Commonwealth Numbered Acts Commonwealth Numbered Acts1 Subsection 4(1)
Insert:
"Aboriginal child" means a child who is a descendant of the Aboriginal people of Australia.
2 Subsection 4(1)
Insert:
"Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander culture" in relation to a child:
(a) means the culture of the Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander community or communities to which the child belongs; and
(b) includes Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander lifestyle and traditions of that community or communities.
3 Subsection 4(1)
Insert:
"family violence" means conduct, whether actual or threatened, by a person towards, or towards the property of, a member of the person’s family that causes that or any other member of the person’s family reasonably to fear for, or reasonably to be apprehensive about, his or her personal wellbeing or safety.
Note: A person reasonably fears for, or reasonably is apprehensive about, his or her personal wellbeing or safety in particular circumstances if a reasonable person in those circumstances would fear for, or be apprehensive about, his or her personal wellbeing or safety.
4 Subsection 4(1)
Insert:
"major long-term issues" , in relation to a child, means issues about the care, welfare and development of the child of a long-term nature and includes (but is not limited to) issues of that nature about:
(a) the child’s education (both current and future); and
(b) the child’s religious and cultural upbringing; and
(c) the child’s health; and
(d) the child’s name; and
(e) changes to the child’s living arrangements that make it significantly more difficult for the child to spend time with a parent.
To avoid doubt, a decision by a parent of a child to form a relationship with a new partner is not, of itself, a major long‑term issue in relation to the child. However, the decision will involve a major long‑term issue if, for example, the relationship with the new partner involves the parent moving to another area and the move will make it significantly more difficult for the child to spend time with the other parent.
5 Subsection 4(1)
Insert:
"relative" of a child:
(a) in Part VII, means:
(i) a step‑parent of the child; or
(ii) a brother, sister, half‑brother, half‑sister, step‑brother or step‑sister of the child; or
(iii) a grandparent of the child; or
(iv) an uncle or aunt of the child; or
(v) a nephew or niece of the child; or
(vi) a cousin of the child; and
(b) in subsection (1AB), has the meaning given by subsection (1AC).
6 Subsection 4(1)
Insert:
"Torres Strait Islander child" means a child who is a descendant of the Indigenous inhabitants of the Torres Strait Islands.
7 At the end of section 4
Add:
(4) A reference in this Act to a person who has parental responsibility for a child is a reference to a person who:
(a) has some or all of that responsibility solely; or
(b) shares some or all of that responsibility with another person.
(5) A reference in this Act to a person who shares parental responsibility for a child with another person is a reference to a person who shares some or all of the parental responsibility for the child with that other person.
8 Section 60B
Repeal the section, substitute:
60B Objects of Part and principles underlying it
(1) The objects of this Part are to ensure that the best interests of children are met by:
(a) ensuring that children have the benefit of both of their parents having a meaningful involvement in their lives, to the maximum extent consistent with the best interests of the child; and
(b) protecting children from physical or psychological harm from being subjected to, or exposed to, abuse, neglect or family violence; and
(c) ensuring that children receive adequate and proper parenting to help them achieve their full potential; and
(d) ensuring that parents fulfil their duties, and meet their responsibilities, concerning the care, welfare and development of their children.
(2) The principles underlying these objects are that (except when it is or would be contrary to a child’s best interests):
(a) children have the right to know and be cared for by both their parents, regardless of whether their parents are married, separated, have never married or have never lived together; and
(b) children have a right to spend time on a regular basis with, and communicate on a regular basis with, both their parents and other people significant to their care, welfare and development (such as grandparents and other relatives); and
(c) parents jointly share duties and responsibilities concerning the care, welfare and development of their children; and
(d) parents should agree about the future parenting of their children; and
(e) children have a right to enjoy their culture (including the right to enjoy that culture with other people who share that culture).
(3) For the purposes of subparagraph (2)(e), an Aboriginal child’s or Torres Strait Islander child’s right to enjoy his or her Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander culture includes the right:
(a) to maintain a connection with that culture; and
(b) to have the support, opportunity and encouragement necessary:
(i) to explore the full extent of that culture, consistent with the child’s age and developmental level and the child’s views; and
(ii) to develop a positive appreciation of that culture.
9 After Subdivision B of Division 1 of Part VII
Insert:
Subdivision BA — Best interests of the child
60CA Child’s best interests paramount consideration in making a parenting order
In deciding whether to make a particular parenting order in relation to a child, a court must regard the best interests of the child as the paramount consideration.
60CB Proceedings to which Subdivision applies
(1) This Subdivision applies to any proceedings under this Part in which the best interests of a child are the paramount consideration.
Note: Division 10 also allows a court to make an order for a child’s interests to be independently represented by a lawyer in proceedings under this Part in which the best interests of a child are the paramount consideration.
(2) This Subdivision also applies to proceedings, in relation to a child, to which subsection 60G(2), 63F(2) or 63F(6) or section 68R applies.
60CC How a court determines what is in a child’s best interests
Determining child’s best interests
(1) Subject to subsection (5), in determining what is in the child’s best interests, the court must consider the matters set out in subsections (2) and (3).
Primary considerations
(2) The primary considerations are:
(a) the benefit to the child of having a meaningful relationship with both of the child’s parents; and
(b) the need to protect the child from physical or psychological harm from being subjected to, or exposed to, abuse, neglect or family violence.
Note: Making these considerations the primary ones is consistent with the objects of this Part set out in paragraphs 60B(1)(a) and (b).
Additional considerations
(3) Additional considerations are:
(a) any views expressed by the child and any factors (such as the child’s maturity or level of understanding) that the court thinks are relevant to the weight it should give to the child’s views;
(b) the nature of the relationship of the child with:
(i) each of the child’s parents; and
(ii) other persons (including any grandparent or other relative of the child);
(c) the willingness and ability of each of the child’s parents to facilitate, and encourage, a close and continuing relationship between the child and the other parent;
(d) the likely effect of any changes in the child’s circumstances, including the likely effect on the child of any separation from:
(i) either of his or her parents; or
(ii) any other child, or other person (including any grandparent or other relative of the child), with whom he or she has been living;
(e) the practical difficulty and expense of a child spending time with and communicating with a parent and whether that difficulty or expense will substantially affect the child’s right to maintain personal relations and direct contact with both parents on a regular basis;
(f) the capacity of:
(i) each of the child’s parents; and
(ii) any other person (including any grandparent or other relative of the child);
to provide for the needs of the child, including emotional and intellectual needs;
(g) the maturity, sex, lifestyle and background (including lifestyle, culture and traditions) of the child and of either of the child’s parents, and any other characteristics of the child that the court thinks are relevant;
(h) if the child is an Aboriginal child or a Torres Strait Islander child:
(i) the child’s right to enjoy his or her Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander culture (including the right to enjoy that culture with other people who share that culture); and
(ii) the likely impact any proposed parenting order under this Part will have on that right;
(i) the attitude to the child, and to the responsibilities of parenthood, demonstrated by each of the child’s parents;
(j) any family violence involving the child or a member of the child’s family;
(k) any family violence order that applies to the child or a member of the child’s family, if:
(i) the order is a final order; or
(ii) the making of the order was contested by a person;
(l) whether it would be preferable to make the order that would be least likely to lead to the institution of further proceedings in relation to the child;
(m) any other fact or circumstance that the court thinks is relevant.
(4) Without limiting paragraphs (3)(c) and (i), the court must consider the extent to which each of the child’s parents has fulfilled, or failed to fulfil, his or her responsibilities as a parent and, in particular, the extent to which each of the child’s parents:
(a) has taken, or failed to take, the opportunity:
(i) to participate in making decisions about major long‑term issues in relation to the child; and
(ii) to spend time with the child; and
(iii) to communicate with the child; and
(b) has facilitated, or failed to facilitate, the other parent:
(i) participating in making decisions about major long‑term issues in relation to the child; and
(ii) spending time with the child; and
(iii) communicating with the child; and
(c) has fulfilled, or failed to fulfil, the parent’s obligation to maintain the child.
(4A) If the child’s parents have separated, the court must, in applying subsection (4), have regard, in particular, to events that have happened, and circumstances that have existed, since the separation occurred.
Consent orders
(5) If the court is considering whether to make an order with the consent of all the parties to the proceedings, the court may, but is not required to, have regard to all or any of the matters set out in subsection (2) or (3).
Right to enjoy Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander culture
(6) For the purposes of paragraph (3)(h), an Aboriginal child’s or a Torres Strait Islander child’s right to enjoy his or her Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander culture includes the right:
(a) to maintain a connection with that culture; and
(b) to have the support, opportunity and encouragement necessary:
(i) to explore the full extent of that culture, consistent with the child’s age and developmental level and the child’s views; and
(ii) to develop a positive appreciation of that culture.
60CD How the views of a child are expressed
(1) Paragraph 60CC(3)(a) requires the court to consider any views expressed by a child in deciding whether to make a particular parenting order in relation to the child. This section deals with how the court informs itself of views expressed by a child.
(2) The court may inform itself of views expressed by a child:
(a) by having regard to anything contained in a report given to the court under subsection 62G(2); or
(b) by making an order under section 68L for the child’s interests in the proceedings to be independently represented by a lawyer; or
(c) subject to the applicable Rules of Court, by such other means as the court thinks appropriate.
Note 1: Paragraph (a)—subsection 62G(3A) generally requires the person giving the report to ascertain the child’s views and include those views in the report.
Note 2: Paragraph (b)—paragraph 68LA(5)(b) requires the independent children’s lawyer for the child to ensure that the child’s views are fully put before the court.
60CE Children not required to express views
Nothing in this Part permits the court or any person to require the child to express his or her views in relation to any matter.
60CF Informing court of relevant family violence orders
(1) If a party to the proceedings is aware that a family violence order applies to the child, or a member of the child’s family, that party must inform the court of the family violence order.
(2) If a person who is not a party to the proceedings is aware that a family violence order applies to the child, or a member of the child’s family, that person may inform the court of the family violence order.
(3) Failure to inform the court of the family violence order does not affect the validity of any order made by the court.
60CG Court to consider risk of family violence
(1) In considering what order to make, the court must, to the extent that it is possible to do so consistently with the child’s best interests being the paramount consideration, ensure that the order:
(a) is consistent with any family violence order; and
(b) does not expose a person to an unacceptable risk of family violence.
(2) For the purposes of paragraph (1)(b), the court may include in the order any safeguards that it considers necessary for the safety of those affected by the order.
10 Subsection 60G(2) (note)
Omit “Division 10 deals”, substitute “Sections 60CB to 60CG deal”.
11 At the end of Division 1 of Part VII
Add:
Subdivision E — Family dispute resolution
60I Attending family dispute resolution before applying for Part VII order
Object of this section
(1) The object of this section is to ensure that all persons who have a dispute about matters that may be dealt with by an order under this Part (a Part VII order ) make a genuine effort to resolve that dispute by family dispute resolution before the Part VII order is applied for.
Phase 1 (from commencement to 30 June 2007)
(2) The dispute resolution provisions of the Family Law Rules 2004 impose the requirements for dispute resolution that must be complied with before an application is made to the Family Court of Australia for a parenting order.
(3) By force of this subsection, the dispute resolution provisions of the Family Law Rules 2004 also apply to an application to a court (other than the Family Court of Australia) for a parenting order. Those provisions apply to the application with such modifications as are necessary.
(4) Subsection (3) applies to an application for a parenting order if the application is made:
(a) on or after the commencement of this section; and
(b) before 1 July 2007.
Phase 2 (from 1 July 2007 to first proclaimed date)
(5) Subsections (7) to (12) apply to an application for a Part VII order in relation to a child if:
(a) the application is made on or after 1 July 2007 and before the date fixed by Proclamation for the purposes of this paragraph; and
(b) none of the parties to the proceedings on the application has applied, before 1 July 2007, for a Part VII order in relation to the child.
Phase 3 (from second proclaimed date)
(6) Subsections (7) to (12) apply to all applications for a Part VII order in relation to a child that are made on or after the date fixed by Proclamation for the purposes of this subsection.
Requirement to attempt to resolve dispute by family dispute resolution before applying for a parenting order
(7) Subject to subsection (9), a court exercising jurisdiction under this Act must not hear an application for a Part VII order in relation to a child unless the applicant files in the court a certificate given to the applicant by a family dispute resolution practitioner under subsection (8). The certificate must be filed with the application for the Part VII order.
Certificate by family dispute resolution practitioner
(8) A family dispute resolution practitioner may give one of these kinds of certificates to a person:
(a) a certificate to the effect that the person did not attend family dispute resolution with the practitioner and the other party or parties to the proceedings in relation to the issue or issues that the order would deal with, but the person’s failure to do so was due to the refusal, or the failure, of the other party or parties to the proceedings to attend;
(aa) a certificate to the effect that the person did not attend family dispute resolution with the practitioner and the other party or parties to the proceedings in relation to the issue or issues that the order would deal with, because the practitioner considers, having regard to the matters prescribed by the regulations for the purposes of this paragraph, that it would not be appropriate to conduct the proposed family dispute resolution;
(b) a certificate to the effect that the person attended family dispute resolution with the practitioner and the other party or parties to the proceedings in relation to the issue or issues that the order would deal with, and that all attendees made a genuine effort to resolve the issue or issues;
(c) a certificate to the effect that the person attended family dispute resolution with the practitioner and the other party or parties to the proceedings in relation to the issue or issues that the order would deal with, but that the person, the other party or another of the parties did not make a genuine effort to resolve the issue or issues.
Note: When an applicant files one of these certificates under subsection (7), the court may take the kind of certificate into account in considering whether to make an order referring to parties to family dispute resolution (see section 13C) and in determining whether to award costs against a party (see section 117).
Exception
(9) Subsection (7) does not apply to an application for a Part VII order in relation to a child if:
(a) the applicant is applying for the order:
(i) to be made with the consent of all the parties to the proceedings; or
(ii) in response to an application that another party to the proceedings has made for a Part VII order; or
(b) the court is satisfied that there are reasonable grounds to believe that:
(i) there has been abuse of the child by one of the parties to the proceedings; or
(ii) there would be a risk of abuse of the child if there were to be a delay in applying for the order; or
(iii) there has been family violence by one of the parties to the proceedings; or
(iv) there is a risk of family violence by one of the parties to the proceedings; or
(c) all the following conditions are satisfied:
(i) the application is made in relation to a particular issue;
(ii) a Part VII order has been made in relation to that issue within the period of 12 months before the application is made;
(iii) the application is made in relation to a contravention of the order by a person;
(iv) the court is satisfied that there are reasonable grounds to believe that the person has behaved in a way that shows a serious disregard for his or her obligations under the order; or
(d) the application is made in circumstances of urgency; or
(e) one or more of the parties to the proceedings is unable to participate effectively in family dispute resolution (whether because of an incapacity of some kind, physical remoteness from dispute resolution services or for some other reason); or
(f) other circumstances specified in the regulations are satisfied.
Referral to family dispute resolution when exception applies
(10) If:
(a) a person applies for a Part VII order; and
(b) the person does not, before applying for the order, attend family dispute resolution with a family dispute resolution practitioner and the other party or parties to the proceedings in relation to the issue or issues that the order would deal with; and
(c) subsection (7) does not apply to the application because of subsection (9);
the court must consider making an order that the person attend family dispute resolution with a family dispute resolution practitioner and the other party or parties to the proceedings in relation to that issue or those issues.
(11) The validity of:
(a) proceedings on an application for a Part VII order; or
(b) any order made in those proceedings;
is not affected by a failure to comply with subsection (7) in relation to those proceedings.
(12) In this section:
"dispute resolution provisions" of the Family Law Rules 2004 means:
(a) Rule 1.05 of those Rules; and
(b) Part 2 of Schedule 1 to those Rules;
to the extent to which they deal with dispute resolution.
60J Family dispute resolution not attended because of child abuse or family violence
(1) If:
(a) subsections 60I(7) to (12) apply to an application for a Part VII order (see subsections 60I(5) and (6)); and
(b) subsection 60I(7) does not apply to the application because the court is satisfied that there are reasonable grounds to believe that:
(i) there has been abuse of the child by one of the parties to the proceedings; or
(ii) there has been family violence by one of the parties to the proceedings;
a court must not hear the application unless the applicant has indicated in writing that the applicant has received information from a family counsellor or family dispute resolution practitioner about the services and options (including alternatives to court action) available in circumstances of abuse or violence.
(2) Subsection (1) does not apply if the court is satisfied that there are reasonable grounds to believe that:
(a) there would be a risk of abuse of the child if there were to be a delay in applying for the order; or
(b) there is a risk of family violence by one of the parties to the proceedings.
(3) The validity of:
(a) proceedings on an application for a Part VII order; or
(b) any order made in those proceedings;
is not affected by a failure to comply with subsection (1) in relation to those proceedings.
(4) If:
(a) the applicant indicates in writing that the applicant has not received information about the services and options (including alternatives to court action) available in circumstances of abuse or violence; and
(b) subsection (2) does not apply;
the principal executive officer of the court concerned must ensure that the applicant is referred to a family counsellor or family dispute resolution practitioner in order to obtain information about those matters.
60K Court to take prompt action in relation to allegations of child abuse or family violence
(1) This section applies if:
(a) an application is made to a court for a Part VII order in relation to a child; and
(b) a document is filed in the court, on or after the commencement of this section, in relation to the proceedings for the order; and
(c) the document alleges, as a consideration that is relevant to whether the court should grant or refuse the application, that:
(i) there has been abuse of the child by one of the parties to the proceedings; or
(ii) there would be a risk of abuse of the child if there were to be a delay in applying for the order; or
(iii) there has been family violence by one of the parties to the proceedings; or
(iv) there is a risk of family violence by one of the parties to the proceedings; and
(d) the document is a document of the kind prescribed by the applicable Rules of Court for the purposes of this paragraph.
(2) The court must:
(a) consider what interim or procedural orders (if any) should be made:
(i) to enable appropriate evidence about the allegation to be obtained as expeditiously as possible; and
(ii) to protect the child or any of the parties to the proceedings; and
(b) make such orders of that kind as the court considers appropriate; and
(c) deal with the issues raised by the allegation as expeditiously as possible.
(2A) The court must take the action required by paragraphs (2)(a) and (b):
(a) as soon as practicable after the document is filed; and
(b) if it is appropriate having regard to the circumstances of the case—within 8 weeks after the document is filed.
(3) Without limiting subparagraph (2)(a)(i), the court must consider whether orders should be made under section 69ZW to obtain reports from State and Territory agencies in relation to the allegations.
(4) Without limiting paragraph (2)(a)(ii), the court must consider whether orders should be made, or an injunction granted, under section 68B.
(5) A failure to comply with a provision of this section in relation to an application does not affect the validity of any order made in the proceedings in relation to the application.
12 At the end of subsection 61C(1)
Add:
Note 1: This section states the legal position that prevails in relation to parental responsibility to the extent to which it is not displaced by a parenting order made by the court. See subsection (3) of this section and subsection 61D(2) for the effect of a parenting order.
Note 2: This section does not establish a presumption to be applied by the court when making a parenting order. See section 61DA for the presumption that the court does apply when making a parenting order.
Note 3: Under section 63C, the parents of a child may make a parenting plan that deals with the allocation of parental responsibility for the child.
13 After section 61D
Insert:
61DA Presumption of equal shared parental responsibility when making parenting orders
(1) When making a parenting order in relation to a child, the court must apply a presumption that it is in the best interests of the child for the child’s parents to have equal shared parental responsibility for the child.
Note: The presumption provided for in this subsection is a presumption that relates solely to the allocation of parental responsibility for a child as defined in section 61B. It does not provide for a presumption about the amount of time the child spends with each of the parents (this issue is dealt with in section 65DAA).
(2) The presumption does not apply if there are reasonable grounds to believe that a parent of the child (or a person who lives with a parent of the child) has engaged in:
(a) abuse of the child or another child who, at the time, was a member of the parent’s family (or that other person’s family); or
(b) family violence.
(3) When the court is making an interim order, the presumption applies unless the court considers that it would not be appropriate in the circumstances for the presumption to be applied when making that order.
(4) The presumption may be rebutted by evidence that satisfies the court that it would not be in the best interests of the child for the child’s parents to have equal shared parental responsibility for the child.
61DB Application of presumption of equal shared parental responsibility after interim parenting order made
If there is an interim parenting order in relation to a child, the court must, in making a final parenting order in relation to the child, disregard the allocation of parental responsibility made in the interim order.
14 At the end of Division 2 of Part VII
Add:
61F Application to Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander children
In:
(a) applying this Part to the circumstances of an Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander child; or
(b) identifying a person or persons who have exercised, or who may exercise, parental responsibility for such a child;
the court must have regard to any kinship obligations, and child‑rearing practices, of the child’s Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander culture.
15 After subsection 62G(3)
Insert:
(3A) A family consultant who is directed to give the court a report on a matter under subsection (2) must:
(a) ascertain the views of the child in relation to that matter; and
(b) include the views of the child on that matter in the report.
Note: A person cannot require a child to express his or her views in relation to any matter (see section 60CE).
(3B) Subsection (3A) does not apply if complying with that subsection would be inappropriate because of:
(a) the child’s age or maturity; or
(b) some other special circumstance.
16 After paragraph 63C(1)(b)
Insert:
(ba) is signed by the parents of the child; and
(bb) is dated; and
16A After subsection 63C(1)
Insert:
(1A) An agreement is not a parenting plan for the purposes of this Act unless it is made free from any threat, duress or coercion.
17 Subsection 63C(2)
Repeal the subsection, substitute:
(2) A parenting plan may deal with one or more of the following:
(a) the person or persons with whom a child is to live;
(b) the time a child is to spend with another person or other persons;
(c) the allocation of parental responsibility for a child;
(d) if 2 or more persons are to share parental responsibility for a child—the form of consultations those persons are to have with one another about decisions to be made in the exercise of that responsibility;
(e) the communication a child is to have with another person or other persons;
(f) maintenance of a child;
(g) the process to be used for resolving disputes about the terms or operation of the plan;
(h) the process to be used for changing the plan to take account of the changing needs or circumstances of the child or the parties to the plan;
(i) any aspect of the care, welfare or development of the child or any other aspect of parental responsibility for a child.
Note: Paragraph (f)—if the Child Support (Assessment) Act 1989 applies, provisions in a parenting plan dealing with the maintenance of a child (as distinct from child support under that Act) are unenforceable and of no effect unless the provisions in the plan are a child support agreement (see section 63CAA and subsection 63G(5) of this Act).
(2A) The person referred to in subsection (2) may be, or the persons referred to in that subsection may include, either a parent of the child or a person other than the parent of the child (including a grandparent or other relative of the child).
(2B) Without limiting paragraph (2)(c), the plan may deal with the allocation of responsibility for making decisions about major long‑term issues in relation to the child.
(2C) The communication referred to in paragraph (2)(e) includes (but is not limited to) communication by:
(a) letter; and
(b) telephone, email or any other electronic means.
18 Section 63DA
Repeal the section, substitute:
(1) If an adviser gives advice or assistance to people in relation to parental responsibility for a child following the breakdown of the relationship between those people, the adviser must:
(a) inform them that they could consider entering into a parenting plan in relation to the child; and
(b) inform them about where they can get further assistance to develop a parenting plan and the content of the plan.
(2) If an adviser gives advice to people in connection with the making by those people of a parenting plan in relation to a child, the adviser must:
(a) inform them that, if the child spending equal time with each of them is:
(i) reasonably practicable; and
(ii) in the best interests of the child;
they could consider the option of an arrangement of that kind; and
(b) inform them that, if the child spending equal time with each of them is not reasonably practicable or is not in the best interests of the child but the child spending substantial and significant time with each of them is:
(i) reasonably practicable; and
(ii) in the best interests of the child;
they could consider the option of an arrangement of that kind; and
(c) inform them that decisions made in developing parenting plans should be made in the best interests of the child; and
(d) inform them of the matters that may be dealt with in a parenting plan in accordance with subsection 63C(2); and
(e) inform them that, if there is a parenting order in force in relation to the child, the order may (because of section 64D) include a provision that the order is subject to a parenting plan they enter into; and
(f) inform them about the desirability of including in the plan:
(i) if they are to share parental responsibility for the child under the plan—provisions of the kind referred to in paragraph 63C(2)(d) (which deals with the form of consultations between the parties to the plan) as a way of avoiding future conflicts over, or misunderstandings about, the matters covered by that paragraph; and
(ii) provisions of the kind referred to in paragraph 63C(2)(g) (which deals with the process for resolving disputes between the parties to the plan); and
(iii) provisions of the kind referred to in paragraph 63C(2)(h) (which deals with the process for changing the plan to take account of the changing needs or circumstances of the child or the parties to the plan); and
(g) explain to them, in language they are likely to readily understand, the availability of programs to help people who experience difficulties in complying with a parenting plan; and
(h) inform them that section 65DAB requires the court to have regard to the terms of the most recent parenting plan in relation to the child when making a parenting order in relation to the child if it is in the best interests of the child to do so.
Note: Paragraphs (a) and (b) only require the adviser to inform the people that they could consider the option of the child spending equal time, or substantial and significant time, with each of them. The adviser may, but is not obliged to, advise them as to whether that option would be appropriate in their particular circumstances.
(3) For the purposes of paragraph (2)(b), a child will be taken to spend substantial and significant time with a parent only if:
(a) the time the child spends with the parent includes both:
(i) days that fall on weekends and holidays; and
(ii) days that do not fall on weekends or holidays; and
(b) the time the child spends with the parent allows the parent to be involved in:
(i) the child’s daily routine; and
(ii) occasions and events that are of particular significance to the child; and
(c) the time the child spends with the parent allows the child to be involved in occasions and events that are of special significance to the parent.
(4) Subsection (3) does not limit the other matters to which regard may be had in determining whether the time a child spends with a parent would be substantial and significant.
(5) In this section:
"adviser" means a person who is:
(a) a legal practitioner; or
(b) a family counsellor; or
(c) a family dispute resolution practitioner; or
(d) a family consultant.
19 Paragraph 63E(3)(b)
Omit “subsection 68F(2)”, substitute “subsections 60CC(2) and (3)”.
20 Subsection 63F(6) (note)
Omit “Division 10 deals”, substitute “Sections 60CB to 60CG deal”.
21 Subsection 63H(2) (note)
Omit “Division 10 deals”, substitute “Sections 60CB to 60CG deal”.
22 Subsections 64B(2) to (4)
Repeal the subsections, substitute:
(2) A parenting order may deal with one or more of the following:
(a) the person or persons with whom a child is to live;
(b) the time a child is to spend with another person or other persons;
(c) the allocation of parental responsibility for a child;
(d) if 2 or more persons are to share parental responsibility for a child—the form of consultations those persons are to have with one another about decisions to be made in the exercise of that responsibility;
(e) the communication a child is to have with another person or other persons;
(f) maintenance of a child;
(g) the steps to be taken before an application is made to a court for a variation of the order to take account of the changing needs or circumstances of:
(i) a child to whom the order relates; or
(ii) the parties to the proceedings in which the order is made;
(h) the process to be used for resolving disputes about the terms or operation of the order;
(i) any aspect of the care, welfare or development of the child or any other aspect of parental responsibility for a child.
The person referred to in this subsection may be, or the persons referred to in this subsection may include, either a parent of the child or a person other than the parent of the child (including a grandparent or other relative of the child).
Note: Paragraph (f)—a parenting order cannot deal with the maintenance of a child if the Child Support (Assessment) Act 1989 applies.
(3) Without limiting paragraph (2)(c), the order may deal with the allocation of responsibility for making decisions about major long‑term issues in relation to the child.
(4) The communication referred to in paragraph (2)(e) includes (but is not limited to) communication by:
(a) letter; and
(b) telephone, email or any other electronic means.
(4A) Without limiting paragraphs (2)(g) and (h), the parenting order may provide that the parties to the proceedings must consult with a family dispute resolution practitioner to assist with:
(a) resolving any dispute about the terms or operation of the order; or
(b) reaching agreement about changes to be made to the order.
23 Subsection 64B(5)
Omit “(c)”, substitute “(f)”.
24 Subsections 64B(6) to (8)
Repeal the subsections, substitute:
(6) For the purposes of this Act:
(a) a parenting order that provides that a child is to live with a person is made in favour of that person; and
(b) a parenting order that provides that a child is to spend time with a person is made in favour of that person; and
(c) a parenting order that provides that a child is to have communication with a person is made in favour of that person; and
(d) a parenting order that:
(i) allocates parental responsibility for a child to a person; or
(ii) provides that a person is to share parental responsibility for a child with another person;
is made in favour of that person.
25 At the end of Division 5 of Part VII
Add:
64D Parenting orders subject to later parenting plans
(1) Subject to subsection (2), a parenting order in relation to a child is taken to include a provision that the order is subject to a parenting plan that is:
(a) entered into subsequently by the child’s parents; and
(b) agreed to, in writing, by any other person (other than the child) to whom the parenting order applies.
(2) The court may, in exceptional circumstances, include in a parenting order a provision that the parenting order, or a specified provision of the parenting order, may only be varied by a subsequent order of the court (and not by a parenting plan).
(3) Without limiting subsection (2), exceptional circumstances for the purposes of that subsection include the following:
(a) circumstances that give rise to a need to protect the child from physical or psychological harm from being subjected to, or exposed to, abuse, neglect or family violence;
(b) the existence of substantial evidence that one of the child’s parents is likely to seek to use coercion or duress to gain the agreement of the other parent to a parenting plan.
26 Section 65A
Before “This”, insert “(1)”.
27 At the end of section 65A
Add:
Note: Paragraph (a)—section 60I provides that people with disputes about matters that may be dealt with in a Part VII order (which includes a parenting order) should generally make use of family dispute resolution before applying for the order.
(2) Measures designed to improve communication between separated parents and to educate parents about their respective responsibilities in relation to their children are contained in this Division (see section 65DA).
Note: Division 13A provides for the compliance regime for dealing with contraventions, and alleged contraventions, of parenting orders.
28 Section 65AA
Repeal the section, substitute:
65AA Child’s best interests paramount consideration in making a parenting order
Section 60CA provides that in deciding whether to make a particular parenting order in relation to a child, a court must regard the best interests of the child as the paramount consideration.
29 Subsection 65D(1)
After “subject to”, insert “sections 61DA (presumption of equal shared parental responsibility when making parenting orders) and 65DAB (parenting plans) and”.
30 Subsection 65D(2)
After “subject to”, insert “section 61DA (presumption of equal shared parental responsibility when making parenting orders) and 65DAB (parenting plans) and”.
31 After section 65D
Insert:
65DAA Court to consider child spending equal time or substantial and significant time with each parent in certain circumstances
Equal time
(1) If a parenting order provides (or is to provide) that a child’s parents are to have equal shared parental responsibility for the child, the court must:
(a) consider whether the child spending equal time with each of the parents would be in the best interests of the child; and
(b) consider whether the child spending equal time with each of the parents is reasonably practicable; and
(c) if it is, consider making an order to provide (or including a provision in the order) for the child to spend equal time with each of the parents.
Note 1: The effect of section 60CA is that in deciding whether to go on to make a parenting order for the child to spend equal time with each of the parents, the court will regard the best interests of the child as the paramount consideration.
Note 2: See subsection (5) for the factors the court takes into account in determining what is reasonably practicable.
Substantial and significant time
(2) If:
(a) a parenting order provides (or is to provide) that a child’s parents are to have equal shared parental responsibility for the child; and
(b) the court does not make an order (or include a provision in the order) for the child to spend equal time with each of the parents; and
the court must:
(c) consider whether the child spending substantial and significant time with each of the parents would be in the best interests of the child; and
(d) consider whether the child spending substantial and significant time with each of the parents is reasonably practicable; and
(e) if it is, consider making an order to provide (or including a provision in the order) for the child to spend substantial and significant time with each of the parents.
Note 1: The effect of section 60CA is that in deciding whether to go on to make a parenting order for the child to spend substantial time with each of the parents, the court will regard the best interests of the child as the paramount consideration.
Note 2: See subsection (5) for the factors the court takes into account in determining what is reasonably practicable.
(3) For the purposes of subsection (2), a child will be taken to spend substantial and significant time with a parent only if:
(a) the time the child spends with the parent includes both:
(i) days that fall on weekends and holidays; and
(ii) days that do not fall on weekends or holidays; and
(b) the time the child spends with the parent allows the parent to be involved in:
(i) the child’s daily routine; and
(ii) occasions and events that are of particular significance to the child; and
(c) the time the child spends with the parent allows the child to be involved in occasions and events that are of special significance to the parent.
(4) Subsection (3) does not limit the other matters to which a court can have regard in determining whether the time a child spends with a parent would be substantial and significant.
Reasonable practicality
(5) In determining for the purposes of subsections (1) and (2) whether it is reasonably practicable for a child to spend equal time, or substantial and significant time, with each of the child’s parents, the court must have regard to:
(a) how far apart the parents live from each other; and
(b) the parents’ current and future capacity to implement an arrangement for the child spending equal time, or substantial and significant time, with each of the parents; and
(c) the parents’ current and future capacity to communicate with each other and resolve difficulties that might arise in implementing an arrangement of that kind; and
(d) the impact that an arrangement of that kind would have on the child; and
(e) such other matters as the court considers relevant.
Note 1: Behaviour of a parent that is relevant for paragraph (c) may also be taken into account in determining what parenting order the court should make in the best interests of the child. Subsection 60CC(3) provides for considerations that are taken into account in determining what is in the best interests of the child. These include:
(a) the willingness and ability of each of the child’s parents to facilitate, and encourage, a close and continuing relationship between the child and the other parent (paragraph 60CC(3)(c));
(b) the attitude to the child, and to the responsibilities of parenthood, demonstrated by each of the child’s parents (paragraph 60CC(3)(i)).
Note 2: Paragraph (c) reference to future capacity—the court has power under section 13C to make orders for parties to attend family counselling or family dispute resolution or participate in courses, programs or services.
65DAB Court to have regard to parenting plans
When making a parenting order in relation to a child, the court is to have regard to the terms of the most recent parenting plan (if any) that has been entered into between the child’s parents (to the extent to which that plan relates to the child) if doing so would be in the best interests of the child.
65DAC Effect of parenting order that provides for shared parental responsibility
(1) This section applies if, under a parenting order:
(a) 2 or more persons are to share parental responsibility for a child; and
(b) the exercise of that parental responsibility involves making a decision about a major long‑term issue in relation to the child.
(2) The order is taken to require the decision to be made jointly by those persons.
Note: Subject to any court orders, decisions about issues that are not major long‑term issues are made by the person with whom the child is spending time without a need to consult the other person (see section 65DAE).
(3) The order is taken to require each of those persons:
(a) to consult the other person in relation to the decision to be made about that issue; and
(b) to make a genuine effort to come to a joint decision about that issue.
(4) To avoid doubt, this section does not require any other person to establish, before acting on a decision about the child communicated by one of those persons, that the decision has been made jointly.
65DAE No need to consult on issues that are not major long‑term issues
(1) If a child is spending time with a person at a particular time under a parenting order, the order is taken not to require the person to consult a person who:
(a) has parental responsibility for the child; or
(b) shares parental responsibility for the child with another person;
about decisions that are made in relation to the child during that time on issues that are not major‑long term issues.
Note: This will mean that the person with whom the child is spending time will usually not need to consult on decisions about such things as what the child eats or wears because these are usually not major long‑term issues.
(2) Subsection (1) applies subject to any provision to the contrary made by a parenting order.
32 Section 65E
Repeal the section.
33 Paragraph 65G(2)(a)
Repeal the paragraph, substitute:
(a) the parties to the proceedings have attended a conference with a family consultant to discuss the matter to be determined by the proposed order; or
34 Subsection 65L(2) (note)
Omit “Division 10 deals”, substitute “Sections 60CB to 60CG deal”.
35 Subsection 65LA(2) (note)
Omit “Division 10 deals”, substitute “Sections 60CB to 60CG deal”.
36 Section 67L (note)
Omit “Division 10 deals”, substitute “Sections 60CB to 60CG deal”.
37 Section 67V (note)
Omit “Division 10 deals”, substitute “Sections 60CB to 60CG deal”.
38 Subsection 67ZC(2) (note)
Omit “Division 10 deals”, substitute “Sections 60CB to 60CG deal”.
39 Subsection 69ZH(2)
After “subsection,”, insert “Subdivision BA of Division 1,”.
40 Subsection 117(1)
After “sections 117AA”, insert “, 117AB”.
41 After section 117AA
Insert:
117AB Costs where false allegation or statement made
(1) This section applies if:
(a) proceedings under this Act are brought before a court; and
(b) the court is satisfied that a party to the proceedings knowingly made a false allegation or statement in the proceedings.
(2) The court must order that party to pay some or all of the costs of another party, or other parties, to the proceedings.
Part 2 — Application of amendments
42 Definitions
In this Part:
commencement means the commencement of this Schedule.
new Act means the Family Law Act 1975 as in force after commencement.
old Act means the Family Law Act 1975 as in force immediately before commencement.
43 Application
(1) Section 60CC of the new Act applies to orders made on or after commencement.
(2) The amendments made by items 13, 29 and 30 of this Schedule apply to parenting orders made on or after commencement.
(3) The amendment made by item 14 of this Schedule applies to proceedings under Part VII, whether or not the proceedings were initiated before commencement.
(4) The amendment made by item 15 of this Schedule applies to directions given under subsection 62G(2) of the new Act on or after commencement.
(5) The amendments made by items 16 and 16A of this Schedule apply to parenting plans made on or after commencement.
(6) The amendment made by item 22 of this Schedule applies to parenting orders made on or after commencement.
(7) The amendment made by item 25 of this Schedule applies to parenting orders made on or after commencement. This includes, without limitation, a parenting order that varies an earlier parenting order, whether the earlier parenting order was made before or after commencement.
(8) Sections 65DAA, 65DAB, 65DAC and 65DAE of the new Act apply to parenting orders made on or after commencement.
(9) The amendment made by item 33 of this Schedule applies to a court proposing to make an order mentioned in subsection 65G(1) of the new Act, whether or not the proceedings to which the order relates were initiated before commencement.
44 Grounds for discharging or varying parenting orders
The amendments made by this Schedule are taken not to constitute changed circumstances that would justify making an order to discharge or vary, or to suspend or revive the operation of, some or all of a parenting order that was made before commencement.
Note: For the need for changed circumstances, see Rice and Asplund (1979) FLC 90‑725.