[(1) deleted]
(2) If —
(a) the
CEO makes a protection application in respect of a child; and
(b) the
Court finds that the child is in need of protection,
the CEO must, if the
CEO has not already done so, provide the Court with a proposal for the child
as soon as practicable after the finding referred to in paragraph (b).
(3) If the CEO makes
—
(a) an
application under section 49 for the extension of a protection order
(supervision); or
(b) an
application under section 56 for the extension of a protection order
(time-limited); or
(c) an
application under section 68 —
(i)
for the replacement of a protection order (supervision)
by another protection order (supervision); or
(ii)
for the replacement of a protection order (time-limited),
protection order (until 18) or protection order (special guardianship) by
another protection order (other than a protection order (special
guardianship)),
the CEO must provide
the Court with a proposal for the child when the application is made.
(4) If the CEO makes
an application under section 68 for the replacement of a protection order
(supervision) by a protection order (time-limited) or protection order (until
18), the CEO must provide the Court with a proposal for the child as soon as
practicable after the application is made.
(5) If —
(a) an
application is made under section 67(1) for the revocation of a protection
order; and
(b) the
Court is considering making another protection order (other than a protection
order (special guardianship)) in respect of the child under section 67(2)(c),
the Court may request
the CEO to provide it with a proposal for the child.
(6) The CEO must
comply with a request under subsection (5) as soon as practicable after it is
made.
(7) The CEO must give
a copy of any proposal provided to the Court under this section to the other
parties.
[Section 143 amended: No. 49 of 2010 s. 35; No. 18
of 2021 s. 61.]