(1) On the prosecution
of any person for the stealing of any property in or from any vessel, barge,
or boat, or from any dock, wharf, or quay, or from any store or shed used in
connection with or adjoining any such dock, wharf, or quay, or for receiving
any such property, knowing it to have been so stolen, or for having on his
person or in any place or conveying in any manner anything which may be
reasonably suspected of being so stolen —
(a)
evidence may be given of any writing, printing, or marks upon the said
property without producing the original writing, printing or marks, or
requiring the production thereof by notice or otherwise; and
(b) any
apparently genuine document purporting to be the bill of lading, manifest,
shipping receipt, delivery order, specification, schedule, packing list, or
invoice relating to the said property, or to property which from the
description thereof in the document or from the writing, printing, or marks
thereon, or on any package containing the same as detailed in the document,
coupled with any other relevant circumstances, may be reasonably assumed to be
the same as the property the subject of the prosecution, shall be admissible
in evidence on production and without further proof, and shall be prima facie
evidence of the particulars and facts contained therein and that the ownership
of the property, the subject matter of the prosecution, is in the consignee
referred to in the document or his assignee.
(2) In deciding
whether any property described as aforesaid may be reasonably assumed to be
the same as the property the subject of the prosecution, regard shall be had
to the source from which the document was produced, and the circumstances of
its receipt or custody by the person producing it, or from whom it was
obtained for the purposes of the prosecution.
(3) It shall be no
objection to the admissibility in evidence of any such document as aforesaid
that the statement of the place in or from which the stealing took place forms
no part of the charge, if the evidence adduced on the prosecution indicates
that the stealing did in fact take place in or from a place such as is
hereinbefore mentioned.
[Section 41A inserted: No. 19 of 1921 s. 2.]