Home
| Databases
| WorldLII
| Search
| Feedback
University of New South Wales Faculty of Law Research Series |
Last Updated: 12 July 2012
The Australian Constitution and the Aid/Watch Case
George Williams, University of New South Wales
This
paper is available for download at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2103978
Citation
This article was published in (2011) 3 Cosmopolitan
Civil Societies: An Interdisciplinary Journal 1-8. This paper may also be
referenced
as [2012] UNSWLRS 20.
Abstract
The Australian Constitution played a significant
role in underpinning the result in the Aid/Watch Case.1 It was invoked by the
majority to support their conclusion
that a body can be a ‘charitable
institution’ despite engaging in political activities. The use of the
Constitution in this way came as a surprise. The case extended an existing
constitutional principle relating to freedom of political communication
from its
electoral base into the protection of the political activities of non-government
organisations. This may have future ramifications
for those organisations in
other areas, as well as further implications for the development of what it
means to be a charity in Australia.
This article examines the use of the
Australian Constitution in the Aid/Watch Case. It explains how the High Court
was able to invoke the Constitution in defining what it means to be a
‘charitable institution’. It also examines the implications of that
reasoning for the
development of charitable law in Australia.
AustLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/UNSWLRS/2012/20.html