New South Wales Consolidated Acts
[Index]
[Table]
[Search]
[Search this Act]
[Notes]
[Noteup]
[Previous]
[Next]
[Download]
[Help]
PROTECTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT OPERATIONS ACT 1997 - SECT 143
Unlawful transporting or depositing of waste
143 Unlawful transporting or depositing of waste
(1) Offence If a person transports waste to a place that cannot lawfully be
used as a waste facility for that waste, or causes or permits waste to be so
transported-- (a) the person, and
(b) if the person is not the owner of the
waste--the owner of the waste, and
(c) if the waste is transported in a
vehicle and the person is not the owner of the vehicle--the owner of the
vehicle,
are each guilty of an offence. : Maximum penalty-- (a) for a
corporation-- (i) if the offence involves asbestos waste--$4,000,000 and, for
a continuing offence, a further penalty of $240,000 for each day the offence
continues, or
(ii) otherwise--$2,000,000 and, for a continuing offence, a
further penalty of $240,000 for each day the offence continues, or
(b) for an
individual-- (i) if the offence involves asbestos waste--$1,000,000 and, for a
continuing offence, a further penalty of $120,000 for each day the offence
continues, or
(ii) otherwise--$500,000 and, for a continuing offence, a
further penalty of $120,000 for each day the offence continues.
Note : An
offence against subsection (1) committed by a corporation is an offence
attracting special executive liability for a director or other person involved
in the management of the corporation--see section 169.
(2) Proof of
lawfulness In any proceedings for an offence under this section the defendant
bears the onus of proving that the place to which the waste was transported
can lawfully be used as a waste facility for that waste.
(3) Defence--owner
of waste It is a defence in any proceedings against an owner of waste for an
offence under this section if the owner did not transport the waste and
establishes-- (a) that the commission of the offence was due to causes over
which the owner had no control, and
(b) that the owner took reasonable
precautions and exercised due diligence to prevent the commission of the
offence.
(3A) Defence--approved notice It is a defence in any proceedings for
an offence under this section if the defendant establishes that-- (a) an
approved notice was, at the time of the alleged offence, given to
the defendant by the owner or occupier of the place to which the waste was
transported or was displayed at the place, and
(b) the approved notice stated
that the place could lawfully be used as a waste facility for the waste, and
(c) the defendant had no reason to believe that the place could not lawfully
be used as a waste facility for the waste.
(3B) However, it is not a defence
in such proceedings for the defendant to establish that the defendant relied
on the advice (other than advice in the form of an approved notice) given by
the owner or occupier concerned to the effect that the place could, at the
time of the alleged offence, be lawfully used as such a waste facility.
(3C)
Defence--waste not deposited It is a defence in any proceedings for an offence
under this section if the defendant establishes that the waste transported by
the defendant was not deposited by the defendant or any other person at the
place to which it was transported.
(4) Definitions In this section--
"approved notice" means a notice, in a form approved by the EPA-- (a) stating
that the place to which the notice relates can lawfully be used as a waste
facility for the waste specified in the notice, and
(b) that contains a
certification by the owner or occupier of the place that the statement is
correct.
"owner" of waste includes, in relation to waste that has been transported, the
person who was the owner of the waste immediately before it was transported.
AustLII: Copyright Policy
| Disclaimers
| Privacy Policy
| Feedback