Commonwealth Numbered Regulations
[Index]
[Table]
[Search]
[Search this Regulation]
[Notes]
[Noteup]
[Previous]
[Next]
[Download]
[Help]
1997 No. 101 WORKPLACE RELATIONS REGULATIONS (AMENDMENT) - REG 3
3. Regulation 30B (Employees excluded from requirements for termination of employment)
[NOTE: The following note should be inserted after subregulation 30B (1):
"[NOTE: The expression 'employee engaged under a contract of employment for a
specified period of time' used in paragraph 30B (1) (a) has been addressed in
a number of cases before the Industrial Relations Court of Australia,
including, in particular, Cooper v Darwin Rugby League Inc (1994) 57 IR 238,
Andersen v Umbakumba Community Council (1994) 126 ALR 121, D'Lima v Board of
Management, Princess Margaret Hospital of Children (1995-1996) 64 IR 19 and
Fisher v Edith Cowan University (unreported judgement of Madgwick J, 12
November 1996, No. WI 1061 of 1996).]".]
3.1 Subregulation 30B (2): Omit "the main", substitute "a substantial". [NOTE:
The following note should be inserted after subregulation 30B (4):
"[NOTE: An employee who is excluded from the provisions of the Act specified
in subregulation 30B (1) may still be eligible to apply for a remedy in
relation to the termination of employment under a State law.]".]
AustLII: Copyright Policy
| Disclaimers
| Privacy Policy
| Feedback