[Index] [Search] [Download] [Related Items] [Help]
TRADESPERSONS' RIGHTS (COST RECOVERY) AMENDMENT REGULATION 2013 (NO. 1) (SLI NO 63 OF 2013)
Explanatory Statement
Select Legislative Instrument 2013 No. 63
Tradespersons' Rights Regulation Act 1946
Tradespersons' Rights (Cost Recovery) Amendment Regulation 2013 (No. 1)
Background:
The Tradespersons' Rights Regulation Act 1946 (the Act) establishes a process for providing national recognition in prescribed metal and electrical trades for eligible Australian residents who developed their skills through means other than an Australian apprenticeship. The Act is administered by Trades Recognition Australia (TRA) within the Department.
Authority:
Subsection 51A(2) of the Act provides that the Governor-General may make cost recovery regulations for the purpose of reimbursing the Department for costs and expenses incurred in administering the Act. Paragraph 51A(3)(a) provides that the cost recovery regulations may prescribe fees in relation to applications for trade certificates or for the carrying out trade tests in connections with applications.
Purpose:
The Tradespersons' Rights (Cost Recovery) Regulations 1993 prescribe fees for making an application for a trade certificate in under the Act. The purpose of the Tradespersons' Rights (Cost Recovery) Amendment Regulation 2013 (No. 1) (the Regulation) is to update the prescribed fees for making an application for a trade certificate, the reissuing or replacement of a certificate and trade test applications to reflect the current costs of the Department providing these services and to remove circumstances where no fee will be payable.
The Regulation amends subregulation 3(1) to prescribe an application fee of $930.
The Regulation also amends subregulation 3(2) to prescribe a fee of $1,000 where an applicant seeking a trade certificate undertakes a trade test. TRA is currently absorbing a significant cost with regard to the administration of, and fees incurred with regard to the conduct of these trade tests.
The Regulation removes subregulation 3(3) which currently exempts certain classes of persons identified from having to pay an application fee. The changes in migration policy which have occurred since 2006 and the implementation of changed administrative arrangements to the Skilled Migration Program and the advent of the National Licensing Scheme have made the intent of subregulation 3(3) to facilitate the movement of approximately 500 skilled migrants per year into the Australian labour market, redundant. In addition, TRA is currently absorbing administrative costs to provide this exemption.
The Regulation also amends subregulation 3(4) to prescribe a fee of $170 with regard to an application for a replacement trade certificate. This reflects the increase in TRA's administrative costs to provide this service.
The Regulation also amends subregulation 4(2) and paragraph 4(3)(a) to prescribe an application fee of $930 in respect of reapplications and further reapplications, that is, the situation where an applicant for a trade certificate who, having had their original application refused, subsequently makes a new application for the same kind of trade certificate. Some applicants make multiple applications, with or without additional information. Currently the application fee is $300 and TRA absorbs a substantial administrative cost when considering these reapplications. However, subregulation 4(3) will still require the application fee to be refunded in circumstances where a reapplication without additional information results in the grant of a trade certificate. This will ensure that an applicant whose original application was refused in error is not double charged in relation to their application.
Consultation
The increased fees are made on a cost recovery basis as determined by the Cost Recovery Impact Statement developed by the Department in consultation with the Department of Finance and Deregulation. The Cost Recovery Impact Statement is provided as Attachment A to this Explanatory Statement.
The Office of Best Practice Regulation was consulted with regard to the changes within the regulation and advised that a Regulatory Impact Statement would not be required (OBPR ID 13204).
Representatives of the Central Council (convened under the Act), including employee representatives have been canvassed with regard to the fees increases. In addition, public consultation occurred when the Department placed the TRA draft Cost Recovery Impact Statement which specified the new fees upon the Department's website in December 2012 and invited stakeholder comment. No adverse comments were received.
The Regulation is a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
Details of the Tradespersons' Rights (Cost Recovery) Amendment Regulation 2013 (No. 1)
Section 1 - Name of Regulation
This section provides that the name of the Regulation as the Tradespersons' Rights (Cost Recovery) Amendment Regulation 2013 (No.1 ).
Section 2 - Commencement
This section provides that the Regulation commences on the day after it is registered on the Federal Register of Legislative Instruments.
Section 3 - Authority
This section provides that the Regulation is made under the Tradespersons' Rights Regulation Act 1946.
Section 4 - Schedule(s)
This section provides that each instrument that is specified in a schedule is amended or repealed as set out in the applicable items in the schedule concerned and that any other item in a schedule has effect according to its terms
Schedule 1 - Amendments
Items [1] - Subregulation 3(1)
Item [1] amends current subregulation 3(1) to remove the reference to Subregulation 3(3). This amendment would be required because subregulation 3(3) will be removed by Item [4].
Item [2] - Subregulation 3(1)
Item [2] amends current subregulation 3(1) to increase the fee for an application for a trade certificate from $300 to $930
Item [3] - Subregulation 3(2)
Item [3] amends current subregulation 3(2) to increase the fee for an application for a trade certificate in respect of carrying out a trade test from $270 to $1,000.
Item [4] - Subregulation 3(3)
Current subregulation 3(3) provides that no fee is payable to the Department for an application for a trade certificate if the applicant has already been assessed under the Skilled Migration Program.
Item [4] removes subregulation 3(3), meaning that applicant who has been assessed under the Skilled Migration Program would be required to pay a fee for an application for a trade certificate.
Item [5] - Subregulation 3(4)
Item [5] amends current subregulation 3(4) to increase the fee for a replacement trade certification from $130 to $170.
Item [6] - Subregulation 4(2)
Item [6] amends current subregulation 4(2) to increase the fee for a new application that contains information that was not provided in the original application from $300 to $930.
Item [7] - Subparagraph 4(3)(a)
Item [7] amends current subparagraph 4(3)(a) to
increase the fee of a further application if the new application as described
by subregulation 4(2) that contains information that was not provided in the
original application from $300 to $930.
Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights
Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011
Tradespersons' Rights (Cost Recovery) Amendment Regulation
2013 (No. 1)
This Regulation is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.
Overview of the Regulation
The purpose of this Regulation is to update the prescribed fees for making an application for a trade certificate, the reissuing or replacement of a certificate and trade test applications to reflect the current costs of the Department providing these services and to remove circumstances where no fee will be payable.
The Regulation does not engage any of the applicable rights or freedoms. Please note that the Regulation does not engage the right to work and rights in work provisions under articles 6(1), 7 and 8(1)(a) of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR), or the right to education under article 13 of the ICESCR . The Regulation merely amends existing fees for an application for a trade certificate, the re-issuing, or replacement of a certificate, and trade tests. The fees designated in this Regulation are collected for the provision of an assessment of an individual's existing trade skills to ensure that they possess the necessary trade skills to work in an Australian workplace, or meet state licensing requirements. That is, the fees do not relate to the provision of employment, nor for the provision of education which leads to the award of an educational certificate. Thus, this Regulation does not impact on the cost or accessibility of education, nor does it impact on the quality of, or accessibility to, an individual's employment.
The Regulation is compatible with human rights as it does not raise any human rights issues
Department of Industry, Innovation, Science, Research and Tertiary Education
COST RECOVERY IMPACT STATEMENT
March 2013 to June 2014
Charges under Trades Recognition Australia's Programs
Table of Contents
1. OVERVIEW
1.2 Background
1.3 Australian Government cost recovery policy
1.4 Change in rates of charge
2. POLICY REVIEW - Analysis of Activities
2.1 Description of activities
3.1 Basis of charging - fee or levy
3.2 Legal requirements for the imposition of charges
3.3 Costs to be included in charges
3.4 Outline of charging structure
3.5 Summary of charging arrangements
4.3 Periodic review
6. ACRONYMS
1. OVERVIEW |
The purpose of this Cost Recovery Impact Statement (CRIS) is to transparently demonstrate compliance of Trade Recognition Australia's (TRA) cost recovery activities with the Australian Government Cost Recovery Guidelines.
There are a number of TRA programs that operate on a cost recovery basis. TRA, in line with the Australian Government Cost Recovery Guidelines, periodically reviews its cost structure and fees with regard to the provision of trade skills assessment services. TRA's costs were last reviewed in 2011-12 and before that in 2006.
This CRIS has been prepared to reflect changes made to existing charging arrangements with regard to the trades skills assessment services administered by TRA and will be in effect from March 2013 to June 2014. Should changes be required during the current CRIS period, a new or amended CRIS will be prepared prior to implementing changes.
TRA is a branch within the Department of Industry, Innovation, Science, Research and Tertiary Education (DIISRTE). The Minister for Immigration has specified a number of authorised assessing authorities for migration purposes. TRA is the only authorised assessing authority for trade occupations under the Migration Act (1958) and manages skills assessment services for people with trade skills who are Australian citizens, residents (both temporary and permanent) and potential migrants to Australia. A person who requires a skills assessment for migration purposes in a trade occupation is required to use TRA's services. These services include the following programs:
The following TRA programs operate on cost recovery basis:
TRA also manages two programs that are not cost recovered, namely:
* OSAP, which is an assessment pathway for applicants applying for permanent migration to Australia, who work in a nominated occupation and hold a passport from a nominated country.
* The 457 Skills Assessment Program, which is an assessment pathway for applicants applying for a Subclass 457 Temporary Business (Long Stay) visa who work in a nominated occupation and hold a passport from a nominated country.
Under the Offshore Skills Assessment Program and 457 Skills Assessment Program, TRA-approved Registered Training Organisations (RTOs) conduct the skills assessments for these programs on a fee for service basis, which are paid directly by the applicants to RTOs. These programs are therefore not included in this CRIS.
Since 2006, TRA has progressively introduced new robust assessment programs to cater better for demand-driven skilled migration, i.e. the JRP, MSA and MPA. The programs target skilled applicants in a number of sectors of skilled migration and utilise rigorous evidence-based assessment approaches to ensure the quality and consistency of assessment outcomes.
Key Stakeholders
The key stakeholders of TRA programs are:
* Applicants
* Program applicants' migration agents
* Employers and employer groups
* Employee representatives
* Industry bodies
* TRA approved Registered Training Organisations (RTOs)
* Department of Immigration and Citizenship
* DIISRTE
Conclusion
The provision of skills assessments to applicants presents a personal benefit to these applicants, either in the form of a positive skills assessment for migration purposes, or the issuance of a trade certificate which can be used for licensing or employment. In some cases there are alternatives to the use of TRA services where optional skills assessments or recognition of prior learning processes can be provided by RTOs.
TRA's activities and associated costs link directly to an individual's choice to apply for assessment/recognition of their trade skills through TRA programs. It is the individual, rather than the larger community, who derives primary benefit from the provided service. It is appropriate that a fee relating directly to the cost of the services provided is charged to the individual.
1.3 Australian Government Cost Recovery Policy
In December 2002, the Australian Government adopted a formal cost recovery policy to improve the consistency, transparency and accountability of its cost recovery arrangements and promote the efficient allocation of resources. The policy's underpinning principle is that entities should set charges to recover all the costs of products or services where it is efficient and effective to do so, where the beneficiaries are a narrow and identifiable group and where charging is consistent with Australian Government policy objectives. Cost recovery policy is administered by the Department of Finance and Deregulation and outlined in the Australian Government Cost Recovery Guidelines (Cost Recovery Guidelines).
The policy applies to all Financial Management and Accountability Act 1997 (FMA Act) agencies and to relevant Commonwealth Authorities and Companies Act 1997 (CAC Act) bodies that have been notified. In line with the policy, individual portfolio ministers are ultimately responsible for ensuring entities' implementation and compliance with the Cost Recovery Guidelines.
1.4 Changes in Rates of Charge
The Cost Recovery Guidelines require that charges should reflect the costs of providing the product or service. It is therefore appropriate to review and amend charges where increased delivery costs have occurred (such as labour costs, IT system improvements, provider fees, impact of CPI on office supplies etc.).
TRA has reviewed the cost incurred to deliver trade skills assessment services to applicants, and where necessary recalibrated applicant fees to reflect that cost.
The cost of managing TRA programs has increased significantly over the past six years, but the application fees that have been in place to date did not reflect these increases. Significant migration policy changes implemented from the 2009-10 financial year also affected the cost of delivering TRA programs. Key policy changes included the withdrawal of the Migration Occupation in Demand List (MODL) and changes to the Skilled Occupations List that saw the reduction of trades-related occupations from 142 to 35.
These changes were introduced as part of a package of reforms with the intent that the number of places available to independent skilled migrants in the skilled migration program would fall as the number of places available for employer-sponsored skilled migrants increased. This affected the number of applicants to TRA programs and meant that economies of scale were lost, thus increasing the cost of assessments. In addition, the restructuring, refinement and creation of new programs to ensure that rigorous assessment processes were applied incurred additional delivery costs. The full extent of the impact will not be apparent until the end of the 2012-13 financial year. This is due to the fact that costs are distorted in the early period of a program due to establishment costs, initial research and adjustments to processes and guidelines. After two years, the program is expected to mature to a point where there is greater clarity about ongoing costs.
In addition, Machinery of Government changes announced in December 2011 have seen TRA move from the Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations to the Department of Industry, Innovation, Science, Research and Tertiary Education. The changed arrangements have seen adjustments to some TRA administrative processes that increased the cost of conducting trade skills assessments.
Cost Structure Review
TRA has reviewed its cost structure, based on current full accrual operating costs (including indirect and corporate support costs). The review found that the average cost for the management and provision of trade skills assessment services for 2012-13 would not align with the fees applied since 2006, or the introductory fees of the more recently created programs.
Demand for TRA's services is mutable, contingent upon external drivers, such as migration policy changes, the high Australian dollar, and Australia's changing skills requirement. However, as individuals with trade skills who are seeking residency in Australia via the Skilled Migration Program are required to obtain skills assessments from TRA, it is unlikely that increased fees would impact significantly on the volume of demand for TRA's services. To ensure that fluctuating demand does not impact on the appropriate recovery of service delivery costs, TRA will review the cost of delivery of its services on an annual basis.
2. POLICY REVIEW - ANALYSIS OF ACTIVITIES |
2.1 Description of activities
While all of TRA's programs can be categorised as providing a skills assessment or recognition service for trades or associated professional occupations, they each provide the service to a different cohort of applicants, service different volumes of work and undertake different activities as outlined below. The programs thus incur different running costs. These costs are reflected in the new fees, and calculated based on the operational costs associated with the programs.
Programs incur costs associated with:
* the IT systems used to manage applicant details and assessment outcomes. These costs reflect the development, implementation and maintenance of business support tools (see details at 3.3);
* a robust compliance and fraud control framework that underpins the integrity of TRA trade skills assessments;
* applicants requesting a review of their trade skills assessment outcome; depending upon the outcome of the review the review fee can be, in some cases, refunded to the applicant; and
* the day-to-day management of applicant information, policy development, and stakeholder liaison.
A number of TRA programs use external providers, TRA approved RTOs, to provide independent assessment or training services to applicants. RTOs do not pay a fee to be authorised as a TRA provider.
Australian Recognised Trade Certificates
Australian Recognised Trade Certificate (ARTC) assessments are conducted under the Tradespersons' Rights Regulation Act 1946. Successful applicants are granted an ARTC.
The Act provides for recognition through an ARTC granted by State based Local Committees (LCs). LCs comprise equal representation from employer and employee representatives.
While the decision to grant an ARTC rests with the LC, TRA undertakes a number of activities to facilitate the process. Key activities include:
The ARTC Program also incurs costs associated with the approval and management of the TRA-approved RTOs that conduct any trade tests required. Under existing fee arrangements, TRA does not fully recover the trade test fee charged by the RTOs.
The existing regulations entitle some applicants under the ARTC Program to trade skills recognition at no charge. Procedural arrangements and resources require these applications be assessed in a manner equivalent to a standard ARTC assessment delivered on a fee for service basis. This approach is inconsistent with the Australian Government's cost recovery policy as it creates equity issues and means that TRA is not fully recovering costs from those who use its services. Therefore, the ARTC Regulations have been amended so that all applicants for skills recognition under the ARTC Program be liable for a standard application charge.
Job Ready Program
The JRP was announced in 2009 and received funding in the 2009-10 Budget (see http://deewr.gov.au/portfolio-budget-statements-2009-10). The Program commenced on 1 January 2010 and operates on a cost recovery basis.
The JRP is a four step employment-based skills assessment program. The program aims to increase the confidence of Australian employers in the skills and qualifications of former international students and to ensure that these graduates are well placed as skilled workers to seek employment in their trade, whether in Australia or overseas.
The Program's four steps are:
Participants must also undertake professional development in Australian workplace language and culture. This service is provided by TRA-approved RTOs. Applicants pay the RTOs on a fee-for-service basis. The Department does not currently charge RTOs a fee to gain TRA approval to deliver this service.
Each step in the Program has a discrete fee with the total fee payable for an applicant who completes the Program capped at $4,150.
At present the JRP is significantly under-recovering its costs. A key reason for the under-recovery of costs is the significantly higher than expected cost of support and enabling services. A number of factors have contributed to the higher program delivery cost. These factors include the financial processes involved in running the JRP program, the complex application process of each step in the JRP, which requires robust application processing, i.e. data entry, document management and preliminary assessment, and the need to allocate staff dedicated to assisting applicants and staff with regard to the complex TRADES II IT system. This has also been exacerbated by a lower than expected level of applications to the program.
A review of the JRP is under way. In order not to pre-empt possible review outcomes with regard to the program structure, the program fees have not been changed as part of this CRIS. Following the review and consideration of program structure, appropriate cost recovery arrangements will be implemented and reflected in a new or amended CRIS.
Migration Skills Assessment Program and Migration Points Advice Program
The MPA program and the MSA program were introduced on 1 July 2011 and replaced the now terminated Skilled Worker Program.
The design of the MSA program takes into account the outcomes of a review of the Skilled Worker Program conducted in early 2011. The program's underpinning principles and assumptions are consistent with contemporary international vocational training qualification arrangements, and qualifications, training and assessment policies elaborated in the Australian Qualifications Framework and Training Packages.
The MPA program provides applicants with advice about the comparability of their overseas training and qualifications to the Australian Qualification Framework (AQF) qualification relevant for their occupation in Australia. It also provides advice about applicants' employment, which must be at the required skill level for their nominated occupation in Australia. Applicants use this information when applying to DIAC for permanent migration
The Program uses extensive research and analysis, including input from international experts, in comparing information for approximately 100 countries and 150 occupations.
TRA officers assess a complex array of evidence provided by applicants to determine an assessment outcome. Key activities include:
The nexus between MSA and MPA is such that the MPA process is streamlined where an applicant has had a previous MSA assessment. The information gained during the robust MSA assessment process can be used in the MPA assessment. This productivity gain is reflected in the lower MPA fee that will be charged to those applicants with a previous MSA assessment. Applicants who do not have a previous MSA assessment will be charged a higher fee.
The MSA review fee is the same as the MSA application fee as, because when a review is received, it is effectively treated as a new application. All research and verifications necessary to making a decision are conducted again to determine whether the original decision was correct.
3. DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION |
3.1 Basis of Charging - Fee or Levy
TRA's cost recovery charges are fees for services.
Fee-for-service charges, where individuals provide payment directly to TRA, can only be legally applied to services provided to an individual and where the relevant charge reasonably reflects the costs incurred in providing the service in question. Reasonable averaging of costs across instances of delivery of a given type of service is permitted when meeting this cost-matching requirement.
As the cost of the services delivered under TRA's individual programs does not vary to a major extent from participant to participant within each program, a fixed level fee for service is the most appropriate approach.
3.2 Legal Requirements for the Imposition of Charges
ARTCs are issued under the Tradespersons' Rights Regulation Act 1946. Section 51A of the Act authorises the collection of fees to pay for the provision of ARTCs. Sections 3 and 4 of the Tradespersons' Rights (Cost Recovery) Regulations 1993 detail the fee structure.
The JRP, MPA and MSA collect fees under the authority of an Instrument (IMMI 10/052) of the Minister for Immigration under Subregulation 5.40(1) of the Migration Regulations 1994. Section 504 of the Migration Act 1958 authorises the charging and recovery of fees in respect of any matter under the Act or the regulations.
3.3 Costs to be Included in Charges
TRA seeks to fully recover costs associated with administering its programs based on the following costing principles and model. The underpinning principles on which recovered costs are based are the estimation of efficient costs and transparency. Costs linked to specific activities are categorised as direct costs, other support costs and indirect costs (overheads). Capital costs have been included in calculations for those TRA programs where capital costs are incurred - generally, the capital costs relate to the TRA TRADES II IT system investment. Each cost is adjusted annually based on operations, supply costs and estimates of achievable efficiencies that might reduce costs. For example, TRA will shortly implement a new payment system that will provide productivity gains through reducing applicant enquiries, and streamlining refund processes.
A costing model, which takes account of the demand volumes and work effort hours attributed to each activity associated with the TRA programs, has been used to calculate costs. This methodology provides the total cost of each activity, which includes direct labour cost and associated support and corporate costs.
The costing model measures the staff time usually taken to perform tasks associated with each activity, which is then costed for the direct salary, including on-costs such as superannuation, leave, workers' compensation, etc. to provide a cost per activity. The support and corporate costs are also included in the hourly rate to derive the "fully loaded" cost. The total cost is then derived by multiplying the total number of regulatory activities performed by the cost of each activity.
Direct costs, of which staff costs are the most significant component, are based on historical financial information and statutory requirements in relation to staff (such as the Department of Industry, Innovation, Science, Research and Tertiary Education Enterprise Agreement), analyses of workload fluctuations, staff numbers required to manage the TRA programs efficiently and surveys of future operational requirements.
Overheads include rent, utilities, corporate services employee costs, ICT infrastructure services and office supplies. These overheads are allocated on the basis of the full time staff equivalents (FTEs) involved in each activity as the most equitable and reasonable basis for allocation, taking account of the fact that employee numbers are the most significant cost determinant for overheads in all activities.
Other support costs include costs associated with application data entry, undertaking necessary checks, branch and regulatory management.
This cost recovery analysis is based on fully distributing overhead costs. Accordingly, all overhead costs are incorporated into individual activity costs.
3.4 Outline of Charging Structure
Fee charges are structured on a unit fee basis with a fee schedule covering applications, trade tests, the issue of replacement ARTC certificates and applicant requests for a review of decision. The fee setting process takes account of Australian and international comparative rates.
TRA minimises costs wherever possible by centralising the application registration process. That is, all applications are registered by a single team. This team also manages TRA's record management requirements (e.g. file creation) and applicants' enquiries. This approach streamlines registration processes and leverages the economies of scale of a high volume workload. It removes duplication of roles, minimises delays and ensures applicants receive a consistent and high quality service.
The calculation of fees takes account of a broad range of variables. For example - the ARTC replacement certificate application fee of $170 takes account of a number of discrete activities and costs. This includes the different APS levels and salary costs of staff conducting the various discrete activities within the process; the time taken to complete an activity; the overheads attached to the process such as the cost incurred to print a new ARTC certificate; staff benefits that accrue, such as leave entitlements and superannuation; and the application's complexity.
An officer at the APS3 level registers the application requesting an ARTC replacement certificate. The registration process takes about 30 minutes. Applicant details from the application are data entered into TRADESII, the cheque or money order attached to the application is forwarded to the Finance Officer (APS 5) to be processed, and the payment is banked. As TRA processes its banking on a batch basis, (that is multiple payments are processed simultaneously), the total time taken (up to two hours), and cost incurred, to process the batch is proportionately split between each application.
The application is allocated to the ARTC program area where an APS 5 officer checks that the applicant had previously been granted an ARTC certificate. This varies from between 5 minutes, where the applicant has been granted an ARTC within the past 5 years, to 30 minutes where the applicant had been granted an ARTC certificate 20 years previously. A replacement certificate is issued to the applicant where entitled. This process takes up to 10 minutes. The replacement certificate is placed in a presentation folder and mailed to the applicant. Where the applicant is not entitled to a replacement certificate, a letter is sent to the applicant advising this decision.
An EL1 officer checks each outcome to ensure that the decision is correct; the certificate correctly shows the applicant's name; the details are recorded correctly in TRADES II; and that the certificate is being mailed to the correct address. This process can take up to 10 minutes.
TRA fees are published on the TRA website.
3.5 Summary of Charging Arrangements
The below summaries outline the fee changes to be implemented under this CRIS.
The fee changes came into effect from March 2013.
2012-2013
Activity |
Method of Recovery |
Volume of Activity |
Price Previous to CRIS |
Cost Recovery Price[1] |
Total Cost for Activity |
Total Recovery for Activity |
|
1.1 |
ARTC application |
Fee For Service |
2,448 |
$300 |
$930 |
$1,125,639 |
$1,119,960 |
1.2 |
Reissue/ replacement certificates |
Fee For Service |
49 |
$130 |
$170 |
$6,843 |
$6,861 |
1.3 |
Trade Test Applications |
Fee For Service |
115 |
$270 |
$1,000 |
$53,369 |
$52,038 |
2.1 |
Migration Skills Assessment (MSA) |
Fee For Service |
2,365 |
$300 |
$1,000 |
$1,123,300 |
$1,123,375 |
2.2 |
MSA Review of Outcome |
Fee For Service |
284 |
$300 |
$900 |
$125,544 |
$127,800 |
3.1 |
Migration Points Advice Program (MPA) Based on Migration Skills Assessment |
Fee For Service |
400 |
$300 |
$600 |
$155,254 |
$150,000 |
3.2 |
Migration Points Advice Program (MPA) Based on Skilled Worker Program skills assessment |
Fee For Service |
172 |
$300 |
$1,100 |
$88,407 |
$86,000 |
3.3 |
MPA Review of Outcome |
Fee For Service |
6 |
$300 |
$300 |
$1,839 |
$1,800 |
$2,680,195 |
$2,667,8342 |
2013/2014
Activity |
Method of Recovery |
Volume of Activity |
Price Previous to CRIS |
Cost Recovery Price |
Total Cost for Activity |
Total Recovery for Activity |
|
1.1 |
ARTC application |
Fee For Service |
2,613 |
$300 |
$930 |
$2,370,741 |
$2,430,090 |
1.2 |
Reissue/ replacement certificates |
Fee For Service |
53 |
$130 |
$170 |
$8,892 |
$9,010 |
1.3 |
Trade Test Applications |
Fee For Service |
123 |
$270 |
$1,000 |
$122,514 |
$123,000 |
2.1 |
Migration Skills Assessment (MSA) |
Fee For Service |
2,530 |
$300 |
$1,000 |
$2,450,399 |
$2,530,000 |
2.2 |
MSA Review of Outcome |
Fee For Service |
304 |
$300 |
$900 |
$264,408 |
$273,600 |
3.1 |
Migration Points Advice Program (MPA) Based on Migration Skills Assessment |
Fee For Service |
485 |
$300 |
$600 |
$286,173 |
$291,000 |
3.2 |
Migration Points Advice Program (MPA) Based on Skilled Worker Program skills assessment |
Fee For Service |
208 |
$300 |
$1,100 |
$219,990 |
$228,800 |
3.3 |
MPA Review of Outcome |
Fee For Service |
7 |
$300 |
$300 |
$2,006 |
$2,100 |
$5,725,123 |
$5,887,600 |
TRA regularly monitors its cost recovery position to consider how costs and revenues align. Strong stakeholder engagement ensures an ongoing consultation process occurs, with regard to TRA's activities and fees charged.
TRA also undertakes periodic reviews of its overall approach to cost recovery. The associated revenues are reported in accordance with the Minister for Finance's Orders for financial reporting.
TRA's costs have a very minimal direct impact on industry or small business and as such minimal specific consultation has occurred with regard to the changed fee arrangements detailed in this CRIS. The draft CRIS document was made available to the public for comment in December 2012 on the DIISRTE website. No feedback was received. The final document will also be available on DIISRTE website. TRA's strong stakeholder relationships mean that stakeholders can provide feedback at their convenience with regard to service delivery and the continuous improvement and evolution of its Programs' structures and costs.
The respective Regulations/Disallowable Instrument will show the amended fee structure. In addition, the revised fee structure will be published on the TRA website. TRA stakeholders can provide feedback to the TRA via the customer satisfaction form that is available on the TRA website.
The cost structure of TRA, delivery mechanisms and the resources required for service delivery will be monitored on a regular basis, with TRA conducting a formal review of its cost recovery approach every four to five years, as required by the Australian Government Cost Recovery Guidelines, with the next major review of all cost recovery arrangements due by 2016-17.
Changes in the range or nature of activities and services over time will be reflected by amending this CRIS or preparing a new CRIS. For example, should the outcomes of the TRA JRP Review expected to be released by mid-2013 lead to changed fees, the CRIS will be updated appropriately.
I certify that this CRIS complies with the Australian Government Cost Recovery Guidelines.
Donald Eric Russell
... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ..
Secretary
Department of Industry, Innovation, Science, Research and Tertiary Education
Date: ... ... 19/03/2013 ... .
6. ACRONYMS |
ARTC - Australian Recognised Trade Certificate Program
CRIS - Cost Recovery Impact Statement
DIAC - Department of Immigration ad Citizenship
DIISRTE - Department of Industry, Innovation, Science, Research and Tertiary Education
FTE - Full-time staff equivalent
IT - Information Technology
JRP - Job Ready Program
JRE - Job Ready Employment
JRFA - Job Ready Final Assessment
JRWA - Job Ready Workplace Assessment
LTC - Local Trades Committee
MPA - Migration Points Advice Program
MSA - Migration Skills Assessment
PSA - Provisional Skills Assessment
RTO - Registered Training Organisation
TRA - Trades Recognition Australia
TRALO - Trades Recognition Australia Liaison Officer
[1] GST does not apply to the fees pursuant to section 81-15.01 of the A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Regulations 1999.
2 Total reflects the superseded fees and new fees which are expected to be collected in 2012-2013.
AustLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback