Australian Capital Territory Bills
[Index]
[Search]
[Download]
[Related Items]
[Help]
This is a Bill, not an Act. For current law, see the Acts databases.
PROJECTS OF TERRITORY IMPORTANCE BILL 2008
2008
THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY
FOR THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL
TERRITORY
(As presented)
(Mr Brendan Smyth)
Projects of
Territory Importance Bill 2008
Contents
Page
2008
THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY
FOR THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL
TERRITORY
(As presented)
(Mr Brendan Smyth)
Projects of Territory
Importance Bill 2008
A Bill for
An Act to facilitate the moving of projects of Territory importance from a
location to another to allow for their effective delivery and, consequently, to
allow for the usual planning processes to be shortened
1 Canberra is a growing, thriving city.
2 It is an important part of planning for the ACT that the planning system
be responsive to achieving good outcomes for ACT residents and for businesses
prepared to invest in the ACT.
3 Some projects undertaken in the ACT have a major impact within the
Territory, whether because they provide fundamental infrastructure, because they
bring significant benefit to the Territory, or because they are otherwise
projects of Territory importance.
4 If the ordinary planning process for projects of Territory importance is
followed, it may not always be possible to deliver the projects within the
timeframes necessary because of an oversight, a change in circumstances or for
another genuine reason.
5 If a project of Territory importance cannot be delivered in a particular
place within the timeframe necessary, that project and related benefits may be
lost to the Territory.
6 If there is a threat that a project of Territory importance may be lost
to the Territory, all the work done, expense incurred and time invested in the
project may be lost.
7 A project of Territory importance that has stalled, or is going to
stall, because of its location may be able to be delivered at another location,
but work done to deliver the project at the originally proposed location cannot
currently be used at the 2nd location, and the planning process therefore needs
to start again. This may discourage investors and investment in the ACT.
8 The Legislative Assembly considers that—
• there should be a mechanism to facilitate the delivery of projects
of Territory importance outside the ordinary planning process if the reason for
non-delivery of the projects is an inappropriate location and another
appropriate location is available
• the mechanism should only be used in exceptional circumstances, and
then only with community support
• the mechanism should contain safeguards that are adequate to
protect ACT residents while also allowing for flexibility
• the Legislative Assembly can adequately oversee such a process and
represent the views of the community.
9 For these reasons, the Legislative Assembly wishes to put in place a
mechanism to facilitate the delivery of projects of Territory importance at
locations other than those originally intended.
The Legislative Assembly for the Australian Capital Territory therefore
enacts as follows:
This Act is the Projects of Territory Importance Act 2008.
This Act commences on the day after its notification day.
Note The naming and commencement provisions automatically commence
on the notification day (see Legislation Act, s 75 (1)).
The dictionary at the end of this Act is part of this Act.
Note 1 The dictionary at the end of this Act defines certain terms
used in this Act, and includes references (signpost definitions)
to other terms defined elsewhere.
For example, the signpost definition ‘development
approval—see the Planning and Development Act 2007,
dictionary.’ means that the term
‘development approval’ is defined in that dictionary and the
definition applies to this Act.
Note 2 A definition in the dictionary (including a signpost
definition) applies to the entire Act unless the definition, or another
provision of the Act, provides otherwise or the contrary intention otherwise
appears (see Legislation Act, s 155 and s 156 (1)).
A note included in this Act is explanatory and is not part of this
Act.
Note See the Legislation Act, s 127 (1), (4) and (5) for the
legal status of notes.
5 Meaning
of project of Territory importance
In this Act:
project of Territory importance means a project
that—
(a) has a major impact within the Territory, whether because the project
does 1 or more of the following or otherwise:
(i) provides critical infrastructure;
(ii) provides important economic, or sustainable environmental,
development;
(iii) encourages substantial capital investment;
(iv) increases and diversifies employment opportunities; or
(b) is prescribed by regulation.
6 What
is a certificate of importance?
In this Act:
certificate of importance, for a project, means a certificate
prepared under section 8 for the project.
Note A certificate of importance must contain certain things and
have commissioners certificates attached (see s 9), and has the effect mentioned
in s 12 if approved by the Legislative Assembly under s 11.
7 When
certificates of importance may be prepared
(1) A certificate of importance may be prepared under section 8 for a
project if—
(a) the Ministers who may jointly prepare a certificate under that section
are satisfied on reasonable grounds that—
(i) the project is a project of Territory importance; and
(ii) substantial progress has been made in gaining development approval
for the project; and
(iii) the actions taken to achieve the progress have been taken in the
genuine belief that the project will be delivered in a particular place;
and
(iv) it is not reasonably practicable in all the circumstances to deliver
the project in the place; and
(b) a senior commissioner of the independent competition and regulatory
commission certifies in writing under section 10 that the commissioner is
satisfied that the project is a project of Territory importance; and
(c) the commissioner for the environment certifies in writing under
section 10 that the commissioner is satisfied that the environmental impact
of the project at the 2nd location is not significantly worse than the
environmental impact of the project at the originally proposed location;
and
(d) the human rights commissioner certifies in writing under
section 10 that the commissioner is satisfied that the impact of the
project on human rights at the 2nd location is not significantly worse than the
impact of the project on human rights at the originally proposed
location.
(2) In deciding whether substantial progress has been made in gaining
development approval for a project, the Ministers must consider the
following:
(a) the time taken to achieve the progress;
(b) the amount expended to achieve the progress;
(c) the stage that has been reached in seeking development
approval;
(d) the extent of consultation undertaken in seeking development
approval.
(3) To remove any doubt, a commissioner considering whether to give a
certificate for a project under subsection (1) (b), (c) or (d) must not consider
the merits of the project.
8 Preparing
certificates of importance
(1) The Minister responsible for economic development and the Minister
responsible for planning must jointly prepare a certificate of importance for a
project, if satisfied that it is appropriate to do so.
(2) However, if the Minister responsible for economic development and the
Minister responsible for planning are the same person—
(a) that person and the Chief Minister must jointly prepare the
certificate of importance; or
(b) if that person is the Chief Minister—the Chief Minister and
1 other Minister must prepare the certificate of importance.
(3) A certificate of importance (including the attached commissioner
certificates) is a notifiable instrument.
Note 1 A certificate of importance for a project must have the
commissioner certificates for the project attached (see s 9 (3)).
Note 2 A notifiable instrument must be notified under the
Legislation Act.
9 Content
of certificates of importance etc
(1) A certificate of importance for a project must contain the
following:
(a) a statement of the reasons for preparing the certificate, including a
description of why the originally proposed location for the project is no longer
suitable and why the 2nd location is suitable;
(b) a description of each planning law that is to be modified and how it
is to be modified;
(c) anything else prescribed by regulation.
(2) The certificate of importance may contain anything else the Ministers
consider necessary.
(3) The certificate of importance must have the commissioner certificates
for the project attached.
10 Commissioner
certificates
(1) This section applies if—
(a) a Minister asks a commissioner in writing for a commissioner
certificate for a project; and
(b) the request includes an outline of the project.
(2) The commissioner must—
(a) give the Minister a certificate—
(i) if the commissioner is a commissioner of the independent competition
and regulatory commission—certifying that the project is a project of
Territory importance; or
(ii) if the commissioner is the commissioner for the
environment—certifying that the environmental impact of the project at the
2nd location is not significantly worse than the environmental impact of the
project at the originally proposed location; or
(iii) if the commissioner is the human rights
commissioner—certifying that the impact of the project on human rights at
the 2nd location is not significantly worse than the impact of the project on
human rights at the originally proposed location; or
(b) if not satisfied in relation to a matter required to be included in
the commissioner’s certificate under paragraph (a)—give the
Minister written notice refusing to give a commissioner certificate for the
project.
(3) The commissioner must comply with subsection (2) within 7 days
after—
(a) the day the Minister asks the commissioner for the commissioner
certificate; or
(b) if the commissioner asks for further information that the commissioner
reasonably needs to decide whether to give the commissioner certificate for the
project—the day the further information is given to the
commissioner.
(4) However, the commissioner need not comply with subsection (2)
if—
(a) the commissioner has asked the Minister in writing for further
information that the commissioner reasonably needs to decide whether to give the
commissioner certificate for the project; and
(b) the Minister has not given the commissioner the information.
(5) A regulation may prescribe what the outline of a project under
subsection (1) (b) must or may include.
11 Approval
by Legislative Assembly
(1) The Legislative Assembly may, by motion carried by at least
12 members, approve a certificate of importance notified under the
Legislation Act.
(2) In this section:
certificate of importance includes an amendment of a
certificate of importance.
12 Effect
of certificates of importance
(1) A certificate of importance for a project comes into force on the day
after the day the certificate is approved under section 11.
(2) When the certificate of importance for a project comes into force, it
modifies a planning law in relation to the project as stated in the certificate
to allow the project to be delivered in a place (the 2nd location)
other than the place (the originally proposed location) originally
intended.
Example of possible
modification
a modification of the Planning and Development Act 2007 to allow a
development application to be made for the project in the 2nd location using
appropriate material prepared for a development application for the project in
the originally proposed location
Note An example is part of the Act, is not exhaustive and may
extend, but does not limit, the meaning of the provision in which it appears
(see Legislation Act, s 126 and s 132).
(3) Without limiting subsection (2), the certificate of importance for a
project may modify the operation of a planning law in relation to the project by
suspending the law’s operation in relation to the project as stated in the
certificate.
(4) However, a modification may allow something done for a project to be
delivered at the originally proposed location to be used for a development
application for delivering the project at the 2nd location only if, in all
the circumstances, it is appropriate for the thing to be used.
Example of when use of something done would
be appropriate
an environmental impact statement for delivering a project at the
originally proposed location that deals with the waste produced by the completed
project, if the location of the project does not affect the waste
Example of when use of something done would
not be appropriate
a development application for delivering a project at the originally
proposed location that has been referred to the commissioner for the
environment, who has given advice under the Planning and Development Act
2007, s 149 that the commissioner supports the application, if the 2nd
location contains significant Aboriginal heritage places and the originally
proposed location does not
(1) This section applies in relation to a project for which a certificate
of importance has been given.
(2) To remove any doubt, a decision to approve an application for
development approval for the project or part of the project, or any other
decision made in relation to the project, is not a reviewable decision under the
Planning and Development Act 2007, section 407.
14 Notice
of end of project
(1) This section applies if a project for which a certificate of
importance has been approved under section 11 is delivered in the 2nd location
for the project.
(2) The Minister must, by motion, advise the Legislative Assembly that the
project has been delivered.
(3) The certificate of importance for the project expires on the day the
Minister advises the Legislative Assembly under subsection (2).
15 Regulation-making
powers
The Executive may make regulations for this Act.
Note A regulation must be notified, and presented to the Legislative
Assembly, under the Legislation Act.
16 Planning
and Development Act 2007, section 407, definition of reviewable decision,
new paragraph (b) (iii)
insert
(iii) a decision by the planning and land authority or Minister in
relation to development for which a certificate of importance has been approved
under the Projects of Territory Importance Act 2008, section 11 (Approval
by Legislative Assembly).
(see s 3)
Note 1 The Legislation Act contains definitions and other provisions
relevant to this Act.
Note 2 For example, the Legislation Act, dict, pt 1, defines the
following terms:
• Chief Minister
• commissioner for the environment
• human rights commissioner
• independent competition and regulatory commission
• Legislation Act
• Minister (see s 162)
• under.
2nd location, for a project—see section 12.
certificate of importance—see section 6.
commissioner means—
(a) the commissioner for the environment; or
(b) the human rights commissioner; or
(c) a senior commissioner of the independent competition and regulatory
commission.
commissioner certificate, for a project, means a certificate
given under section 10 (2) (a) for the project.
development approval—see the Planning and
Development Act 2007, dictionary.
originally proposed location, for a project—see section
12.
planning law means—
(a) the Environment Protection Act 1997; or
(b) the Nature Conservation Act 1980; or
(c) the Planning and Development Act 2007; or
(d) a Territory law prescribed by regulation.
project means something that requires, or a part of which
requires, development approval.
project of Territory importance—see section
5.
Endnotes
1 Presentation speech
Presentation speech made in the Legislative Assembly on 2008.
2 Notification
Notified under the Legislation Act on 2008.
3 Republications of amended laws
For the latest republication of amended laws, see
www.legislation.act.gov.au.
© Australian Capital Territory
2008
[Index]
[Search]
[Download]
[Related Items]
[Help]