[Index] [Search] [Download] [Related Items] [Help]
HEALTH INSURANCE (DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING SERVICES TABLE) AMENDMENT REGULATIONS 2006 (NO. 2) (SLI NO 85 OF 2006)
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Select Legislative Instrument 2006 No. 85
Minute No. 8 of 2006 – Minister for Health and Ageing
Subject: Health Insurance Act 1973
Health Insurance (Diagnostic Imaging Services Table) Amendment Regulations 2006 (No. 2)
Subsection 133(1) of the Health Insurance Act 1973 (the Act) provides that the
Governor-General may make regulations, not inconsistent with the Act, prescribing all matters required or permitted by the Act to be prescribed, or necessary or convenient to be prescribed for carrying out or giving effect to the Act.
The Act provides, in part, for payments of Medicare benefits in respect of professional services rendered to eligible persons. Section 9 of the Act provides that Medicare benefits shall be calculated by reference to the fees for medical services, including diagnostic imaging services, set out in prescribed tables.
Section 4AA of the Act provides that the regulations may prescribe a table of diagnostic imaging services, the amount of fees applicable in respect of each item and the rules for interpretation of the table. Schedule 1 to the Health Insurance (Diagnostic Imaging Services Table) Regulations 2005 (the Principal Regulations) prescribes such a table.
The purpose of the Regulations is to:
· provide Medicare eligibility for diagnostic Computed Tomography (CT) scans performed on a dual purpose (hybrid) machine;
· ensure consistency with the reporting requirements for CT and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scans;
· omit an obsolete rule of interpretation for MRI; and
· specify that certain CT items of service are not to be claimed if performed to image the coronary arteries.
The Australian Government (as represented by the Department of Health and Ageing) manages Medicare funding for diagnostic imaging services through four agreements known as the “2003-2008 Quality and Outlays Memoranda of Understanding (MoUs)”. The MoUs cover radiology, cardiac imaging, nuclear medicine imaging and obstetric and gynaecological ultrasound services.
Details of the Regulations are provided in the Attachment.
The Act specifies no conditions that need to be met before the power to make the Regulations may be exercised.
The Regulations would be a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
The Regulations would commence on 1 May 2006.
Authority: Subsection 133(1) of the Health Insurance Act 1973
DETAILS OF THE PROPOSED HEALTH INSURANCE (DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING SERVICES TABLE) AMENDMENT REGULATIONS 2006 (No. 2)
Regulation 1 – Name of Regulations
This regulation provides that the title of the Regulations is the Health Insurance (Diagnostic Imaging Services Table) Amendment Regulations 2006 (No. 2).
Regulation 2 - Commencement
This regulation provides for the amendment regulations to commence on 1 May 2006.
Regulation 3 – Amendments
This regulation provides that the Health Insurance (Diagnostic Imaging Services Table) Regulations 2005 (the Principal Regulations) are amended as set out in the attached Schedule.
Schedule - Amendments
Rule of interpretation 20 in Part 2 to Schedule 1 to the Principal Regulations precludes payment of a Medicare benefit if a scan is performed using a Hybrid Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) scanner. This is because previous hybrid machine models have not been capable of producing scans of the same quality as those performed on a stand-alone CT machine. However, current evidence suggests that modern hybrid machines are capable of producing the same quality scans as those provided on a stand-alone CT machine.
Rules of interpretation 19 and 20, as substituted, would provide for a CT scan performed on a stand-alone or hybrid machine to be Medicare-eligible only if performed for diagnostic purposes by a specialist radiologist:
- rule of interpretation 19 would be amended to prescribe in paragraph 19(1)(b) that in addition to the service being provided under the professional supervision of a specialist radiologist, the CT scan must also be reported by a specialist radiologist, and
- rule of interpretation 20 would prescribe that a CT service is not an eligible service if performed as part of another diagnostic imaging procedure which uses CT to enhance the image (attenuation correction) or provide detailed information about the location, size and shape of lesions in the body (anatomical correlation).
Item [2] – Rule of interpretation 33
Rule of interpretation 33 is substituted to provide in paragraph 33(1)(b) that a Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) or Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA) service is to be reported by an eligible provider as described in rule of interpretation 34. This amendment is to ensure consistency of the rules of interpretation for reporting requirements for CT scans and MRI/MRA scans.
Item [3] – Rule of interpretation 34
Paragraphs (1) and (2) of rule of interpretation 34 are amended by omitting reference to “rule 33” and inserting “subrule 33(1)” to reflect the proposed amendment to rule of interpretation 33.
Item [4] – Rule of interpretation 39
Paragraph 3 of rule of interpretation 39 prescribes that one fee applies if two or more MRI musculoskeletal services are provided to a person on a single occasion. It was introduced in the Principal Regulations from 1 August 2004 as part of a major restructure of MRI services from 1 August 2004.
The Principal Regulations were further amended from 1 November 2004 to provide in paragraphs 2 and 3 of rule of interpretation 38 for a discounted fee model to apply when two or more MRI musculoskeletal services are provided to the same patient on the same day. Paragraph 3 of rule of interpretation 39 no longer applied but was not omitted from the Principal Regulations at that time.
Paragraph 3 of rule of interpretation 39 is omitted from the Principal Regulations as it has been superseded by paragraphs 2 and 3 of rule of interpretation 38.
Items [5] to [9]