Commonwealth Numbered Acts
[Index]
[Table]
[Search]
[Search this Act]
[Notes]
[Noteup]
[Previous]
[Next]
[Download]
[Help]
CORPORATIONS ACT 1989 No. 109 of 1989 - SECT 850
Defences to alleged breach of subsection 849 (2)
850. (1) Where:
(a) a person:
(i) when making a recommendation orally, fails to disclose; or
(ii) when making a recommendation in writing, fails to set out in
that writing;
as required by subsection 849 (2), particulars of a matter; and
(b) it is proved that the person was not, and could not reasonably be
expected to have been, aware of that matter when making the
recommendation; the failure is not a contravention of that subsection.
(2) Where:
(a) a dealer or investment adviser, or a representative of a dealer or
investment adviser:
(i) when making a recommendation orally, fails to disclose; or
(ii) when making a recommendation in writing, fails to set out in
that writing;
as required by subsection 849 (2), particulars of a matter;
(b) in the case of a representative of a dealer or investment adviser-by
making the recommendation, the representative does an act as a
representative of the dealer or investment adviser;
(c) it is proved that the dealer or investment adviser had in operation,
throughout a period beginning before the decision to make the
recommendation was made and ending after the recommendation was made,
arrangements to ensure that:
(i) the natural person who made the decision knew nothing about
that matter before the end of that period; and
(ii) no advice with respect to the making of the recommendation was
given to the person by anyone who knew anything about that
matter; and
(d) it is also proved that:
(i) the person in fact knew nothing about that matter before the
end of that period; and
(ii) no such advice was so given; the failure is not a contravention
of that subsection.
(3) Neither of subsections (1) and (2) limits the generality of the other.
AustLII: Copyright Policy
| Disclaimers
| Privacy Policy
| Feedback