For an application for a surveillance warrant, the information is as follows—
(a) when and where the application was made;
(b) if known, the name of the person the chairman reasonably believes has been, or is likely to be, involved in corruption being investigated by the commission;
(c) a description of the place mentioned in the application;
(d) the type of corruption to which the application relates;
(e) whether or not the warrant was issued;
(f) if the warrant was issued—(i) when and where it was issued, and the court that issued it; and(ii) how long the warrant was in force; and(iii) the benefits derived from exercising powers under the warrant; andExamples of benefits derived from exercising powers under a surveillance warrant—• a proceeding started because of the use of a surveillance device under the warrant• a brief description of how using a surveillance device under the warrant helped in the investigation of the corruption(iv) if and when powers were exercised under the warrant; and(v) if a surveillance device was not installed under the warrant—why it was not installed.