Victorian Bills Explanatory Memoranda

[Index] [Search] [Download] [Bill] [Help]


VICTORIA POLICE BILL 2013

               Victoria Police Bill 2013

                         Introduction Print


               EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM

                                  General
The Bill is for a new principal Act for the administration and governance of
Victoria Police, the State's primary law enforcement organisation. The Bill
will largely repeal the Police Regulation Act 1958 which was drafted across
six decades in a mix of old-fashioned and modern language.
The Bill is a further step towards implementing the Government's response to
recommendations for legislative reform made in the report of the Inquiry into
the command, management and functions of the senior structure of Victoria
Police ("the Report") lead by Jack Rush QC under section 52 of the Public
Administration Act 2004.
The Bill--
         ·    recognises that Victoria Police's role is to serve the Victorian
              community and uphold the law, so as to promote a safe, secure
              and orderly society; and

         ·    establishes Victoria Police as an organisation made up of both
              sworn officers and public servants; and
         ·    creates a more transparent framework to govern the
              relationship between Victoria Police and the Government; and
         ·    provides for the appointment of police officers of all ranks,
              protective services officers and special constables; and
         ·    provides a clearer framework for governing and administering
              Victoria Police.




571316                                1     BILL LA INTRODUCTION 15/10/2013

 


 

Clause Notes PART 1--PRELIMINARY Part 1 of the Bill provides for preliminary matters, including the purposes, commencement and definitions. Clause 1 sets out the purposes of the Bill, which are to re-enact and modernise the law relating to the governance and regulation of Victoria Police and to retitle and substantially repeal the Police Regulation Act 1958. Clause 2 provides for the Bill's commencement arrangements. All provisions will come into effect on a day or days to be proclaimed, or on 1 December 2014 if not proclaimed before that date. Clause 3 contains definitions of terms used in the Bill. The clause largely re-makes definitions contained in the Police Regulation Act 1958 with the following key changes-- · commissioned officer--the Police Regulation Act 1958 referred to police officers of the rank of Inspector or above who had been certified by the Governor in Council as "officers". To avoid confusion with the term police officer, the new term commissioned officer is used to refer to the police officers who are certified under clause 14; · member of Victoria Police personnel--refers to the categories of people who are employed or appointed to work at Victoria Police; · police officer--the Police Regulation Act 1958 did not contain a definition of police officer and referred instead to a member of the force. Police officer is defined as the Chief Commissioner, a Deputy Commissioner, an Assistant Commissioner or a person appointed under Division 5 of Part 3; · Victoria Police--as the Bill establishes Victoria Police, a definition of Victoria Police is included; · Victoria Police employee--refers to the people employed in Victoria Police by the Chief Commissioner under Part 3 of the Public Administration Act 2004. 2

 


 

Clause 4 provides the meaning of efficiency for the purposes of the promotion or transfer of police and protective services officers. The clause re-enacts the current meaning of efficiency used in the Police Regulation Act 1958. Efficiency is used for the purposes of promotion and transfer of police and protective services officers. Clause 5 allows the Chief Commissioner to determine an area to be the Melbourne Metropolitan area for the purposes of the Bill by publishing a notice in the Government Gazette. This is relevant to the definition of country position. PART 2--VICTORIA POLICE This Part recognises Victoria Police in legislation as a body comprising the Chief Commissioner and those appointed or employed by the Chief Commissioner under the Bill, as well as those employed by the Chief Commissioner under the Public Administration Act 2004. The Part also articulates Victoria Police's role and general functions and articulates the relationship between Victoria Police and the Government in a way that seeks to maintain ministerial and parliamentary responsibility, control and accountability for Victoria Police while safeguarding police operational independence. Division 1--Constitution, role and functions Clause 6 establishes Victoria Police as the police force of Victoria. A note to the clause recognises that Victoria Police is a "special body" under section 6(1) of the Public Administration Act 2004. Clause 7 lists the personnel who make up Victoria Police. The personnel that make up Victoria Police are the Chief Commissioner, Deputy Commissioners, Assistant Commissioners, other police officers, protective services officers, police recruits, police reservists and Victoria Police employees. Clause 8 outlines the role of Victoria Police, which is to serve the Victorian community and uphold the law so as to promote a safe, secure and orderly society. 3

 


 

Clause 9 gives a non-exhaustive list of Victoria Police's general functions and provides that these functions do not confer on any person any civil right of action, provide any person with a defence to any civil action or otherwise affect any civil right of action. The list of general functions are consistent with Victoria Police's Code of Conduct, and include preserving the peace, protecting life and property, preventing the commission of offences, detecting and apprehending offenders, and helping those in need of assistance. Division 2--Relationship with government Clause 10 allows the Minister, after consultation with the Chief Commissioner, to direct the Chief Commissioner in relation to the policy and priorities to be pursued in the performance of the functions of Victoria Police. For example, the Minister could direct the Chief Commissioner to implement certain government policing policies and priorities. For the purpose of safeguarding the operational independence of the Chief Commissioner, subclause (2) limits the Minister's power to direct the Chief Commissioner. Subject to subclause (3) the Minister cannot direct the Chief Commissioner on any matter relating to-- · preservation of the peace and the protection of life and property in relation to any person or group of persons; · enforcement of the law in relation to any person or group of persons; · the investigation or prosecution of offences in relation to any person or group of persons; · decisions about individual members of Victoria Police personnel, including decisions in relation to discipline; · the organisational structure of Victoria Police; · the allocation or deployment of police officers or protective services officers to or at particular locations; · training, education and professional development programs within Victoria Police; · the content of any internal grievance-resolution procedures. 4

 


 

Subclause (3) provides an exception to some of these limitations. The exception is where one of the listed entities has made a report or recommendation in relation to matters set out in subclause (2)(e) to (h) and the Minister believes that the Chief Commissioner has not responded adequately to that report or recommendation. The following entities are listed for the purpose of the clause-- · the IBAC; · the Auditor-General; · the State Services Authority; · the Public Sector Standards Commissioner; · a coroner; · the Commissioner for Law Enforcement Data Security; · a Parliamentary Committee; · a Commission of Inquiry established under section 88B of the Constitution Act 1975; · a Board of Inquiry established under section 88C of the Constitution Act 1975; · a Royal Commission; · a prescribed entity. Before issuing a direction to the Chief Commissioner, the Minister must first consult with the Chief Commissioner. To promote transparency and accountability, the Minister must make the direction in writing and publish a copy in the Government Gazette. The Chief Commissioner must also publish a copy of the direction on the Victoria Police website. Clause 11 allows the Minister to request information or reports from the Chief Commissioner. The Chief Commissioner must comply with the Minister's request, subject to some exceptions designed to safeguard the operational independence of the Chief Commissioner and protect public safety. The Chief Commissioner does not need to provide the requested information to the Minister if the Chief Commissioner considers 5

 


 

that giving the information to the Minister would be reasonably likely to-- · prejudice any investigation of a contravention or possible contravention of the law; or · prejudice the prosecution of any person for an offence; or · endanger the life or physical safety of any person. Clause 12 requires the Chief Commissioner to provide a report to the Minister within 3 months after the end of the financial year on-- · any action taken by the Chief Commissioner during that year under Division 6 of Part 4. Division 6 of Part 4 relates to action that the Chief Commissioner may take in respect of a police officer or protective services officer who is incapable of performing their duties. The report must contain the outcome of that action, including the result of any review of that action by the PRS Board; · any action taken by the Chief Commissioner or an authorised officer during that year under Part 7. Part 7 relates to action taken in respect of alleged breaches of discipline by police officers and protective services officers. The report must contain the outcome of that action (including the result of any review of that action by the PRS Board); · any action taken during that year by the Chief Commissioner under clause 195. Clause 195 relates to action taken in respect of alleged breaches of discipline by special constables; and · the prescribed information in relation to Part 5. Part 5 relates to drug and alcohol testing of Victoria Police personnel. Subclause (3) ensures that the report is made public, either through inclusion in Victoria Police's annual report under the Financial Management Act 1994 or publication on the Internet. 6

 


 

PART 3--VICTORIA POLICE PERSONNEL Part 3 provides a statutory framework for the Chief Commissioner, Deputy Commissioners, Assistant Commissioners, other police officers, police recruits, protective services officers and police reservists, who are all appointed or employed pursuant to this Part. The Chief Commissioner employs a further category of Victoria Police personnel, called Victoria Police employees, under Part 3 of the Public Administration Act 2004. Division 1--Ranks, commissions and numbers Clause 13 sets out the ranks of police officers. The ranks, in descending order of seniority, are as follows-- · Chief Commissioner; · Deputy Commissioner; · Assistant Commissioner; · commander; · chief superintendent; · superintendent; · chief inspector; · inspector; · senior sergeant; · sergeant; · senior constable; · constable. Clause 14 re-enacts the effect of section 8(2) and part of section 5 of the Police Regulation Act 1958 in modern language. The purpose is twofold. First, to allow the Governor in Council to certify that a police officer of any of the following ranks is a commissioned officer of Victoria Police-- · Assistant Commissioner; · commander; · chief superintendent; · superintendent; 7

 


 

· chief inspector; · inspector. Secondly, to provide that a commissioned officer of Victoria Police is responsible for the general management and control of the portion of Victoria Police that the Chief Commissioner places under their control. Clause 15 allows the Governor in Council to determine the number of police officers by rank and the total number of protective services officers. The mechanism is by Governor in Council Order. The Chief Commissioner must comply with such an order if one exists. A similar mechanism was contained in section 8(1) of the Police Regulation Act 1958. Division 2--Chief Commissioner Division 2 provides a statutory framework for the office of the Chief Commissioner and further articulates the relationship between the Chief Commissioner and the Minister. The relationship between the Chief Commissioner and the Minister is important. This is because Victoria Police is accountable to the Minister through the office of the Chief Commissioner. In turn, the Minister is accountable to Parliament. The provisions aim to reflect ministerial and parliamentary responsibility, control and accountability over Victoria Police, while safeguarding the Chief Commissioner's operational independence. Clause 16 sets out the role of the Chief Commissioner and further articulates the relationship between the Chief Commissioner and the Minister. Specifically, the Chief Commissioner-- · is the chief constable and the chief executive officer of Victoria Police; and · is responsible for the management and control of Victoria Police; and · is responsible for implementing the policing policy and priorities of the Government; and · is responsible for providing advice and information to the Minister on the operations of Victoria Police and policing matters generally; and · is responsible to the Minister for the general conduct, performance and operations of Victoria Police. 8

 


 

Section 16 of the Public Administration Act 2004 operates to also give the Chief Commissioner all the functions of a public service body Head under that Act in relation to Victoria Police employees. Clause 17 allows the Governor in Council to appoint a Chief Commissioner of Police. Further conditions of office are outlined in Part 1 of Schedule 1. Clause 18 allows the Governor in Council to appoint a police officer as Acting Chief Commissioner for any length of time when the office of Chief Commissioner is vacant or when the Chief Commissioner is absent from duty or unable to perform the duties of office. The Minister may appoint an Acting Chief Commissioner for a period not exceeding 4 weeks. The Governor in Council may also revoke an appointment (whether made by the Governor in Council or the Minister). An Acting Chief Commissioner-- · has all the powers and must perform all the duties of the Chief Commissioner; and · is eligible for reappointment. Clause 19 allows the Chief Commissioner to delegate any duty, function or power to a member or class of members of Victoria Police personnel (other than police recruits). There are, however, exceptions. The following powers may not be delegated-- · the power under clause 83 to determine that a work unit or work function within Victoria Police is a designated work unit or work function; · the power under clause 196 to declare an incident to be an incident requiring urgent cross-border assistance; · the power under clause 197 to extend a declaration made under clause 196; · the power of delegation. 9

 


 

The following powers may only be delegated to a police officer holding the rank of inspector or above, or a Victoria Police employee at a level of Grade 6 or above-- · the power under clause 236 to authorise a media organisation; or · the power under clause 238 to authorise the giving of a photograph to an authorised media organisation. Where another Act gives a power, duty or function to the Chief Commissioner, that Act may make further limitations on the Chief Commissioner's power of delegation under this clause. For example, section 34 of the the Crimes (Assumed Identities) Act 2004 limits the number of delegations that may be made and constrains the rank of police officer who may be delegated powers and functions under that Act. Division 3--Deputy Commissioners Division 3 deals with the appointment, removal from office, role and accountabilities of Deputy Commissioners. One of the primary objectives of Division 3 is to acknowledge that while Deputy Commissioners are appointed by the Governor in Council, Deputy Commissioners' primary accountability and responsibility is to the Chief Commissioner. Clause 20 sets out the Deputy Commissioners' role as being responsible for the management and control of the portion of Victoria Police that is placed under their charge subject to the direction and control of the Chief Commissioner. As police officers, Deputy Commissioners have the powers and duties of a police officer as outlined in clause 51. Clause 21 allows the Governor in Council to appoint Deputy Commissioners and requires the Minister to consult the Chief Commissioner before making an appointment recommendation. Further conditions of office are outlined in Part 2 of Schedule 1. Clause 22 allows the Chief Commissioner and Governor in Council to appoint a police officer as an Acting Deputy Commissioner during a vacancy in the office of a Deputy Commissioner or when a Deputy Commissioner is absent from duty or unable to perform the duties of office. 10

 


 

The Chief Commissioner may appoint an Acting Deputy Commissioner for a period of 4 weeks or less and the Governor in Council may appoint an Acting Deputy Commissioner for any period. The Governor in Council may also revoke an appointment (whether made by the Governor in Council or the Chief Commissioner). An acting Deputy Commissioner-- · has all the powers and must perform all the duties of the Deputy Commissioner; and · is eligible for reappointment. Clause 23 allows a Deputy Commissioner to act temporarily as Chief Commissioner if no Acting Chief Commissioner has been appointed and-- · the office of Chief Commissioner is vacant; or · the Chief Commissioner is absent from duty or unable to perform the duties of office. The Bill does not re-enact section 6(1) of the Police Regulation Act 1958. That provision had the effect that Deputy Commissioners may exercise all the powers of the Chief Commissioner. In the absence of that provision, clause 23 aims to ensure the continuity of the powers, duties and functions of the Chief Commissioner when the Chief Commissioner is not otherwise available. A further purpose of the clause is to support an overarching purpose of promoting Deputy Commissioners' primary accountability and responsibility to the Chief Commissioner. To promote accountability for the use of this provision a Deputy Commissioner must make a written declaration to the Minister before exercising the powers and assuming the duties of the Chief Commissioner. The powers and duties of the Chief Commissioner under this provision cease when-- · an Acting Chief Commissioner is appointed under clause 18; or · the Chief Commissioner resumes duty; or 11

 


 

· the period of 72 hours after the making of the declaration expires. Division 4--Assistant Commissioners An overarching purpose of Division 4 is to-- · allow the Chief Commissioner to choose who to employ as Assistant Commissioners; and · provide an employment framework that promotes Assistant Commissioners as being responsive and accountable to the Chief Commissioner; and · provide appropriate discipline standards for Assistant Commissioners; and · provide appropriate employment security for Assistant Commissioners in defined circumstances by providing a right to return to a position at a former rank. Clause 24 allows the Chief Commissioner, on behalf of the Crown, to employ as many Assistant Commissioners as he or she thinks necessary. Further conditions of employment are outlined in Part 3 of Schedule 1. Assistant Commissioners have the powers and duties of a police officer as outlined in clause 51. Clause 25 ensures that Assistant Commissioners have the status of a police officer. Specifically, subclause (1) provides that a person who was a police officer immediately before the time his or her contract of employment as an Assistant Commissioner comes into force continues to be a police officer on and after the time the contract comes into force. Subclause (2) provides that a person who was not a police officer immediately before the time his or her contract of employment as an Assistant Commissioner comes into force is taken to have been appointed as a police officer at the time the contract comes into force. Clause 26 allows the Chief Commissioner to appoint police officers to be Acting Assistant Commissioners during a vacancy in the office or when Assistant Commissioners are absent from duty or unable to perform the duties of office. The Chief Commissioner may make an appointment under this clause for a period of 6 months or less and may revoke the appointment at any time. An Acting Assistant Commissioner has all the powers and duties of the person for whom he or she is acting. 12

 


 

Division 5--Other police officers Division 5 deals with the appointment, probation, promotion, and transfer of police officers at the following ranks: commander, chief superintendent, superintendent, chief inspector, inspector, senior sergeant, sergeant, senior constable and constable. Clause 27 allows the Chief Commissioner to appoint police officers below the rank of Assistant Commissioner if they satisfy the prescribed appointment criteria. The power to appoint a police officer is subject to any order made by the Governor in Council under clause 15 determining either or both the total number of police officers and the total number of officers of each rank. Subclause (3) allows the Chief Commissioner, in exceptional circumstances, to waive any of the prescribed criteria for appointment in a particular case. Subclause (4) allows an appointment to be made on a full-time or part-time basis, or for a fixed term or ongoing basis. Subclause (5) allows the Chief Commissioner to make a part-time or fixed-term appointment where the Chief Commissioner is satisfied that it is necessary to do so for the purposes of-- · a specific project or task force of finite duration; or · dealing with an emergency within the meaning of the Emergency Management Act 1986. Subclause (6) requires the instrument of appointment to specify the rank at which the person is appointed. Clause 28 sets out the probation period for appointments and specifies terms and conditions of the probation period. Constables serve 2 years of probation while other ranks serve one year. Probation periods relating to the appointment of a person to the role of police officer are distinct from the specified probation periods for promotions of police officers set out in clause 32. The Chief Commissioner may terminate an officer's appointment during a probation period (initial or further) at any time or may extend the probation period once for a period of one year. There is no limit on the reasons for which a Chief Commissioner may terminate an appointment or extend the probation period during the probation period. At the end of the probation period or the further probation period, the appointment is confirmed unless, before that time, the Chief Commissioner terminates the appointment. Subclause (5) sets 13

 


 

out the circumstances and kinds of leave that are not to be counted towards the probation period. These are-- · suspension; · leave without pay; · personal leave of one month or more continuously; · maternity leave; · long service leave. Clause 29 re-enacts section 9 of the Police Regulation Act 1958 as inserted by section 10 of the Police Regulation Amendment Act 2012. Clause 29 provides for the appointment of police and former police of other jurisdictions. Clause 29 enables the Chief Commissioner to request advice from the Police Registration and Sevices Board ("PRS Board") of the suitability of a person who is or was an officer or member of the police force of another jurisdiction (but has never been a police officer in Victoria) for appointment to Victoria Police. The PRS Board will advise the Chief Commissioner whether the person meets the prescribed criteria (or will meet it subject to the completion of specified training) and has the aptitude and efficiency to perform the relevant duties. The Chief Commissioner is required to consider the advice of the PRS Board as to the suitability of the person for appointment to the Victoria Police and at which rank they should be appointed. Clause 30 re-enacts section 9A of the Police Regulation Act 1958 as inserted by section 10 of the Police Regulation Amendment Act 2012. Clause 30 enables the Chief Commissioner to appoint as a police officer a person who has formerly been a police officer in Victoria and is registered on the Police Profession Register. If the former police officer is not registered on the Police Profession Register, the Chief Commissioner may request the advice of the PRS Board as to whether the person meets the prescribed criteria (or will meet it subject to completion of specified training) and has the aptitude and efficiency of an officer at the proposed appointment rank. The Chief Commissioner is required to consider the advice of the 14

 


 

PRS Board as to the suitability of the person for appointment to Victoria Police and at which rank they should be appointed. Clause 31 allows the Chief Commissioner to promote police officers to higher ranks after considering the following criteria-- · the efficiency of the candidate for promotion (as defined in clause 4(1)); and · where there is more than one candidate for promotion, the relative efficiencies regardless of seniority. Relative seniority, however, must be considered for promotions to the rank of senior sergeant, sergeant or senior constable if the candidates are equally efficient. However, in the following promotions, the Chief Commissioner does not need to consider the criteria-- · promotions to the position of senior constable (general duties); · promotions of constable to senior constable within the same position. The Chief Commissioner must publish notice of promotions in the Police Gazette. Clause 32 provides for a one year probation period for promotions and specifies terms and conditions of the probation period. The Chief Commissioner may disallow the promotion at any time during the probation period or may extend the probation period for up to one year. The clause does not limit the reasons for which the Chief Commissioner may disallow a promotion or extend a probation period during the probation period. At the end of a probation period, the promotion is confirmed unless disallowed or extended. An officer whose promotion is disallowed reverts to the rank that they held immediately before the promotion. Subclause (5) sets out the circumstances and kinds of leave that are not to be counted towards the probation period. These are-- · suspension; · leave without pay; · personal leave of one month or more continuously; 15

 


 

· maternity leave; · long service leave. Clause 33 provides a general power for the Chief Commissioner to transfer a police officer in accordance with the Act and regulations. Clause 34 allows the Chief Commissioner to transfer police officers to another position at the same rank after considering-- · the efficiency of the candidate for transfer; and · where there is more than one candidate for transfer, the relative efficiencies regardless of seniority. Relative seniority, however, must be considered for transfers to the rank of senior sergeant, sergeant or senior constable if the candidates are equally efficient. However, in the following circumstances, the Chief Commissioner does not need to consider these criteria-- · transfers to the position of constable (general duties); · transfers to the position of senior constable (general duties); · transfers made under an expression of interest process agreed under an industrial instrument applying to police officers. The Chief Commissioner must publish notice of transfers in the Police Gazette. Clause 35 re-enacts section 8AC of the Police Regulation Act 1958 as inserted by section 9 of the Police Regulation Amendment Act 2012. The clause gives the Chief Commissioner the power to make immediate directed transfers of police officers to any part of the State if it is necessary for the provision of policing services. 16

 


 

Division 6--Police recruits Clause 36 allows the Chief Commissioner to employ police recruits who satisfy prescribed criteria for employment. In exceptional circumstances, the Chief Commissioner may waive any of the prescribed criteria. The Chief Commissioner is to determine the terms and conditions of the employment, including the period of employment. The Chief Commissioner may also terminate or extend the employment of a police recruit at any time. There is no limit on the reasons for which a Chief Commissioner may terminate or extend the employment of a police recruit. Division 7--Protective services officers Division 7 deals with the functions, appointment, probation, promotion and transfer of protective services officers of all ranks. Clause 37 sets out the functions of protective services officers, which are to provide services for the protection of-- · persons holding certain official or public offices; and · the general public in certain places; and · certain places of public importance. Clause 38 allows the Chief Commissioner to appoint protective services officers if they satisfy the prescribed appointment criteria. The power to appoint a protective services officer is subject to any order made by the Governor in Council under clause 15 determining the total number of protective services officers. Subclause (3) allows the Chief Commissioner, in exceptional circumstances, to waive any of the prescribed criteria for appointment in a particular case. Subclause (4) allows an appointment to be made on a full-time or part-time basis, or for a fixed term or ongoing basis. Subclause (6) allows the Chief Commissioner to terminate the appointment of a protective services officer at any time before the protective services officer takes an oath or makes an affirmation under clause 50. The clause does not limit the reasons for which a Chief Commissioner may terminate the appointment of a protective services officer in those circumstances. 17

 


 

Clause 39 sets out the probation period for appointments of protective services officers as being 2 years and specifies terms and conditions of the probation period. The Chief Commissioner may terminate a protective services officer's appointment during a probation period (initial or further) at any time or may extend the probation period for a period of up to one year. The clause does not limit the reasons for which a Chief Commissioner may terminate an appointment or extend the probation period during the probation period. At the end of a probation period or further probation period, the appointment is confirmed unless, before that time, the Chief Commissioner terminates the appointment. Subclause (5) sets out the circumstances and kinds of leave that are not to be counted towards the probation period. These are-- · suspension; · leave without pay; · personal leave of one month or more continuously; · maternity leave; · long service leave. Clause 40 allows the Chief Commissioner to promote protective services officers after considering-- · the efficiency (as defined in clause 4(2)) of the candidate for promotion; and · where there is more than one candidate for promotion, the relative efficiencies. Seniority must be considered if the candidates are equally efficient. However, for ranks specified in the regulations, the Chief Commissioner need not consider these criteria. The Chief Commissioner must publish notice of promotions in the Police Gazette. Clause 41 provides for a one year probation period for protective services officer promotions and specifies terms and conditions of the probation period. The Chief Commissioner may disallow the promotion at any time during the probation period or may extend the probation period for up to one year. The clause does not limit the reasons for which a Chief Commissioner may 18

 


 

disallow a promotion or extend a probation period during the probation period. At the end of a probation period, the promotion is confirmed unless the Chief Commissioner has disallowed it. A protective services officer whose promotion is disallowed reverts to the rank that they held immediately before the promotion. Subclause (6) sets out the circumstances and kinds of leave that are not to be counted towards the probation period. These are-- · suspension; · leave without pay; · personal leave of one month or more continuously; · maternity leave; · long service leave. Clause 42 provides a general power for the Chief Commissioner to transfer a protective services officer in accordance with the Act and regulations. Clause 43 allows the Chief Commissioner to transfer protective services officers considering-- · the efficiency (as defined in clause 4(2)) of the candidate for transfer; and · where there is more than one candidate for transfer, the relative efficiencies. Seniority must be considered if the candidates are equally efficient. However, in the following circumstances, the Chief Commissioner does not need to consider these criteria-- · transfers made under an expression of interest process; or · transfers to a position at a rank specified in the regulations. The Chief Commissioner must publish notice of transfers in the Police Gazette. 19

 


 

Clause 44 gives the Chief Commissioner the power to make immediate directed transfers of protective services officers to any part of the State if it is necessary to provide protective services. Division 8--Police reservists Clause 45 lists the provisions and Acts for which police reservists are taken to be police officers. Police reservists are retired members of the force who were appointed as police reservists under section 103 of the Police Regulation Act 1958. Clause 46 provides that police reservists are under a duty to act under the control and direction of the Chief Commissioner or of any other police officer or police reservist under whom they are placed by the Chief Commissioner. This does not take away from the common law powers of police reservists as police officers under section 51(a). Clause 47 allows the Chief Commissioner to require a police reservist to attend training. Clause 48 allows a police reservist to resign from office by giving 7 days written notice (or less with agreement of the Chief Commissioner). Clause 49 allows the Chief Commissioner to suspend or terminate the appointment of a police reservist at any time. The clause does not limit the reasons for which a Chief Commissioner may suspend or terminate. PART 4--POLICE DUTIES, POWERS, ENTITLEMENTS PROTECTION AND LIABILITY Part 4 deals with the oath of office for police officers and protective services officers, duties, powers and obligations of police officers and protective services officers, the Chief Commissioner's instructions and determinations, general employment matters relating to police officers and protective services officers (including retirement, resignation, ill-health retirement and incapacity for duty), protection from liability and police tort claims. 20

 


 

Division 1--Oath of office Clause 50 provides that police officers and protective services officers must take and subscribe an oath or affirmation of office before performing the duties and exercising the powers of a police officer or protective services officer. The oath may be administered by-- · a magistrate in the case of the Chief Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner; · a magistrate, the Chief Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner in the case of an Assistant Commissioner; · a magistrate, the Chief Commissioner, a Deputy Commissioner or an Assistant Commissioner in any other case. The oath or affirmation for police officers and protective services officers is set out in Schedule 2. Subclause (4) requires the person who administers the oath or affirmation to forward a copy of the subscribed oath or affirmation to-- · the Minister, in the case of the oath or affirmation of the Chief Commissioner; or · the Chief Commissioner, in any other case. Division 2--General duties and powers Clause 51 re-enacts the effect of section 11(1) of the Police Regulation Act 1958. The clause provides that a police officer who has taken and subscribed the oath or made and subscribed the affirmation under clause 50 has-- · the duties and powers of a constable at common law; and · any duties and powers imposed or conferred on a police officer by or under this or any other Act or by or under any subordinate instrument. 21

 


 

Clause 52 re-enacts the effect of section 118D of the Police Regulation Act 1958. The clause provides that a protective services officer who has taken and subscribed the oath or made and subscribed the affirmation under clause 50 has, in the performance of his or her functions, the duties and powers of a constable at common law. Further, a protective services officer on duty at a prescribed place has all the duties and powers imposed or conferred on the protective services officer under this or any other Act. Clause 53 re-enacts section 15 of the Police Regulation Act 1958 in modern language. The clause permits common reputation, rather than documentary evidence, to be sufficient evidence as to a person's identity as a police officer or protective services officer. Clause 54 re-enacts section 11(2) to (9) of the Police Regulation Act 1958 as inserted by the Police Regulation Amendment Act 2012. The clause allows the Chief Commissioner to give written notice to a police officer with the effect that the officer, for a temporary period, does not have their police powers and duties. The Chief Commissioner may only issue a notice under this clause to a police officer who-- · is about to begin, or is on, a period of leave without pay of 28 days or more, other than excluded leave; or · is on secondment to any organisation or body. Subclause (3) provides that a notice given by the Chief Commissioner-- · takes effect when the officer is give the notice or at the later time determined by the Chief Commissioner and specified in the notice; and · unless cancelled earlier, has effect until the latter of-- · the expiry of the period determined by the Chief Commissioner and specified in the notice; or · the registration of the officer on the Police Profession Register. 22

 


 

Subclause (4) provides that while a notice given to a police officer under subclause (1) has effect-- · neither the Chief Commissioner or any other police officer has authority to give the officer an instruction in respect of the officer's performance of his or her functions or duties; and · the officer does not commit a breach of discipline by failing to comply with the Chief Commissioner's instructions. Subclause (5) allows the Chief Commissioner to cancel a notice given to a police officer under subclause (1) at any time by giving written notice of cancellation. Subclause (6) provides that nothing in this clause affects the ability of the Chief Commissioner to end a police officer's secondment or leave without pay. Subclause (7) provides that a police officer who is given a notice under subclause (1) must, as soon as practicable, return any Victoria Police equipment and Victoria Police identification that is required by the Chief Commissioner to be returned under this subclause. Subclause (8) provides a definition of excluded leave, which means-- · maternity, paternity or parental leave; or · compassionate leave; or · study leave; or · leave granted for the purposes of service with-- · an investigative agency other than Victoria Police; or · a professional association that represents police officers. Clause 55 re-enacts the effect of section 16 of the Police Regulation Act 1958. The clause provides that all powers of a person as a police or protective services officer immediately ceases when he or she ceases to be a police or protective services officer. Examples of circumstances in which a person ceases to be a 23

 


 

police officer are set out in the note to subclause (1) and for a protective services officer in the note to subclause (2). Division 3--Specific duties and powers Clause 56 re-enacts the effect of sections 19 and 20 of the Police Regulation Act 1958. The clause gives a duty to police officers to execute-- · all process directed to him or her other for the recovery of fines and other amounts; and · all lawful summonses, warrants, orders and directions directed to him or her by a court or tribunal. Subclause (2) allows such process, summonses, warrants, orders or directions to be executed by any other police officer who has the same authority as if it had been directed to him or her. Subclause (3) provides that court or tribunal for the purposes of this clause includes-- · a board, commission or other body established by or under an Act; and · a coroner; and · a member, officer or member of staff of a court or tribunal. Clause 57 re-enacts the effect of section 122 of the Police Regulation Act 1958. The clause outlines the circumstances and process for the disposal of unclaimed property which has lawfully come into possession of a member of Victoria Police personnel. It may be sold by public auction, destroyed or disposed of by other means approved by the Minister. Any proceeds must be paid into the Consolidated Fund. Clause 58 re-enacts the effect of section 125 of the Police Regulation Act 1958. The clause outlines a process by which disputes about property (other than property seized by a warrant issued under section 73 of the Magistrates' Court Act 1989) that has come into the possession of a police officer in the performance of duties or exercise of powers of the officer, may be resolved. 24

 


 

In summary, the process involves-- · application to the Magistrates' Court; · notification of relevant people; · Magistrates' Court's decision. Subclause (5) provides that any person notified of the application and any other person who claims an interest that would entitle the person to possession of the property may appear and be heard at the hearing of the application. Subclause (6) provides that if a person notified of the application fails to attend the hearing, the hearing may be held in the person's absence. Subclause (7) provides that proceedings cannot be brought against a police officer or the State for recovery of the property or recovery of the value of the property if a police officer complies with an order made under this clause. Subclause (8) provides that subclause (7) does not affect any other rights or liabilities of any person who has or claims to have an interest in the property. Clause 59 allows a police officer to assist a coroner in the investigation of a death or fire under Part 4 of the Coroners Act 2008. Division 4--Chief Commissioner's instructions and determinations Clause 60 allows the Chief Commissioner to issue, amend and revoke instructions for the general administration of Victoria Police and the effective and efficient conduct of the operations of Victoria Police. The clause is modelled on the existing power in section 17 of the Police Regulation Act 1958. Subsection (2) gives a non-exhaustive list of things that may be contained in the Chief Commissioner's instructions, including-- · the specification of things (including uniforms) to be Victoria Police equipment for the purposes of the Bill; · the specification of things to be Victoria Police identification for the purposes of this Bill; 25

 


 

· any other matters determined by the Chief Commissioner under clause 62. Subclauses (3) and (4) allow the Chief Commissioner's instructions to incorporate other documents and provide that they are not subject to section 32 of the Interpretation of Legislation Act 1984, which requires certain actions to be taken in respect of documents that are incorporated in subordinate documents (for example publication of notice in the Government Gazette). Subclause (5) provides that nothing in this clause takes away from the application of clause 51(a) or 52(1). Clause 61 requires all Victoria Police personnel to comply with the Chief Commissioner's instructions. Clause 62 allows the Chief Commissioner to determine police uniforms, equipment, standards of grooming and clothing accessories for police officers, police recruits or protective services officers. These may-- · differ based on sex, gender identity, physical features or religious belief or activity; and · provide for exceptions based on genuine medical, cultural or religious grounds. The clause re-enacts the effect of section 5(2) and (3) of the Police Regulation Act 1958. The section is intended to constitute an "enactment" for the purposes of section 75 of the Equal Opportunity Act 2010. This has the effect that the Equal Opportunity Act 2010 does not apply to determinations lawfully made under this clause. Division 5--General employment matters Clause 63 allows the Chief Commissioner to make an agreement with a police officer or protective services officer for the officer to undertake a training course and may require him or her to give a surety for compliance with the agreement. Subclause (2) provides that any agreement made under subclause (1) by the Chief Commissioner with a Deputy Commissioner must be approved by the Governor in Council before it can take effect. 26

 


 

The provision is modelled on section 129 of the Police Regulation Act 1958, which allowed the Governor in Council to authorise the Minister to enter into such an agreement. Clause 64 provides that a police officer or protective services officer is entitled to long service leave in accordance with Schedule 3. This re-enacts the effect of section 120 of the Police Regulation Act 1958. Clause 65 allows a police officer or protective services officer to resign or retire from Victoria Police by giving written notice of not less than 4 weeks (or a shorter period agreed by the Chief Commissioner) to the Chief Commissioner. Subclause (2) provides that the clause does not apply to the Chief Commissioner, a Deputy Commissioner or an Assistant Commissioner. The retirement provisions for the Chief Commissioner, Deputy Commissioners and Assistant Commissioners are set out in Schedule 1. Clause 66 re-enacts the effect of section 16C of the Police Regulation Act 1958 which provides that a police officer or protective services officer who is absent from duty without authorisation or lawful reason for more than one calendar month is taken to have abandoned their appointment. This is intended to have the effect that the officer's powers immediately cease under clause 55. Clause 67 re-enacts the effect of section 16B of the Police Regulation Act 1958 allowing the Chief Commissioner to retire a police officer or protective services officer for ill-health reasons and sets out the process that the Chief Commissioner is required to follow in order to do so. Subclause (1) allows the Chief Commissioner to inquire into the physical or mental fitness and capacity of a police officer or protective services officer at any time, on his or her own motion or at the request of the officer. Subclause (2) empowers the Chief Commissioner to require the police officer or protective services officer to undergo a medical examination. 27

 


 

Subclause (3) requires the Chief Commissioner to consider the report prior to forming a view about the officer's physical or mental capacity and provides the process requirements if the Chief Commissioner considers that the officer is physically or mentally incapable of performing his or her duties. Subclause (4) requires the Chief Commissioner to consider any submission made by the police officer or protective services officer. Subclause (5) provides that the Chief Commissioner may ill-health retire the officer after following the required process and being satisfied that the police officer or protective services officer is physically or mentally incapable of performing his or her duties. Notice of the retirement must be given to the police officer or protective services officer. Subclause (6) requires the notice given under subclause (5) to state the grounds on which the Chief Commissioner is satisfied that the police officer or protective services officer is physically or mentally incapable or performing his or her duties. Division 6--Incapacity for duty This Division re-enacts the effect of Division 4 of Part IV of the Police Regulation Act 1958 dealing with incapacity for duty. The Division enables the Chief Commissioner to take action where a police officer or protective services officer is incapable of performing his or her duties. Clause 68 inserts definitions of incapacity, notice of incapacity, remedial action. Clause 69 allows the Chief Commissioner to give a police officer or protective services officer a notice of incapacity if the Chief Commissioner believes that the officer is incapable of performing his or her duties (for reasons not related to physical or mental impairment) and remedial action has not resolved the reasons for incapacity. The notice must state the proposed action to be taken by the Chief Commissioner (transfer to other duties, demotion or dismissal) and the grounds on which the Chief Commissioner believes the officer to be incapable. The officer may make a written submission to the Chief Commissioner within 21 days after receiving the notice. 28

 


 

Clause 70 provides that if, after giving a police officer or protective services officer a notice of incapacity and considering any submission made by the officer, the Chief Commissioner is satisfied that the officer is incapable of performing his or her duties, the Chief Commissioner may by written notice, transfer the officer to other duties, demote or dismiss the officer. The notice must state the grounds on which the Chief Commissioner is satisfied that the officer is incapable of performing his or her duties. Division 7--Protections Division 7 provides protections for certain persons in respect of certain policing activities. Clause 71 re-enacts the effect of section 124 of the Police Regulation Act 1958 relating to protection of police officers executing warrants and expands the protection to protective services officers who have limited powers to execute arrest warrants under the Magistrates' Court Act 1989. The clause provides the procedure for bringing an action against a protected person in respect of a warrant and protects the person from liability for actions performed in the course of executing a warrant. Division 8--Liability for tortious conduct by police and protective services officers Division 8 creates a new scheme to replace section 123 of the Police Regulation Act 1958. This Division sets out the extent to which the State may be liable for the tortious conduct of police officers and protective services officers and the process requirements for bringing a claim for a police tort. Clause 72 defines police tort as a tort committed by a police officer or protective services officer in the performance or purported performance of the officer's duties. 3 key elements make up this definition-- · who performed the conduct; and · the kind of conduct; and · the type of legal action that is being brought. 29

 


 

Who performed the conduct Police tort applies to conduct by-- · police officers (by virtue of the definition); and · protective services officers (by virtue of the definition); and · special constables (by virtue of clause 193); and · police reservists (by virtue of clause 45). A police tort also applies to conduct of former officers, special constables and police reservists, if, at the time that the conduct occurred, the person held that office. The kind of conduct A police tort must arise from conduct in the performance or purported performance of the officer's duties. The test is not intended to include conduct performed in a personal capacity, divorced from the duties of the officer. The type of legal action It is intended that the scheme apply to-- · tort claims (including intentional torts, like assault, battery, trespass and non-intentional torts, like negligence); · detrimental action claims under the Protected Disclosure Act 2012; · actions for wrongful death under Part III of the Wrongs Act 1958 where the wrong is a police tort; and · any other kind of actions prescribed in the regulations. These claims are called police tort claims (see clause 73). It is not intended that police tort claims include other kinds of claims, such as-- · breach of contract; or · administrative law actions; or · other statute-based actions not otherwise prescribed. 30

 


 

Clause 73 provides that the scheme applies to police tort claims, being-- · an action for damages under Part III of the Wrongs Act 1958 in respect of a wrong that is an alleged police tort; or · a counterclaim for an alleged police tort; or · any other prescribed action, claim or proceeding in respect of an alleged police tort. Clause 74 provides that the State is liable for a police tort subject to the defence of serious and wilful misconduct. This is intended to displace the common law rule derived from Enever v The King (1906) 3 CLR 969 that provides that the State is not vicariously liable for torts of police officers. It is intended that the common law rule only be displaced to the extent that it applies to police tort claims. The meaning of "serious and wilful misconduct" has been considered judicially in the context of the NSW police tort scheme, in the case of State of NSW v Wayne Eade [2006] NSWSC 84. While allowing for the concept of injury, in Eade the NSW Supreme Court was guided by the following meaning considered in Sawle v Macadamia Processing Co Pty Ltd [1999] NSWCC 26: "conduct beyond negligence, even beyond culpable or gross negligence. In order to establish serious and wilful misconduct, it must be demonstrated that the person performing an act or suffering an omission knows that it will cause risk of injury, or acts in disregard of consideration whether it will cause injury. The word "wilful" connotes that the applicant must have acted deliberately. As it seems to me, in order to establish serious and wilful misconduct, a person accused of it must be shown to have knowledge of the risk of injury and, in the light of that knowledge, proceeded without regard to the risk.". Subclause (2) provides that the State is not liable for a police tort if the State establishes on a police tort claim that the conduct giving rise to the police tort was serious and wilful misconduct by the police officer or protective services officer concerned. 31

 


 

The intended effect of this defence is that if the State pleads the serious and wilful misconduct defence, and the Court finds that the defence is made out, then the State is not liable for the police tort even if-- · the claim is a police tort claim; and · the elements of the claim itself are made out. In this circumstance, the individual officer would be personally liable. The State, however, needs to plead the serious and wilful misconduct defence in order to engage it. This means that where the State does not plead the serious and wilful misconduct defence, and the requisite elements of the claim are made out, the State may be liable even if the Court considers there is evidence of serious and wilful misconduct. Subclause (3) provides that where the State is liable for a police tort, the police officer or protective services officer involved is not liable to any person for the police tort and is not liable to indemnify or to pay any contribution to the State in respect of the liability incurred by the State. Subclause (4) provides that the State is not liable for a tort committed by a police officer or protective services officer that is not a police tort. This may occur, for example, where the conduct giving rise to the tort was not in the course or purported course of the duties of the officer. Clause 75 outlines the process for making police tort claims. Subclause (1) requires police tort claims to be brought against the State and prohibits them being made against the police officer or protective services officer concerned. Subclause (2) allows a person who makes a police tort claim (other than a counterclaim) against the State to seek to have the police officer or protective services officer joined to the proceedings only if the State pleads in its defence to the claim that-- · the State would not be liable because of section 74(2), that is, the conduct is serious and wilful misconduct; or · the alleged tort, if proven, would not be a police tort. 32

 


 

Subclause (3) provides that, if the court permits the person to have the police officer or protective services officer joined-- · the person is not required to file a new originating process, but may instead amend the existing originating process; and · the court may make any orders it considers appropriate to enable the existing originating process to be amended. Subclause (4) is intended to displace the Limitation of Actions Act 1958 so long as the making of a claim to join an officer to the proceedings is done within 2 months after the State's defence is served. The effect is to permit the claim to be made out of time. Clause 76 provides a process for the making of counterclaims that are police tort claims. Counterclaims are proceedings brought against the plaintiff by an alleged tortfeasor. Subclause (2) allows a person to seek to have the State joined to the proceedings. Subclause (3) clarifies that the State may defend a claim for an alleged police tort that is a counterclaim on the basis-- · of the serious and wilful misconduct defence at clause 74(2); or · that the alleged tort, if proven, would not be a police tort. Clause 77 allows the State 60 days to serve its defence to a police tort claim where the defence pleads serious and wilful misconduct. This may have the effect that certain aspects of Court Rules are displaced. This extended period of time reflects the importance of the decision whether or not to plead the serious and wilful misconduct defence and the significant consequences of such a pleading for the State, the police officer or protective service officer involved and the plaintiff. 60 days will usually allow Victoria Police sufficient time to gather existing evidence on the incident, review files, seek legal advice if necessary and make the decision whether to plead the serious and wilful misconduct defence or not. 33

 


 

In some situations, however, the State may need even further time in which to serve its defence. For example-- · where an internal investigation has not yet been completed; or · where many police officers are involved in the incident; or · where the issues are complex and require further investigation or further legal advice needs to be obtained before pleading the defence. For this reason, subclause (2) permits the court in which the police tort claim is made to extend this time. Clause 78 provides that, if the State successfully defends liability for a police tort on the basis of the serious and wilful misconduct defence at clause 74(2), the State has no right to seek costs against the plaintiff. If the State successfully defends liability on the basis that the action is not a police tort, then the normal rules as to costs would apply. Clause 79 requires the Minister to pay a successful claimant an amount no more than the amount of damages and costs ordered by a Court to be paid to the claimant if all of the following are met-- · the claimant is awarded damages on a police tort against a police officer or protective services officer. This may occur where the State successfully denies liability on the basis that the tortious conduct constitutes serious and wilful misconduct; and · the Minister is satisfied that the claimant is unlikely to recover the amount from the officer who committed the police tort. The claimant would need to demonstrate this element to the satisfaction of the Minister; and · the Minister is satisfied that the claimant has exhausted all other avenues to recover the amount. For example, that the claimant has unsuccessfully sought to recover the amount from a joint-tortfeasor or through a relevant insurer (if any). 34

 


 

Subclause (2) provides that the State may recover the amount of any payment referred to in subclause (1) from the police officer or protective services officer concerned as a debt in a court of competent jurisdiction. Clause 80 provides that the Division does not affect certain claims and proceedings, including-- · a person bringing legal proceedings or claiming damages or other relief in any legal proceeding against another person who is not a police officer or protective services officer but who is jointly or severally liable for a police tort; · a person bringing legal proceedings or claiming damages or other relief in any legal proceeding against a police officer or protective services officer in respect of an alleged tort that is not a police tort. Clause 81 describes the effect of the Division on other laws. Specifically, this has the effect that the limitation periods for filing claims that are provided in the Limitations of Actions Act 1958 apply to police tort claims except as provided by clause 75(4). PART 5--DRUG AND ALCOHOL TESTING Part 5 deals with drug and alcohol testing for Victoria Police personnel and special constables. Division 1 deals with preliminary matters including definitions used in the Part. Divisions 2 to 5 set out the circumstances in which the Chief Commissioner can direct a person to undergo testing. Division 6 deals with the use and admissibility of test results. Division 7 deals with other general matters relating to drug and alcohol testing. Division 1--Introduction Clause 82 contains definitions of terms used in this Part. Key terms include-- · critical incident which is defined to mean-- · an incident involving the discharge of a firearm by a member of Victoria Police personnel while the member is on duty; or 35

 


 

· an incident involving a member of Victoria Police personnel while the member is on duty which results in the death of, or serious injury to, a person and which also involves the use of force, the use of a car by the member (including as a passenger), or the death of or serious injury to a person who is in the custody of the member. This definition of a critical incident substantially re-enacts the definition of critical incident in section 85A of the Police Regulation Act 1958. However, it differs from that definition by the inclusion of any incident involving the discharge of a firearm by a member of Victoria Police personnel while the member is on duty. This will mean that, if appropriate, the Chief Commissioner may issue a testing direction to a member in circumstances where the discharge of a firearm does not result in serious injury or death. · designated work unit and designated work function are defined to mean those units and functions determined under clause 83 by either the Chief Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner to be work units or work functions designated for the purposes of drug and alcohol testing. Whether a work unit or work function is designated is relevant to whether a Victoria Police employee is subject to testing under clause 90 (Targeted testing--certain Victoria Police employees), clause 92 (Designated work unit testing) and clause 93 (Designated work function testing). · rostered on and rostered off are terms defined by reference to clause 84 and are relevant to Part 5. A person is rostered on if he or she has reported to work or is required to report to work in accordance with a roster or is working overtime. If a person is not rostered on he or she is rostered off. These definitions are relevant to whether the Chief Commissioner may direct a person to undergo a test. · testing direction is defined to mean a direction by the Chief Commissioner to give a sample of breath, urine, hair, oral fluid, a buccal swab or blood for the purpose of testing for the presence of alcohol or a drug of dependence. 36

 


 

Clause 83 provides that the Chief Commissioner or a Deputy Commissioner may determine which work units and work functions are to be designated for the purposes of this Part. These determinations are relevant to testing directions which can be given under clause 90 (Targeted testing--certain Victoria Police employees) and under Division 4 of Part 5 (Designated work unit testing and designated work function testing). Clause 84 sets out the circumstances in which a person is considered to be rostered on and rostered off for the purposes of drug and alcohol testing. The Chief Commissioner may only issue a testing direction under Division 3 (Targeted testing), Division 4 (Designated work unit testing and designated work function testing) and Division 5 (Random testing) to a person who is rostered on). A person who is rostered off, may be rostered on under clause 89 for the purposes of a test to detect the presence of a drug of dependence. The Chief Commissioner may issue a testing direction to a person under Division 2 (Critical incident testing) whether or not the person is rostered on (subject to the timeframes set out in clause 86(3)(b)). Division 2--Critical Incident Testing Division 2 sets out the circumstances in which the Chief Commissioner may issue a testing direction following a critical incident. Clause 85 specifies who the Chief Commissioner can give a testing direction to for the purposes of a drug and/or alcohol test following a critical incident. The term critical incident is defined in clause 82. All Victoria Police personnel and special constables are subject to the critical incident testing provisions whether rostered on or rostered off. Clause 86 specifies that the Chief Commissioner may give a testing direction, other than to give a sample of hair, to a member of Victoria Police personnel under this Division if the conditions in subclause (3) are satisfied. Subclause (2) provides that if the conditions set out in subclause (3) are satisfied but a testing direction cannot be given to the member of Victoria Police personnel because the person is unconscious or otherwise unable to comply with a testing 37

 


 

direction, the Chief Commissioner may direct a medical practitioner or registered nurse to take a sample of blood from the person. Subclause (3)(a) sets out the conditions that must be satisfied for the Chief Commissioner to give a direction under subclause (1) or (2). The first condition is that the Chief Commissioner reasonably believes that the person has been involved in a critical incident, whether or not the person was physically present at the place where the critical incident occurred. For example, this will enable the Chief Commissioner to issue a testing direction to a pursuit controller who was not physically present in a vehicle that was involved in a critical incident, but who was involved in providing directions and information to the persons using the vehicle in the course of their duties. Subclause (3)(b) provides a further condition that if the critical incident involved the use of a motor vehicle by a member of Victoria Police personnel, the direction must be given within 3 hours after the critical incident occurred. For any other type of critical incident (such as the use of force or the discharge of a firearm), the testing direction must be given within a reasonable time after the critical incident occurred. Clause 87 provides that if a sample of blood has been taken when a person is unconscious or otherwise unable to comply, when the person regains consciousness or otherwise becomes able to comply with a testing direction, the person must be informed that a blood sample has been taken and that he or she may refuse to consent to the use of any evidence derived from the sample. The person must be advised that if he or she refuses to give consent-- · the refusal is a breach of discipline for police officers and protective services officers; · the refusal may be taken into account in the management of the person's performance of his or her duties if the person is a police recruit; · the refusal may be taken into account in determining whether the employee has engaged in unsatisfactory performance, misconduct or serious misconduct if the person is a Victoria Police employee. 38

 


 

Subclause (2) provides that any evidence derived from a sample must be destroyed if the person refuses to give consent to its use under subclause (1). Subclause (3) provides that the sample of blood taken under clause 86(2) must be destroyed if the person refuses to give consent under subclause (1). Division 3--Targeted Testing Division 3 sets out the circumstances in which the Chief Commissioner may issue a targeted testing direction. Clause 88 provides the circumstances in which the Chief Commissioner may issue a targeted testing direction to Victoria Police personnel other than Victoria Police employees. Subclause (2) provides that the Chief Commissioner may issue a testing direction if the Chief Commissioner reasonably suspects that the person has consumed alcohol or a drug of dependence and because of that suspicion, the Chief Commissioner reasonably believes that the person ought to be tested for the good order and discipline of Victoria Police. Clause 96(2) sets out in what circumstances the Chief Commissioner may have regard to these test results. Subclause (3) provides that the Chief Commissioner may also issue a testing direction if the Chief Commissioner reasonably believes that the person appears to be unfit for work because the person has consumed alcohol or a drug of dependence. Clause 96(1) sets out in what circumstances the Chief Commissioner may have regard to these test results. Subclause (4) provides the Chief Commissioner may only issue a testing direction to a person who has been required to report for work under clause 89 to test for a drug of dependence. Clause 89 provides that the Chief Commissioner may require a person to report for work for the purposes of giving them a targeted testing direction under clause 88(2). That person is taken to be rostered on. The effect is if the Chief Commissioner reasonably suspects that a person who is not rostered on has consumed a drug of dependence the Chief Commissioner may direct them to provide a sample for the purposes of a drug test under clause 88(2), if the Chief Commissioner reasonably believes that the person ought to be tested for the good order and discipline of Victoria Police. The person cannot be rostered on 39

 


 

under clause 89 for the purpose of a test to detect the presence of alcohol. Subclause (3) provides that a person who is rostered on for the purposes of being given a testing direction under clause 88(2) must be accompanied by a police officer to the place where the person will give a sample for the purposes of testing for a drug of dependence. Subclause (4) provides that a person who has been rostered on under subclause (1) must not refuse or fail to accompany the police officer to the place where the person will give a sample for the purposes of testing for a drug of dependence without a reasonable excuse. A failure to comply with a direction of the Chief Commissioner is a breach of discipline under clause 125(1)(d). Subclause (5) provides that if a person who has been rostered on under subclause (1) fails or refuses to comply with the direction because he or she is ill, the person must provide a certificate or form signed by a medical practitioner. Clause 90 provides the circumstances in which the Chief Commissioner may issue a targeted testing direction to Victoria Police employees who are rostered on and work in a designated work unit or carry out a designated work function. Subclause (2) provides that to give a testing direction, the Chief Commissioner must reasonably believe that the person appears to be unfit for work because he or she has consumed alcohol or a drug of dependence. Division 4--Designated work unit testing and designated work function testing Clause 91 sets out who may be issued with a testing direction under this Division. Clause 83 empowers the Chief Commissioner and Deputy Commissioners to designate work units and work functions for the purposes of drug and alcohol testing. Victoria Police personnel who work in a designated work unit or who perform a designated work function are subject to these testing provisions. 40

 


 

Clause 92 sets out the circumstances in which the Chief Commissioner may issue a testing direction to a group of persons who work in a designated work unit. A testing direction to give a sample of hair may not be given. The clause requires that the persons given a direction under these provisions must be rostered on at the time the direction is given. Paragraph (a) provides that a testing direction may be given to every person who is rostered on and who works in that designated work unit. Paragraph (b) provides that a testing direction may be given to 2 or more persons who work in the designated work unit, are rostered on and who are randomly selected. The term random selection is defined in clause 82. Clause 93 sets out the circumstances in which the Chief Commissioner may issue a testing direction to a group of persons who perform a designated work function. A testing direction to give a sample of hair may not be given. The clause requires that the persons given a direction under these provisions must be rostered on at the time the direction is given. Paragraph (a) provides that a testing direction may be given to every person who is rostered on and who performs that designated work function. Paragraph (b) provides that a testing direction may be given to 2 or more persons who perform the designated work function, are rostered on and who are randomly selected. The term random selection is defined in clause 82. Division 5--Random testing Clause 94 provides that this Division applies to members of Victoria Police personnel who are rostered on other than Victoria Police employees. Clause 95 provides that the Chief Commissioner may give a testing direction to one or more persons to whom the Division applies if they have been randomly selected. A testing direction to give a sample of hair may not be given. The term random selection is defined in clause 82. 41

 


 

Division 6--Use of test results Clause 96 sets out when the Chief Commissioner may have regard to evidence derived from a sample obtained under Divisions 2, 3, 4 and 5. The purpose for which the Chief Commissioner may use test results depends on under which provision the testing direction was given. Subclause (1) provides that test results relating to a sample obtained under the critical incident, targeted testing (clause 88(3) and (4) only), designated work unit, designated work function and random testing provisions can be used as evidence by the Chief Commissioner for the following purposes-- · managing the person's performance of his or her duties in relation to the consumption of drugs or alcohol. This might include arranging for the person to attend drug and alcohol counselling or sending the person home. The test results cannot be used in relation to managing a person's performance of their duties in regards to matters that are entirely unconnected to their consumption of drugs or alcohol; · if the person is a police officer or a protective services officer, conducting an inquiry or investigation under Division 6 of Part 4 (which deals with incapacity for duty), Part 7 (which deals with breaches of discipline), Part 9 (which deals with the investigation of complaints) and Part 10 (which deals with the investigation of protected disclosure complaints); · if the person is a special constable, a disciplinary investigation in respect of that person under clause 195; · if the person is a Victoria Police employee, a determination about whether the person has engaged in unsatisfactory performance, misconduct or serious misconduct under the Public Administration Act 2004 or the relevant industrial agreement applying to that person; The test results may also be used by the Chief Commissioner as evidence in any proceedings related to disciplinary investigations or investigations of complaints and protected disclosure complaints. 42

 


 

Subclause (2) provides that test results relating to a sample obtained under clause 88(2) (Targeted testing provisions) can be used as evidence by the Chief Commissioner for the following purposes-- · if the person is a police officer or a protective services officer, conducting an inquiry or investigation under Division 6 of Part 4 (which deals with incapacity for duty), Part 7 (which deals with breaches of discipline), Part 9 (which deals with the investigation of complaints) and Part 10 (which deals with the investigation of protected disclosure complaints); · if the person is a special constable, a disciplinary investigation in respect of that person under clause 195. The test results may also be used by the Chief Commissioner as evidence in any proceedings related to disciplinary investigations or investigations of complaints and protected disclosure complaints. Clause 97 provides for the admissibility of test results in certain court proceedings. Subclause (1) provides that evidence derived from a sample obtained under Divisions 2, 3, 4 and 5 is inadmissible in any proceeding in a court, tribunal or before a person or body authorised to hear and receive evidence. Subclause (2) provides for exceptions to the general rule of inadmissibility provided for in subclause (1). For instance, if evidence is derived from a sample obtained following a critical incident, the evidence will be admissible in criminal, civil and coronial proceedings arising from the critical incident. This includes police tort claims made under Division 8 of Part 4. Clause 98 provides that the Chief Commissioner must ensure that the result of any test conducted in accordance with a testing direction given under Part 5 must be handled in accordance with the regulations. 43

 


 

Division 7--General Clause 99 provides that a member of Victoria Police personnel must comply with a testing direction given to him or her under this Part. Clause 125(1)(d) also provides that it is a breach of discipline to fail to comply with a testing direction given under this Part. Clause 100 provides that it is an offence to tamper with a sample obtained in accordance with Part 5 without reasonable excuse. The offence encompasses tampering or interfering with a sample, or attempting to tamper or interfere with a sample, passing off or attempting to pass off another sample for a sample and substituting or attempting to substitute a sample. A reasonable excuse could include a person collecting, storing, analysing or reporting on the sample in a manner which is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the regulations. Clause 101 protects registered medical practitioners or approved health professionals from civil action for conduct done in the course of taking samples required or allowed to be taken from any person under Part 5. Clause 102 provides that nothing in Part 5 of the Bill affects the operation of Part 5 of the Road Safety Act 1986. Part 5 of that Act allows testing of drivers for alcohol or other drugs. PART 6--POLICE REGISTRATION Part 6 re-enacts Part VAA of the Police Regulation Act 1958 as inserted by the Police Regulation Amendment 2012 to provide for the operation of the Police Profession Register. Division 1--Registration Division 1 provides for the qualifications and eligibility required for registration on the Police Profession Register and for the registration process. Clause 103 provides that a person is qualified for registration on the Police Profession Register if they have good character and reputation, have the qualifications and experience prescribed by the regulations as requisites for registration and have the aptitude and efficiency to perform as a police officer at a specified rank. 44

 


 

Clause 104 provides that a person may apply to the PRS Board for registration (by written application accompanied by evidence of qualifications) if he or she is either-- · a police officer who is absent on secondment to another body or on leave without pay; or · a former police officer (other than a former police officer who has been dismissed). An application must be in writing, containing the information required by the PRS Board, and be accompanied by evidence of the applicant's qualifications and experience and the prescribed fee. Clause 105 enables the PRS Board to register an applicant, if it is satisfied that the applicant is qualified for registration in accordance with the criteria set out in clause 103. Registration can be subject to conditions determined by the PRS Board as appropriate. The PRS Board must notify the applicant of its decision on any application including the reasons for any conditions being imposed or the refusal of registration. It cannot refuse registration without first notifying the applicant of its intended action, allowing the applicant the opportunity to make submissions and taking those submissions into account. If the PRS Board registers an applicant, it must include the applicant's details on the Police Professional Register and issue a certificate of the applicant's registration details. Clause 106 specifies that registration of an applicant on the Police Profession Register commences when their details are included on the Register and remains in force until the applicant is appointed as a police officer or the expiry of the period of registration specified in the certificate of registration or the cancellation of the applicant's registration, whichever is earlier. Division 2--Renewal of registration Division 2 provides the process for renewal of registration on the Police Profession Register. Clause 107 requires the PRS Board to notify persons registered on the Police Profession Register that their registration is about to expire at least 2 months before the expiry date. The notification must also inform the person that they may apply to have their 45

 


 

registration renewed and the date on which the person's registration will expire. The President or Deputy President of the Registration Division may notify persons under this clause. Clause 108 enables a person who is registered on the Police Profession Register to apply for a renewal of their registration by written application accompanied by evidence of their qualifications for registration. If the application is not decided before their registration expires, the registration continues in effect until the registration is renewed by the PRS Board or the person is notified that renewal of their registration has been refused. The President or Deputy President of the Registration Division may perform the functions of the Board under this clause. Clause 109 enables the PRS Board to renew the registration of a person on the Police Profession Register if that person is qualified for registration. The PRS Board may make the renewal subject to any conditions that it considers appropriate. The PRS Board must ensure natural justice to any person whose registration the Board does not intend to renew by requiring that the applicant for renewal of registration has written notification of the Board's intention and the opportunity to make a submission and for that submission to be considered. The President or Deputy President of the Registration Division may perform the functions of the Board under this clause. Division 3--Suspension and cancellation of registration Clause 110 requires the PRS Board to give a written notice to a registered person suspending their registration on the Police Profession Register on receiving a declaration from the Chief Commissioner that the person has been suspended from duty or directed to take leave from Victoria Police. The suspension is effective from the time that notice of suspension is given to the registered person and remains in effect until-- · the person's return to duty; or · the cancellation of the person's registration. The President or Deputy President of the Registration Division may perform the functions of the Board under this clause. 46

 


 

Clause 111 gives a discretionary power to the PRS Board to suspend the registration on the Police Profession Register if-- · the PRS Board has received information that the person is not qualified for registration; or · the person's application for registration contained information that was false or misleading; or · the Chief Commissioner notifies the PRS Board that an inquiry into breach of discipline by the officer has commenced. The President or Deputy President of the Registration Division may perform the functions of the Board under this clause. Clause 112 provides that the effect of a suspension of registration under this Part is that the person is taken not to be registered on the Police Profession Register. Clause 113 requires the PRS Board to cancel the registration of a person registered on the Police Profession Register on a declaration from the Chief Commissioner that the person has been dismissed from Victoria Police. The cancellation takes effect from the time when notice of it is given to the person. The President or Deputy President of the Registration Division may perform the functions of the Board under this clause. Clause 114 enables the PRS Board to notify a person registered on the Police Profession Register of the intention to cancel their registration and enables that person to respond within the time specified in the notice (which cannot be less than 21 days after notice was given) to show cause why the registration should not be cancelled. The Board must consider the response before cancelling the person's registration. The President or Deputy President of the Registration Division may perform the functions of the Board under this clause. Clause 115 enables the PRS Board to cancel the registration of a person on the Police Profession Register if that person was given notice of intention to cancel under clause 114. The PRS Board must give written notice to the person that their registration has been cancelled. The cancellation will take effect from the day on which this notice is given to the person, unless a later day is specified in the notice. The President or Deputy President of 47

 


 

the Registration Division may perform the functions of the Board under this clause. Clause 116 requires a person whose registration on the Police Profession Register has been cancelled to return his or her certificate of registration to the PRS Board within 28 days after the notice of cancellation is received. Failure to do so is an offence with a maximum penalty of 60 penalty units. Division 4--Hearings Division 4 provides for hearings by the PRS Board concerning the grant or refusal of registration on the Police Profession Register or the cancellation of that registration. Clause 117 enables the PRS Board to conduct a hearing if the President or the Deputy President of the Registration Division determine that a hearing is necessary to determine whether to-- · grant or refuse an application for registration or renewal of registration; or · cancel registration-- on the Police Profession Register. Written notice of the day, time and venue of the hearing must be given to the applicant or person given a notice of intention to cancel registration. The hearing is conducted by 3 members of the Registration Division of the PRS Board that must include either the President or the Deputy President of the Registration Division (who will preside at the hearing) and a legal practitioner of at least 5 years standing. Clause 118 specifies the procedure at hearings of the Registration Division of the PRS Board. An applicant for registration or a person given notice of intention to cancel registration may appear at the hearing and be represented by any person other than a legal practitioner. If the applicant or person fails to appear at the hearing, the hearing may be held in their absence. The PRS Board is not bound by the rules of evidence and may require evidence to be given on oath and administer an oath for that purpose. Matters are decided at a hearing according to the opinion of the majority of members present. 48

 


 

Clause 119 provides that hearings of the PRS Board to refuse an application for registration, or renewal of registration, on the Police Profession Register must be held in private unless the PRS Board determines to conduct the hearing in public, which it may do-- · on application of the applicant; or · on its own motion, if it is satisfied that a hearing in public would facilitate the conduct of the proceedings or is in the public interest. Clause 120 provides that hearings of the PRS Board to cancel the registration of a person on the Police Profession Register must be held in public, but the PRS Board may conduct the hearing (or any part of it) in private-- · on application of the person given a notice of intention to cancel; or · on its own motion, if it is satisfied that a hearing (or any part of it) in private would facilitate the conduct of the proceedings or is in the public interest. The PRS Board may also make an order prohibiting the reporting, publication or disclosure of the proceedings or any information derived from them. The Board must display a copy of the order where the hearing is being held. Failure to comply with the order is an offence with a maximum penalty of 60 penalty units for an individual and 300 penalty units for a body corporate. Division 5--Police Profession Register Division 5 provides for the maintenance of the Police Profession Register by the PRS Board. Clause 121 requires the PRS Board to keep the Police Profession Register (in a form or manner that it determines) containing particulars of registered persons, including any conditions imposed on registration, and other information that the PRS Board considers appropriate. A separate part of the Register must contain particulars of persons whose registration has been suspended or cancelled. 49

 


 

Clause 122 requires the Chief Commissioner to give timely notification to the PRS Board if a person registered on the Police Profession Register is-- · appointed as a police officer; or · returns from a period of absence on secondment or leave without pay; or · is dismissed from Victoria Police. Division 6--General Division 6 provides for general matters applicable to the PRS Board in performing its registration functions. Clause 123 specifies that the PRS Board is bound by the rules of natural justice. Clause 124 specifies the methods by which any notice or document required to be given or served may be served upon a person. PART 7--DISCIPLINE Part 7 re-enacts the effect of Division 2 of Part IV of the Police Regulation Act 1958. Division 1--Breaches of discipline Clause 125 re-enacts the effect of section 69 of the Police Regulation Act 1958 by listing the circumstances in which a police officer or protective services officer commits a breach of discipline. Subclause (2) provides that it is also a breach of discipline for a police officer or protective services officer to knowingly assist or participate in a breach of discipline. Clause 126 re-enacts the effect of section 70 of the Police Regulation Act 1958 allowing the Chief Commissioner to conduct a preliminary investigation into a suspected breach of discipline and-- · transfer the officer to other duties; or 50

 


 

· direct the officer to take any accrued leave; or · suspend the officer with pay-- at any time during an investigation. Subclause (3) requires the Chief Commissioner to withdraw the transfer, direction or suspension if the officer has not been charged under clause 127 within 3 months. Subclauses (4) and (5) allow the Chief Commissioner to apply to the PRS Board for an extension of the time specified in subclause (3) and allow the President of the PRS Board or Deputy President of the Review Division to give the extension if he or she reasonably believes it is necessary for the investigation. Clause 127 remakes the effect of section 71 of the Police Regulation Act 1958 allowing the Chief Commissioner to charge a police officer or protective services officer with a breach of discipline. Subclauses (2) and (3) are intended to ensure that the police discipline system is not used instead of the criminal justice system. The Chief Commissioner is required to consult with the independent Director of Public Prosecutions ahead of charging a police officer or protective services officer with a discipline matter that could reasonably be considered an offence referred to in Schedule 4. Subclause (4) allows the Chief Commissioner to-- · transfer a charged officer to other duties; or · direct the charged officer to take any accrued leave; or · suspend the charged officer with or without pay. Subclause (5) provides that any action taken under subclause (4) remains in force until the charge has been finally determined. Clause 128 re-enacts the effect of section 72 of the Police Regulation Act 1958 prescribing the manner and form of the charge. Clause 129 re-enacts the effect of section 73 of the Police Regulation Act 1958 requiring the Chief Commissioner (or a person authorised under section 130(1)(b)) to inquire into and determine a charge. 51

 


 

Clause 130 re-enacts the effect of section 74 of the Police Regulation Act 1958 allowing the Chief Commissioner to authorise persons to charge or inquire into and determine charges. Clause 131 re-enacts the effect of section 75 of the Police Regulation Act 1958 prescribing the procedure on an inquiry. Clause 132 re-enacts the effect of section 76 of the Police Regulation Act 1958 prescribing the determinations that may be made following an inquiry that finds that the charge has been proved. Clause 133 remakes section 77 of the Police Regulation Act 1958 allowing for enforcement of a determination to pay compensation or costs or make restitution. Clause 134 remakes section 78 of the Police Regulation Act 1958 in relation to adjournment of charges. Division 2--Offences punishable by imprisonment Clause 135 re-enacts the effect of section 79 of the Police Regulation Act 1958 outlining the steps that the Chief Commissioner may take if he or she-- · reasonably believes that a police officer or protective services officer has committed an offence punishable by imprisonment; or · has been charged with an offence punishable by imprisonment. Clause 136 re-enacts the effect of section 80 of the Police Regulation Act 1958 which outlines the consequences that flow from a charge being found proven against a police officer or protective services officer. Clause 137 re-enacts the effect of section 81 of the Police Regulation Act 1958 prohibiting the Chief Commissioner from taking action against an officer under Division 1 in respect of an act for which the officer has had action taken against him or her under clause 136(1). 52

 


 

Division 3--Effect of suspension, dismissal or reduction of rank Clause 138 re-enacts the effect of section 86 of the Police Regulation Act 1958 which prescribes the effect of suspension of a police officer or protective services officer. Clause 139 re-enacts the effect of section 86AAA of the Police Regulation Act 1958 providing the circumstances in which a police officer or protective services officer forfeits or must repay their salary. Clause 140 re-enacts the effect of section 86AA of the Police Regulation Act 1958 providing for no compensation for dismissal or reduction in rank of police officers or protective services officers. PART 8--APPEALS AND REVIEWS Part 8 re-enacts Part IVAA of the Police Regulation Act 1958 to provide for appeals and reviews of certain decisions in respect of police officers and protective services officers. Division 1--Appeals Clause 141 re-enacts the effect of section 86AC of the Police Regulation Act 1958 providing the circumstances in which a police officer may appeal to the PRS Board regarding the selection of another police officer for promotion or transfer subject to one modification. The clause limits the number of appeals allowed per person to 4 per financial year, rather than 4 in the previous 12 months. Clause 142 re-enacts the effect of section 86AD of the Police Regulation Act 1958 providing the circumstances in which a protective services officer may appeal to the PRS Board regarding the selection of another protective services officer for promotion or transfer subject to one modification. The clause limits the number of appeals allowed per person to 4 per financial year, rather than 4 in the previous 12 months. Clause 143 re-enacts the effect of section 86AE of the Police Regulation Act 1958 specifying the constitution of the PRS Board for the purposes of appeals. 53

 


 

Clause 144 re-enacts the effect of section 86AF of the Police Regulation Act 1958 providing that an appeal under this Division is to be by way of a re-hearing. Clause 145 re-enacts the effect of section 86AG of the Police Regulation Act 1958 specifying the procedure on an appeal. Division 2--Reviews Clause 146 re-enacts the effect of section 86AH of the Police Regulation Act 1958 outlining the decisions of the Chief Commissioner for which a police officer or protective services officer may seek review by the PRS Board. Clause 147 re-enacts the effect of section 86AI of the Police Regulation Act 1958 requiring applications for review to be in an approved form and specifies lodgement timeframes. Clause 148 re-enacts the effect of section 86AJ of the Police Regulation Act 1958 specifying the constitution of the PRS Board for the purposes of reviews. Clause 149 re-enacts the effect of section 86AK of the Police Regulation Act 1958 providing for special procedures for the review of directed transfer decisions made under clause 156. Clause 150 re-enacts the effect of section 86AL of the Police Regulation Act 1958 providing that if an application is lodged to review a decision under clause 70(2) to transfer, demote or dismiss an officer who is incapable of performing his or her duties, the Chief Commissioner must lodge the file within 2 business days after being notified of the application. Clause 151 re-enacts the effect of section 86AM of the Police Regulation Act 1958 providing that the PRS Board must consider, when conducting a review, the interest of the applicant and the public interest. Clause 152 re-enacts the effect of section 86AN of the Police Regulation Act 1958 providing the powers and requirements of the PRS Board when considering an application for a review of a decision to terminate or dismiss a police officer or protective services officer. 54

 


 

Clause 153 re-enacts the effect of section 86AO of the Police Regulation Act 1958 providing the requirements of the PRS Board when considering an application for review of certain decisions including demotion and transfer decisions. Clause 154 re-enacts the effect of section 86AP of the Police Regulation Act 1958 providing the powers of the PRS Board when reviewing a decision, other than a review under clauses 152 and 153. Division 3--General provisions for appeals and reviews Clause 155 re-enacts the effect of section 86AQ of the Police Regulation Act 1958 providing that the PRS Board is bound by the rules of natural justice in all appeals and reviews before it. Clause 156 re-enacts the effect of section 86AR of the Police Regulation Act 1958 providing that the PRS Board must conduct proceedings with minimal formality and as quickly as a proper consideration of the subject-matter permits. Other than requirements in the Act, the Board may regulate its own procedure. The Board must also notify the Chief Commissioner of the lodging of an appeal or review as soon as practicable. Clause 157 re-enacts the effect of section 86AS of the Police Regulation Act 1958 providing that hearings of the PRS Board on an appeal or review be held in public, subject to the power of the Board to direct a hearing or part of it be held in private, if that would facilitate the appeal or review or it is in the public interest. Clause 158 re-enacts the effect of section 86AT of the Police Regulation Act 1958 providing that, on an appeal, both the appellant and the person selected for promotion or transfer may appear. The Chief Commissioner may appear and be represented by any person other than a legal practitioner. At a review hearing, both the applicant and the Chief Commissioner may appear at the proceedings and be represented by any person other than a legal practitioner. Clause 159 re-enacts the effect of section 86AU of the Police Regulation Act 1958 providing that the PRS Board is not bound by the rules of evidence and may inform itself as it sees fit including requiring evidence to be given on oath or affirmation. 55

 


 

Clause 160 re-enacts the effect of section 86AV of the Police Regulation Act 1958 providing that the President or the Deputy President of the Review Division may issue a summons to a person to appear and produce documents on an appeal or review. The offence provision in section 86AV of the Police Regulation Act 1958 is re-enacted at section 161. Clause 161 re-enacts, with greater specificity, the offence provision in section 86AV of the Police Regulation Act 1958. The provision contains 4 discrete offences-- · refusal or failure to attend as required by a properly served summons; · refusal or failure to answer a question that the PRS Board requires a person to answer; · refusal or failure to produce a document that the PRS Board requires a person to produce; · refusal or failure to take an oath or make an affirmation when required to do so by the PRS Board. Each offence attracts a "reasonable excuse" defence. The clause increases the maximum penalty from 10 penalty units to 120 penalty units or imprisonment for 1 year or both for each offence. Clause 162 re-enacts the effect of section 86AX of the Police Regulation Act 1958 prohibiting behaviour that constitutes contempt of the PRS Board. The clause increases the maximum penalty from 30 penalty units or imprisonment for 3 months or both to 120 penalty units or imprisonment for 1 year or both. Clause 163 re-enacts the effect of section 86AY of the Police Regulation Act 1958 providing that parties involved in an appeal or review before the PRS Board have same protection and immunity as if the proceedings were in the Supreme Court. Clause 164 re-enacts the effect of section 86AZ of the Police Regulation Act 1958 providing that the PRS Board may, in exceptional circumstances, extend the time limit fixed by the Act or regulations for lodging an appeal or application for review or doing any other thing in relation to the appeal or review. 56

 


 

Clause 165 re-enacts the effect of section 86AW of the Police Regulation Act 1958 providing that the Chief Commissioner must give effect to an order or decision of the PRS Board on an appeal or a review. PART 9--COMPLAINTS AND INVESTIGATIONS Part 9 re-enacts the complaints and investigation provisions of Part IVA of the Police Regulation Act 1958. These provisions set out how complaints about the conduct or misconduct of a police officer or protective services officer can be made, the handling and investigation of those complaints, the prohibition of victimisation in relation to protected persons and associated offences. Division 1--Preliminary Clause 166 re-enacts the definitions contained in section 86A of the Police Regulation Act 1958. The definition of conduct is the same. However, the term serious misconduct from the Police Regulation Act 1958 is replaced by the term misconduct. This aligns the definitions with the definitions in the Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commission Act 2011. Division 2--Complaints and investigations Clause 167 re-enacts the effect of section 86L of the Police Regulation Act 1958 providing for the making of complaints about the conduct of police officers and makes clear, on the face of the legislation, that the provisions apply to complaints made by and about protective services officers. Clause 168 re-enacts the effect of section 86LA of the Police Regulation Act 1958 requiring the referral of misconduct complaints received by police officers to the Chief Commissioner and makes clear, on the face of the legislation, that the provision applies to complaints made by and about protective services officers. Clause 169 re-enacts the effect of section 86M of the Police Regulation Act 1958 requiring the Chief Commissioner to investigate complaints about misconduct that are not protected disclosure complaints and requiring the Chief Commissioner to provide details of a misconduct complaint or investigation to the IBAC. 57

 


 

Clause 170 re-enacts the effect of section 86O of the Police Regulation Act 1958 requiring the Chief Commissioner to report on the progress of investigations, conciliation of investigations and completion of investigations to the IBAC. Clause 171 re-enacts the effect of section 86Q of the Police Regulation Act 1958 giving the Chief Commissioner a power to direct police officers and protective services officers to answer questions, provide relevant information or produce relevant documents and failure to do so is a breach of discipline. Clause 172 re-enacts the effect of section 86T of the Police Regulation Act 1958 requiring the Chief Commissioner to advise complainants of the results of the investigation and action taken or proposed to be taken, so long as it is not contrary to the public interest. Division 3--General Clause 173 re-enacts the effect of section 86V of the Police Regulation Act 1958 protecting complainants against victimisation by making it an offence to take detrimental action against complainants. Clause 174 re-enacts the offences in section 86K of the Police Regulation Act 1958 and increases the maximum penalty from 10 penalty units or imprisonment for 1 year or both to 120 penalty units or imprisonment for 1 year or both in line with modern penalty unit scales. PART 10--INVESTIGATION OF PROTECTED DISCLOSURE COMPLAINTS Part 10 re-enacts the effect of Part IVB of the Police Regulation Act 1958, which was introduced by the Protected Disclosure Act 2012. The Part deals with police investigation of protected disclosure complaints. The drafting of the Part has been modernised to reflect the new terms police officer and Victoria Police personnel. Division 1--Investigations Clause 175 re-enacts the effect of section 86X of the Police Regulation Act 1958 requiring the Chief Commissioner to investigate all protected disclosure complaints that the IBAC refers to him or her. 58

 


 

Clause 176 re-enacts the effect of section 86Y of the Police Regulation Act 1958 which deals with questioning of police officers and protective services officers for the purpose of investigating protected disclosure complaints. Clause 177 re-enacts the effect of section 86Z of the Police Regulation Act 1958 allowing the person who made the protected disclosure complaint to request information about the investigation from the Chief Commissioner. Division 2--Action on investigation Clause 178 re-enacts the effect of section 86ZA of the Police Regulation Act 1958 requiring and allowing the Chief Commissioner to take action in certain circumstances. Clause 179 re-enacts the effect of section 86ZB of the Police Regulation Act 1958 requiring the Chief Commissioner to report to the IBAC and allowing the Chief Commissioner to give information to the Premier and the Minister about the findings of the investigation. Clause 180 re-enacts the effect of section 86ZC of the Police Regulation Act 1958 allowing the Premier and the Minister to disclose information for the purpose of obtaining advice. Clause 181 re-enacts the effect of section 8ZD of the Police Regulation Act 1958 requiring the Chief Commissioner to inform the person who made the protected disclosure complaint of the outcome of the investigation. Clause 182 re-enacts the effect of section 86ZE of the Police Regulation Act 1958 listing circumstances in which the Chief Commissioner must not disclose information. Division 3--Disclosure of information Clause 183 re-enacts the effect of section 86ZF of the Police Regulation Act 1958 providing definitions for the purpose of the disclosure of information offence in this Division. Clause 184 re-enacts the effect of section 86ZG of the Police Regulation Act 1958 which provides that subject to specific exemptions in subclauses (2) to (6), it is an offence for a person who is or was a member of Victoria Police personnel to disclose information 59

 


 

obtained under this Part. The offence is punishable by a maximum of 120 penalty units or imprisonment for 1 year or both. Clause 185 re-enacts the effect of section 86ZH of the Police Regulation Act 1958 which provides that subject to specific exemptions in subclauses (2) to (4) and clause 186, it is an offence for a person to disclose a restricted matter. The definition of restricted matter is in clause 183. The offence is punishable by a maximum of 120 penalty units or imprisonment for 1 year or both. Clause 186 re-enacts the effect of section 86ZI of the Police Regulation Act 1958 which allows the Chief Commissioner to authorise in writing the disclosure of a restricted matter to a person specified in the authorisation. Division 4--Investigation procedures Clause 187 re-enacts the effect of section 86ZJ of the Police Regulation Act 1958 requiring the Chief Commissioner to establish investigation procedures for protected disclosure complaints. Clause 188 re-enacts the effect of section 86ZK of the Police Regulation Act 1958 allowing the IBAC to review the Chief Commissioner's investigation procedures. Clause 189 re-enacts the effect of section 86ZL of the Police Regulation Act 1958 requiring the Chief Commissioner to adopt the IBAC's recommendations in relation to investigations procedures or give the IBAC reasons for not doing so. Division 5--Other matters Clause 190 re-enacts the effect of section 86ZM of the Police Regulation Act 1958 allowing the Chief Commissioner to request that the IBAC withdraw the referral of a protected disclosure complaint. 60

 


 

PART 11--SPECIAL CONSTABLES Part 11 re-enacts the effect of Part VC of the Police Regulation Act 1958 dealing with the appointment and administration of special constables. The Chief Commissioner may appoint police officers from other jurisdictions as special constables. This appointment gives those persons the legal powers, duties and functions of a police officer in Victoria. This enables special constables to operate in Victoria during times of emergency or in cross-border locations. Division 1--Appointment of special constables generally Clause 191 re-enacts the effect of section 102L of the Police Regulation Act 1958 which allows the Chief Commissioner to appoint police officers of other jurisdictions as special constables. Clause 192 re-enacts the effect of section 102M of the Police Regulation Act 1958 which provides for the taking and subscribing of the oath or affirmation of the office of special constable. The form of oath or affirmation is set out in Schedule 2. Clause 193 re-enacts the effect of section 102N of the Police Regulation Act 1958 which provides for the status and powers of special constables. More specifically, special constables are taken to be police officers, have the duties and powers of constables at common law and any duties and powers conferred on police officers by statute or subordinate instrument. Clause 194 re-enacts the effect of section 102O of the Police Regulation Act 1958 allowing the Chief Commissioner to terminate the appointment of special constables and prescribing the process for termination. Clause 195 re-enacts the effect of section 102P of the Police Regulation Act 1958. Special constables are subject to similar disciplinary processes as police officers. The Chief Commissioner may notify the chief officer of a special constable's "home" jurisdiction of the outcome of any disciplinary or criminal investigation. 61

 


 

Division 2--Incidents requiring urgent cross-border assistance Clause 196 re-enacts the effect of section 102Q of the Police Regulation Act 1958 allowing the Chief Commissioner or a Deputy Commissioner to declare an incident to be an incident requiring urgent cross-border assistance. Clause 197 re-enacts the effect of section 102R of the Police Regulation Act 1958 providing for the period a declaration under clause 196 remains in force (14 days maximum) and the process for a declaration extension. Clause 198 re-enacts the effect of section 102S of the Police Regulation Act 1958 providing that the appointment of persons under clause 191 as special constables may be either orally or in writing during a declared incident, as well as the administrative processes required to notify the Minister and the person appointed as a special constable. Clause 199 re-enacts the effect of section 102T of the Police Regulation Act 1958 allowing a special constable appointed during a declared incident to make and subscribe an oath or affirmation of office as soon as practicable after his or her appointment. This is to ensure flexibility during times of emergency. Clause 200 re-enacts the effect of section 102U of the Police Regulation Act 1958 providing for the termination of appointment of special constables at the end of the period in which a declaration under clause 196 is in force. PART 12--POLICE REGISTRATION AND SERVICES BOARD Part 12 re-enacts Part V of the Police Regulation Act 1958 to provide for the continuation, functions and powers of the PRS Board. Division 1--Establishment and functions Clause 201 continues the PRS Board as the same statutory body corporate established by section 87 of the Police Regulation Act 1958. 62

 


 

Clause 202 re-enacts functions of the PRS Board contained at section 87A of the Police Regulation Act 1958. The functions of the PRS Board are-- · registration functions that include maintaining the Police Profession Register and registering persons on it and, if requested to do so, advising the Chief Commissioner on proposed appointments to Victoria Police; and · professional standards functions that include advising the Chief Commissioner on competency standards, practical standards and educational courses for police officers and protective services officers; and · review functions that include hearing and determining appeals and reviews, and general functions that include advice to the Minister and the Chief Commissioner and inquiring into matters referred by the Minister or the Chief Commissioner. Clause 203 re-enacts the effect of section 87B of the Police Regulation Act 1958 establishing the Divisions of the PRS Board as follows-- · Registration Division; · Professional Standards Division; · Review Division-- to perform the registration, professional standards and review functions of the PRS Board respectively. Clause 204 re-enacts the effect of section 87C of the Police Regulation Act 1958 vesting the PRS Board with all necessary powers to perform its functions. Division 2--Membership Clause 205 re-enacts the effect of section 87D of the Police Regulation Act 1958 specifying the membership of the PRS Board as the President, Deputy Presidents for each of the Divisions, police officers (nominated by their professional association or the Chief Commissioner) and an academic. Members are appointed by the Governor in Council on the recommendation of the Minister, who must be satisfied that the person can perform the duties of a member of the PRS Board. 63

 


 

Clause 206 re-enacts the effect of section 87E of the Police Regulation Act 1958 specifying the membership of the Registration Division as the President (ex officio), a Deputy President, police officers nominated by a police professional association, police officers nominated by the Chief Commissioner, an academic and a legal practitioner of at least 5 years standing. Clause 207 re-enacts the effect of section 87F of the Police Regulation Act 1958 specifying the membership of the Professional Standards Division as the President (ex officio), a Deputy President and other members that must be academics, legal practitioners of at least 5 years standing or former or serving police officers. Clause 208 re-enacts the effect of section 87G of the Police Regulation Act 1958 specifying the membership of the Review Division as the President (ex officio), a Deputy President and other members that must include a legal practitioner of at least 5 years standing or a former police officer. Clause 209 re-enacts the effect of section 87H of the Police Regulation Act 1958 providing that the President may allocate members of the PRS Board to the Divisions. Members may be allocated to more than one Division. Clause 210 re-enacts the effect of section 87I of the Police Regulation Act 1958 providing that members of the PRS Board are entitled to the remuneration and allowances fixed from time to time by the Governor in Council. Clause 211 re-enacts the effect of section 87J of the Police Regulation Act 1958 providing for the accountability of the President of the PRS Board to the Minister for the performance of the PRS Board. Clause 212 re-enacts the effect of section 87K of the Police Regulation Act 1958 providing the circumstances in which the office of a member of the PRS Board becomes vacant and the circumstances in which the Governor in Council, on the recommendation of the Minister, may remove a member from office. 64

 


 

Clause 213 re-enacts the effect of section 87L of the Police Regulation Act 1958 specifying arrangements for acting appointments. The Governor in Council may appoint-- · a Deputy President to act as the President; or · a person to act as the Deputy President-- during a vacancy in the office of President or Deputy President or if the President or Deputy President is absent or unable to perform his or her duties. The Governor in Council may determine the terms and conditions of that acting appointment and terminate the appointment at any time. The Minister may appoint a person to act as a member of the PRS Board during the vacancy in the office of a member or if the member is absent or unable to perform his or her duties. The Minister may determine the terms and conditions of that acting appointment and terminate the appointment at any time. Division 3--General provisions for the PRS Board Clause 214 re-enacts the effect of section 87M of the Police Regulation Act 1958 specifying the requirements for meetings of the PRS Board with one modification. The clause introduces a quorum of 25% rather than a majority of members. Clause 215 re-enacts the effect of section 87N of the Police Regulation Act 1958 providing that a vacancy in the membership of the PRS Board or a defect or irregularity in the appointment of a member does not invalidate acts or decisions of the PRS Board. Clause 216 re-enacts the effect of section 87O of the Police Regulation Act 1958 providing immunity from liability to members of the PRS Board for any act or omission in good faith in the performance of a function (other than a review function) under the Act or reasonably believed to be in the performance of a function under the Act. Liability for the act or omission attaches instead to the PRS Board. See clause 163 for the protection and immunity of members of the PRS Board on appeals or reviews. 65

 


 

Clause 217 re-enacts the effect of section 87P of the Police Regulation Act 1958 providing that the PRS Board may employ staff under Part 3 of the Public Administration Act 2004 necessary to perform its functions or to enter agreements or arrangements for the use of staff or other government departments, statutory authorities or public bodies. Clause 218 re-enacts the effect of section 87Q of the Police Regulation Act 1958 prohibiting a PRS Board officer (which includes the members and staff of the PRS Board) from making a record of information acquired in the performance of his or her functions. Contravention of this provision is an offence. A maximum penalty of 60 penalty units is specified. This prohibition does not apply to making records or disclosures-- · necessary for the officer to perform his or her functions under the Act; · required under the Independent Broad-based Anti- corruption Commission Act 2011; · with the consent of the person to whom the information relates; · necessary for the PRS Board to complete a report of its operations under the Financial Management Act 1994. Clause 219 provides that the PRS Board may, by instrument, delegate any function or power to a member of the PRS Board or an employee or member of staff of a government department or other body referred to in clause 217 except-- · the power under clauses 104(2) and 108(2) to approve forms; · the power under clause 111 to suspend a person's registration; · the power under clause 115 to cancel a person's registration; · any power or function under Part 8; · the power of delegation. 66

 


 

Division 4--Checks and investigations by the PRS Board Clause 220 re-enacts the effect of section 87R of the Police Regulation Act 1958 specifying that the powers vested in the PRS Board under this Division are for the purposes of-- · determining whether to register a person on the Police Profession Register or renew their registration; or · advising the Chief Commissioner as to whether a police officer from another jurisdiction or a former police officer has the integrity, qualifications and experience for admission or re-admission into Victoria Police. Clause 221 re-enacts the effect of section 87S of the Police Regulation Act 1958 providing that the PRS Board may require an applicant for registration or a proposed appointee to submit to tests required by the PRS Board and provide the Board with-- · a check of their criminal record; · references or reports; · evidence of recent service as a police officer in Victoria or another jurisdiction; · written consent for the Board to obtain information about their previous police service-- for the Board to perform its functions under this Division. Clause 222 re-enacts the effect of section 87T of the Police Regulation Act 1958 providing that the PRS Board may-- · conduct investigations and enquiries; and · require an applicant for registration or proposed appointee to appear before the Board to answer questions and produce documents or information required by the Board-- for the purpose of its functions specified in clause 220. Consideration of an application for registration or renewal of registration by a police officer of another jurisdiction or Victorian police officer may be refused if the applicant fails to appear before the PRS Board or answer any question or produce 67

 


 

any documents or provide information required by the PRS Board. Clause 223 re-enacts the effect of section 87U of the Police Regulation Act 1958 providing that the PRS Board may issue a summons to a person to attend and give evidence or produce documents to the PRS Board. A person who fails to attend before the PRS Board or produce any document required by the summons commits an offence and is liable to a maximum penalty of 10 penalty units. Clause 224 re-enacts the effect of section 87V of the Police Regulation Act 1958 providing the means by which a notice or summons under this Division may be served and specifying the time the service is taken to have been effected under the various modes. PART 13--CONFIDENCE AND PRIVILEGE Part 13 deals with a number of schemes to protect the confidentiality and privilege of police information. Division 1--Confidentiality of police information Division 1 reforms the offences relating to unauthorised disclosure of police information and documents in section 127A of the Police Regulation Act 1958. Reforms include-- · the offences will clearly apply to disclosure of police information by former members of Victoria Police personnel; · the provisions clarify that the Chief Commissioner's instructions are a source of a duty not to disclose information; · a new information disclosure offence will apply to current and former contractors, consultants and service providers. This new offence will also apply to bodies corporate; · the provisions clarify that reasonable excuse is a defence to the offences and an example of reasonable excuse is that the person charged with the offence took reasonable steps not to access, make use of, or disclose the information. An evidentiary burden applies to this defence; · other minor and technical amendments to modernise the offences and ensure they fit within the broader scheme of the Bill. 68

 


 

Clause 225 provides definitions of police information and service provider. In summary-- Police information means-- · any information that has come to the knowledge or into the possession of a member of Victoria police personnel in the performance of functions or duties or the exercise of powers or otherwise as a result of being a member of Victoria Police personnel; or · any information given or made available to a service provider by Victoria Police or a member of Victoria Police personnel for the purposes of the provision of services by the service provider. Service provider means a contractor, consultant or other person who is or has been engaged to provide services to Victoria Police or to the Chief Commissioner, or a person who is or has been employed by or engaged to provide services to a contractor, consultant or other person engaged to provide these services. Clause 226 provides clarity on matters to be considered for the purposes of determining whether it is the duty of a member or former member of Victoria Police personnel not to access, make use of or disclose police information. Without limiting the sources of such a duty, regard must be had to the Chief Commissioner's instructions. Clause 227 re-enacts the summary offences of unauthorised access to, use of or disclosure of police information by members or former members of Victoria Police personnel in section 127A(1) and (2) of the Police Regulation Act 1958. The offence attracts a maximum penalty of 240 penalty units or imprisonment for 2 years or both. Clause 228 re-enacts the indictable offences of unauthorised access to, use of or disclosure of police information by members or former members of Victoria Police personnel in section 127A(1AB) and (4) of the Police Regulation Act 1958. The offence attracts a maximum penalty of 600 penalty units or imprisonment for 5 years or both. 69

 


 

Clause 229 introduces a new offence of unauthorised access to, use of or disclosure of police information by service providers. In the case of an individual, the offence attracts a maximum penalty of 240 penalty units or imprisonment for 2 years or both. In the case of a body corporate, the offence attracts a maximum penalty of 1200 penalty units. Clause 230 re-enacts the effect of section 127A(1B) of the Police Regulation Act 1958 allowing the Chief Commissioner to authorise certain people to access, use or disclose information on a computerised database with modifications. A relevant person within the meaning of the Corrections Act 1986 is referred to instead of a person holding a position. This reflects the current provisions of the Corrections Act 1986. Clause 231 re-enacts the examples of authorised access to, use of or disclosure of police information in section 127A(1C) to (1G) of the Police Regulation Act 1958. Clause 232 re-enacts the offence in section 85G of the Police Regulation Act 1958 to disclosing the identity of the person who has been giving a testing direction under Part 5. Clause 232 also extends the offence to include disclosure of test results obtained under Part 5 (unless disclosure is authorised by the Act or regulations). Exemptions to the offence apply to the Chief Commissioner and to the IBAC or an IBAC officer in the performance of their duties. In the case of an individual, the offence attracts a maximum penalty of 60 penalty units or imprisonment for 6 months or both. In the case of a body corporate, the offence attracts a maximum penalty of 300 penalty units. Division 2--Other confidentiality and privilege provisions Clause 233 re-enacts the effect of section 126 of the Police Regulation Act 1958 providing that deliberations of Ministers and parliamentary committees may not be required to be disclosed. Clause 234 re-enacts the effect of section 124A of the Police Regulation Act 1958 regarding certain crime reports being privileged and not subject to a defamation suit. The provision has been updated to reflect the inclusion of publication of documents by electronic communication within the meaning of the Defamation Act 2005. 70

 


 

Division 3--Agency Photographs Division 3 re-enacts Part VIC of the Police Regulation Act 1958, which is a scheme to facilitate the Chief Commissioner's release of agency photographs (for example "mug shots") to media organisations. Clause 235 re-enacts definitions of agency photograph, authorised media organisation, journalism and media organisation currently contained in section 3 of the Police Regulation Act 1958. Clause 236 re-enacts the effect of section 118W of the Police Regulation Act 1958 allowing the Chief Commissioner to authorise a media organisation to be given agency photographs. Clause 237 re-enacts the effect of section 118X of the Police Regulation Act 1958 allowing media organisations to apply to the Chief Commissioner for authorisation under clause 236. Clause 238 re-enacts the effect of section 118R of the Police Regulation Act 1958 allowing the Chief Commissioner to authorise the giving of agency photographs to media organisations. Clause 239 re-enacts the effect of section 118S of the Police Regulation Act 1958 allowing authorised media organisations to apply for the giving of agency photographs. Clause 240 re-enacts the effect of section 118T of the Police Regulation Act 1958 listing the matters that the Chief Commissioner must consider before authorising the giving of an agency photograph under clause 238. Clause 241 re-enacts the effect of section 118Vof the Police Regulation Act 1958 requiring the Chief Commissioner to notify the person photographed about any decision to authorise the giving of their photograph to a media organisation. Clause 242 re-enacts the offences in sections 118W(4) and 118U of the Police Regulation Act 1958. It is an offence for a media organisation not to comply with an authorisation, and specific journalistic purposes and standards. Clause 243 re-enacts the effect of section 118Y of the Police Regulation Act 1958 protecting the Chief Commissioner and media organisations in respect of the publication of agency photographs in a manner that complies with the scheme. 71

 


 

Clause 244 re-enacts the effect of section 118Z of the Police Regulation Act 1958 providing a protection to those authorising the giving of agency photographs from criminal offences. Clause 245 re-enacts the effect of section 118ZA of the Police Regulation Act 1958 providing that nothing in this Division affects or limits the operation of section 234 regarding certain crime reports being privileged and not subject to a defamation suit. Division 4--Disclosure of vehicle accident information Division 4 re-enacts Part VIB of the Police Regulation Act 1958, which is a scheme to facilitate the disclosure of vehicle accident information. Clause 246 re-enacts the definitions in section 118L of the Police Regulation Act 1958. Clause 247 re-enacts section 118M of the Police Regulation Act 1958 allowing the Minister to declare non-Victorian statutory insurance scheme laws and persons as statutory scheme insurers. Clause 248 re-enacts section 118N of the Police Regulation Act 1958 allowing certain persons to request vehicle accident information from police. Clause 249 re-enacts section 118O of the Police Regulation Act 1958 prescribing the form and content of applications for vehicle accident information. Clause 250 re-enacts the effect of section 118P of the Police Regulation Act 1958 allowing disclosure of vehicle accident information. Clause 251 re-enacts the offence in section 118Q of the Police Regulation Act 1958 which provides that it is an offence to disclose or use vehicle accident information for a purpose other than an authorised purpose. The clause re-enacts the 60 penalty unit maximum and introduces a new maximum penalty of 300 penalty units for a body corporate. 72

 


 

PART 14--COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT Division 1--General offences in relation to Victoria Police Clause 252 modernises the offences contained at sections 95 and 97 of the Police Regulation Act 1958 relating to bribery and corruption by police officers, protective services officers and police recruits. The maximum penalty for the offences is increased from 100 penalty units to imprisonment for 2 years or 240 penalty units or both. A proceeding for an offence against this clause may be commenced within the period of 3 years after the alleged commission of the offence. This provision re-enacts section 95(2) of the Police Regulation Act 1958, which was introduced following recommendations made in May 1998 in the Ombudsman's Report into Operation Bart. Clause 253 modernises the offences contained at sections 95 and 97 of the Police Regulation Act 1958 relating to bribery and corruption towards police officers, protective services officers and police recruits. The maximum penalty for the bribery offences is increased from 100 penalty units to imprisonment for 2 years or 240 penalty units or both for an individual and 1200 penalty units for a body corporate. A proceeding for an offence against this clause may be commenced within the period of 3 years after the alleged commission of the offence. This provision re-enacts section 95(2) of the Police Regulation Act 1958, which was introduced following recommendations made in May 1998 in the Ombudsman's Report into Operation Bart. Clause 254 modernises the offences in section 96 of the Police Regulation Act 1958 relating to failure to return Victoria Police identification or Victoria Police equipment on ceasing to hold office as a police officer or protective services officer. The maximum penalty for the offences is increased from 50 penalty units to 60 penalty units or imprisonment for 6 months or both. 73

 


 

A reasonable excuse defence is available. The Chief Commissioner's written permission to retain identification or equipment is a reasonable excuse. This supports long standing Victoria Police practice for former police officers or protective services officers to retain certain Victoria Police equipment as a personal memento after retirement. Clause 255 creates a new offence of unauthorised manufacture, possession, use or supply of Victoria Police equipment. Elements of the offence are currently contained in section 97 of the Police Regulation Act 1958. It is not an offence if the person has the approval of the Chief Commissioner, the person is performing their duties or the person otherwise has a reasonable excuse. The maximum penalty for the offence for an individual is 120 penalty units or imprisonment for 1 year or both. The maximum penalty for a body corporate is 600 penalty units. Subclause (2) allows the Chief Commissioner to give written approval for a person or class of persons to manufacture, possess, use or supply Victoria Police equipment. Subclause (4) provides a broad definition of supply, which includes sell, including by auction, hire out, exchange, give away or otherwise dispose of, offer to supply, advertise, display or expose for supply. Clause 256 modernises the offence relating to impersonating police officers in section 97 of the Police Regulation Act 1958. Separate offences are provided for impersonating police officers, protective services officers and police recruits. The maximum penalty for each offence is increased from 100 penalty units to 120 penalty units or imprisonment for 1 year or both. Clause 257 modernises the offence in section 98 of the Police Regulation Act 1958. The clause makes it an offence to obtain or attempt to obtain appointment as a police officer or protective services officer by making a false representation or using a false document. The maximum penalty is increased from 20 penalty units to 60 penalty units or imprisonment for 6 months or both. 74

 


 

Clause 258 re-enacts the offences in section 127 of the Police Regulation Act 1958 of causing disaffection among police officers or protective services officers and inducing or attempting to induce a police officer or protective services officer to withhold their services or commit a breach of discipline. Subclause (3) re-enacts the defences of good faith and pointing out improvements in laws or working conditions. Division 2--Ancillary provisions for offences Division 2 enacts an accessorial liability provision and a "Type 1" directors liability provision modelled on COAG principles contained in the publication Personal Liability for Corporate Fault: Guidelines for applying the COAG Principles (COAG guidelines) that was endorsed by COAG on 25 July 2012 and published on the COAG website. The model provisions were first introduced across the Victorian statute book by the Statue Law Amendment (Directors' Liability) Act 2013. Clause 259 provides definitions of body corporate and officer with reference to the Corporations Act 2001 of the Commonwealth. Clause 260 introduces a model accessorial liability provision. If a body corporate commits an offence, an officer of the body corporate also commits the offence if the officer-- · authorised or permitted the commission of the offence by the body corporate; or · was knowingly concerned in any way (whether by act or omission) in the commission of the offence by the body corporate. The accessorial liability provision applies to the following offences-- · tampering with a drug or alcohol sample (clause 100(1)); · disclosing information in relation to drug and alcohol testing (clause 232(1)); · authorisation and use of agency photographs (clause 242(1) and (2)); 75

 


 

· disclosure or use of vehicle accident information for a purpose other than an authorised purpose (clause 251(1) and (2)). Clause 261 provides a Type 1 directors liability provision. The clause imposes liability on officers where the officer failed to exercise due diligence to prevent the commission of the offence by the body corporate. The Type 1 directors liability provision applies to the following offences-- · unauthorised access to, use of or disclosure of police information by services providers (clause 229(1)); · bribery and corruption towards police officers or protective services officers (clause 253(1) to (3)); · unauthorised manufacture, possession, use or supply of Victoria Police identification or Victoria Police equipment (clause 255(1)). Clause 262 provides the circumstances in which a body corporate, employer or principal agent performs an action and forms the necessary mental element to be liable for offences under the Bill. Subclause (1) provides that for the purpose of a criminal proceeding, any conduct engaged in on behalf of a body corporate is taken to have been engaged in also by the body corporate, if the conduct was engaged in by an employee, agent or officer of the body corporate within the scope of the employee's, agent's, or officer's actual or apparent authority. Subclause (2) provides that for the purpose of a criminal proceeding, any conduct engaged in on behalf of a person other than a body corporate (the principal) is taken to have been engaged in also by the principal if the conduct was engaged in by an employee of the principal within the scope of the employee's actual or apparent authority. Subclause (3) provides that if, in any criminal proceeding, it is necessary to establish the state of mind of a body corporate in relation to particular conduct, it is sufficient to show that-- 76

 


 

· that the conduct was engaged in by an officer of the body corporate within the scope of the officer's actual or apparent authority and the officer had that state of mind; or · that the conduct was engaged in by an agent of the body corporate and-- · the agent acted at the specific direction or with the specific consent or agreement of the body corporate; or · the agent had that state of mind; or · the body corporate was aware of the agent's state of mind when the conduct was engaged in. Subclause (4) provides that if, in any criminal proceeding, it is necessary to establish the state of mind of a person other than a body corporate in relation to particular conduct, it is sufficient to show that-- · the conduct was engaged in by an employee of the person within the scope of the employee's actual or apparent authority and the employee had that state of mind; or · the conduct was engaged in by an agent of the person and-- · the agent acted at the specific direction or with the specific consent or agreement of the person; or · the agent had that state of mind; or · the person was aware of the agent's state of mind when the conduct was engaged in. Subclause (5) provides that a reference in this section to the state of mind of a person includes a reference to the knowledge, intention, opinion, belief or purpose of the person and the person's reasons for the intention, opinion, belief or purpose. Subclause (6) provides that criminal proceeding means a proceeding for an offence against a provision of this Act. 77

 


 

Division 3--Search and seizure powers Division 3 modernises the search and seizure provisions of Division 3 of Part VA of the Police Regulation Act 1958. The new provisions apply to offences under the Bill and are modelled on the search and seizure provisions in the Australian Consumer Law and Fair Trading Act 2012. Changes from the Police Regulation Act 1958 provisions to the provisions in the Bill include-- · the Bill includes definitions of motor vehicle, aircraft and vessel; · the Bill separates the clauses dealing with search with and without consent; · the Bill provides clearer requirements for notice before entry and search and acknowledgement of consent to entry and search; · the Bill makes clear that a police officer conducting a search without consent may take images. Clause 263 provides the definitions of aircraft, motor vehicle, public place, relevant offence, vehicle and vessel that apply in the Division. Clause 264 allows a police officer to enter or search certain premises with the consent of the occupier of the premises. Subclause (1) provides that if a police officer believes on reasonable grounds that a person has committed or is committing a relevant offence, the police officer may, with the occupier's consent, enter and search the premises and exercise the powers referred to in subclauses (2) and (3). Subclause (2) provides that, when entering a premises with the consent of an occupier, a police officer may seize anything the officer finds on the premises or examine, take and keep samples of any goods the officer finds on the premises, if the officer believes on reasonable grounds that they are connected with the alleged contravention. In the case of any document on the premises, an officer may require the document to be produced for examination, examine, make copies or take extracts from the document (or arrange for copies to be made or extracts taken), and remove the document for as long as reasonably necessary to make copies or take extracts. 78

 


 

Subclause (3) provides that an officer may make any still or moving image or audio-visual recording if the officer reasonably believes it is necessary to do so for the purpose of establishing the alleged contravention. Clause 265 prevents a police officer from entering and searching premises under clause 264 unless, before the occupier has consented to the entry and search, the officer has produced his or her identification and informed the occupier of the purpose of the search, and that the occupier may refuse to consent to the entry and search, or to the seizure of anything found during the search, as well as the taking of any sample of things or any copy or extract from a document found during the search. An occupier must also be informed that anything seized or taken with consent may be used as evidence. Clause 266 requires the police officer to ask the occupier to sign an acknowledgement prior to entering and searching the premises under clause 264. Subclause (2) sets out what an acknowledgement for the purposes of subclause (1) must contain. Subclause (3) provides that if the occupier consents to the officer seizing or taking anything from the premises during the search, before seizing or taking the thing, the officer must ask the occupier to sign an acknowledgment. Subclause (4) provides that an acknowledgement for the purposes of subclause (3) must state that the occupier has consented to the seizure or taking of the thing, and the date and time of that consent. Subclause (5) provides that the officer must give a copy of a signed acknowledgement to the occupier before leaving the premises. Subclause (6) provides that if, in any proceeding, a signed acknowledgement is not produced to the court or tribunal, it is to be presumed until the contrary is proved that the occupier did not consent to the entry and search or to the seizure or taking of the thing. 79

 


 

Clause 267 enables a police officer to apply to a magistrate for a search warrant in relation to particular premises or a vehicle located in a public place. Subclause (1) enables a police officer to apply to a magistrate for the issue of a search warrant if the officer believes on reasonable grounds that there is or may be within the next 72 hours, evidence on the premises or vehicle that a person may have committed a relevant offence. Subclause (2) enables a magistrate to issue such a search warrant in accordance with the Magistrates' Court Act 1989 if satisfied by the evidence. Clause 268 sets out the form and content of a search warrant issued under clause 267(2). Subclause (1) provides that a search warrant may authorise a police officer named in the warrant to enter specified premises, by force if necessary and do certain things in relation to things named or described in the warrant. Subclause (2) sets out particular things that must be stated in the search warrant, including its purposes, any conditions to which the warrant is subject, whether entry is authorised for a specified time or any time of the day or night, and the day on which the warrant ceases to have effect. Subclause (3) clarifies that a power to enter referred to in subclause (1) includes a power to enter and search a vehicle on the premises. Subclause (4) provides that a search warrant issued under the Bill must be issued in accordance with Magistrates' Court Act 1989 and the rules that apply to search warrants under that Act extend and apply to a search warrant issued under the Bill. Clause 269 provides that before executing a search warrant issued under clause 267(2), the police officer named in the warrant must announce that he or she is authorised by the warrant to enter the premises, and if the police officer has been unable to obtain unforced entry, must give any person at the premises an opportunity to allow entry. However, a police officer is not required to comply with these requirements if the police officer believes on reasonable grounds that immediate entry is required 80

 


 

to ensure the safety of any person or to ensure that the effective execution of the search warrant is not frustrated. Clause 270 provides that a police officer, when executing a search warrant, must identify himself or herself to the occupier of the premises and provide the occupier with a copy of the warrant, or if the occupier is not present, any other person who is present at the premises, and give that person a copy of the warrant. Clause 271 provides that a search warrant issued under clause 267(2) authorises a police officer named in the warrant to seize or take a sample of things not described in the warrant if the police officer believes on reasonable grounds that the thing is of a kind that could have been included in a search warrant issued under Division 3, or will afford evidence about any offence (whether or not a relevant offence), and in the case of seizure, that seizing the item is necessary in order to prevent its concealment, loss, or destruction or its use in the commission of an offence (whether or not a relevant offence). Clause 272 provides for the retention and return of seized things. Subclause (1) requires a police officer to take reasonable steps to return a thing seized under Division 3 if the reason for its seizure no longer exists and the thing is not required in connection with any investigation or proposed investigation under Part 7, 9 or 10. Subclause (2) provides that if the thing seized has not been returned within 6 months after it was seized, the officer must take reasonable steps to return it unless required for the proceeding or an investigation under Part 7, 9 or 10 or the Magistrates' Court makes an order under 273 extending the period during which the thing may be retained. Clause 273 allows the Magistrates' Court to extend the 6 month period in which the police officer may retain the thing seized. Subclause (1) allows a police officer to apply to the Magistrates' Court for an extension of the period for which the police officer may retain the thing. Subclause (2) allows the Magistrates' Court to order an extension if satisfied that retention is necessary for investigation or evidence purposes, or for an investigation or proposed investigation under Part 7, 9 or 10. 81

 


 

Clause 274 allows things seized (whether under this or any other Act) in relation to relevant offences or an offence punishable by imprisonment to be used in connection with an investigation into the conduct of a police officer under Part 7, 9 or 10. PART 15--GENERAL Clause 275 re-enacts the effect of section 6(2) of the Police Regulation Act 1958 requiring all courts to take judicial notice of the seal or signature of the Chief Commissioner, an Acting Chief Commissioner, a Deputy Commissioner, an Acting Deputy Commissioner, an Assistant Commissioner, and an Acting Assistant Commissioner. Clause 276 allows the Chief Commissioner to request a member of Victoria Police personnel give a DNA sample under section 464ZGFA of the Crimes Act 1958 (which relates to voluntary samples) and provides that the protections and requirements under sections 464ZGFA and 464ZGFB of the Crimes Act 1958 apply. Clause 277 provides the Governor in Council with a general regulation making power. Schedule 5 sets out specific subject matter for regulations. PART 16--REPEALS, AMENDMENTS AND TRANSITIONAL PROVISIONS Division 1--Police Regulation Act 1958 Division 1 makes changes to the Police Regulation Act 1958 as a result of the re-enactment and replacement of provisions by the Bill. All provisions of the Police Regulation Act 1958 are repealed with the exception of those that relate to police pensions and a provision in relation to police reservists. Transitional provisions are dealt with in Schedule 6. Clause 278 changes the short title of the Police Regulation Act 1958 to the Police Regulation (Pensions) Act 1958. Clause 279 amends and repeals definitions in the Police Regulation Act 1958. Only those definitions relating to the pensions scheme for members of the force appointed under the Police Regulation Act 1958 remain. 82

 


 

Clause 280 repeals provisions in the Police Regulation Act 1958 relating to the appointment and retirement of members of the force. Clauses 13 to 49 of the Bill deal with these matters. Clause 281 repeals provisions in the Police Regulation Act 1958 relating to duties and discipline, employment and disciplinary matters, appeals and reviews, complaints and investigations, investigation of protected disclosure complaints, the Police Registration and Services Board, enforcement and the appointment of special constables. These matters are dealt with in Parts 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 and 14 of the Bill. Clause 282 repeals provisions in the Police Regulation Act 1958 relating to the retired police reserve, including the power for the Chief Commissioner to appoint police reservists. The Chief Commissioner will no longer be able to appoint police reservists. Existing police reservists are dealt with in Division 8 of Part 3 of the Bill. Clause 283 repeals provisions in the Police Regulation Act 1958 relating to the appointment of protective services officers, the disclosure of vehicle accident information and agency photographs. Clauses 37 to 44 deal with protective services officers, clauses 246 to 251 deal with vehicle accident information and clauses 235 to 245 deal with agency photographs. Clause 284 repeals miscellaneous provisions in the Police Regulation Act 1958 relating to matters including immunity of members of the force and unauthorised disclosure of information and documents. Clauses 72 to 81 deal with the new police tort scheme which replaces the immunity scheme in the Police Regulation Act 1958. Clauses 225 to 232 deal with confidentiality of police information including unauthorised disclosure of information and documents. Clause 285 repeals the First and Second Schedules of the Police Regulation Act 1958 which deal with reportable offences and the form of the oath. Schedule 4 to the Bill deals with reportable offences and Schedule 2 to the Bill contains the form of the oaths. Clause 286 repeals this Division once the amendments have all taken effect and the Division is thus spent. 83

 


 

Division 2--Transitional provisions Clause 287 gives effect to Schedule 6 which contains transitional provisions. SCHEDULE 1 PART 1--CHIEF COMMISSIONER Part 1 deals with terms and conditions of the office of Chief Commissioner. Clause 1 provides that the Chief Commissioner holds office for the period specified in his or her instrument of appointment and that term must not exceed 5 years. The Chief Commissioner is eligible for reappointment and other terms and conditions may be specified in his or her instrument of appointment. Clause 2 provides that in the following circumstances the office of Chief Commissioner becomes vacant. If the Chief Commissioner-- · becomes an insolvent under administration; or · becomes a represented person within the meaning of the Guardianship and Administration Act 1986; or · resigns or retires; or · is removed from office. Clause 3 allows the Chief Commissioner to resign or retire from office by giving written notice to the Governor in Council. Clause 4 allows the Governor in Council to remove the Chief Commissioner on the recommendation of the Minister on the basis of the following grounds. If the Chief Commissioner-- · has engaged in misconduct; or · is found guilty of an indictable offence; or · has engaged in other paid employment without the prior consent of the Minister; or · has brought Victoria Police into disrepute; or · has neglected his or her duties; or · is incapable or inefficient in, performing his or her duties. 84

 


 

Clause 5 allows the Governor in Council, on the recommendation of the Minister, to suspend the Chief Commissioner if the Minister believes that grounds may exist for removal of the Chief Commissioner under clause 4. Suspension may be lifted at any time and may be for a maximum of 30 days. PART 2--DEPUTY COMMISSIONERS Part 2 deals with terms and conditions of the office of a Deputy Commissioner. Clause 6 provides that a Deputy Commissioner holds office for the period specified in his or her instrument of appointment and that term must not exceed 5 years. A Deputy Commissioner is eligible for reappointment and other terms and conditions may be specified in his or her instrument of appointment. Clause 7 provides that in the following circumstances, the office of a Deputy Commissioner becomes vacant. If a Deputy Commissioner-- · becomes an insolvent under administration; or · becomes a represented person within the meaning of the Guardianship and Administration Act 1986; or · resigns or retires; or · is removed from office. Clause 8 allows a Deputy Commissioner to resign or retire from office by giving written notice to the Governor in Council. Clause 9 allows the Governor in Council to remove a Deputy Commissioner on the recommendation of the Minister on the basis of the following grounds. If a Deputy Commissioner-- · has engaged in misconduct; or · is found guilty of an indictable offence; or · has engaged in other paid employment without the prior consent of the Chief Commissioner; or · has brought Victoria Police into disrepute; or 85

 


 

· has neglected his or her duties; or · is incapable or inefficient in, performing his or her duties. Clause 10 allows the Governor in Council on the recommendation of the Minister to suspend a Deputy Commissioner if the Minister believes that grounds may exist for removal of a Deputy Commissioner under clause 9. Suspension may be lifted at any time and may be for a maximum of 30 days. PART 3--ASSISTANT COMMISSIONERS Part 3 deals with matters relating to the employment of Assistant Commissioners. Clause 11 provides for the employment of Assistant Commissioners by contract. Clause 12 requires the contract of employment to hold Assistant Commissioners to at least as high discipline standards as those applicable to police officers under the Bill, including provision for termination for a breach of discipline. Clause 13 requires the contract of employment to provide for ill-health retirement in similar circumstances to those in which a police officer may be retired. Clause 14 provides that the incapacity for duty provisions in the Bill do not apply to Assistant Commissioners. This is because the contract adequately provides for performance management. Clause 15 provides for reduction in remuneration of Assistant Commissioners consistent with the terms of the contract. Clause 16 provides for termination of employment of Assistant Commissioners consistent with the terms of the contract. Clause 17 provides that an Assistant Commissioner is not entitled to any compensation as a result of termination or reduction in salary other than as provided with the terms of the contract. Clause 18 provides for resignation or retirement of Assistant Commissioners. 86

 


 

Clause 19 provides that Assistant Commissioners whose contract of employment is terminated (other than for discipline or ill-health reasons) or expires, are entitled to return to a position at their former rank in certain circumstances. SCHEDULE 2 Schedule 2 re-enacts the Second Schedule to the Police Regulation Act 1958 which contains the form of the oath to be taken by police officers, protective services officers and special constables. SCHEDULE 3 Schedule 3 re-enacts sections 120 and 120A of the Police Regulation Act 1958, which deals with long service leave provisions for police officers (excluding the Chief Commissioner and Deputy Commissioners) and protective services officers. Clause 1 provides that the Schedule applies to all police officers and protective services officers with the exception of the Chief Commissioner and Deputy Commissioners. Clause 2 re-enacts the effect of section 120(1) of the Police Regulation Act 1958 providing a basic long service leave entitlement of 3 months per 10 years' service, with 15 months per further 5 years' service. Clause 3 re-enacts the effect of section 120(1A) of the Police Regulation Act 1958 allowing long service leave entitlements to be taken on half-pay. Clause 4 re-enacts the effect of section 120(3) of the Police Regulation Act 1958 allowing the Chief Commissioner to grant long service leave so that Victoria Police is not unduly affected by police officers and protective services officers taking long service leave at or about the same time. Clause 5 re-enacts the effect of section 120(2), (4) and (6) of the Police Regulation Act 1958 providing for payment in place of long service leave on retirement or death of a police officer or protective services officer who has served for between 4 and 10 years. 87

 


 

Clause 6 re-enacts the effect of section 120A of the Police Regulation Act 1958 providing for payment in place of long service leave on resignation of a police officer or protective services officer who has served for more than 10 years. SCHEDULE 4 Schedule 4 lists the offences which are specified for the purposes of clause 127(2) of the Bill. If the Chief Commissioner or authorised person reasonably believes that a police officer or protective services officer has committed an offence in this Schedule, the Chief Commissioner or authorised person must not charge that person with the commission of a breach of discipline until they have consulted with the Director of Public Prosecutions. SCHEDULE 5 Schedule 5 lists matters in respect of which the Governor in Council may make regulations. SCHEDULE 6 Schedule 6 deals with transitional matters and savings provisions arising because of the enactment of the Bill and the substantive repeal of the Police Regulation Act 1958. The principal objective of the Schedule is to preserve existing appointments and entitlements for police personnel. 88

 


 

 


[Index] [Search] [Download] [Bill] [Help]