Western Australian Current Acts

[Index] [Table] [Search] [Search this Act] [Notes] [Noteup] [Previous] [Next] [Download] [Help]

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE ACT 2004 - SECT 133

133 .         Separate trials, court may order

        (1)         The powers in this section may be exercised by a court on its own initiative or on an application by an accused and may be exercised before or during a trial.

        (2)         A court may amend or cancel an order made under this section.

        (3)         If a court is satisfied that an accused is likely to be prejudiced in the trial of a prosecution notice or indictment because it contains 2 or more charges, the court may order —

            (a)         that the accused be tried separately on one or more of the charges; and

            (b)         the prosecutor to tell the court the order in which the charges will be tried.

        (4)         If a court is satisfied that an accused is likely to be prejudiced in the trial of a prosecution notice or indictment because it also charges one or more other accused, the court may order —

            (a)         that one or more of the accused be tried separately from the other or others; and

            (b)         the prosecutor to tell the court the order in which the accused will be tried.

        (5)         In deciding whether to make an order under subsection (3) or (4) in respect of an indictment to be tried by a jury, it is open to a superior court —

            (a)         to decide that any likelihood of the accused being prejudiced can be guarded against by a direction to the jury; and

            (b)         to so decide irrespective of the nature of the offence or offences charged; and

            (c)         to so decide even if —

                  (i)         the evidence on one of the charges is inadmissible on another; or

                  (ii)         the evidence against one of the accused is not admissible against another,

                as the case requires.

        (6)         In considering, for the purposes of this section, the likelihood of an accused being prejudiced in the trial by a jury of an indictment that contains 2 or more charges of a sexual nature, the court must not have regard to the possibility that similar fact evidence, the probative value of which outweighs its potentially prejudicial effect, may be the result of collusion or suggestion.

        (7)         If a superior court makes or refuses to make an order under subsection (3) or (4) before the day on which the accused’s trial is listed to start, the court must not start the trial unless the court is satisfied —

            (a)         that no party who could commence an appeal against the order or refusal under the Criminal Appeals Act 2004 section 26 intends to do so; or

            (b)         that —

                  (i)         the time for commencing such an appeal has expired; and

                  (ii)         any such appeal commenced before the time expired has been concluded.

        [Section 133 amended: No. 2 of 2008 s. 26.]



AustLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback