Western Australian Current Acts

[Index] [Table] [Search] [Search this Act] [Notes] [Noteup] [Previous] [Next] [Download] [Help]

GUARDIANSHIP AND ADMINISTRATION ACT 1990 - SECT 110ZP

110ZP .         Term used: research decision-maker

        (1)         A person is a research decision-maker for a research candidate if —

            (a)         the candidate is unable to make reasonable judgments in respect of their participation in medical research; and

            (b)         the person is first in order of the following persons —

                  (i)         a person to whom subsection (2) applies;

                  (ii)         if there is no person to whom subsection (2) applies — a person to whom subsection (3) applies;

                  (iii)         if there is no person to whom either subsection (2) or (3) applies — a person to whom subsection (4) applies.

        (2)         This subsection applies to a person who is —

            (a)         an enduring guardian for the research candidate; and

            (b)         authorised to make a research decision in relation to the candidate; and

            (c)         reasonably available; and

            (d)         willing to make a research decision in relation to the candidate.

        (3)         This subsection applies to a person who is —

            (a)         a guardian for the research candidate; and

            (b)         authorised to make a research decision in relation to the candidate; and

            (c)         reasonably available; and

            (d)         willing to make a research decision in relation to the candidate.

        (4)         This subsection applies to a person who is a substitute decision-maker for the research candidate under section 110ZQ.

        (5)         If there are 2 or more persons who are the research decision-makers for a research candidate under this section —

            (a)         the persons are jointly the research decision-maker for the candidate; and

            (b)         if the persons cannot agree on a research decision for the candidate — the person next in order of priority under this section is the research decision-maker for the candidate.

        [Section 110ZP inserted: No. 14 of 2020 s. 12.]



AustLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback