Insert:
(a) applies to participants in a particular section of the telecommunications
industry; and
(b) deals with one or more matters relating to the telecommunications
activities of those participants; and
(c) deals wholly or mainly with one or more matters relating to the
relationship between carriage service providers and their retail
customers;
the body or association may apply to the ACMA for a declaration that the body or association is eligible for reimbursement of refundable costs incurred by it in developing the code.
Form of application etc.
(a) in writing; and
(b) in accordance with the form approved in writing by the ACMA; and
(c) accompanied by:
(i) an estimate of the total of the refundable costs likely to be incurred
by the body or association in developing the code; and
(ii) a statement breaking down that estimate into categories of refundable
costs.
Further information
Definition
(a) the body or association represents the section of the telecommunications
industry referred to in paragraph 136A(1)(a); and
(b) the code will deal wholly or mainly with one or more matters relating
to the relationship between carriage service providers and their
retail customers; and
(c) the process for developing the code, as outlined in the application,
is likely to ensure that the interests of those retail customers are
adequately represented in relation to the development of the code; and
(d) the total of the refundable costs likely to be incurred by the body or
association in developing the code, as set out in the estimate that
accompanied the application, is reasonable.
Reimbursement of costs
(a) a section 136B declaration was made in relation to the development of
an industry code by a body or association; and
(b) when the section 136B declaration was in force, the body or
association gave a copy of the code to the ACMA under
section 117; and
(c) the ACMA is satisfied that the code deals wholly or mainly with one or
more matters relating to the relationship between carriage service
providers and their retail customers; and
(d) the ACMA is satisfied that the process for the development of the code
ensured that the interests of those retail customers were adequately
represented in relation to the development of the code; and
(e) the copy of the code was accompanied by:
(i) a written statement itemising one or more costs incurred by the body
or association in developing the code; and
(ii) a written claim for reimbursement of those costs; and
(iii) a written declaration by an approved auditor that he or she is of the
opinion that the subparagraph (i) statement complies with the
approved auditing requirements; and
(iv) a written statement describing the process for the development of the
code; and
(f) the ACMA is satisfied that each of the costs itemised in the
subparagraph (e)(i) statement:
(i) is a refundable cost incurred by the body or association in developing
the code; and
(ii) was incurred when the section 136B declaration was in force;
the ACMA must, by written notice given to the body or association, determine that the body or association is entitled to be paid a specified amount.
(a) the total of the costs itemised in the subparagraph (1)(e)(i)
statement;
(b) the estimate that accompanied the application for the
section 136B declaration.
Approved auditors and approved auditing requirements
(a) the persons who are to be approved auditors for the purposes of this
section; and
(b) the requirements that are to be approved auditing requirements for the
purposes of this section.
(a) a body or association has incurred a cost in connection with a transaction
where the parties to the transaction are not dealing with each other at arm's
length in relation to the transaction; and
(b) apart from this section, the cost is counted for the purposes of the
application of this Division to the body or association; and
(c) the amount of the cost is greater than is reasonable;
the amount of the cost is taken, for the purposes of the application of this Division in relation to the body or association, to be the amount that would have been reasonable if the parties were dealing with each other at arm's length.