[Index] [Search] [Download] [Help]
This is a Bill, not an Act. For current law, see the Acts databases.
House of Assembly—No 60
As laid on the table and read a first time, 24 November 2004
South Australia
Road
Traffic (Drug Tests) Amendment Bill 2004
A Bill For
An Act to amend the Road Traffic Act 1961.
Contents
Part 1—Preliminary
1 Short title
2 Amendment provisions
Part 2—Amendment of Road
Traffic Act 1961
3 Amendment of section 47A—Interpretation
4 Insertion of section 47BA—Driving
under influence
47BA Driving while having prescribed drug
present in blood
5 Insertion of section 47EB
47EB Police may require oral fluid analysis
6 Amendment of section 47F—Police to
facilitate blood test at request of incapacitated person etc
7 Amendment of section 47FA—Police to
provide transport assistance for blood tests in certain circumstances outside
Metropolitan Adelaide
8 Amendment of section 47FB—Blood
tests by nurses where breath analysis or oral fluid analysis taken outside
Metropolitan Adelaide
9 Amendment of section 47G—Evidence
etc
10 Insertion of section 47GB
47GB Oral fluid analysis where consumption of
prescribed drug occurs after driving
11 Amendment of section 47H—Approval of
apparatus for the purposes of breath analysis, alcotests and oral fluid analysis
12 Amendment of section 47I—Compulsory
blood tests
13 Amendment of section 47IA—Certain offenders to attend lectures
14 Amendment of section 47J—Recurrent offenders
Schedule 1—Related amendment
Part 1—Preliminary
1 Amendment provisions
Part 2—Amendment of Criminal
Law (Forensic Procedures) Act 1998
2 Amendment of
section 5—Non-application of Act to certain procedures
The Parliament of South Australia enacts
as follows:
This Act may be cited as the Road Traffic (Drug Tests)
Amendment Act 2004.
In this Act, a provision under a heading referring to the
amendment of a specified Act amends the Act so specified.
Part 2—Amendment of Road Traffic Act 1961
3—Amendment of section 47A—Interpretation
(1) Section 47A(1)—after
the definition of gross vehicle mass insert:
oral fluid includes saliva;
oral fluid analysis means an analysis of oral fluid by means
of an apparatus of a kind approved by the Governor for the conduct of oral
fluid analysis;
(2) Section 47A(1)—after
the definition of prescribed concentration of alcohol insert:
prescribed drug means a substance declared by the
regulations to be a prescribed drug;
4—Insertion of section 47BA—Driving under influence
After section 47B insert:
47BA—Driving
while having prescribed drug present in blood
(1) A person must not—
(a) drive a motor vehicle; or
(b) attempt to put a motor vehicle in motion,
while there is present in his or her blood a
prescribed drug.
Maximum penalty:
For a first offence—a fine of not less
than $500 and not more than $900.
For a second offence—a fine of not less
than $700 and not more than $1 200.
For a third or subsequent offence—a fine
of not less than $1 200 and not more than $2 000.
(2) If a court convicts a person of an offence
against subsection (1), the following provisions apply:
(a) the court must order that the person be disqualified from
holding or obtaining a driver's licence—
(i) in the case of a
first offence—for such period, being not less than 6 months, as the court
thinks fit;
(ii) in the case of a second offence—for such period, being not
less than 12 months, as the court thinks fit;
(iii) in the case of a third or subsequent offence—for such
period, being not less than 2 years, as the court thinks fit;
(b) the
disqualification prescribed by paragraph (a) cannot be reduced or
mitigated in any way or be substituted by any other penalty or sentence unless,
in the case of a first offence, the court is satisfied, by evidence given on
oath, that the offence is trifling, in which case it may order a period of
disqualification that is less than the prescribed minimum period but not less
than one month;
(c) if the person is the holder of a driver's licence—the
disqualification operates to cancel the licence as from the commencement of the
period of disqualification;
(d) the
court may, if it thinks fit to do so, order that conditions imposed by section
81A or 81AB of the Motor Vehicles Act 1959 on any driver's licence
issued to the person after the period of disqualification be effective for a
period greater than the period prescribed by that section.
(3) In
determining whether an offence is a first, second, third or subsequent offence
for the purposes of this section, any previous offence against
subsection (1) or section 47(1), 47B(1), 47E(3),
47EB(6) or 47I(14) for which the defendant has been convicted will be taken
into account, but only if the previous offence was committed within the
prescribed period immediately preceding the date on which the offence under
consideration was committed.
(4) In this section—
prescribed period means 5 years.
After section 47EA insert:
47EB—Police
may require oral fluid analysis
(1) If
a member of the police force has required, or may require, a person to submit
to an alcotest or breath analysis under section 47E, the member of the police
force may require the person to submit to an oral fluid analysis (whether in
addition to, or instead of, a requirement under that section).
(2) An
oral fluid analysis required under subsection (1) must be commenced within
two hours of the event giving rise to the belief referred to in section 47E(1).
(3) A
member of the police force may give reasonable directions for the purpose of
making a requirement under this section that the driver
submit to an oral fluid analysis.
(4) A
person must forthwith comply with a direction under subsection (3).
(5) The
regulations may prescribe the manner in which an oral fluid analysis is to be
conducted and may, for example, require that more than one sample of oral fluid
is to be provided for analysis.
(6) A person required under this section to
submit to an oral fluid analysis must not refuse or fail to comply with all
reasonable directions of a member of the police force in relation to the
requirement and, in particular, must not refuse or fail to allow a sample of
oral fluid to be taken in accordance with the directions of a member of the
police force.
Maximum penalty:
For a first offence—a fine of not less
than $700 and not more than $1 200.
For a subsequent offence—a fine of not
less than $1 500 and not more than $2 500.
(7) It is a defence to a prosecution under
subsection (6) that—
(a) the requirement or direction to which the prosecution
relates was not lawfully made; or
(b) the person was not allowed the opportunity to comply with
the requirement or direction after having been given the prescribed oral advice
in relation to—
(i) the consequences
of refusing or failing to comply with the requirement or direction; and
(ii) the person's right to request the taking of a blood sample
under section 47F; or
(c) there was, in the circumstances of the case, good cause for
the refusal or failure of the defendant to comply with the requirement or
direction.
(8) No person is entitled to refuse or fail to
comply with a requirement or direction under this section on the ground that—
(a) the person would, or might, by complying with that
requirement or direction, furnish evidence that could be used against himself
or herself; or
(b) the person consumed a prescribed drug after the person last
drove a motor vehicle or attempted to put a motor vehicle in motion and before
the requirement was made or the direction given.
(9) A person may not raise a defence that the
person had good cause for a refusal or failure to comply with a requirement or
direction under this section by reason of some physical or medical condition of
the person unless—
(a) a sample of the person's blood was taken in accordance with
section 47F; or
(b) the person made a request as referred to in section 47F(2),
but—
(i) a member of the
police force failed to facilitate the taking of a sample of the person's blood
as required by that section; or
(ii) a medical practitioner was not reasonably available for the
purpose of taking such a sample; or
(c) the taking of a sample of the person's blood in accordance
with section 47F was not possible or reasonably advisable or practicable in the
circumstances by reason of some physical or medical condition of the person.
(10) Where a court convicts a person of an
offence against subsection (6), the following provisions apply:
(a) the court must order that the person be disqualified from
holding or obtaining a driver's licence—
(i) in the case of a first offence—for such
period, being not less than twelve months, as the court thinks fit; or
(ii) in the case of a subsequent offence—for such period, being
not less than three years, as the court thinks fit;
(b) the
disqualification prescribed by paragraph (a) cannot be reduced or
mitigated in any way or be substituted by any other penalty or sentence unless,
in the case of a first offence, the court is satisfied, by evidence given on
oath, that the offence is trifling, in which case the court may order a period
of disqualification that is less than the prescribed minimum period but not
less than one month;
(c) if the person is the holder of a driver's licence—the
disqualification operates to cancel the licence as from the commencement of the
period of disqualification;
(d) the
court may, if it thinks fit to do so, order that conditions imposed by section
81A or 81AB of the Motor Vehicles Act 1959 on any driver's licence
issued to the person after the period of disqualification be effective for a
period greater than the period prescribed by that section.
(11) In
determining whether an offence is a first or subsequent offence for the
purposes of this section, any previous offence against subsection (6) or
section 47(1), 47B(1), 47BA(1), 47E(3)or 47I(14) for
which the defendant has been convicted will be taken into account, but only if
the previous offence was committed within the prescribed period immediately
preceding the date on which the offence under consideration was committed.
(12) A
sample of oral fluid taken under this section (and any other forensic material
taken incidentally during an oral fluid analysis) must not be used for a
purpose other than that contemplated by this section.
(13) The Commissioner of Police must ensure that
a sample of oral fluid taken under this section (and any other forensic
material taken incidentally during an oral fluid analysis) is destroyed as soon
as practicable—
(a) if the person is convicted by a court on a charge of an
offence against section 47BA(1) relating to the sample—at the end of period
available for lodging an appeal against the conviction; or
(b) if the person is discharged or acquitted by a court on all
charges of an offence against section 47BA(1) relating to the sample—at the end
of period available for lodging an appeal against the discharge or acquittal;
or
(c) if
an appeal against a conviction or discharge or acquittal for an offence or
offences against section 47BA(1) relating to the sample has been lodged within
the period available for lodging such an appeal—after the appeal is withdrawn
or lapses or is finally determined.
(14) If
a sample of oral fluid taken under this section (and any other forensic
material taken incidentally during an oral fluid analysis) is destroyed in
accordance with this subsection (13), the Commissioner of Police must ensure
that reasonable steps are taken, within 14 days of the destruction of the
material, to give written notice of that fact to the person from whom the
sample was obtained.
(15) In this section—
forensic material means any human material from which the
person from whom the material was taken could be identified;
prescribed period means 5 years.
6—Amendment of section 47F—Police to facilitate blood test at request of incapacitated person etc
Section 47F(2)—after
"section 47E" insert:
or 47EB
Section 47F(1)(a)—after
"analysis" insert:
, or oral fluid analysis,
Section 47FB(1)—after
"analysis" insert:
, or oral fluid analysis,
9—Amendment of section 47G—Evidence etc
(1) Section 47G(3a)—after
"alcotests" insert:
or oral fluid analysis
(2) Section 47G—after subsection (8) insert:
(8a) Without
affecting the admissibility of evidence that might be given otherwise than in
pursuance of this section, evidence may be given, in any proceedings for an
offence, of the presence of a prescribed drug indicated as being present in the
blood of the defendant by an oral fluid analysis and, where the requirements
and procedures in relation to oral fluid analysis under this Act, including
subsection (8d), have been complied with, it must be presumed, in the
absence of proof to the contrary, that the prescribed drug so indicated was
present in the blood of the defendant at the time of the oral fluid analysis.
(8b) No evidence can be adduced in rebuttal of
the presumption created by subsection (8a) except—
(a) evidence
of the presence of a prescribed drug in the blood of the defendant as indicated
by analysis of a sample of blood taken and dealt with in accordance with
section 47I or in accordance with the procedures prescribed by regulation; and
(b) evidence as to whether the results of analysis of the sample
of blood demonstrate that the oral fluid analysis gave a false indication of
the presence of a prescribed drug in the blood of the defendant.
(8c) As soon as
practicable after a person has submitted to an oral fluid analysis, the person
conducting the oral fluid analysis must deliver to the other person a notice in
the prescribed form specifying—
(a) the result of the oral fluid analysis; and
(b) the date and time of the oral fluid analysis; and
(c) any other information required by the regulations.
(8d) If a person has
submitted to an oral fluid analysis and a prescribed drug is indicated as being
present in the person's blood, the person who conducted the oral fluid analysis
must forthwith—
(a) give
the person the prescribed oral advice and deliver to the person the prescribed
written notice as to the operation of this Act in relation to the results of
the oral fluid analysis and as to the procedures prescribed for the taking and
analysis of a sample of the person's blood; and
(b) at the request of the person made in accordance with the
regulations, deliver an approved blood test kit to the person.
(8e) A
certificate purporting to be signed by a member of the police force and to
certify that an oral fluid analysis apparatus referred to in the certificate is
or was of a kind approved under this Act for the purpose of performing oral
fluid analysis is, in the absence of proof to the contrary, proof of the matter
so certified.
(8f) A certificate purporting to be signed by a
member of the police force and to certify—
(a) that
a person named in the certificate submitted to an oral fluid analysis on a
specified day and at a specified time and that the oral fluid analysis
indicated that a prescribed drug may then have been present in the blood of
that person; and
(b) that the prescribed oral advice and the prescribed written
notice were given and delivered to the person in accordance with
subsection (8d)(a); and
(c) that—
(i) the person did not
make a request for an approved blood test kit in accordance with the
regulations; or
(ii) at the request of the person, a kit that, from an
examination of its markings, appeared to the person signing the certificate to
be an approved blood test kit was delivered to the person in accordance with
subsection (8d)(b),
is, in the absence of proof to the contrary, proof that the
requirements of subsection (8d) were complied with in relation to the
person.
(8g) A prosecution for an offence will not fail
because of a deficiency of a kit delivered to the defendant in purported
compliance with subsection (8d)(b) and the
presumption under subsection (8a) will apply despite such a deficiency
unless it is proved—
(a) that the defendant delivered the kit unopened to a medical
practitioner for use in taking a sample of the defendant's blood; and
(b) by
evidence of the medical practitioner, that the medical practitioner was,
because of a deficiency of the kit, unable to comply with the prescribed
procedures governing the manner in which a sample of a person's blood must be
taken and dealt with for the purposes of subsection (8a).
(8h) If it is proved in proceedings that a prescribed drug was
present in the defendant's blood at the time of an oral fluid analysis, it must
be conclusively presumed that the prescribed drug was present in the
defendant's blood throughout the period of two hours immediately preceding the
oral fluid analysis.
(8i) A
certificate purporting to be signed by an approved person certifying the usual
effect of a particular prescribed drug on behaviour when consumed or used
(including its effect on a person's ability to drive properly) is, in the
absence of proof to the contrary, proof of the matter so certified.
(3) Section 47G(9)—after
paragraph (b) insert:
(c) subsections (8a) to (8i) (inclusive) apply only in relation
to an offence against section 47BA(1).
(4) Section 47G—after subsection (9) insert:
(10) In this section—
approved person means a person who has been declared by
the Governor by notice in the Gazette to be an approved person for the purposes
of subsection (8i).
After section 47GA insert:
47GB—Oral
fluid analysis where consumption of prescribed drug occurs after driving
(1) This
section applies to proceedings for an offence against section 47BA(1) in which the results of an oral fluid analysis under
this Act are relied on to establish the commission of the offence.
(2) If in proceedings to which this section
applies the defendant satisfies the court—
(a) that
the defendant consumed a prescribed drug during the period (the relevant
period) after the defendant last drove a motor vehicle or attempted to
put a motor vehicle in motion and before the performance of the oral fluid
analysis; and
(b) in a case where the defendant was required to submit to the
oral fluid analysis because the defendant was, or may have been, required under
section 47E(1)(d) to submit to an alcotest or breath analysis or both—
(i) that the defendant
complied with the requirements of this Act in relation to the accident; and
(ii) that the prescribed drug was not consumed by the defendant
during the relevant period while at the scene of the accident; and
(c) in
a case where the defendant was required to submit to the oral fluid analysis
because the defendant was, or may have been, required under section 47E(2a) to
submit to an alcotest—that the prescribed drug was not consumed by the
defendant during the relevant period in the vicinity of the breath testing
station,
the court may, despite the other provisions of this Act, find
the defendant not guilty of the offence charged.
11—Amendment of section 47H—Approval of apparatus for the purposes of breath analysis, alcotests and oral fluid analysis
Section 47(H)(1)—after
paragraph (b) insert:
(c) approve apparatus of a specified kind for the purpose of
conducting oral fluid analysis.
12—Amendment of section 47I—Compulsory blood tests
(1) Section 47I(8)—after
"blood" (second occurring) insert:
, and whether a prescribed drug is present in the blood,
(2) Section 47I(9)—after
"present" insert:
, and whether a prescribed drug is present,
(3) Section 47(11)—after paragraph (d) insert:
(da) the presence of a prescribed drug in the
blood; and
(4) Section 47(13ba)—after "alcohol"
insert:
, or the prescribed drug,
(5) Section 47(13bb)—delete "or 47B(1) that a concentration of alcohol was present in the
defendant's blood at the time at which a sample of blood was taken under this
section, it must be conclusively presumed that that concentration of
alcohol" and substitute:
, 47B(1) or 47BA(1) that a concentration
of alcohol, or a prescribed drug, was present in the defendant's blood at the
time at which a sample of blood was taken under this section, it must be
conclusively presumed that that concentration of alcohol, or the prescribed
drug,
(6) Section 47(14b)—delete "or 47E(3)" and substitute:
, 47BA(1), 47E(3) or 47EB(6)
13—Amendment of section 47IA—Certain offenders to attend lectures
Section 47IA(3),
definition of prescribed first or second offence—delete
"47E(3)" and substitute:
47BA(1), 47E(3), 47EB(6)
14—Amendment of section 47J—Recurrent offenders
Section 47J(12),
definition of prescribed offence—delete "47E(3)" and
substitute:
47BA(1), 47E(3), 47EB(6)
Part 1—Preliminary
In this Schedule, a provision under a heading referring to the
amendment of a specified Act amends the Act so specified.
Part 2—Amendment
of Criminal Law (Forensic Procedures) Act 1998
2—Amendment of section 5—Non-application of Act to certain procedures
Section 5—after paragraph (b) insert:
(c) the taking of a sample of oral fluid from a person under section 47EB of the Road Traffic Act 1961.