(1) In deciding an
appeal, the Supreme Court may do one or more of the following —
(a)
dismiss the appeal;
(b)
allow the appeal;
(c) set
aside or vary the decision of the court of summary jurisdiction and sentence
imposed, order made or thing done as a result of the decision;
(d)
substitute a decision that should have been made by the court of summary
jurisdiction;
(e)
order the case to be dealt with again by the court of summary jurisdiction,
with or without orders to that court —
(i)
as to how or by whom it is to be constituted;
(ii)
as to how it must deal with the case;
(f) make
any order under the Magistrates Court Act 2004 section 36(6);
(g) if
the appeal is against a decision to acquit an accused of a charge on account
of mental impairment — exercise any power that the Court of Appeal may
exercise under section 32;
(ga) if
the appeal is against a decision or finding referred to in section 6(ea) or
(ec) — exercise any power that the Court of Appeal may exercise under
section 32A;
(gb) if
the appeal is against an order, refusal or decision referred to in
section 6(ed) or (ee) — exercise any power that the Court of Appeal may
exercise under section 32B;
(h) make
an order as to the costs of the appeal and the costs of the proceedings in the
court of summary jurisdiction;
(i)
make any other order it thinks fit.
(2) Despite subsection
(1)(b), even if a ground of appeal might be decided in favour of the
appellant, the Supreme Court may dismiss the appeal if it considers that no
substantial miscarriage of justice has occurred.
(3) The Supreme Court
is not required to set aside or vary a decision of a court of summary
jurisdiction because the court omitted to make any necessary finding of fact
if the facts or evidence —
(a) in
substance support the decision; or
(b)
justify the finding,
and the Supreme Court,
under subsection (1), may instead either vary the decision or substitute
another decision for it.
(4) On an appeal
against a conviction, the Supreme Court may vary a decision of a court of
summary jurisdiction or substitute another decision for it if there is some
excess which may, consistently with the merits of the case, be corrected.
(5) On an appeal
against a sentence, the Supreme Court may have regard to any relevant matter
that has occurred between when the offender was convicted and when the appeal
was heard.
[Section 14 amended: No. 10 of 2023 s. 303.]