Northern Territory Consolidated Regulations

[Index] [Table] [Search] [Search this Regulation] [Notes] [Noteup] [Previous] [Next] [Download] [Help]

SUPREME COURT RULES 1987 - REG 44.05

Expert witnesses giving evidence on same or similar question

    (1)     This rule applies if 2 or more parties to a proceeding call, or intend to call, expert witnesses to give evidence about the same, or a similar, question.

    (2)     The Court may direct:

        (a)     that the expert witnesses confer; or

        (b)     that the expert witnesses produce for use by the Court a document identifying:

            (i)     the matters and issues about which their opinions are in agreement; and

            (ii)     the matters and issues about which their opinions differ; or

        (c)     that:

            (i)     the expert witnesses give evidence at trial after all or certain factual evidence relevant to the question has been led; and

            (ii)     each party intending to call 1 or more expert witnesses close that party's case in relation to the question, subject only to adducing the evidence of the expert witnesses later in the trial; or

        (d)     that, after all or certain factual evidence has been led, each expert witness file and serve an affidavit or statement indicating:

            (i)     whether the expert witness adheres to any opinion earlier given; or

            (ii)     whether, in the light of factual evidence led at trial, the expert witness wishes to modify any opinion earlier given; or

        (e)     that:

            (i)     each expert witness take the oath as a witness one immediately after another; and

            (ii)     when giving evidence, an expert witness occupy a position in the courtroom (not necessarily in the witness box) that is appropriate to the giving of evidence; or

        (f)     that each expert witness give an oral exposition of his or her opinion, or opinions, on the question; or

        (g)     that each expert witness give his or her opinion about the opinion, or opinions, given by another expert witness; or

        (h)     that the expert witnesses be cross-examined in a certain manner or sequence; or

            (i)     that cross-examination or re-examination of the expert witnesses be conducted:

            (i)     by completing the cross-examination or re-examination of an expert witness before starting the cross-examination or re-examination of another; or

            (ii)     by putting to each expert witness, in turn, each question relevant to 1 subject or issue at a time, until the cross-examination or re-examination of all the witnesses is completed.

Order 45     Originating motion



AustLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback