(1) If a protective
security officer is found on an informal inquiry to have committed a breach of
the Code, the officer may apply for a review under this section on the ground
that he or she did not commit the breach concerned or that there was a serious
irregularity in the processes followed in the informal inquiry.
(2) If a determination
is made on an informal inquiry that action should be taken in relation to the
protective security officer concerned for a breach of the Code, the officer
may apply for a review under this section on the ground that the action is not
warranted by the nature of the breach or in the circumstances of the case.
(3) An application for
review under this section must be made to a person determined under the
regulations within the period and in the manner prescribed by the regulations.
(4) A person to whom
an application is made under this section—
(a)
must, as soon as practicable, conduct a review (subject to this Act and any
order or direction of the Commissioner) of the processes followed in the
informal inquiry, or the finding or determination made on the informal
inquiry, as the case may require; and
(b) must
afford the applicant an opportunity to make submissions either orally or in
writing in support of his or her application; and
(c) may,
according to the nature of the case—
(i)
order that a new informal inquiry be conducted or that
the processes involved in the inquiry be recommenced from some specified
stage; or
(ii)
affirm or quash any finding or determination reviewed; or
(iii)
make a determination that should have been made in the
first instance; and
(d) must
ensure that a written report of the results of the review is prepared and
delivered to the Commissioner; and
(e) must
ensure that particulars of the results of the review are furnished to the
protective security officer concerned.
(5) This section
applies to the exclusion of any right of appeal under Part 7 of the
Police (Complaints and Disciplinary Proceedings) Act 1985 .