(1) When a person is
approached in connection with the person’s possible appointment as an
arbitrator, the person must disclose any circumstances likely to give rise to
justifiable doubts as to the person’s impartiality or independence.
(2) An arbitrator,
from the time of the arbitrator’s appointment and throughout the
arbitral proceedings, must without delay disclose any circumstances of the
kind referred to in subsection (1) to the parties unless they have already
been informed of them by the arbitrator.
(3) An arbitrator may
be challenged only if circumstances exist that give rise to justifiable doubts
as to the arbitrator’s impartiality or independence, or if the
arbitrator does not possess qualifications agreed to by the parties.
(4) A party may
challenge an arbitrator appointed by the party, or in whose appointment the
party has participated, only for reasons of which the party becomes aware
after the appointment has been made.
(5) For the purposes
of subsection (1), there are justifiable doubts as to the impartiality or
independence of a person approached in connection with a possible appointment
as arbitrator only if there is a real danger of bias on the part of the person
in conducting the arbitration.
(6) For the purposes
of subsection (3), there are justifiable doubts as to the impartiality or
independence of an arbitrator only if there is a real danger of bias on the
part of the arbitrator in conducting the arbitration.
Note for this section:
This section (other
than subsections (5) and (6)) is substantially the same as Art 12 of the Model
Law. Subsections (5) and (6) provide that the test for whether there are
justifiable doubts as to the impartiality or independence of a person or
arbitrator is whether there is a real danger of bias.