Commonwealth Repealed Acts

This legislation has been repealed.

CORPORATIONS LAW- SECT 1243

(1)

Subject to this Part, the board of a futures organisation may allow and settle a proper claim for compensation from a fidelity fund of the futures organisation at any time after the occurrence of the pecuniary loss in respect of which the claim arose.

(2)

Subject to subsection (3), a person shall not commence proceedings under this Part against a futures organisation without leave of the board unless:

(a)

the board has disallowed the person's claim; and

(b)

the claimant has exhausted all relevant rights of action and other legal remedies for the recovery of the money or other property in respect of which the pecuniary loss occurred, being rights and remedies that are available against the member of the futures organisation in relation to whom the claim arose and all other persons who are liable in respect of the loss suffered by the claimant, other than any right or remedy that the claimant may have, under section 1240 or a corresponding previous law, against a person other than the futures organisation.

(3)

A person who has been refused leave by the board of a futures organisation under subsection (2) may apply to the Court for leave to commence proceedings against the futures organisation and the Court may make such order in the matter as it thinks fit.

(4)

The board of a futures organisation, after disallowing, whether wholly or partly, a claim for compensation from the fidelity fund of the futures organisation, shall serve notice of the disallowance in the prescribed form on the claimant or on the claimant's solicitor.

(5)

Proceedings against a futures organisation in respect of a claim that has been disallowed by the board of the futures organisation shall not be commenced after the end of 3 months after the service of the notice of disallowance referred to in subsection (4).

(6)

In proceedings brought to establish a claim, evidence of an admission or confession by, or other evidence that would be admissible against, the person against whom a defalcation or fraudulent misuse of property is alleged is admissible to prove the defalcation or fraudulent misuse notwithstanding that the person is not the defendant in or a party to those proceedings, and all defences that would have been available to that person are available to the futures organisation.

(7)

The board or, where proceedings are brought to establish a claim, the Court, if satisfied that there was a defalcation or fraudulent misuse of property on which to found the claim, may allow the claim and act accordingly notwithstanding that the person against whom the defalcation or fraudulent misuse of property is alleged has not been convicted or prosecuted or that the evidence on which the board or the Court, as the case may be, acts would not be sufficient to establish the guilt of that person on a criminal trial in respect of the defalcation or fraudulent misuse of property.