33—Mental harm—duty of care
(1) A person (the
"defendant") does not owe a duty to another
person (the "plaintiff" ) to take care not to cause the plaintiff mental harm
unless a reasonable person in the defendant's position would have foreseen
that a person of normal fortitude in the plaintiff's position might, in the
circumstances of the case, suffer a psychiatric illness.
(2) For the purposes
of this section—
(a) in a
case of pure mental harm, the circumstances of the case to which the court is
to have regard include the following:
(i)
whether or not the mental harm was suffered as the result
of a sudden shock;
(ii)
whether the plaintiff witnessed, at the scene, a person
being killed, injured or put in peril;
(iii)
the nature of the relationship between the plaintiff and
any person killed, injured or put in peril;
(iv)
whether or not there was a pre-existing relationship
between the plaintiff and the defendant;
(b) in a
case of consequential mental harm, the circumstances of the case include the
nature of the bodily injury out of which the mental harm arose.
(3) This section does
not affect the duty of care of a person (the
"defendant") to another (the "plaintiff") if the defendant knows, or ought
reasonably to know, that the plaintiff is a person of less than normal
fortitude.