Commonwealth Consolidated Acts

[Index] [Table] [Search] [Search this Act] [Notes] [Noteup] [Previous] [Next] [Download] [Help]

CORPORATIONS ACT 2001 - SECT 1043M

Defences to prosecution for an offence

  (1)   In a prosecution of a person for an offence based on subsection   1043A(1) or (2), it is not necessary for the prosecution to prove the non - existence of facts or circumstances which, if they existed, would, by virtue of section   1043B, 1043C, 1043D, 1043E, 1043F, 1043G, 1043H, 1043I, 1043J or 1043K, preclude the act or omission from constituting a contravention of subsection   1043A(1) or (2), as the case may be, but it is a defence if the facts or circumstances existed.

Note:   A defendant bears an evidential burden in relation to the facts or circumstances. See subsection   13.3(3) of the Criminal Code .

  (2)   In a prosecution brought against a person for an offence based on subsection   1043A(1) because the person entered into, or procured another person to enter into, a transaction or agreement at a time when certain information was in the first - mentioned person's possession:

  (a)   it is a defence if the information came into the first - mentioned person's possession solely as a result of the information having been made known as mentioned in subparagraph   1042C(1)(b)(i); and

  (b)   it is a defence if the other party to the transaction or agreement knew, or ought reasonably to have known, of the information before entering into the transaction or agreement.

Note:   A defendant bears an evidential burden in relation to the matters referred to in paragraphs   (a) and (b). See subsection   13.3(3) of the Criminal Code .

  (3)   In a prosecution against a person for an offence based on subsection   1043A(2) because the person communicated information, or caused information to be communicated, to another person:

  (a)   it is a defence if the information came into the first - mentioned person's possession solely as a result of the information having been made known as mentioned in subparagraph   1042C(1)(b)(i); and

  (b)   it is a defence if the other person knew, or ought reasonably to have known, of the information before the information was communicated.

Note:   A defendant bears an evidential burden in relation to the matters referred to in paragraphs   (a) and (b). See subsection   13.3(3) of the Criminal Code .


AustLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback