9.9
|
7
|
Convenience
|
Convenience
|
Sufficient HSC
|
17.1
|
8.3
|
8
|
Offer of Place
|
Reputation for Teaching
|
No Particular Reason
|
5.1
|
8.3
|
9
|
Interesting Curriculum
|
Interesting Curriculum
|
N
|
158.0
|
121.0
|
|
|
|
In contrast, graduate students are more independent from their parents, more
pragmatic and place much less value on the prestige of
the University (25%
versus 44% of the combined degree students). They report that the m fact of
having been offered a place at the law school was, at
least, an equally
important reason far them (25% versus 3% of the combined degree students). In
addition, graduate students rank
the prestige of the law school itself as a
mason for studying law there slightly higher 116% versus 13% of the combined
degree students)
and give more clearly priority to pragmatic reasons (work hours
compatible, location compatible, travelling time compatible and so
on) than
combined degree students (16% versus 3%) in their decision to go
to the Sydney University Law School. This highlights the fact that graduate
students have progressed to stages in their life-careers
where a number of
additional concerns compete with the concern for their academic studies. Their
problems in attempting to balance
competing commitments in an environment which
prefers to ignore such problems set them most dearly apart from the combined
degree
students for whom these problems are, as yet, not so acute. This
observation is also supported by our qualitative analysis.
Degrees in
other faculties. Though all versions of the combined degree operate under
the same admission requirements, law students chose predominantly the
Arts/Law combination, or an arts degree prior to the law degree in the case of
graduate students (Tables 22 and 23).
Table 22: Combined Degree Type
SQ 6 WHAT FACULTY ENROLED IN
|
||
|
First Year
|
Final Year
|
Arts
|
48.4
|
36.7
|
Economics
|
37.6
|
27.5
|
Science
|
14.0
|
6.7
|
Not Applicable
|
—
|
29.2
|
N
|
157.0
|
129.0
|
Table 23: Graduate Degree Type
SQ7 WHAT DEGREE HELD
|
||
|
First Year
|
Final Year
|
B.A.
|
—
|
20.2
|
B.Sc
|
—
|
4.2
|
B.Ec
|
—
|
3.4
|
B.Eng
|
—
|
0.8
|
Double
|
—
|
7.5
|
Not Appl.
|
100.0
|
68.9
|
N
|
159.0
|
119.0
|
A closer examination reveals here that especially those students from
resourceful families (high occupational status of father, high
level of
educational attainment of father and mother) — who constitute the largest
group of law students in absolute numbers
— choose the arts/law degree
combination and, to a lesser extent, the science/law degree combination while
students from less
resourceful families or from families who appear to be upward
mobile tend to prefer the economics/law degree. This observation supports
our
earlier finding that access to and participation in dominant culture is not only
engineered socio-economically but also socio-culturally.
Here the study of arts
and humanities and the combined arts/law degree may play a role, more than the
study of economics and the
combined economics/law degree, to classify a specific
group of people who are aware of such links between university education and
dominant culture and can use this link to their advantage.
Another factor in
the explanation of the preference for the arts/law degree is related to gender.
Women prefer significantly (p=0.0052)
the arts/law degree (52%) over the
economics/law degree (26%) and the science/law degree (9%), while men,
conversely, prefer the
economics/law degree (42%) over the arts/law degree (32%)
and the science/law degree (13%). In the light of what has been said earlier
about the intergenerational transmission of values through mothers rather than
through fathers, this finding of an elective affinity
between women and the
dominance of the B.A. degree among women, relates both to the high incidence of
mothers with this degree reported
by the law students and to the prediction that
the female B.A./LLB students are well positioned to become powerful
communicators
of the dominant culture themselves even if this is not necessarily
reflected in the occupational status which they will eventually
attain.
Surprisingly, the difference of the type of high school from which the law
students graduate has no discernible effect on the choice
of the type of the
degree.62 Though it could be expected that especially
the curricula of independent schools predispose students for a preference for
the arts/law
degree while Catholic and non-selective schools could be seen to
cater predominantly for an upward mobile student
population63 with a preference for economics/law
degree, the data do not show such effects.
Admission to Law School
The self-reports of the law students confirm that the decision to embark on a university degree is taken relatively early in the educational plans of parents and students. In contrast, the decision to study law comes relatively late. It is this group of students with parents with a long-term commitment to a high level of educational attainment rather than with a firm preference for the particular vocational training of law who dominate the profile of Sydney University Law School students. The high demand for the combined law degree as a high educational level degree has allowed universities to peg the admission to it increasingly at the top end of selective procedures. In support of this trend, the operation of quota schemes, that is, the induction of scarcity of admission on the basis of economic student/teacher ratio calculations, has allowed universities to consolidate the status of the combined law degree as a high educational level degree. As a result, the required classification level (HSC/TER) for admission to the combined law degree has steadily increased and is reflected in the student populations in different admission years (Chart 14). Given the involved selective dynamics, pressure on the admission to the combined law degrees is set to remain high, in spite of an increase of law school places in NSW overall with the establishment of new law schools, a possible drop in average first year incomes of young lawyers with the saturation of the job market in the law firm and, especially the large law firm, sector and a steady increase of jobs in the public and administrative law sector. Overall, the pool of high level academic achievers will increase rather than decrease and the selectivity of the education system will intensify rather than slacken. Under these circumstances, it must be expected that the number of students seeking admission to a limited number of law school places will increase faster than the increase of law school places in coming years.
Chart 14: Entry Scores for Admission to Law School (HSC)
WOMEN AND ADMISSION TO LAW SCHOOL
With the intensification of the educational (selective) value of the law degree by:
the
proportion of women admitted to law school has increased steadily and
considerably. Women form now the majority of law students.
This is reflected in
our samples of the law student population (first year: 51%, final year: 57%).
Female law students differ very little in their personal and educational
profile from male students, as far as it could be ascertained
by our study. This
is largely explained by the particular bias of the law student population
towards highly resourceful families
in which the genderised upbringing of girls
is less pronounced than in less resourceful families and where there is a
stronger support
for the equality of opportunity for girls, especially through
the significantly higher proportion of mothers in these families who
have
attained high levels of formal education themselves. However, even here
socio-cultural valuations prevent a full realisation
of equality and lead to
genderised patterns of self-concept operation by women which is different from
that operated by men. Such
patterns are not visible on the level of formal
educational qualification if, as in our case, academic credentials are made the
criteria
for selection and women perform here as well or better than men; most
correlations which involve indicators of formal educational
attainment fail to
return significant differences between female and male law students. Patterns of
genderised self-concept operation
are largely communicated in more subtle forms.
The result of the operation of such genderised patterns is, for instance and as
shown,
the preference of women for the arts/law degree. However, we must assume
that such patterns operate also in many other respects such
as differences
between male and female students in degrees of self-confidence (but not
self-esteem) and assertiveness or degrees
of self-control, as informed by
pervasive traditional “nice-girl” concepts. Such more subtle but
nevertheless pervasive
patterns would also explain our earlier finding that
women rate helping as a reason to study law overall higher than men. This is
not
because female law students subscribe to the value of helping in a higher degree
than male law students. Rather, women present
themselves in their self-reports,
as overall, with a differently socialised, and so genderised, response style:
women are brought
up to be more reluctant to reject such caritative values of a
vocational career as curtly as men — qui facet consentire videtur.
FULL-TIME OR PART-TIME STUDIES AND SUPPORT DURING STUDIES
Evidently, the majority of all law students at Sydney University Law School come directly from a selective high school and from a more or less supportive family home in one of the more affluent suburbs in the Sydney metropolitan area. Their admission to university and law school coincides for most of them with considerable changes in their life-careers: students have to learn to experience themselves as independent young adults who can take charge of their own lives. The experience of adulthood, and concomitant changes in self-concept, come earlier for young adults who are not at all or not as much committed to the value of higher education as the law students and the parents of law students. For the majority of law students, however, such changes in self-concept come comparatively late. They form then an undercurrent of coping tasks which add pressure to the work load of educational tasks during the years of study. Our data show that this pressure of everyday-life coping on students increases as the years of study pass, and that there are distinctly different patterns for first year law students and older law students in the way how this coping pressure is relieved through different arrangements of support (Table 24). While, as expected, parents are the major source of support for students who come directly from high school, this supportive role of parents diminishes as students get older or come to law school as graduate students. Here, the supportive role of parents is partially replaced by the own work in paid employment, by the increased demand on grants and scholarships but also by relying more heavily on savings.
Table 24: Primary Source of Support
SQ 30 PRIMARY SOURCE OF FINANCIAL SUPPORT
|
||
|
First Year (%)
|
Final Year (%)
|
Austudy
|
7.5
|
10.3
|
Other Scholarship
|
0.6
|
0.9
|
Parents
|
52.2
|
27.4
|
Savings
|
1.3
|
2.6
|
Paid Work
|
9.4
|
35.9
|
Partner
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
Other
|
28.9
|
23.1
|
N
|
159.0
|
117.0
|
Though women in our law student sample are more frequently supported by
parents than male students (46% versus 37%), and men, conversely
report more
frequently paid work as their primary source of support then women (men: 27%,
women: 16%), the gender difference is not
big enough to be statistically
significant. Predictably, a more important difference64
is made by the occupational status of the father. Here students with fathers
with upper professional status report the highest proportion
of parental support
(51%) and a low, but not the lowest, proportion of paid work (19%), students
with fathers who are reported with
the occupational status of a worker have the
lowest proportion of parental financial support (5%) and the highest proportion
of paid
work (36%) but also by far the highest proportion of support from the
Government’s Austudy support grant scheme (23%).
For all other groups
of law students, Austudy grants are only a minor source for financial support.
The fact that the children of
fathers with managerial and entrepreneurial
occupational status resort slightly less to paid (employed) work as a source of
financial
support than the children of fathers with upper professional status
(17% 14% and 19% respectively) may indicate that “full-time”
law students who engage in paid work are motivated to do so also by other than
purely economic
considerations, such as social networking, work experience or
simply diversion in a dull course of studies. On the other hand, the
correlation
of the HSC source of financial support shows clearly65
that students with the highest HSC results (441 and over) have predominantly
parents as the source of their support (53%), while students with the
lowest HSC score (up to 401) have also the lowest degree of parental support
(14%)
and the highest proportion of Austudy support (22%). Behind the figures,
we find again the uneven distribution of the entry scores
between combined law
degree students and graduate students. This takes here the form that the
graduate, and older, law students have
the lower academic credentials which
prevent them to enter law school directly and force them to take the detour of
another degree.
Being now older and coming from less resourceful family
backgrounds than students who come directly from high school parental support
for them is much less likely than is the case for the combined law degree
students.
The increasing role of paid work, in turn, competes considerably
with the demands on time and attention paid by law students to their
studies. A
majority of all law students, and whether or not their primary source for
financial sup port is paid work, report that
they work during the semesters
(Table 25), and that their work in paid employment increases the further they
advance in their studies
at the law school.
Table 25: Current Paid Work
SQ 31 CURRENTLY IN REGULAR PAID WORK
|
||
|
First Year (%)
|
Final Year (%)
|
YES
|
55.3
|
66.1
|
NO
|
44.7
|
33.9
|
N
|
159.0
|
121.0
|
The proportion of those who report such commitments is similar for women
(61%) and for men (HI%) and not significantly related to
the occupational status
of the father. Overall, more than 50% of law students in all groups manage
somehow not only to combine regular
paid work and university studies but also to
complete their studies successfully,
The pervasiveness of this
extracurricular activity is further evident by the increase of work hours which
law students spend in those
activities away from their studies (Table 26). The
conclusion which can be drawn from these observations is that:
Table 26: Work Hours
SQ31.1 WORK HOURS
|
||
|
First Year (5)
|
Final Year (%)
|
Under 5 hours
|
24.1
|
3.7
|
5–10 hours
|
42.5
|
34.1
|
10–20 hours
|
28.7
|
47.6
|
Over 20 hours
|
4.6
|
14.6
|
N
|
87.0
|
82.0
|
This interpretation of the survey results is further supported by the
accounts which students gave about their experiences of studying
law.
The
clash of the occurrence of important life-events with the studies at law school
is further indicated by the clear increase of
household commitments of older
students (compare Tables 27 and 28). Though child-care commitments do not
constitute a significant
problem of this student population — less than 1%
report having children — it is evident that a growing number of students
establish or are committed to established living arrangements of some form or
other with another person or a number of other persons
away from the family
home; formally, only a small number of students are married or marry at this
stage of their life-careers. Law
students are also reluctant to call these
interpersonal relationships, where they exist, engagements or de facto
marriages (Table
27). Women report a higher household commitment than men
(45% vs. 30%) but this difference is not statistically significant. Similarly,
women and men report their marital status in equal proportions (single: 91%;
married women: 4%, married men: 6%). As follows from the discussion
above, and as predicted by family studies literature, students with fathers with
the occupational status
of a worker report a slightly higher marriage rate than
any other group of students (13% vs. upper professional: 4%, upper services:
6%,
managerial: 7%, entrepreneurial: 2%). However, as far as our sample of law
students is concerned, this result is not statistically
significant due to the
very small number of students with that family background in our sample.
Furthermore, it is likely that the
higher proportion of married students in the
group of less resourceful families is more related to the fact, which was
observed earlier,
that a higher number of older students come from that
background, and that it is age rather than a demonstrable inclination to marry
early which produces the observed difference.
Table 27: Household-/Child Care Commitments
SQ 32 HOUSEHOLD-CHILD CARE COMMITMENTS
|
||
|
First Year (%)
|
Final Year (%)
|
YES
|
29.5
|
50.4
|
NO
|
70.5
|
49.6
|
N
|
159.0
|
117.0
|
Table 28: Work Hours Home Duties
SQ 32.1 WORK HOURS
|
||
|
First Year (%)
|
Final Year (%)
|
Under 5 hours
|
56.5
|
15.3
|
5–10 hours
|
32.6
|
61.0
|
10–20 hours
|
6.5
|
16.9
|
Over 20 hours
|
4.3
|
6.8
|
N
|
46.0
|
59.0
|
Table 29: Status
SQ 33 STATUS
|
|
|
|
First Year (%)
|
Final Year (%)
|
Single
|
99.4
|
80.2
|
Engaged
|
0.0
|
4.1
|
De Facto
|
0.0
|
4.1
|
Married
|
0.6
|
11.6
|
N
|
159.0
|
121.0
|
THE EXPERIENCE OF STUDYING LAW
Our in-depth interviews allow us to elaborate on
the responses in the survey in relation to the conditions of studying at
law school and to add the students’ point of view to our
interpretations. Overall, students seem to agree with the way in which work
practices in the admission to law school operate,
at least to the degree that
they are not deterred to do everything again in the same way if they were faced
with that decision again.
However, such a verdict does not necessarily allow the
conclusion that law school operations are perfect. Rather, it appears that
above
all the assessment of the quality of studying law is informed by a feeling of
resigned fatalism on part of the law students.
Studying at the law school
has to be endured, rather than that it can be enjoyed, as a m n s to the end of
a successful, remunerative
career in the legal profession. As such, the peculiar
quality of studying law is tolerated as a rite of passage which constitutes
only
a stepping stone for the life after law school without much intrinsic value as
an academic activity:
I’ve never really applied myself as much as I did in my honours years [in arts]. I’ve just tried to perfect the technique of getting reasonable marks ... I thought it was quite shallow (22 — B8).
I don’t like the subject [law]. I think its emphasis on law and exceptions to that sort of thing ..on a philosophical level ... takes away from the humanity of law... Instead you get the ridiculously complicated set of laws that work out where it goes. So I think on that level I don’t like the formalism (6 — B8).
I think here is an over-emphasis on cramming for exams ... I think that’s got to be a bad thing because you forget everything so quickly when you cram for exams (23 — B8).
The other strong impression I get is that [law is a difficult subject] is simply not true but is a myth which makes you feel that there is something quite behind it. Because you can get away with a minimal amount of study and I mean last year with the help of friends I did not attend class, I just read their notes and sat for the exam and got through and I am not the only one (7 — B8).
I think the biggest thing about my experience of studying law is that I had to work 2–3 days a week throughout my law degree and that made it very difficult because none of the lecturers had really time for people who have to go [to work] in the evening. So it just meant I missed a high proportion of lectures. It just made it a real hard work. And I think it’s unrealistic to think that people can’t and don’t do it because I know people who have done law and have never gone to one lecture because they have been working full-time. So that really strikes me, the sort of the unreality of expecting people not to work and the unreality of expecting people to do it full time (8 — B8).
This clash of different levels of the operation of law school practices is, as we have seen, the result of the congruence of everyday-life coping and studying which is particularly problematic for specific groups of students:
It’s been like learning in a vacuum. I can’t speak for undergraduates [i.e. non-graduates] here. Most graduates here hate it. We were just talking about it downstairs and most people hate and loath this law school. Well, I think there is a big difference between people who have just come from school and graduates. The problems that graduates are going to face aren’t really catered for ... I don’t think in the structure of the course. The chief one being financial. There’s virtually no leniency or room for work for instance. They don’t structure the course so that you can have a day off in the week. And if you have to work, then it is just tough ... (2 — B8).
Again, the other thing about my study is that being an older student I had a lot of outside study commitments that I’ve to deal with and I had mixed reactions from the law school about that ... I remember going to the Dean and saying [what was] happening ... . And he was terribly sympathetic until I said on top of that I was working and then .. the shield came down and he was no longer assertive and said University had a policy that students aren’t to work. And I guess I feel bitter about that still (7 — B8).
Nevertheless law students, being well educated and polite people, are quick to point out redeeming aspects and explanations for their experience of studying at the law school:
Some of the courses I think are a little on the dull side but you’re bound to strike that for anything. Some have been good, some are well thought, some, I think perhaps I think are lacking a little. Some have been a little organised, we’ve been given a little run around, though it’s not typical and I guess to some extent it can be due to all sorts of factors (3 — M).
I think one of the positive effect it had is that it made me think a little bit more logically whereas before ..it was very much sort of all English and history and stuff and law has made me sort of think a little bit more step by step ... that sort of thing. So on that level, I suppose, it has been good (6 — M).
The first three years were basically a non-experience in studying law which was quite stressful. But only after when the results came back, since then I’ve found it very interesting as a body of theory and applied theory (10 — B8).
The first few years I didn’t really feel like I was studying law because I was doing my other degree mainly. I remember in legal institutions we always had materials to read and we were sort of bamboozled in the kind of language. It took us a while to get used to the style of mainly the reading material that we have to go through and also the whole process I think is somewhat different. It takes a while to get into the flow of it (24 — B8).
Good and bad. I found it at first very difficult to fit into the legal way of thinking, coming from arts. I suppose, I just naturally lean towards discussing rather than learning rules and being able to put them down and actually utilise them which is what law is all about. First I found that difficult. Now, I am actually seeing the way it is and I’m working with it. I quite enjoy that as well (26 — B8).
Many students, however, are quite fond of their law school experience:
It’s been interesting, it drags on a little bit but it’s quite interesting, different, yeah (1 — B8).
Generally pretty good. It has been very intensive the last of this year and last year particularly. I think to start with we saw very little of the law, particularly in the first two years, that was only a small percentage of the course I was doing and I didn’t really do much law at all. Generally, it’s been good (3 — B8). Well, I have really enjoyed it. Apart from the very first subject I had.. . (4 — B8).
On a wider scale, I’ve enjoyed most of my time here a lot. I don’t like first year for the same reasons no one likes first year. But since then, I think, I am really happy with the whole social set-up and that sort of thing (6 — B).
I think it has given me a lot of satisfaction and it has certainly focussed the direction of the very important areas which is going to make my family life sort of more balanced. Overall, [the law school experience] would be good (7 — B).
So far it’s very interesting and enjoyable. I find that with the semester system the subjects are concentrated in one semester, so wk have a better grasp of what we are doing (25 — B8).
I enjoy it. I actually enjoy the law. For me part of the problem would be to adjust to the fact that a lot of legal practice has nothing to do with the law in the substantial sense. For me it was always an interesting and challenging subject area in itself (28 — B8).
EXPECTED CAREERS
The law students who are admitted to Sydney
University Law School in the particular way which has been discussed here rank
the legal
practice in one of the big city law firms as their preferred option
for the career after graduation from law school. This option
is ranked highest
both by first year law students and by the more experienced students (Table 30)
and by both female and male students.
The gender difference noted here —
women: 26% and men: 38% — is considerable but not statistically
significant. Overall,
the option of legal practice as a private practice could
also be seen as the underlying rationale for the legal education curriculum;
it
is, therefore, not surprising that law students rank this career option highest.
However, also here students adjust their preferences according to their
perceptions of the current situation as they progress with
their studies. Older
students are increasingly ranking the corporate law firm as their preferred
option and abandon the idea of practicing
law as a self-employed single
practitioner, probably as a result of accumulating more information about the
different career options.
Overall, however, there is a considerable distance
between the first rank of preferred legal career options (legal practice in a
city law farm) and the next options (legal practice self-employed, lawyer
employed by a business firm respectively) in the valuation
of law students.
Notably, all three top rankings refer to legal practice in the private sector.
This underlines the specific way
in which the operation of the legal system is
perceived, taught and learned in legal education organisations which are based
on the
English common law tradition.67
Table 30. Expected Career
SQ 24 LIFE AFTER THE LAW DEGREE
|
|||||
|
First Year (%)
|
Final Year (%)
|
Ranking First Year
|
Ranking Final Year
|
|
Private Practice, SE
|
35.0
|
25.8
|
1
|
Private Practice, Firm
|
Prestige University
|
Private Practice, Firm
|
60.4
|
68.3
|
2
|
Private Enterprise, Firm
|
Offer of Place
|
Private Enterprise, SE
|
14.0
|
14.2
|
3
|
Public Practice, SE
|
Prestige Law School
|
Private Enterprise, Firm
|
30.6
|
29.2
|
4
|
Public Service, Law
|
Family Tradition
|
Public Service, Law
|
29.3
|
25.0
|
5
|
Community Work
|
Sufficient HSC
|
Public Service, Non-Law
|
9.6
|
13.3
|
6
|
Private Enterprise, SE
|
No Particular Reason
|
Community Work
|
20.4
|
21.7
|
7
|
Public Service, Non-Law
|
Convenience
|
Teaching, Secondary
|
5.7
|
4.2
|
8
|
Teaching, Tertiary
|
Reputation for Teaching
|
Teaching, TAFE
|
2.5
|
2.5
|
9
|
Other
|
Interesting Curriculum
|
Teaching, Tertiary
|
4.5
|
13.3
|
10
|
No Plans
|
|
No Plans
|
17.2
|
9.2
|
11
|
Teaching, Secondary
|
|
Other
|
13.5
|
12.5
|
12
|
Teaching, TAFE
|
|
N
|
157.0
|
120.0
|
|
|
|
Consistently with this, also the definition of community work — ranked
fifth as a career option by both first year law students
and older students
— is seen by the law students as a form of private legal practice for a
particularly deserving clientele.
While a wide majority of the students do not
nominate this option, a significant number of female students (30% as against
11% male
students; p=0.0002) see this field as a career option. In view of our
earlier finding that female students do not support caritative
values
significantly more than male students, we can expect that such a clearly
gendered pattern is related to a realistic perception
of the female law students
of their chances on the job market and so to an adjustment of their career
aspirations to that perception.
However, the relatively few students, including
women, who have stated that helping others was a somewhat or a very important
reason
for them to study law, are clearly also those who rank the community
service highly; we find here a strong (p=0.0000) positive relation
between these
two measurements of students’ self-concepts. We must, therefore, assume
that this career option is not only an
adjustment of perceptions but also a
consistently followed career path, particularly for female law students.
We
could expect that the clear preference for private legal practice of law
students is positively related to the socioeconomic status
of the families from
which they come. However, such an assumption is not supported by the data. They
do not show any statistically
significant difference in the pattern of career
preferences in the different groups of students in relation to the occupational
status
of their fathers. A remarkable exception are the students with fathers
with the occupational status of worker who report the lowest
commitment to
community legal work of all groups. This indicates, at least, that the
socialisation at law school — but not
necessarily the education there
— facilitates the transmission of traditional values regarding legal
career options and promotes
upward mobility values in those comparatively few
students from lower middle class families who manage to gain admission to law
school.
All these values centre around private enterprise in contrast, for
instance, to the promotion of the public good through a public
service career,
including academic careers in teaching and research. A socialisation of this
type in the educational environment
of law schools is the legacy of the medieval
constitution of (common) law as a professional enterprise rather than as a
public concern.
CONCLUSION
The self-reports of the law students reveal a
peculiar tension between the academic aspirations and achievements which brought
students
into law school, on the one side, and the reality of an academically
relatively uninspiring curriculum which they find there, on
the other side. This
tension manifests itself in a high degree of dissatisfaction with the formal and
curricular aspects of studying
law and, above all, in a high degree of
extracurricular activities by law students which are not only instigated by
economic needs.
We have tried to explain this tension as a conflict between the
operations of the law school as a trade school and as an academic
tertiary
education organisation, with both having their different — and divergent
— objectives. In this conflict, the
law school has the gatekeeper function
in the process of the structural coupling of the economic system, here largely
the legal profession,
with the education system, here largely the university.
This process has tied the access to legal careers to long, and because of
that,
highly selective, educational and academic career-paths. This has lifted
studying law to requested levels of educational attainment
which are out of
reach for most school leavers in NSW but a few lucky ones. As our observations
have shown, and as far as law as
an academic discipline is concerned, this
process is not driven by any intrinsic need for or any actual improvement of the
quality
of education but by the intensification and differentiation of
educational selection. The combined law degree is the prototypical
result of
such a process. The requirements for admission to this degree have ensured that
the law school, and legal practice, recruit
students who come, almost
exclusively, from the highest achieving student population in the state. As it
happens, this is also the
socially most narrow selection of students in the
state.
The observed processes are complex and historically, economically and
culturally deeply entrenched in the society of NSW. Any attempt
to unsettle or
to reverse them appear to be fanciful. Not any one actor or group of actors can
achieve change unilaterally and without
getting severely hurt in the process.
The conclusion of our study must be that admission policy can only be made
by political means. It must set out goals boldly, and it
must promote procedures
for goal-achievement on many levels. As far as admission to law school is
concerned, a bench-mark will be
here to give aspiring students a chance which is
at least as equitable as the lottery mentioned at the beginning. The approach of
a ballot, especially if modified in form of a staggered ballot which honours
achievement, is not only less systematically unfair
than present admission
practices, it is also feasible.68 The law school, in
turn, would have to re-draft its curricula, rethink the warped concept of
full-time studies and set its own agenda
of modern, both technical and
contextual legal education rather than to ride on the back of well-established
but, as far as understanding
the operation of law is concerned, irrelevant arts,
economics and science courses. In view of the self-reports of the law students,
as canvassed in this study, also this re-thinking of the academic operations of
law schools beyond admission practices would not
be a bad thing.
* Sydney University Law School.
© 1992. (1992) 3 Legal Educ
Review 155.
1 Though the author takes full and sole responsibility for the research as conducted, interpreted and presented in the following report, I gratefully acknowledge that the underlying study is a collective effort. The questionnaire for this survey was compiled and designed by Hilary Astor, Patrick Parkinson, Julie Stubbs and KA Ziegert; Research Assistant Lynne Barnes carried out the coding and processing of the data with SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences). The ethnographic interview guideline was designed by Don Rothwell and KA Ziegert, who, together with Lynne Barnes, were also responsible for conducting and recoding the interviews. Angelita Smith transcribed the many hours of narratives patiently and aptly from the tape recordings to computer readable format. The research for this study was funded by the Law Foundation of New South Wales.
2 Scientific research accepts today that the measurement of scientific “truth” or “knowledge” is the created consensus of the scientific community rather than a discovered objective reality. Compare Y Lavee & DC Dollahite, The Linkage Between Theory and Research in Family Science (1991) 53 J Marriage & Fam 361, at 361.
3 For the most recent excellent summary of the research, see D Anderson, Access to University Education in Australia 1852–1990: Changes in the Undergraduate Social Mix (1990) 33 Aust U Rev 37; for Norway and Scandinavia, see M Nordli Hansen & E Rogg, Höyere utdanning i Norge. Rekruttering, finansiering og umfodeling (Tertiary Education in Norway. Recruitment, Budgeting and Redistribution) (1991) 32 Tidsskrift for Samfunnsosrkning 387.
4 In Australia notably the dropping of tuition fees by the Whitlam government in 1974. See Anderson, supra note 3, at 42, 43.
5 This is seen most clearly in the wake of the squeeze on government expenditure on education in Australia and other Western societies in the 1980s. See Anderson, supra note 3, at 44.
6 Even societies which have targeted the value of social equality centrally in their political programs like Sweden, Poland or the USSR have had, by a number of different historical factors, surprisingly little success in varying the social mix of their university undergraduate entrants. For Sweden and (communist) Poland, see Anderson, supra note 3, at 46–47; for the USSR, see ME Ruban et al, Wandel der Arkits- und Lebensbedingungen in der Sowjetunion 1955–1980. Planziele und Ergebnisse im Spiegel sozialer Indikatoren (Social Change of the Working and Living Conditions in the USSR 1955–1980. Planned Targets and Outcomes in the Light of Social Indicators) (Frankfurt: Campus, 1983) 149.
7 Anderson, supra note 3, at 42.
8 The equal access of women to higher education will be qualified further in the following discussion with reference to law students. For an historical account of the access of women to legal education see A Sachs & J Hoff Wilson, Sexism and the Law. A Study of Male Beliefs and Judicial Bias (Oxford: Martin Robertson, 1978). To date, women studying at Australian law schools represent about 50% or more of the students. It is another matter that the legal profession evidently does not recruit female law graduates in the same proportions as male students and that female law students adjust their self-concepts accordingly.
9 AI Abdelrahman & SF Morgan, Socio-economic and Institutional Correlates of Family Formation in Khartoum, 1945–75 (1987) 49 J Marriage &. Fam 49–52; O Albornoz, Education and Development Revisited: a Sociological Perspective (1989) 4 Int Soc’y 273.
10 Here the objective was to report quickly on the ramifications of a possible change in admission policy of one particular law school (University of Sydney) based on a fairly broadly based interest of faculty in the demographic and educational profile of law students. This allowed for only a limited research exercise with respect to lead-in time and the human resources available for conducting the research notwithstanding the substantial funding by the Law Foundation of New South Wales.
11 For instance, Lavee and Dollahite state: “The goal of producing a better consensual knowledge base — not just for the sake of knowledge, but knowledge that will provide a more valid basis for intervention and action — will be facilitated by an explicit reference to theory in research reports. It is theory that gives meaning to research findings, and it is theory that enables the development of systematic consensual explanation of [social] phenomena.” Levee & Dollahite, supra note 2, at 370.
12 N Luhmann, Soziale System. Grundriss einer allgemeinen Theme (Social Systems. Outline of a General Theory) (Frankfurt; Suhrkamp, 1984). Applications to socio-legal research, family studies and legal education research are discussed in KA Ziegert, The Impossible Task of Teaching Law: Legal Education in Operation (1988) 5 Tidskrift für Rättssocidogi 183.
13 The terms socialisation and education cannot be used interchangeably as they denote different things. N Luhmann, Strukturelle Defizite. Bemerkungen zur sysfernfheorefischen Analyse des Erziehungmsens (Structural Deficits. Remarks on a Systems Theory Analysis of Education) in J Oelkers et al, eds, Pädagogik, Erziehungswissenschaft und Systemtheorie, (Weinheh Beltz, 1987) 57–75; Ziegert, supra note 12. Socialisation can be defined as the ensemble of cognitive processes of adaptation of the personal system (learning) which are operated by every individual, and only that individual, all of the time. Education, on the other hand, is the intentionalised (organised) attempt to mobilise socialisation processes for particular purposes as directly defined by the educational organisations (kindergarten, schools, universities, etc.) and indirectly defined by political organisation (religious organisations, the economic sector, state, etc.). However, such educative attempts need socialisation to work congruently in order to be successful. In this sense, education needs individuals to mobilise their socialisation processes, or in other words, their active participation in the organisation of education. Clearly, such a participation cannot be taken for granted. It is entirely controlled internally by the personal system of a given individual and only poorly affected (enticed, manipulated, stimulated and so on) from outside (the education system/ environment). The individual may or may not become “educated” in the process but will become definitely socialised in the process, for example, to avoid participation in educative organisation where such participation would affect the self-concept adversely, or to accept participation where it promotes the self-concept.
14 Social structure here means everything that can be communicated interpersonally (socially) from one individual or a number of individuals to another or other individuals in such an effective way that it affects the cognitive operations of that other individual or those other individuals. Social action and organisation, in turn, are entirely and only constituted by communication.
15 This is the consensual knowledge in socialisation research. M Hansen, Sosiale utdanningsforskjeller. Hvordan er det blitt forklart? Hvordan bör de forklares? (Social Differentiation in Education. How Has it Been Explained? How Should one Explain It?) (1986) 1 Tidsskrift for Samfunnsforskning 3; CL Cappell & RM Pipkin, The Inside Tracks. Status Distinctions in Allocations to Elite Law Schools, in PW Kingston & LS Lewis eds, The High-Status Track. Studies of Elite Schools and Stratification (New York: State University of New York Press, 1990) 211–230; Ziegert supra note 12. However this knowledge is not at all or insufficiently reflected in the literature on the methodology of teaching. On the methodologies of teaching, see generally P Ramsden, Learning to Teach in Higher Education (London: Routledge, 1992).
16 FG Castles, The Politics of Economic Vulnerability: A Comparison of Australia and Sweden (1987) 30 Acta Sociologica 271.
17 N Luhmann, Verfassung als evolutionare Errungenschaft (The Constitution as an Evolutionary Achievement) (1990) 9 Rechtshistorisches Journal 176; KA Ziegert, Courts and the Self-Concept of Law. The Mapping of the Environment by Courts of First Instance (1992) Syd L Rev (forthcoming).
18 The most common case, as far as legal education is concerned is the issue of what is considered to be “core” or “compulsory” subjects for a law degree. In this issue legal practice, guided by economic exigencies, and advanced legal education at university, guided by academic insights, often differ. Autonomy of both systems is, generally, preserved by differentiation of the degree structure, that is a widening of the choice of courses and certificates.
19 Notably, this applies only to the (historically, English medieval) common law tradition with its strong emphasis on legal practice as a private enterprise. In European continental law, universities have been traditionally dominant in legal education, significantly with the emphasis on turning out academic lawyers, judges and (public) administrative lawyers. Ziegert, supra note 12.
20 Anderson, supra note 3.
21 Primary groups are groups for the factual arrangement of stable face-to-face relationships which facilitate interpersonal communication on an on-going basis, and only that, in turn, allows for the attainment of social skills and self-concept formation. The definition of primary groups in traditional terms (the family as a married heterosexual couple with child/children) is irrelevant as far as socialisation is concerned.
22 PR Arnato & G Ochiltree, Family Resources and the Development of Child Competence (1986) 48 J Marriage & Fam 47; PR Amato, Children in Australian Families. The Growth of Competence (Sydney: Prentice Hall, 1987).
23 Even if childhood socialisation experiences are of fundamental importance for the structure of personal systems, the concept of socialisation presented here makes the point that adjustment (restructuring) of the personal system takes place all the time, but then only within the limits set by the historically acquired structures of the personal system This observation of a high degree of adaptability of even traumatised children is supported by the most recent family research. See M Kline, JR Johnston, & JM Tschann, The Long Shadow of Marital Conflict: a Model of Children’s Postdivorce Adjustment (1991) 53 J Marriage & Fam 297.
24 Compare supra note 13. For example, a truant child learns (meaning, becomes socialised) to refuse education or to rebel against external attempts of manipulation.
25 Though it is possible to draw a classificatory distinction between private school types (so, for instance, the Australian Bureau of Statistics, Yearbook 1988 (Canberra: AGPS, 1988) 422 distinguishes Anglican, Catholic, Other) and even between different types of Catholic schools, the important structural difference is here between the (public) community school and an intentional detour from it by adherence to particularistic (undemocratic) values. The data in the following demonstrate this significant divide and its most severe impact on the political culture in NSW and Australia.
26 This eagerness on the part of faculties to certificate has not so much education in mind but economic rationalism At the same time it points to the dilemma of the structural coupling of education with the economic system: the more an educational organisation panders to economic interests (for instance, in order to attract fee-paying students, by an inflation of certification), the more it loses its autonomy. This loss of autonomy is reflected by a loss of the academic prestige which is conferred exclusively by the academic community at large (and not b the economic system). The diminishing prestige of an educational organisation, in turn, makes it lose its attraction for economic interests by the devaluation of the certificates that this organisation can issue.
27 It is tempting to see the faculties of medicine as in a similar situation. However, it is important to note here that the professional training of medical doctors, riding on the back of the natural sciences, is far more specialised (differentiated) than legal education which makes a direct link with the medical profession and faculties of medicine much less pronounced.
28 The following account will show that in spite of this homogeneity of the law student population differentiating processes can be observed, even if observed differences remain generally small or statistically not significant. This general finding implies also that educational attempts to certify relatively large differences in the academic attainment within this population (by specific assessment procedures and order of merits lists) are, typically, artifacts which reflect more on the educational organisation of legal education and its operators (that is, the law teachers and the specific assessment regimes of law faculties) than on the achievement of understanding specific course contents on part of the students.
29 Data were collected from August 1990 to October 1990.
30 The questionnaires were distributed and filled out in class during term time with a 100% return rate.
31 Here a random number (every 7th student up to 100) of students were drawn from the Registrar’s record and invited by letter to participate in the study. Of the 100 students addressed, 33 volunteered to participate and were interviewed. Interviews lasted from 30 minutes to one how and were recorded on audiotape, transcribed verbatim but only partly evaluated as far as this report is concerned.
32 V & ML Schwalbe, Parental Behaviour and Adolescent Self- Esteem (1986) 48 J Marriage & Fam 47; P Amato, Psychological Distress and the Recall of Childhood Family Characteristics (1991) 53 J Marriage & Fam 1011.
33 Amato, supra note 32, at 1018.
34 J Lobdell & D Perlman, The Intergenerational Transmission of Loneliness: a Study of College Females and Their Parents (1986) 48 1 Marriage & Fam 589; Amato, supra note 32; DB Kandel, Parenting Styles, Drug Use, and Children’s Adjustment in Families of Young Adults (1990) 52 1 Marriage & Fam 183.
35 It is important to note that we refer, in the following, to such an accumulation of the interdependence of economic and cultural capital where we refer to “resourceful families”.
36 Australian Bureau of Statistics, supra note 25, at 301.
37 Australian Bureau of Statistics, supra note 25, at 298.
38 Here it is also remarkable, and supports the argument of homogamic patterns of family constitution further, especially in families which. cope well, that the differences in the levels of educational attainment between the mothers and fathers of law students are much smaller than the differences between the educational attainment levels of men and women in the general population.
39 A measure for the relationship of access to dominant culture and high level resourcefulness in families could be the correlation between the variables of father’s occupation and country of birth. Here our data show that all fathers of law students with the highest occupational status (upper professional, upper services) are reported to have been born in Australia or in countries with Anglo-Saxon culture. However, the proportion of fathers of law students who have been born in countries with other than Anglo-Saxon culture is so small that this result is not statistically significant.
40 With reference to this socio-cultural variable, the self-selection of law students appears to be in contrast to the self-selection of medicine students even though both groups face similarly high admission requirements and together form the pool of high academic achievers. A recent student survey in the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Sydney has found a considerably higher rate of students from non-English speaking family backgrounds than our study of law students. Furthermore, the study of medicine students has revealed frequently poor (English) language skills in students from non-English speaking backgrounds. This clear difference between the two student populations (With the same levels of high school performance) could be explained by the preference for natural science subjects (which do not link to dominant culture) by secondary school students who want to study medicine versus preference given to humanities (English, history — which link to dominant culture) by future law students. Such an explanation is supported by our findings on the choice of subjects of law students in secondary schools but also by our interviews where students frequently referred explicitly to their quandary with the choice between medicine or law in a situation where they had achieved sufficiently high secondary school results to enter either medicine or law. Eventually, law was preferred because of strong performances in English, debating, history and languages. Typically students would state: “I think because I was reasonable at debating and sort of standing up and talking that people presupposed that law and banisters in particular was the way to go [for me] ... and the fad that I didn’t really want to do much else.”
41 Because availability and access to information before entering law school are more complex events than the rather more objective family variables discussed earlier, recall by students here is much more likely to be biased by their current situation and the mental state of the student at the time of the survey and the interview. The results must, therefore, be interpreted with caution.
42 It can be argued further that, in fact, also non-selective schools can be shown to operate selectively through their local setting in socioeconomically segregated areas in Sydney from which their students are drawn. Here secondary schools which are situated in more affluent suburban settings have, overall, higher performance levels resulting in higher numbers of students from these public schools to be admitted to the law degree than from public schools in less affluent settings.
43 Cappell and Pipkin find in their study of admission to elite law schools in the U.S.A. that the by far most reliable predictor variable for being admitted to an elite law school is “academic credentials”, that is, educational classification. Cappell & Pipkin, supra note 15. This corresponds, on a nation-wide level, to the state-wide operation of a tertiary entry score in N.S.W., that is, in the U.S and here a measurement of institutional selection practices and only in relation to that a measurement of individual achievement.
44 The rates for graduate students from selective state schools, Catholic schools and independent schools are 16%, 13% and 4% respectively.
45 Calculations in order to obtain three groups of fairly similar size are based on the 1986 ABS census data which provide an account of income per individual per suburb. The socio-economic level of a suburb was classified “low”, “medium”, and “high” when the percentage of incomes of $36,000 and above per individual were up to 0.8%, between 0.9% and 4.6%, and over 4.6% respectively.
46 Residency was reported through postal code only. Where postal code areas and ABS local areas did not match, researchers used their local knowledge to classify the socio-economic status of the residential am.
47 These measurements are significant for mothers (chi-square 32.26, p) but not for fathers.
48 Chi square 35.61, p=0.0012
49 An intriguing finding is hem also that only “Modern History” is significantly (p=0.0003) more frequently chosen by students who lived in the socio-economically less affluent suburbs of Sydney when they were in year 12; all other subjects appear to be taken proportionately to the same extent by all groups of students. No apparent explanation could be found for this observation.
50 For similarities between the profiles of law students and medicine students respectively, compare supra note 40.
51 Also here recall is evidently problematic and informed by the current situation at the time of the survey: the importance of the reason “sufficient marks” fades from memory with the final year students and so becomes less prominent in their ranking of reasons for studying law, while “employment” moves up in importance with them, which is less important for those students who have just started law school.
52 Only 3 out of 273 students (1%) nominated this category (compare Table 21).
53 10% of the women, but 24% of the men find this reason not at all important, 13% and 29% of the women find it of little importance and important respectively (10% and 33% of the men respectively). However, the few students, women included, who find “helping” an important or very important reason to study law, are particularly committed to this value and would choose community service also as a legal career option.
54 These measurements are statistically highly significant (p=0.0002).
55 High income not at all important: non-selective state schools — 16%, Catholic — 9%, independent — 21%; important: non-selective state — 35 %, Catholic — 42%, independent — 36%; somewhat important: non-selective state — 24%, Catholic — 28%, independent — 21%. In contrast to Sydney University Law School, where Catholic students are overrepresented and a consistently growing group over the last decade, Catholic students are underrepresented in the admission to U.S. elite law schools. Cappell & Pipkin, supra note 15.
56 See also the small appeal of the particular law school and no appeal of the law school curriculum in the ranking of reasons why the law students chose the University of Sydney for their studies (compare Table 21).
57 KA Ziegert, Legal Impact in Australia and Sweden: The Diffuse Law Concept, paper presented at the 25th Annual Meeting of the Law and Society Association, Madison, Wisconsin, 1989.
58 Statistically, this measurement is moderately significant (p=0.0205).
59 This is above all reflected in our interviews with the final year students who report almost unanimously that the first year of their law study was the most difficult for them
60 Amato, supra note 32.
61 The correlation between the type of the degree and the socio-economic level of the residential area where students lived in the last year of high school (year 12) shows significantly ( =0.0005) that 82% and 84% of those students who lived in residential areas with a high or medium socio-economic level but only 60% of students who lived in a residential area with low socio-economic level were enrolled in one of the combined degree courses. Conversely, 15% here were enrolled in a graduate law course while only 7% and 8% of the students who lived in a residential area with medium and high socio- economic level respectively were admitted as graduate students.
62 Neither has the type of school any effect on the gender distribution which then could affect the choice of degree type, for instance, in the form that a majority of women comes through independent schools and enrol in the arts/law degree. Though the proportion of women per type of high school is biased towards less costly (meaning. less selective) education for women compared with males, however this difference is not statistically significant. In both cases most students come from independent schools (36% female and 46% male) and least likely from non-selective schools (24% female and 19% male), with Catholic schools, as usual, in a middle position (24% female and 25% male).
63 We can assume this on the basis of the observation that, as far as selective schools are concerned, most law students who report the occupational status of their fathers as workers, have graduated from Catholic schools (35%). However, there are more law students with a father reported as worker who come from non-selective (public) schools (44%). Conversely, only 20% of law students with fathers with upper professional status come from Catholic schools, while 54% come from independent schools and only 16% come from nonselective schools.
64 This difference is significant on the p level.
65 This correlation is highly significant (p=0.0000).
66 These are the normative prescription of a large number of compulsory subjects, the sequence in which the compulsory subjects must be taken. and of an upper limit of the number of units which students are allowed to take per year. This regulatory framework masquerading as educative prerequisites, is constituted by work practices which protect the law school organisation and staff from any pressure of internal competition and rapid change.
67 This is in clear contrast to the legal education in continental European legal systems which primarily qualify students to judicial and public service, including academic careers. Students’ career choices are here reversed, with the public service career as the most preferred choice and the private legal practice as a less preferred option.
68 WKB Hofstee, The Case for Compromise in Educational Selection and Grading, in SB Anderson & JS Helmick eds, On Educational Testing (San Francisco: Josey Bass, 1983) 109.
AustLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/LegEdRev/1992/7.html