Western Australian Current Acts

[Index] [Table] [Search] [Search this Act] [Notes] [Noteup] [Previous] [Next] [Download] [Help]

CO-OPERATIVES ACT 2009 - SECT 481D

481D .         Enforcement orders after contravention of undertaking

        (1)         If the Supreme Court is satisfied, on the application of the Registrar, that a person has contravened an undertaking accepted by the Registrar, the court may make any or all of the following orders —

            (a)         an order prohibiting the person from engaging in specified conduct;

            (b)         an order directing the person to take specified action to comply with the undertaking;

            (c)         an order directing the person to pay to the Registrar an amount up to the amount of any financial benefit that the person has obtained directly or indirectly and that is reasonably attributable to the contravention of the undertaking;

            (d)         any order that the court considers appropriate directing the person to compensate any other person who has suffered loss, injury or damage as a result of the contravention of the undertaking;

            (e)         any other order that the court considers appropriate.

        (2)         The Supreme Court may make an interim order under subsection (1)(a) pending final determination of the application.

        (3)         The Supreme Court may, on the application of the Registrar or the person in respect of whom the order was made, vary or discharge an order under subsection (1)(a).

        (4)         An order under subsection (1)(a) may be made subject to such conditions as the Supreme Court thinks appropriate.

        (5)         The Supreme Court must not make an order under this section (other than an interim order) unless satisfied on the balance of probabilities that proper grounds for the order have been established.

        (6)         If a co-operative or other corporation is found to have contravened an undertaking, each officer of the co-operative or other corporation is taken to have so breached the undertaking if the officer knowingly authorised or permitted the breach, and the Supreme Court may make, against the officer, all or any of the orders specified in subsection (1) that the court thinks appropriate.

        [Section 481D inserted: No. 7 of 2016 s. 177.]



AustLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback