17—Liability of vehicle owners and expiation of certain offences
(1) Without derogating
from the liability of any other person, but subject to this regulation, if a
vehicle is involved in an offence against regulation 16, the owner of the
vehicle is guilty of an offence and liable to the same penalty as is
prescribed for the principal offence and the expiation fee that is fixed for
the principal offence applies in relation to an offence against this
regulation.
(2) The owner and
driver of a vehicle are not both liable through the operation of this
regulation to be convicted of an offence arising out of the same
circumstances, and consequently conviction of the owner exonerates the driver
and conversely conviction of the driver exonerates the owner.
(3) An expiation
notice or expiation reminder notice given under the
Expiation of Offences Act 1996 to the owner of a vehicle for an alleged
offence against this regulation involving the vehicle must be accompanied by a
notice inviting the owner, if he or she was not the driver at the time of the
alleged offence against regulation 16, to provide the Trust, within the
period specified in the notice, with a statutory declaration—
(a)
setting out the name and address of the driver; or
(b) if
he or she had transferred ownership of the vehicle to another prior to the
time of the alleged offence against regulation 16 and has complied with
the Motor Vehicles Act 1959 in respect of the transfer—setting out
details of the transfer (including the name and address of the transferee).
(4) Before proceedings
are commenced against the owner of a vehicle for an offence against this
regulation involving the vehicle, the complainant must send the owner a
notice—
(a)
setting out particulars of the alleged offence against regulation 16; and
(b)
inviting the owner, if he or she was not the driver at the time of the alleged
offence against regulation 16, to provide the complainant, within 21 days
of the date of the notice, with a statutory declaration setting out the
matters referred to in subregulation (3).
(5) Subregulation (4)
does not apply to—
(a)
proceedings commenced where an owner has elected under the
Expiation of Offences Act 1996 to be prosecuted for the offence; or
(b)
proceedings commenced against an owner of a vehicle who has been named in a
statutory declaration under this regulation as the driver of the vehicle.
(6) Subject to
subregulation (7), in proceedings against the owner of a vehicle for an
offence against this regulation, it is a defence to prove—
(a)
that, in consequence of some unlawful act, the vehicle was not in the
possession or control of the owner at the time of the alleged offence against
regulation 16; or
(b) that
the owner provided the complainant with a statutory declaration in accordance
with an invitation under this regulation.
(7) The defence in
subregulation (6)(b) does not apply if it is proved that the owner made
the declaration knowing it to be false in a material particular.
(8) If—
(a) an
expiation notice is given to a person named as the alleged driver in a
statutory declaration under this regulation; or
(b)
proceedings are commenced against a person named as the alleged driver in such
a statutory declaration,
the notice or summons, as the case may be, must be accompanied by a notice
setting out particulars of the statutory declaration that named the person as
the alleged driver.
(9) The particulars of
the statutory declaration provided to the person named as the alleged driver
must not include the address of the person who provided the statutory
declaration.
(10) In proceedings
against a person named in a statutory declaration under this regulation for
the offence to which the declaration relates, it will be presumed, in the
absence of proof to the contrary, that the person was the driver of the
vehicle at the time at which the alleged offence was committed.
(11) In proceedings
against the owner or driver of a vehicle for an offence against this Part, an
allegation in the complaint that a notice was given under this regulation on a
specified day will be accepted as proof, in the absence of proof to the
contrary, of the facts alleged.