Editors --- "Table of key cases" [2008] SydUPLawBk 5; in Fitzgerald, Brian; Gao, Fuping; O'Brien, Damien; Shi, Sampsung Xiaoxiang (eds), "Copyright Law, Digital Content and the Internet in the Asia-Pacific" (Sydney University Press, 2008) xi

• Australia
• Hong Kong
• People’s Republic of China
• Singapore
• United States

---

Table of Key Cases

Australia

Cooper v Universal Music Australia Pty Ltd [2006] FCAFC 187	230
Dow Jones and Company Inc v Gutnick [2002] CLR 575	394,398–401,403
Stevens v Kabushiki Kaisha Sony Computer Entertainment [2005] HCA 58; (2005) 224 CLR 193	184,352
Universal Music Australia Pty Ltd v Cooper [2005] FCA 972	212,230
Universal Music Australia Pty Ltd v Sharman Licence Holdings [2005] FCA 1242	113,230–231
University of New South Wales v Moorhouse and Angus & Robertson [1975] HCA 26; (1975) 133 CLR 1	194,229

Hong Kong

Chan Nai Ming v HKSAR [2007] 3 HKC 255	184,368–369,372,375–379
HKSAR v Chan Nai Ming [2005] 1469 HKCU 1	330–332,369–371,374
Sony Computer Entertainment Inc v Lik Sang International Ltd [2003] HKEC 521	352
Nintendo Co Ltd v Lik Sang International Ltd [2003] HKCFI 499	353

People’s Republic of China

Wang Meng, et al v Beijing Cenpok Intercom Technology Co Ltd. Beijing Haidian District People’s Court Civil Judgment (1999) Hai Zhi Chu Zi No. 57	16
Music Copyright Society of China v Guangzhou Netease Computer System Inc and China Mobile Inc (Beijing), Beijing No. 2 Intermediary People’s Court Civil Judgment (2002) Er Zhong Min Chu No. 03119	23
Zheng Chengsi v Sursen Digital Technology Inc Beijing Haidian District Court, Civil Judgment (2004) No 12509	196
Warner Music v Rongshuxia Computer Inc Shanghai No 2 Intermediate Court, Civil Judgment (2003) Er Min Chu Zi No. 21	196
Push Sound Co v Fashionow Beijing No. 2 Intermediary People’s Court, Civil Judgement (2005) Er Zhong Min Chu Zi No. 13739	209
Go East Entertainment Co., Ltd (A Universal Music Company) v. Beijing Centry Yuebo Technology Co., Ltd (owner of chinamp3.com) Beijing No. 1 Intermediary People’s Court, Civil Judgement (2004) Yi Zhong Min Chu Zi No.400; Beijing High People’s Court, Civil Judgment (2004) Gao Min Zhong Zi No. 713	210
Chen Xingliang v National Digital Library Ltd Beijing Haidian District People’s Court Civil Judgement (2002) Hai Min Chu Zi No. 5702	195,260
Ruide (Group) Inc v Yibin Cuiping District Oriental Information Service Inc Beijing Haidian District People’s Court Civil Ruling (1999) Hai Zhi Chu No 21; Beijing No. 1 Intermediary People’s Court Civil Ruling (1999) Yi Zhong Zhi Chu No 64	386
Li Xuebin v Beijing Sohu (.com) information service Inc. Shanghai No.2 Intermediary People’s Court Civil Ruling (2006) Hu Er Zhong Min 5 (Zhi) Chu No 226	388
Shenzhen Yuan Hang Technology Co Ltd v Shenzhen Tencent Computer System Co Ltd, Tencent Technology Co Ltd. (Shenzhen), and Shenzhen Tencent Computer System Co Ltd, (Xi’an Branch) Xi’an Intermediary People’s Court Civil Ruling (2007) Xi Min Si Chu No 23	390
Wang Lu v Yahoo! Inc Beijing No 1 Intermediary People’s Court Civil Ruling (2005) Yi Zhong Min Chu No. 5761	392
Beijing Billich Culture Development Co., Ltd v. Charles Billich Beijing No 2 Intermediary People’s Court, Civil Ruling (2003) Er Zhong Min Chu Zi No 03814; Beijing High People’s Court, Civil ruling, (2004) Gao Min Zhong Zi No. 36	393

Singapore

Lotus Development Corp v Ong Seow Pheng [1997] 3 SLR 137	113
Ng Chye Huay and Anor v PP [2005] SGHC 193; [2006] 1 SLR 157	90,96
Public Prosecutor v Taw Cheng Kong [1998] 2 SLR 410	78

United States

Calder v Jones[1984] USSC 53; , 465 US 783 (1984)	395–397
MGM Studios Inc v Grokster Ltd, 545 US 913 (2005)	113,181,227,395–396
Parker v Google Inc, 422 F Supp 2d 492 (ED Pa, 2006)	223
Perfect 10 Inc v Amazon Com Inc[2007] USCA9 270; , 487 F 3d 701 (9th Cir, 2007)	180
Perfect 10 Inc v Cybernet Ventures Inc, 213 F Supp 2d 1146 (CD Cal 2002)	224,226
Viacom International Inc v YouTube Inc, YouTube LLC and Google Inc, 07-cv-02103 (United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, filed 13 March 2007)	176,184,220-223,225,227,233
Zippo Manufacturing Co v Zippo Dot Com Inc, 952 F Supp 1119 (WD Pa 1997)	395