(1) In estimating the
weight, if any, to be attached to a statement rendered admissible as evidence
by section 79C regard shall be had to all the circumstances from which any
inference can reasonably be drawn as to the accuracy or otherwise of the
statement, and, in particular —
(a) to
the question of whether or not the statement was made contemporaneously with
the occurrence or existence of the facts stated; and
(b) to
the question of whether or not the qualified person or any person concerned
with making or keeping the document containing the statement, had any
incentive to conceal or misrepresent the facts; and
(c) to
the question of whether or not the information in the statement was of a kind
which was collected systematically; and
(d) to
the question of whether or not the information in the statement was collected
pursuant to a duty to do so; and
(e)
where the statement wholly or in part reproduces or is derived from
information from one or more devices, to the reliability of the device or
devices; and
(f)
where the statement reproduces or is derived from any information, to the
reliability of the means of reproduction or derivation.
(2) For the purpose of
any rule of law or practice requiring evidence to be corroborated or
regulating the manner in which uncorroborated evidence is to be treated, a
statement rendered admissible as evidence by virtue of section 79C shall not
be treated as corroboration of the evidence given by the qualified person.
[Section 79D inserted: No. 66 of 1987 s. 5.]