(1) If the regulator
is not satisfied that a safety case outline provided by the operator of a
determined major hazard facility will lead to the development of a safety case
that complies with regulation 561, the regulator may require the operator
to alter the outline.
(2) If the regulator
proposes to require an operator to alter a safety case outline, the regulator
must give the operator a written notice—
(a)
informing the operator of the proposed requirement and the reasons for it; and
(b)
advising the operator that the operator may make a submission to the regulator
in relation to the proposed requirement; and
(c)
specifying the date (being not less than 28 days) by which the submission
must be made.
(3) The regulator
must—
(a) if
the operator has made a submission in relation to the proposed requirement to
alter a safety case outline—consider that submission; and
(b)
whether or not the operator has made a submission—decide whether or not
to require the operator to alter the outline; and
(c)
within 14 days after deciding, give the operator written notice of the
decision, including details of the alteration required and the reasons why it
is required.
(4) The operator must
alter the outline as required.
Maximum penalty:
(a) In
the case of an individual—$3 600.
(b) In
the case of a body corporate—$18 000.
(5) The operator must
give the regulator a copy of a safety case outline that has been
altered—
(a)
under this regulation; or
(b) by
the operator on the operator's initiative.
Maximum penalty:
(a) In
the case of an individual—$3 600.
(b) In
the case of a body corporate—$18 000.
(6) The safety case
outline as altered becomes the safety case outline for the major hazard
facility.