Australian Capital Territory Repealed Acts

[Index] [Table] [Search] [Search this Act] [Notes] [Noteup] [Previous] [Next] [Download] [Help]

This legislation has been repealed.

CREDIT ACT 1985 (REPEALED) - SECT 25

Consequential discharge of tied loan contract and mortgage

    (1)     Subject to section 27, if a contract of sale is rescinded or discharged (whether under this Act or any other law in force in the ACT) and there is a tied loan contract made with the buyer by a linked credit provider of the supplier under the contract of sale, at the same time as the contract of sale is rescinded or discharged—

        (a)     the tied loan contract is discharged to the extent that it was entered into for the purposes of the payment for the goods and services supplied under the contract of sale; and

        (b)     any mortgage relating to the tied loan contract is discharged to the extent that it secures the payment of a debt or other pecuniary obligation or performance of any other obligation under the tied loan contract.

    (2)     Subsection (1) does not apply if the credit is provided by a linked credit provider of a supplier to a buyer as a result of an approach by the buyer to the credit provider that was not induced by the supplier.

    (3)     If, because of subsection (1), a tied loan contract is discharged when a contract of sale is rescinded or discharged—

        (a)     the credit provider is liable to the buyer for any amount paid by the buyer to the credit provider under the tied loan contract to the extent that it is discharged; and

        (b)     the supplier is liable to the credit provider for—

              (i)     the amount (if any) paid under the tied loan contract, to the extent that it is discharged, by the credit provider to the supplier; and

              (ii)     the amount paid under the tied loan contract, to the extent that it is discharged, by the credit provider to the buyer and paid by the buyer to the supplier; and

              (iii)     the amount of the loss (if any) suffered by the credit provider because of the discharge of the tied loan contract, being an amount not exceeding the amount of the accrued credit charge under the tied loan contract; and

        (c)     the buyer is liable to the credit provider for any amount paid under the tied loan contract, to the extent that it is discharged, to the buyer by the credit provider, other than amounts paid to the buyer and paid by him or her to the supplier;

and, if the contract of sale is a contract of sale of goods and services—

        (d)     if the goods are in the possession of the buyer

              (i)     if, before the rescission or discharge of the contract of sale, there was not a mortgage relating to the tied loan contract—the buyer shall deliver the goods to the supplier; or

              (ii)     if, before the rescission or discharge of the contract of sale, there was a mortgage relating to the tied loan contract, to the extent that it is discharged—the buyer shall deliver the goods to the credit provider; and

        (e)     if the goods are in the possession of the credit provider and no amounts are owed to the credit provider under paragraph (b)—the credit provider shall deliver the goods to the supplier.

    (4)     If, under subsection (3) (d), goods are delivered to the credit provider, the credit provider is entitled to possession of the goods as against the supplier until the credit provider has been paid the amount for which the supplier is liable to the credit provider under subsection (3) (b).



AustLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback