[Index] [Search] [Download] [Related Items] [Help]
EXTRADITION (LITHUANIA) REGULATIONS 2005 (SLI NO 3 OF 2005)
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Issued by the authority of the Minister
for Justice and Customs
Select Legislative
Instrument 2005 No. 3
Extradition Act 1988
Extradition (Lithuania) Regulations 2005
Section 55 of
the Extradition Act 1988 (the Act) provides, in part, that the Governor‑General
may make regulations, not inconsistent with the Act, prescribing all matters
required or permitted by the Act to be prescribed, or necessary or convenient
to be prescribed for carrying out or giving effect to the Act.
Section 5 of the
Act defines an ‘extradition country’ to include a country that is declared by the
regulations to be an extradition country.
Paragraph 11(1)(b) of the Act provides that the
regulations may make provision for application of the Act subject to certain
limitations, conditions, exceptions or qualifications.
The purpose of the Regulations is to establish
extradition arrangements with Lithuania under regulations for that specific
purpose, enabling Australia to consider extradition requests received from Lithuania. Australia did not have an extradition
relationship with Lithuania prior to the Regulations being made.
The Act applies the modern ‘no evidence’ extradition procedure. Under this procedure countries are not
required to present evidence establishing a prima facie case against the
person sought.
Extradition to Lithuania
under the Regulations operates in accordance with the Act, subject to a
modification, namely that an arrested person may apply to a magistrate for
release after 60 days if a request for his or her extradition has not been
received. The standard period under the
Act is 45 days. Modification to apply a
60 day period is common and has been included in extradition agreements with
Brazil, Chile, Hungary, Mexico, Paraguay, South Korea and the United States.
Extradition
under the Regulations is subject to the various safeguards set out in the
Act. For example, extradition would not
be permitted where the fugitive was sought for or in connection with her or his
race, religion, nationality or political opinions or would be tried, sentenced
or detained for a political or military offence. In addition, the Attorney-General would
retain a broad discretion to refuse an extradition request by Lithuania in any
particular case.
This action is
consistent with the provisions of the Act.
Similar ‘non-treaty Regulations’ currently provide that the Act applies
to Cambodia, Canada, Croatia, Denmark, Estonia, Iceland, Japan, Jordan,
Kyrgyzstan, Latvia, Lebanon, the Marshall Islands, Slovenia, Thailand and the
United Kingdom.
The Regulations are
a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act
2003.
The Regulations
commenced on the day after their registration on the Federal Register of
Legislative Instruments.