Commonwealth Numbered Acts
[Index]
[Table]
[Search]
[Search this Act]
[Notes]
[Noteup]
[Previous]
[Next]
[Download]
[Help]
TAXATION LAWS AMENDMENT (SUPERANNUATION) ACT 1992 No. 208 of 1992 - SECT 45
Roll-over of ETPs
45. Section 27D of the Principal Act is amended:
(a) by omitting from subparagraphs (1)(b)(i) and (ii) "this paragraph" and
substituting "this section";
(b) by omitting from subparagraph (1)(b)(iii) "this subparagraph" and
substituting "this section";
(c) by adding at the end the following subsections:
"(4) A taxpayer's election under subsection (1) is taken to have specified the
amount worked out using the steps set out in the following provisions of this
section as the extent to which the taxpayer wishes a particular applied amount
to be regarded as consisting of an eligible component covered by
sub-subparagraph (1)(b)(iii)(A), (B) or (BA).
"(5) Step 1: the applied amount consists of the following notional components:
(a) the notional concessional component, which is the amount (including a
nil amount) specified in the taxpayer's election under subsection (1)
as the extent to which the taxpayer wishes the applied amount to be
regarded as consisting of the eligible component covered by
sub-subparagraph (1)(b)(iii)(D);
(b) the notional undeducted contributions, which is the amount (including
a nil amount) specified in the taxpayer's election under subsection
(1) as the extent to which the taxpayer wishes the applied amount to
be regarded as consisting of the eligible component covered by
sub-subparagraph (1)(b)(iii)(C);
(c) the notional pre-July 83 component, which is the lesser of the
following amounts:
(i) the amount worked out using the formula:
Notional Pre-July 83
Applied - concessional x Total period
amount component
where:
'Pre-July 83' is the number of whole days (if any) in the eligible service
period that occurred before 1 July 1983;
'Total period' is the number of whole days in the eligible service period;
(ii) the amount represented by the component (Applied
amount-Notional concessional component) in subparagraph (i),
reduced by the notional undeducted contributions;
(d) the notional post-June 83 component, which is the applied amount
reduced by the other notional components.
"(6) Step 2: if the applied amount includes a notionalpre-July 83 component,
the taxpayer's election under subsection (1) is taken to have specified that
notional component as the extent to which the taxpayer wishes the applied
amount to be regarded as consisting of the eligible component covered by
sub-subparagraph (1)(b)(iii)(BA).
"(7) Step 3: if the applied amount includes a notional post-June 83 component,
the taxpayer's election under subsection (1) has no effect unless the
following rules are complied with:
(a) the sum of:
(i) the amount specified in the taxpayer's election under
subsection (1) as the extent to which the taxpayer wishes the
applied amount to be regarded as consisting of the eligible
component covered by sub-subparagraph (1)(b)(iii)(A); and
(ii) the amount specified in the taxpayer's election under
subsection (1) as the extent to which the taxpayer wishes the
applied amount to be regarded as consisting of the eligible
component covered by sub-subparagraph (1)(b)(iii)(B); must
equal the notional post-June 83 component of the applied
amount;
(b) the amount specified in the taxpayer's election under subsection (1)
as the extent to which the taxpayer wishes the applied amount to be
regarded as consisting of the eligible component covered by
sub-subparagraph (1)(b)(iii)(B) must not exceed the untaxed element of
the post-June 83 component of the qualifying eligible termination
payment, reduced by the sum of:
(i) if there are one or more other applied amounts which relate to
one or more earlier qualifying roll-over payments (which other
applied amounts are called 'previous applied amounts')-the
amount specified in the taxpayer's election under subsection
(1) as the extent to which the taxpayer wishes the previous
applied amounts to be regarded as consisting of that eligible
component; and
(ii) the untaxed element of the retained amount of the post-June 83
component of the qualifying eligible termination payment;
(c) the amount specified in the taxpayer's election as the extent to which
the taxpayer wishes the applied amount to be regarded as consisting of
the eligible component covered by sub-subparagraph (1)(b)(iii)(A) must
not exceed the sum of:
(i) the taxed element of the post-June 83 component of the
qualifying eligible termination payment, reduced, in a case
where there are one or more other applied amounts which relate
to one or more earlier qualifying roll-over payments (which
other applied amounts are called 'previous applied amounts'),
by the sum of the amounts specified in the taxpayer's election
under subsection (1) as the extent to which the taxpayer wishes
the previous applied amounts to be regarded as consisting of
that eligible component; and
(ii) if the sum of:
(A) the notional post-June 83 component of the applied
amount; and
(B) if there are one or more other applied amounts-the
notional post-June 83 components of those other applied
amounts; and
(C) the retained amount of the post-June 83 component of the
qualifying eligible termination payment; exceeds the
post-June 83 component of the qualifying eligible
termination payment-the amount calculated using the
formula:
Notional post-June 83
component of applied - Limit calculated + Amount calculated
amount under paragraph (b) under subparagraph (i).".
AustLII: Copyright Policy
| Disclaimers
| Privacy Policy
| Feedback