Queensland Bills Explanatory Notes

[Index] [Search] [Download] [Bill] [Help]


PLANNING (URBAN ENCROACHMENT - MILTON BREWERY) BILL 2008

                           Planning (Urban Encroachment--Milton Brewery) Bill 2008




Planning (Urban Encroachment--Milton
Brewery) Bill 2008


Explanatory Notes

Introduction
The purpose of the Planning (Urban Encroachment--Milton Brewery) Bill
2008 (the Bill) is to ensure clarity and certainty in an environment of
increasing development and intensification, therefore creating an enabling
environment for development in the area.
The Milton Rail Station Precinct, directly opposite the Milton Brewery,
provides an opportunity for Transit Orientated Development (TOD). TODs
are mixed use residential and employment areas designated to maximise
the efficient use of land through high levels of access to public transport.
While such planning strategies maximise land use efficiencies and address
Queensland's significant growth, Queensland recognises it must balance
and address the impacts of urban encroachment on industries and
landowners.
Development at Milton Rail Station Precinct will lead to increased
population densities and reduce the distance between residences and the
Brewery, which has been operating since the 1870s and is of heritage
significance. Urban encroachment thereby increases the risk of litigation
from landowners and tenants affected by the Brewery emissions, even
though the Brewery operates within its current licence conditions.
The Bill specifically protects the established Brewery, by conferring
immunity from criminal (local law) and civil proceedings for releasing
contaminants in the atmosphere, noise and light emissions based nuisance
complaints where the Brewery is operating within its licence conditions.
The protection only applies to new development that results in
intensification. Specifically this is an application for a material change of
use of premises or reconfiguring a lot (but not class 1a, 1b or 10 buildings
or structures), a relevant development application made after the
commencement of this Act, and a relevant development application made
but not decided before commencement of this Act.
                                                                           Page 1

 


 

Planning (Urban Encroachment--Milton Brewery) Bill 2008 Short Title of the Bill The short title of the Bill is the Planning (Urban Encroachment--Milton Brewery) Bill 2008 Objectives of the Bill The Bill confers immunity from criminal (local law) and civil proceedings, for releasing contaminants in the atmosphere, noise and light emissions based nuisance complaints in relation to certain development where the Brewery is operating within its licence conditions. Policy rationale The Bill addresses the impacts of encroaching development and creates an enabling environment for significant transit oriented development in Milton. Legislation is required to develop a viable model that addresses urban encroachment with sufficient flexibility to meet State and Local Government, industry and community needs. The Environmental Protection Agency has determined acceptable levels of air and noise emissions from the Brewery relevant to its current location and proximity to other land uses, as articulated in its licence. The Brewery is currently operating within its licence conditions. It is possible that repeated complaints of nuisance may result in changed conditions for the Brewery regardless of its lawful operations. The certainty provided through legislative protection will allow the Brewery to operate as an existing use. The Bill does not override the common law rights of residents of existing development or prescribe emission levels for releasing contaminants into the atmosphere, noise and light. How objectives are achieved The Bill achieves its objectives by conferring statutory immunity from criminal (local law) and civil proceedings for nuisance complaints based on releasing contaminants into the atmosphere, noise and light emissions, where the Brewery is operating within its licence conditions. The Bill only applies to new development where intensification, as defined in the Bill, Page 2

 


 

Planning (Urban Encroachment--Milton Brewery) Bill 2008 results from that development in the relevant area outlined in schedule one of the Bill. Residents and prospective residents are made aware of the conferred immunity through notation on land titles. Alternative method of achieving the policy objectives There are no other viable alternatives that would achieve the Government's policy objectives. Estimated cost for Government implementation There are no costs to Government resulting from the proposed legislation. Consistency with Fundamental Legislative Principles The proposed Bill impacts on the rights and liberties of individuals, particularly in relation to the right of a landowner to the use and enjoyment of his or her land, through conferred immunity for the Brewery from proceedings or prosecution. The common law rights of residents of existing development will not be overridden as protection will apply to new development after the date of enactment. As the criteria includes development applications already lodged but no decision made, or approved but no certificate of classification issued, the legislation may apply to a small group of people, if any, who may have already purchased properties (e.g. off the plan) prior to the commencement of the legislation. Urgent introduction of the proposed Bill will ensure as few people as possible, if any, are impacted by this component. The proposed Bill also allows for a person to end a contract to purchase affected premises if the applicant for a relevant development application has failed to advise the registrar to place a notice on the title (section 10), or any seller of relevant premises has failed to advise the purchaser (section 11). While this affects the developer's or seller's contractual rights, there is in these circumstances, a greater and over-riding need to protect the purchaser's rights. Other common law rights remain available to all relevant parties. Under the proposed Bill, no criminal proceedings under local laws or civil proceedings may be taken against the Brewery with respect to emission of noise, releasing contaminants into the atmosphere within its current licence Page 3

 


 

Planning (Urban Encroachment--Milton Brewery) Bill 2008 conditions; or with respect to light emissions of no more intensity than that emitted at any time before commencement of the Bill. The legislation is subject to five-yearly reviews. Consultation Lion Nathan has been consulted to discuss its concerns regarding the potential impact of encroaching development on its existing use. The Brisbane City Council has also been consulted with respect to the Bill. Consultation has occurred with key government departments that may have an interest in the Bill. Notes on Provisions Part 1 Preliminary Clause 1 states the short title of the Bill. Clause 2 provides for commencement of the Act on a day to be fixed by proclamation. Clause 3 states the main purpose of the Act. The main purpose of the Act is to protect the existing use of the Milton Brewery from encroachment by, and the intensification of, development. It does this by limiting civil and criminal (local law) proceedings against the Brewery when operating in accordance with authorised levels of noise, light and the release of contaminants into the atmosphere. Part 2 Interpretation Clause 4 states that a schedule to the Act contains a dictionary of particular words used in the Act. Page 4

 


 

Planning (Urban Encroachment--Milton Brewery) Bill 2008 Clause 5 outlines what a relevant development application is for the purposes of the Act. Although a development application for a material change of use of premises or reconfiguring a lot applies, certain types of buildings are not caught by the Act. These are class 1a and 1b buildings and class 10 buildings or structures. The definitions of these types of buildings are contained in the Act. Under subsection 2 of clause 5, a map called "Milton Rail Precinct" is contained in schedule 1. The map outlines the geographical area to which this Act pertains. Clause 6 clarifies that words used in this Act that are also defined in the Environmental Protection Act 1994 and the Integrated Planning Act 1997 have the same application and meaning as words in both of those Acts. Part 3 Legal Proceedings Clause 7 explains the application of this section to relevant development applications (as defined in clause 5) once this section of the Act commences. The Act applies to a relevant development application made after the commencement of this section, and to a relevant development application made but not decided before commencement of this section. Except for approval of development applications for class 1a, 1b and 10 buildings and structures, an approval of a relevant development application given before the commencement of this section is still subject to the Act. Subsection 2 of clause 7 defines classification of relevant buildings that are subject to this section. Clause 8 provides for a limitation of civil or criminal proceedings that can be taken by an affected person against Milton Brewery. The brewery registration certificate, (as defined in the dictionary in the schedule) allows Milton Brewery to carry out chapter 4 activities. If Milton Brewery is complying with the brewery registration certificate, an affected person cannot bring civil or criminal proceedings against the Brewery relating to the development conditions of the Brewery's development approval and any code of environmental compliance applying to the relevant act. The inability of an affected person to litigate in these circumstances applies despite any other Act providing to the contrary. Page 5

 


 

Planning (Urban Encroachment--Milton Brewery) Bill 2008 Subsection 8(2)(b) provides that an affected person cannot bring civil or criminal proceedings against the Brewery if the relevant act was, or caused by, the emission of light and the emission was not more than the intensity of light emitted at any time before the commencement of this section. Subsection 4 of clause 8 states that if there is either an amendment to, or the issue of, a new development approval or registration certificate which authorises greater emissions of light, noise or release of contaminants into the atmosphere, then there is no immunity provided for Milton Brewery. Part 4 Particular Obligations Clause 9, subsections 1 and 2, provide for relevant development applications to be recorded in the appropriate register. Within 20 business days of making a relevant development application, the applicant for a relevant development must give the registrar written notice in an approved form, asking that the registrar record an affected area notation. There is a maximum penalty of 200 penalty units for non-compliance. Under subsection 2, the registrar records that information on the appropriate register. Under subsections 3 and 4, in the event the application is refused, withdrawn or lapsed, the applicant notifies the registrar in writing in the approved form, to remove the record (affected area notation) from the registrar's records and the registrar does so. There is a maximum penalty of 20 penalty units for failure by the applicant to notify the registrar to remove the record. Subsection 5 provides for removal of a notation from the registrar's records if the registrar is satisfied that the notation is no longer relevant. Under subsection 6 there is no cost to the applicant for the recording or removal of an affected area notation by the registrar. Clause 10 addresses a situation where the applicant for a relevant development application does not notify the registrar pursuant to section 9. Where a contract for sale of the premises or part of the premises has been entered into, failure to notify gives the prospective buyer the right to end the contract before settlement if written notice is given to the applicant's agent. Page 6

 


 

Planning (Urban Encroachment--Milton Brewery) Bill 2008 Under subsection 4 the application must refund any deposit made by the buyer within 14 days of ending the contract. A maximum penalty of 200 penalty units applies to subsection 4. Clause 11 addresses a situation where a relevant development application has been approved and property or premises of that relevant development is offered for sale to a prospective buyer. In this situation, before entering a contract, the seller must notify the prospective buyer in writing of the restrictions applicable under part 3 and that a record on the relevant register (pursuant to section 9) applies. Under subsections 3 and 4 failure of the seller to so notify the prospective buyer gives the prospective buyer the right to end the contract before settlement if written notice to that affect is given to the applicant's agent. If the contract is terminated, under subsection 6, the seller must within 14 days after termination of the contract, refund to the prospective buyer any deposit paid. A maximum penalty of 200 penalty units applies to subsection 6. Subsection 8 makes clear that the provision applies to the applicant for the relevant development application and all subsequent sellers of the property. Part 5 Miscellaneous provisions Clause 12 requires that the registered operator named in the brewery registration certificate must publish the brewery registration certificate and details relevant to it, on the registered operator's website. Failure to do so does not affect the operation of section 8. Clause 13 provides for a regulation to be made under this Act and that the maximum penalty such a regulation can impose is 20 penalty units. Clause 14 provides that the Minister must review the operation and effectiveness of this Act within 5 years after the date of assent and that a report on the review must be laid before the Legislative Assembly as soon as practicable once the review is finished. Page 7

 


 

Planning (Urban Encroachment--Milton Brewery) Bill 2008 Part 6 Transitional provision Clause 15 provides that section 9(1) applies to a relevant development application mentioned in section 7(1)(b) or (c) as if a reference to "20 business days after making the application" was replaced by "20 business days after the commencement of this section". Subsection 2 provides that sections 9(3) and (4) do not apply to a relevant development application mentioned in section 7(1)(c). Clause 16 is a transitional provision for section 11. It provides that if a prospective buyer entered into a contract to which section 11 applies, to buy a property before commencement of this section, the prospective buyer does not have a right to end the contract or claim damages if the seller has not given an affected area notice to the prospective buyer. Subsection 3 states that the failure to give the prospective buyer an affected area notice does not constitute a breach of contract by the seller. Schedule 1 Schedule 1 provides a map of the affected area referred to under section 5(2). Schedule 2 Schedule 2 is the dictionary referred to under section 4. © State of Queensland 2008 Page 8

 


[Index] [Search] [Download] [Bill] [Help]