[Index] [Search] [Download] [Bill] [Help]
AusCheck Bill 2006
WARNING:
This Digest was prepared for debate. It reflects the legislation as introduced
and does not canvass subsequent amendments. This Digest does not have
any official legal status. Other sources should be consulted to determine
the subsequent official status of the Bill.
CONTENTS
Passage History
Purpose
Background
Financial Implications
Main Provisions
Concluding Comments
Endnotes
Contact Officer & Copyright Details
Date introduced: 7
December
House: House of Representatives
Portfolio: Attorney-General
Commencement: Day after receiving the Royal Assent
The Bill establishes the AusCheck scheme which will be the Australian background checking service for people who work in the Australian maritime and aviation industries.
On
To provide a regulatory framework for establishment of a centralised background checking service by the Attorney-General’s Department, for the purposes of coordinating and conducting certain criminal, security and other background checking.
To give the Attorney-General’s Department the authority to coordinate background criminal and security assessments for the applicants for the Aviation Security Identity Card (ASIC) and the Maritime Security Identification Card (MSIC) and any subsequent schemes. The bill also gives to and confirms the authority of the Attorney-General’s Department:
However, AusCheck’s initial role will be limited to background checks for the ASIC and MSIC schemes. The bill includes general provisions which will allow AusCheck to expand its role in the future for other background checking schemes. The government argues that this will minimise duplication for people who need to apply for background checks for different purposes.(3)
Since the events of
An ASIC is required if a person needs to work in an airside area or a landside security zone—collectively the ‘secure area’—at a security controlled airport that has regular public transport services.
Implemented on
The ASIC or MSIC indicates that the holder has been
background-checked and that the check revealed that they are of suitable
character to be in a secure area. The identity of the person seeking
the card is verified, then a background check is conducted including:
a criminal history check by CrimTrac, a security assessment by the Australian
Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO) and where required, an Authority
to Work in
The ASIC is valid for two years, while the MSIC is valid for five years. Upon expiry of the card—and assuming there is still a valid reason to access security designated area(s)—a full background check is again conducted of the person’s proof of identity, criminal convictions, and, if necessary, authority to work in Australia. The security assessment by ASIO remains ‘active’ after the person obtains their initial ASIC or MSIC.(5)
Following a recommendation of the Wheeler Report,(6) AusCheck was established to:
AusCheck will operate on a cost recovery basis and maintain a comprehensive database of all applicants and cardholders for the aviation and maritime industries.
AusCheck will help the aviation and maritime industries to identify individuals who should not be eligible for an ASIC or MSIC, by applying a consistent interpretation of the statutory requirements and providing a recommendation to the relevant issuing body.
In December
The
Clause 4 – Several items are defined in this clause. The most noteworthy is ‘AusCheck scheme’. It means the scheme prescribed for the purposes of clause 8 of the bill. The regulations may provide for the establishment of the background checking scheme relating to the conduct and coordination of background checks of individuals for the purposes of:
The ‘other such purposes’ referred to above are notably very broad in terms of their scope and reach. They include purposes related to:(11)
In the bill the term ‘personal information’ has the same meaning as it does in the Privacy Act 1988. Under the Privacy Act “personal information” means information or an opinion (including information or an opinion forming part of a database), whether true or not, and whether recorded in a material form or not, about an individual whose identity is apparent, or can reasonably be ascertained, from the information or opinion.
The Explanatory Memorandum points out that the term ‘background check’ is the linchpin of the description of the function established by the bill.(12) A background check involves an assessment of particular types of information relating to an individual person. It includes an assessment of one or more of the following types of information:(13)
The wording of paragraph 5 (d) provides an apparently generous allowance for information collection.
The process by which personal information is acquired and assessed for a background check is set out in Part 2 – Establishment of the AusCheck scheme and in clause 18, the regulation making power.
This clause enables regulations to be made which will provide the necessary detail for the AusCheck scheme of background checking.
Sub-clause 9(1) enumerates a variety of matters that may be provided for by the regulations.
The regulations may provide for an application for a background check to be made by:
The regulations may specify the information that is to be included in an application for a background check, as well as the form of advice that is to be given to the applicant and the person to whom the background check relates. The regulations may also set the form of advice to be given to other persons about the results of the background check.
The criteria used to judge the information gathered by the background check, and the decisions that can be made based on the results of the background check can also be defined in the regulations. However, certain specific classes of background checks will not require such criteria to be set out in regulations under the AusCheck scheme if they are already set out in other legislation (subclause 9(3)). This is the case in relation to background checks for ASICs and MSICs – the criteria and decision making powers in relation to these are already provided for in regulations under the Aviation Transport Security Act 2004 and the Maritime Transport and Offshore Facilities Security Act 2003.
Sub-clauses (2) and (3) permit regulations for background checks to be relevantly tailored for different industry or activity requirements.
The AusCheck scheme may require a person to apply for and pass a background check before they are permitted to:
The Explanatory Memorandum states that it is envisaged that the use of such a provision would be confined to situations where a certain class of background checks was required to implement policy that had not been provided for by other legislation. It is expected that future background checking schemes will be constructed under the provisions of an Act under the relevant portfolio which provides the appropriate policy framework.(14)
The Joint Committee of Public Accounts and Audit recommended that AusCheck decisions should be subject to appeal through the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT).(15) On the face of it, this would seem a good idea given that AusCheck’s role may be dramatically extended via regulation, as outlined in clauses 4 (c) and 5 (d).
Decisions regarding ASICs and MSICs are already appellable to the AAT under the existing regulations. Similarly, adverse or qualified ASIO security assessments may be appealed, under the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Act 1979. While the Explanatory Memorandum states that it is expected that future background checking schemes would be constructed under specific Acts, it may be prudent to insert a general provision for appeal to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal, in the event that this is not provided for in specific legislation.
This clause gives power to the Secretary of the Department to give directions to a person who has applied for a background check, or who is required or allowed to take action in matters related to a background check. Subclause (2) states that this power may include –but not be confined to – instructing a person to notify the Secretary as to whether or not a licence, permit or other authorisation has been issued to a person in respect of whom a background check has been performed.
A penalty may be imposed by regulations for failure to comply with a direction by the Secretary.(16)
This clause enables the Secretary of the Department to delegate their powers or functions under the AusCheck scheme to:
A person to whom such a delegation is made is obliged to exercise those powers or functions in compliance with any directions given by the Secretary.
This confirms that the collection, use and disclosure of personal information must be for purposes related to giving effect to the operation of the AusCheck scheme. This is consistent with the principles of the Privacy Act 1988.
This clause permits the Secretary to establish and maintain a database of information, including AusCheck scheme personal information about an individual that relates to the AusCheck scheme.
However, the uses of this information are explicitly confined, to be used for:
Subclause (3) authorises the use of de-identified information drawn from the database for the purposes of research, government and/or industry planning.
Given the breadth, depth and sensitivity of personal information that is expected to be collected by such a scheme, effective protection of such information and penalties for unauthorised use and disclosure are essential.
This clause seeks to offer further protection of information gathered by AusCheck as part of conducting a background check. It makes it an offence for a current or past employee of AusCheck to make unauthorised use or disclosure of information obtained in relation to background checking. The maximum penalty is imprisonment for 2 years.
Disclosure of information is not permitted unless:
The defendant has the burden of showing that their disclosure of information fell into one of the exceptions listed above. The reason for having a reverse onus of proof is the premium placed on privacy, and also because a person working for AusCheck would be familiar with the rules of disclosure and the operation of exceptions. Hence, it would be much easier for the defendant to prove that the disclosure fell within an exception than for the prosecution to prove that it did not.(17)
The Explanatory Memorandum sets out the Privacy Act in relation to the AusCheck scheme.(18)
Clause 18 provides that the Governor-General may make regulations in relation to:
The centralisation of background checks for aviation and maritime security cards has been recommended by a number of transport security reviews. AusCheck will be responsible for ASIC and MSIC background checks. This will be a significant task given that there are more than 120,000 ASICs and 60,000 MSICs currently in operation.(20) Any expansion of AusCheck’s role to other background checks should continue to be monitored by the Parliament.
This paper has been prepared to support the work of the Australian Parliament using information available at the time of production. The views expressed do not reflect an official position of the Parliamentary Library, nor do they constitute professional legal opinion.
ISSN 1328-8091
© Commonwealth of Australia 2007
Except to the extent of the uses permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, including information storage and retrieval systems, without the prior written consent of the Parliamentary Library, other than by members of the Australian Parliament in the course of their official duties.
Published by the Parliamentary Library, 2007.