[Index] [Search] [Download] [Bill] [Help]
Social Security Amendment (Flexible Participation Requirements for Principal Carers) Bill 2010
WARNING:
This Digest was prepared for debate. It reflects the legislation as introduced
and does not canvass subsequent amendments. This Digest does not have
any official legal status. Other sources should be consulted to determine
the subsequent official status of the Bill.
CONTENTS
Passage history
Purpose
Background
Financial implications
Main provisions
Contact officer & copyright details
Social Security Amendment (Flexible Participation Requirements for Principal Carers) Bill 2010
Date introduced: 10 March 2010
House: House of Representatives
Portfolio: Employment and Workplace Relations
Commencement: 1 July 2010.
Links: The links to the Bill, its Explanatory Memorandum and second reading speech can be found on the Bills page, which is at http://www.aph.gov.au/bills/. When Bills have been passed they can be found at ComLaw, which is at http://www.comlaw.gov.au/.
The purpose of the Social Security Amendment (Flexible Participation Requirements for Principal Carers) Bill 2010 (the Bill) is to amend the Social Security Act 1991 (the Act), so as to change the participation requirements for principal carers who receive income support, allowing them to more effectively balance parenting responsibilities with participation requirements.
In July 2006, participation requirements were introduced for people who were receiving income support payments and were parents or carers for children. They were termed Principal Carers and certain aspects of their entitlements and obligations were modified to recognise the impact of their caring role.[1]
Principal carers can be eligible for Parenting Payment, Newstart Allowance, Youth Allowance (for jobseekers) or Special Benefit. They are generally subject to a part-time participation requirement once their youngest child reaches the age of six years. Principal carers can satisfy those requirements by:
However, principal carers have access to a range of exemptions from those participation requirements where specific situations apply. Automatic exemptions apply where the principal carer is:
Other exemptions are available on a case by case basis in situations where the principal carer is unable to undertake 15 hours of paid work per week, which include:
In June 2008, the Government commissioned a review of the participation rules for parents and mature age job seekers in response to feedback that some of the requirements were unduly onerous and added no value to income support recipients’ job search efforts. The Participation Review Taskforce (the Taskforce) reported to the Government in August 2008 and its report was made public at the time of the 2009 Budget in May 2009. In its report, the Taskforce recommended that the operation of participation requirements for parents be fine tuned.[3] These recommendations were agreed to by the Government and will be implemented from 1 July 2010. The full list of changes was set out in the Budget press release from the Minister for Employment Participation, Brendan O’Connor, as follows:
The Government will adopt the Taskforce’s recommendations including:
Other recommendations that will be implemented include making more information available to parents about exemptions and allowing more practical reporting for carers and parents on their earnings and participation efforts to Centrelink via the internet or telephone.[4]
The Bill implements the recommended changes that require legislative amendments. Other recommendations can be implemented administratively or by legislative instrument.
The measures will cost $26.8 million over the four years 2009-10 to 2012-13.[5]
Schedule 1 of the Bill sets out amendments proposed in relation to participation requirement exemptions to principal carers receiving the following types of income support payments:
who have school-aged children and who must otherwise report at least 15 hours of approved activities to Centrelink each week.
The Schedule deals with participation requirement exemptions that would apply in relation to those recipients who:
Item 3 inserts new sections 5F and 5G into the Act, which set out the definitions of ‘main supporter’ and ‘secondary pupil child’.
In general, if a person is the main supporter of a ‘secondary pupil child’, that person is regarded as the ‘main supporter’ of that child (proposed subsection 5G(1)). However, in determining whether a person is the main supporter of a secondary pupil child, existing subsections 5(18)–(22) and 5(24) would apply as they currently do in determining whether someone is the principal carer for a child (proposed subsection 5G(2)).
Proposed section 5F defines ‘secondary pupil child’. The definition excludes the situation where the ‘secondary pupil child’ is actually the partner of a person.
These definitions contribute to extending certain participation requirement exemptions available to people who receive the above-mentioned income support payments. Currently, for example, parents who home school or distance educate their children may only receive a participation requirement exemption until their youngest child turns 16 years of age. This amendment extends the availability of the exemption until that child finishes high school.[6]
Item 4 substitutes existing paragraph 502C(2)(a) of the Act, so as to allow a Parenting Payment recipient to claim a participation requirement exemption due to domestic violence without having to leave the relationship. Existing paragraph 502C(2)(a) requires the person to have left the relationship, which gave rise to the domestic violence, before they could claim the exemption.
Items 7, 13 and 19 propose similar amendments in relation to recipients of the Youth Allowance, Newstart Allowance and Special Benefit.
Item 6 substitutes existing subsection 502D(3A) of the Act with new subsections 502D(3A)–(3C). Section 502D relates to determinations made by the Secretary that a participation requirement exemption applies to a person in particular circumstances.
Proposed subsection 502D(3A) provides that the Secretary must make such a determination if he or she is satisfied that the person is the principal carer of one or more children, including being the main supporter of one or more secondary pupil child.[7]
Proposed subsection 5D(3B) provides that the Secretary must make such a determination if satisfied that the person is the main supporter of one or more secondary pupil children and is also either the home or distance educator of one or more of those children.
The Explanatory Memorandum states:
Paragraphs 502D(3)(b) and (c) of the Social Security Act provide an exemption to a person who is receiving Parenting Payment where the Secretary is satisfied the person is the principal carer of one or more children, and:
These exemptions are maintained.
New subsection 502D(3B) will extend the participation exemptions contained in paragraphs 502D(3)(b) and (c) to a person who is the main supporter of one or more secondary pupil children.[8]
Proposed subsection 502D(3C) provides that the Secretary must also make a determination if satisfied that:
Items 9, 15 and 21 propose similar amendments in relation to recipients of the Youth Allowance, Newstart Allowance and Special Benefit.
Items 9, 15 and 21 also propose to amend sections 542FA, 602C and 731DB in the Act, by inserting new subsections 542FA(3B), 602C(3B) and 731DB(3B) respectively. These proposed subsections require the Secretary to make a determination that a participation requirement exemption applies to a person if satisfied that the person:
This amendment extends the participation requirement exemption from the current situation where the person must be a principal carer in order for the exemption to apply (existing subsection 502D(3)). Note, however, that the current exemption for principal carers is being maintained.
Items 10–12, 16–18 and 22–24 propose similar amendments in relation to recipients of the Youth Allowance, Newstart Allowance and Special Benefit.
Members, Senators and Parliamentary staff can obtain further information from the Parliamentary Library on (02) 6277 2410.
[1]. For more detail on the 2006 Welfare to Work reforms see D Daniels and P Yeend, Employment and Workplace Relations Amendment (Welfare to Work and Other Measures) Bill 2005, Bills digest, no. 70, 2005-06, Parliamentary Library, Canberra, 2005, viewed 7 May 2010, http://www.aph.gov.au/Library/pubs/bd/2005-06/06bd070.pdf
[2]. Guide to the Social Security Law, version 1.164, 3 May 2010, p. 3.5.1.260. viewed 7 May 2010, http://www.facs.gov.au/guides_acts/ssg/ssguide-3/ssguide-3.5/ssguide-3.5.1/ssguide-3.5.1.260.html
[3]. Participation Review Taskforce Report, Australian Government, 31 August 2008, viewed 10 May 2010, http://www.deewr.gov.au/Employment/Documents/ParticipationTaskforceReport.pdf
[4]. B O’Connor (Minister for Employment Participation), Improved participation requirements for parents and carers, media release, 12 May 2009, viewed 10 May 2010, http://www.deewr.gov.au/Ministers/OConnor/Media/Releases/Pages/Article_090512_181921.aspx
[5]. Explanatory Memorandum, Social Security Amendment (Flexible Participation Requirements for Principal Carers) Bill 2010, p. 2.
[6]. Explanatory Memorandum, op. cit., p. 1.
[7]. As to the meanings of ‘principal carer’, see Social Security Act 1991 subsections 5(15)–(24).
[8]. Explanatory Memorandum, op. cit., pp. 5–6.
[9]. As to the meaning of ‘registered and active foster carer’, see Social Security Act 1991 section 5B.