Queensland Consolidated Acts
[Index]
[Table]
[Search]
[Search this Act]
[Notes]
[Noteup]
[Previous]
[Next]
[Download]
[Help]
MINERAL RESOURCES ACT 1989 - SECT 269
Land Court’s recommendation on hearing
269 Land Court’s recommendation on hearing
(1) Upon the hearing by the Land Court under this part of all matters in
respect of an application for the grant of a mining lease, the Land Court
shall forward to the Minister— (a) any objections lodged in relation
thereto; and
(b) the Land Court’s recommendation.
Note— For other
relevant provisions about forwarding documents, see section 386O .
(2) For
subsection (1) (b) , the Land Court’s recommendation must consist of— (a)
a recommendation to the Minister that the application be granted or rejected
in whole or in part; and
(b) if the application relates to land that is the
surface of a reserve and the owner of the reserve has not consented to the
grant of a mining lease over the surface area, the following— (i) a
recommendation to the Minister as to whether the Governor in Council should
consent to the grant over the surface area;
(ii) any conditions to which the
mining lease should be subject.
(3) A recommendation may include a
recommendation that the mining lease be granted subject to such conditions as
the Land Court considers appropriate, including a condition that mining shall
not be carried on above a specified depth below specified surface area of the
land.
(4) The Land Court, when making a recommendation to the Minister that
an application for a mining lease be granted in whole or in part, shall take
into account and consider whether— (a) the provisions of this Act have been
complied with; and
(b) the area of land applied for is mineralised or the
other purposes for which the lease is sought are appropriate; and
(c) if the
land applied for is mineralised, there will be an acceptable level of
development and utilisation of the mineral resources within the area applied
for; and
(d) the land and the surface area of the land in respect of which
the mining lease is sought is of an appropriate size and shape in relation
to— (i) the matters mentioned in paragraphs (b) and (c) ; and
(ii) the type
and location of the activities proposed to be carried out under the lease and
their likely impact on the surface of the land; and
(e) the term sought is
appropriate; and
(f) the applicant has the necessary financial and technical
capabilities to carry on mining operations under the proposed mining lease;
and
(g) the past performance of the applicant has been satisfactory; and
(h)
any disadvantage may result to the rights of— (i) holders of existing
exploration permits or mineral development licences; or
(ii) existing
applicants for exploration permits or mineral development licences; and
(i)
the operations to be carried on under the authority of the proposed mining
lease will conform with sound land use management; and
(j) there will be any
adverse environmental impact caused by those operations and, if so, the extent
thereof; and
(k) the public right and interest will be prejudiced; and
(l)
any good reason has been shown for a refusal to grant the mining lease; and
(m) taking into consideration the current and prospective uses of that land,
the proposed mining operation is an appropriate land use.
(5) Where the Land
Court recommends to the Minister that an application for the grant of a mining
lease be rejected in whole or in part the Land Court shall furnish the
Minister with the Land Court’s reasons for that recommendation.
(6) If—
(a) the application is for the grant of a coal mining lease; and
(b) under
section 318BA , a preference decision is required;
the Land Court can not
recommend that the lease not be granted so as to give preference to petroleum
development.
AustLII: Copyright Policy
| Disclaimers
| Privacy Policy
| Feedback