South Australian Numbered Acts

[Index] [Table] [Search] [Search this Act] [Notes] [Noteup] [Previous] [Next] [Download] [Help]

WORKERS REHABILITATION AND COMPENSATION (SCHEME REVIEW) AMENDMENT ACT 2008 (NO 17 OF 2008) - SECT 16

16—Amendment of section 36—Discontinuance of weekly payments

        (1)         Section 36(1)—delete paragraph (h) and substitute:

            (h)         the worker's entitlement to weekly payments ceases because of the passage of time; or

                  (i)         the worker's entitlement to weekly payments ceases because of the occurrence of some other event or the making of some other decision or determination that, under another provision of this Act, brings the entitlement to weekly payments to an end or the discontinuance of weekly payments is otherwise authorised or required under another provision of this Act.

        (2)         Section 36(1a)—after paragraph (f) insert:

            (fa)         the worker refuses or fails to participate in assessments of the worker's capacity, rehabilitation progress or future employment prospects (including by failing to attend); or

        (3)         Section 36(2)(c)—delete paragraph (c) and substitute:

            (c)         the worker has recommenced work as an employee or as a self-employed contractor, or the worker has had an increase in remuneration as an employee or a self-employed contractor; or

            (d)         the worker's entitlement to weekly payments reduces because of the passage of time; or

            (e)         the worker's entitlement to weekly payments reduces because of the occurrence of some other event or the making of some other decision or determination that, under another provision of this Act, is expressed to result in a reduction to an entitlement to weekly payments or the reduction of weekly payments is otherwise authorised or required under another provision of this Act.

        (4)         Section 36(2)—delete "(and any reduction made on the basis of this subsection must be consistent with section 35)"

        (5)         Section 36(3a)—delete "21 days" and substitute:

the prescribed number of days

        (6)         Section 36(3a)—after paragraph (b) insert:

            (ba)         where a decision to reduce weekly payments is made on account of the end of the first entitlement period or the second entitlement period under section 35A; or

            (bb)         where a decision to discontinue weekly payments is made on account of the end of the third entitlement period under section 35A; or

            (bc)         where a decision to discontinue weekly payments is made on account of—

                  (i)         a review by the Corporation under section 35B(3); or

                  (ii)         a decision of the Corporation under section 35C(5)(a); or

        (7)         Section 36—after subsection (3a) insert:

        (3b)         For the purposes of subsection (3a), the prescribed number of days is—

            (a)         if the worker has been receiving weekly payments under this Division (or Division 7A) for a period that is less than 52 weeks, or for 2 or more periods that aggregate less than 52 weeks—14 days;

            (b)         in any other case—28 days.

        (8)         Section 36(4), (4a) and (5)—delete subsections (4), (4a) and (5) and substitute:

        (4)         Subject to complying with subsection (3a), a discontinuance or reduction of weekly payments under this section takes effect in accordance with the terms of the Corporation's notice under subsection (3).

        (5)         The effect of a decision to discontinue or reduce weekly payments is not affected by the worker lodging a notice of dispute under Part 6A.

        (5a)         If a dispute is resolved in favour of the worker at the reconsideration, conciliation or judicial determination stage, or on an appeal, the worker is entitled to be paid—

            (a)         in the case of a reconsideration—the total amount that, under the terms of the reconsideration, should have been paid to the worker between the date that the disputed decision took effect and the date that the decision, as varied under the reconsideration, takes effect (less any amount paid to the worker under subsection (15));

            (b)         in the case of a resolution at the conciliation stage—any amount payable under the terms of the relevant settlement;

            (c)         in the case of a judicial determination or determination or on appeal—the amount that, under the terms of the determination or according to the outcome of the appeal, would have constituted the worker's entitlements under this Act had the weekly payments not been discontinued or reduced (as the case may be), taking into account any amount paid to the worker under a preceding paragraph, under subsection (15), or under another provision of this Act, and subject to the specific terms of any determination or order made as a result of the judicial determination or appeal (as the case may be).

        (5b)         An amount paid under subsection (5a) will be taken to be an amount in arrears under section 47 (with interest payable subject to the operation of section 47(2)).

        (5c)         If a dispute is ultimately resolved in favour of the Corporation and the worker has been paid an amount in excess of the amount of the worker's lawful entitlements to weekly benefits on account of the operation of subsection (5a)(c) or (15), the Corporation may, at the Corporation's discretion (but subject to the regulations)—

            (a)         recover the amount of the excess (together with any interest on that amount paid by the Corporation) from the worker as a debt; or

            (b)         set off the amount recoverable under paragraph (a) against liabilities of the Corporation to make payments to the worker under this Act.

        (9)         Section 36—after subsection (13) insert:

        (14)         In connection with the operation of subsection (1) (and to avoid doubt), a worker is required—

            (a)         to take reasonable steps to attend any appointment reasonably required for the purposes of this Division; and

            (b)         to take reasonable steps to comply with any requirement reasonably required under a rehabilitation program or a rehabilitation and return to work plan,

(and a failure to comply with these requirements constitutes a ground for the discontinuance of payments under this section).

        (15)         Despite subsections (4) and (5), if—

            (a)         a worker who has—

                  (i)         received a notice of discontinuance of weekly payments under this section; and

                  (ii)         lodged a notice of dispute under Part 6A,

applies to the WorkCover Ombudsman for a review of the decision to discontinue weekly payments; and

            (b)         on the application for review it appears to the WorkCover Ombudsman that it was not reasonably open to the Corporation to decide to discontinue the payments having regard to the circumstances of the case,

the WorkCover Ombudsman may suspend the operation of the decision to discontinue weekly payments.

        (16)         Weekly payments reinstated under subsection (15) will continue until—

            (a)         the notice of dispute is withdrawn; or

            (b)         the matter is resolved on reconsideration by the Corporation or at conciliation (or otherwise between the parties); or

            (c)         the Tribunal—

                  (i)         determines the matter in the exercise of its judicial function; or

                  (ii)         pending its determination of the matter—orders that the worker should no longer have the benefit of the weekly payments due to some unreasonable act, omission or delay on the part of the worker in connection with the proceedings.

        (17)         In connection with the operation of subsection (15)—

            (a)         the WorkCover Ombudsman should seek to consider an application for review under subsection (15)(a) as expeditiously as is reasonably practicable; and

            (b)         the WorkCover Ombudsman has an absolute discretion as to whether or not the worker or the Corporation will be heard on the review; and

            (c)         a decision of the WorkCover Ombudsman on a review is not subject to appeal or review under this or any other Act or law.



AustLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback