New South Wales Consolidated Acts
[Index]
[Table]
[Search]
[Search this Act]
[Notes]
[Noteup]
[Previous]
[Next]
[Download]
[History]
[Help]
CRIMES (HIGH RISK OFFENDERS) ACT 2006 - SECT 7
Pre-trial procedures
7 Pre-trial procedures
(1) An application for an extended supervision order must be served on the
offender concerned within 2 business days after the application is filed in
the Supreme Court or within such further time as the Supreme Court may allow.
(2) The State must disclose to the offender such documents, reports and other
information as are relevant to the proceedings on the application (whether or
not intended to be tendered in evidence)-- (a) in the case of anything that is
available when the application is made, as soon as practicable after the
application is made, and
(b) in the case of anything that subsequently
becomes available, as soon as practicable after it becomes available.
Note--:
Section 21A (6) provides that the State must not disclose a victim statement
to the offender unless the person who made the statement consents to the
disclosure.
(3) A preliminary hearing into the application is to be conducted
by the Supreme Court within 28 days after the application is filed in the
Supreme Court or within such further time as the Supreme Court may allow.
(4)
If, following the preliminary hearing, it is satisfied that the matters
alleged in the supporting documentation would, if proved, justify the making
of an extended supervision order, the Supreme Court must make orders-- (a)
appointing-- (i) 2 qualified psychiatrists, or
(ii) 2 registered
psychologists, or
(iii) 1 qualified psychiatrist and 1 registered
psychologist, or
(iv) 2 qualified psychiatrists and 2 registered
psychologists,
to conduct separate psychiatric or psychological examinations
(as the case requires) of the offender and to furnish reports to the Supreme
Court on the results of those examinations, and
(b) directing the offender to
attend those examinations.
(5) If, following the preliminary hearing, it is
not satisfied that the matters alleged in the supporting documentation would,
if proved, justify the making of an extended supervision order, the Supreme
Court must dismiss the application.
AustLII: Copyright Policy
| Disclaimers
| Privacy Policy
| Feedback