Commonwealth Numbered Regulations

[Index] [Table] [Search] [Search this Regulation] [Notes] [Noteup] [Previous] [Next] [Download] [Help]

1997 No. 101 WORKPLACE RELATIONS REGULATIONS (AMENDMENT) - REG 3

3. Regulation 30B (Employees excluded from requirements for termination of employment)
[NOTE: The following note should be inserted after subregulation 30B (1):

"[NOTE: The expression 'employee engaged under a contract of employment for a
specified period of time' used in paragraph 30B (1) (a) has been addressed in
a number of cases before the Industrial Relations Court of Australia,
including, in particular, Cooper v Darwin Rugby League Inc (1994) 57 IR 238,
Andersen v Umbakumba Community Council (1994) 126 ALR 121, D'Lima v Board of
Management, Princess Margaret Hospital of Children (1995-1996) 64 IR 19 and
Fisher v Edith Cowan University (unreported judgement of Madgwick J, 12
November 1996, No. WI 1061 of 1996).]".]

3.1 Subregulation 30B (2): Omit "the main", substitute "a substantial". [NOTE:
The following note should be inserted after subregulation 30B (4):

"[NOTE: An employee who is excluded from the provisions of the Act specified
in subregulation 30B (1) may still be eligible to apply for a remedy in
relation to the termination of employment under a State law.]".] 


AustLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback