20—Occupier's duty of care
(1) Subject to this
Part, the liability of the occupier of premises for injury, damage or loss
attributable to the dangerous state or condition of the premises shall be
determined in accordance with the principles of the law of negligence.
(2) In determining the
standard of care to be exercised by the occupier of premises, a court shall
take into account—
(a) the
nature and extent of the premises; and
(b) the
nature and extent of the danger arising from the state or condition of the
premises; and
(c) the
circumstances in which the person alleged to have suffered injury, damage or
loss, or the property of that person, became exposed to that danger; and
(d) the
age of the person alleged to have suffered injury, damage or loss, and the
ability of that person to appreciate the danger; and
(e) the
extent (if at all) to which the occupier was aware, or ought to have been
aware, of—
(i)
the danger; and
(ii)
the entry of persons onto the premises; and
(f) the
measures (if any) taken to eliminate, reduce or warn against the danger; and
(g) the
extent (if at all) to which it would have been reasonable and practicable for
the occupier to take measures to eliminate, reduce or warn against the danger;
and
(h) any
other matter that the court thinks relevant.
(3) The fact that an
occupier has not taken any measures to eliminate, reduce or warn against a
danger arising from the state or condition of premises does not necessarily
show that the occupier has failed to exercise a reasonable standard of care.
(4) Subject to any Act
or law to the contrary, an occupier's duty of care may be reduced or excluded
by contract but no contractual reduction or exclusion of the duty affects the
rights of any person who is a stranger to the contract.
(5) Where an occupier
is, by contract or by reason of some other Act or law, subject to a higher
standard of care than would be applicable apart from this subsection, the
question of whether the occupier is liable for injury, damage or loss shall be
determined by reference to that higher standard of care.
(6) An occupier owes
no duty of care to a trespasser unless—
(a) the
presence of trespassers on the premises, and their consequent exposure to
danger, were reasonably foreseeable; and
(b) the
nature or extent of the danger was such that measures which were not in fact
taken should have been taken for their protection.