Editors --- "Corrigendum" [2018] SydLawRw 23; (2018) 40(4) Sydney Law Review 571

---

CORRIGENDUM

Date issued: 30 November 2018

Change to: Volume 40 Number 3 September 2018 issue since the original version was published, due to a typographical error.

Article: Thomas Crofts, ‘Prosecuting Child Offenders: Factors Relevant to Rebutting the Presumption of Doli Incapax’ [2018] SydLawRw 13; (2018) 40(3) Sydney Law Review 339.

Page 341: For the sentence on page 341 accompanying n 14, deletion of ‘criminal code act’ so that the sentence reads:

The rebuttable presumption of doli incapax for children aged 10 but not yet 14 remains a common law presumption in New South Wales (‘NSW’), South Australia and Victoria despite a 1997 recommendation that the presumption should be

retained and placed on a statutory footing in all Australian jurisdictions.^[14]

---

^[14] Australian Law Reform Commission and Human Rights and Equal Opportunities Commission, above n 6, [18.20].